Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Fulvestrant

Phase 4FDA approved

Advanced Breast Cancer | Small molecule | Oncology |AstraZeneca PLC|Trials Updated: Oct 15, 2026

Fulvestrant development status

FDA approval on record Apr 25, 2002 as Faslodex
Approval holderAstrazeneca
ApplicationNDA021344
Highest phase Phase 4 (NCT02447328)
Phase scored for AZNPhase 3
Registered trials 200 across 78 sponsors since Jul 2003

Label indication Monotherapy FASLODEX is indicated for the treatment of: • Hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women not previously treated with endocrine therapy, or • HR-positive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following endocrine therapy. FDA label

Fulvestrant target and mechanism

Molecular targetESR1
Target classAntagonist
ModalitySmall molecule

Also known as Standard Arm - Fulvestrant, Fulvestrant injection, Faslodex, ZD9238

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedDouble-BlindCONTROLLEDBiomarker
Total Trials23
Total Enrollment5,513

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

Fulvestrant clinical trials

Fulvestrant · 23 trials · 16 indications

Phase 3 11Phase 2 10Phase 1 2
NCT06764186A Phase IIIB Study to Evaluate the Use of Capivasertib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Who Have Relapsed/Progressed on ET and CDK4/6 Inhibitor Reflecting Real World Clinical Practice in SpainLocally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING101 Analytics
NCT04305496Capivasertib+Fulvestrant vs Placebo+Fulvestrant as Treatment for Locally Advanced (Inoperable) or Metastatic HR+/HER2- Breast CancerLocally Advanced (Inoperable) or Metastatic Breast Cancer
ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING818 Analytics
NCT01602380A Global Study to Compare the Effects of Fulvestrant and Arimidex in a Subset of Patients With Breast Cancer.Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
COMPLETED462 Analytics
NCT01300351Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant 500 mg Versus 250 mg in Advanced Breast Cancer WomenBreast Cancer
COMPLETED249 Analytics
NCT00944918Study of Faslodex With or Without Concomitant Arimidex Versus Exemestane Following Progression on Non-steroidal Aromatase Inhibitors (NSAI)Progression-free Survival
COMPLETED25 Analytics
NCT00327769Faslodex Advanced Breast Cancer Local Chinese StudyAdvanced Breast Cancer
COMPLETED234 Analytics
NCT00099437Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.Breast Cancer
ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING736 Analytics
NCT00256698Anastrozole Monotherapy Versus Maximal Oestrogen Blockade With Anastrozole and Fulvestrant Combination TherapyBreast Cancer
COMPLETED514 Analytics
NCT00065325The Evaluation of the Efficacy and Tolerability of FASLODEX (Fulvestrant) and AROMASIN (Exemestane) in Hormone Receptor Positive Postmenopausal Women With Advanced Breast CancerLocally Advanced Breast Cancer
COMPLETED694 Analytics
NCT00241449A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Faslodex With Nolvadex in Postmenopausal Women With Advanced Breast CancerBreast Cancer
COMPLETED51 Analytics
PHASE3ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING
A Phase IIIB Study to Evaluate the Use of Capivasertib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Who Have Relapsed/Progressed on ET and CDK4/6 Inhibitor Reflecting Real World Clinical Practice in Spain
Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast CancerUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING
Capivasertib+Fulvestrant vs Placebo+Fulvestrant as Treatment for Locally Advanced (Inoperable) or Metastatic HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer
Locally Advanced (Inoperable) or Metastatic Breast CancerUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Global Study to Compare the Effects of Fulvestrant and Arimidex in a Subset of Patients With Breast Cancer.
Hormone Receptor Positive Breast CancerUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Fulvestrant 500 mg Versus 250 mg in Advanced Breast Cancer Women
Breast CancerUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Study of Faslodex With or Without Concomitant Arimidex Versus Exemestane Following Progression on Non-steroidal Aromatase Inhibitors (NSAI)
Progression-free SurvivalUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Faslodex Advanced Breast Cancer Local Chinese Study
Advanced Breast CancerUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING
Comparison of Fulvestrant (FASLODEX™) 250 mg and 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Oestrogen Receptor Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Progressing or Relapsing After Previous Endocrine Therapy.
Breast CancerUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Anastrozole Monotherapy Versus Maximal Oestrogen Blockade With Anastrozole and Fulvestrant Combination Therapy
Breast CancerUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
The Evaluation of the Efficacy and Tolerability of FASLODEX (Fulvestrant) and AROMASIN (Exemestane) in Hormone Receptor Positive Postmenopausal Women With Advanced Breast Cancer
Locally Advanced Breast CancerUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Faslodex With Nolvadex in Postmenopausal Women With Advanced Breast Cancer
Breast CancerUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Time to next treatment (TTNT)
From start of date of first dose of capivasertib+fulvestrant treatment to date of the first subsequent anti-cancer therapy or death or up to within approximately 12 months after Last Subject Inclusion

Time to next treatment (TTNT1 is defined as the time from the date of first dose of capivasertib+fulvestrant until the first subsequent anti-cancer therapy after discontinuation of study treatment or death due to any cause).

Progression Free Survival: Overall Population (Months) in the Global Cohort
Assessed every 8 weeks for the first 18 months and every 12 weeks thereafter, from randomization to radiological progression.

Progression free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, as assessed by the investigator at the local site, or death due to any cause, in the global cohort. Participants who discontinue treatment prior to progression should continue to be scanned until progression. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (short axis diameter used for lymph nodes), or clinically significant increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of a new lesion(s).

Progression Free Survival: Overall Population (Percentage) in the Global Cohort
Assessed every 8 weeks for the first 18 months and every 12 weeks thereafter, from randomization to radiological progression.

Progression free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, as assessed by the investigator at the local site, or death due to any cause. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (short axis diameter used for lymph nodes), or clinically significant increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of a new lesion(s). Participants who discontinue treatment prior to progression should continue to be scanned until progression. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used.

Progression Free Survival: Altered Population (Months) in the Global Cohort
Assessed every 8 weeks for the first 2 years following objective disease progression or treatment discontinuation and then every 12 weeks.

Progression free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, as assessed by the investigator at the local site, or death due to any cause.

Progression Free Survival: Altered Population (Percentage) in the Global Cohort
Assessed every 8 weeks for the first 2 years following objective disease progression or treatment discontinuation and then every 12 weeks.

Progression free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, as assessed by the investigator at the local site, or death due to any cause. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used.

Progression Free Survival: Overall Population (Months) in the China Cohort
Assessed every 8 weeks for the first 18 months and every 12 weeks thereafter, from randomization to radiological progression.

Progression free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, as assessed by the investigator at the local site, or death due to any cause, in the global cohort. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (short axis diameter used for lymph nodes), or clinically significant increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of a new lesion(s). Participants who discontinue treatment prior to progression should continue to be scanned until progression.

Progression Free Survival: Overall Population (Percentage) in the China Cohort
Assessed every 8 weeks for the first 18 months and every 12 weeks thereafter, from randomization to radiological progression.

Progression free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, as assessed by the investigator at the local site, or death due to any cause. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (short axis diameter used for lymph nodes), or clinically significant increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of a new lesion(s). Participants who discontinue treatment prior to progression should continue to be scanned until progression. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used.

Progression Free Survival: Altered Population (Months) in the China Cohort
Assessed every 8 weeks for the first 2 years following objective disease progression or treatment discontinuation and then every 12 weeks.

Progression free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, as assessed by the investigator at the local site, or death due to any cause.

Progression Free Survival: Altered Population (Percentage) in the China Cohort
Assessed every 8 weeks for the first 2 years following objective disease progression or treatment discontinuation and then every 12 weeks.

Progression free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization until progression per RECIST v1.1, as assessed by the investigator at the local site, or death due to any cause Kaplan-Meier estimate was used.

Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Patients Treated With Fulvestrant With Those Treated With Anastrozole
Baseline RECIST 1.1 assessments (Day 0) and then every 12 weeks until the earliest of disease progression evident, patient dies or has surgery/radiotherapy for their disease (up to approximately 38 months)

PFS was defined as the time from randomisation until objective disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), surgery or radiotherapy to manage worsening of disease or death by any cause (in the absence of progression). Outcome measure is reported as median time from randomisation to PFS, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

Progression-free Survival
36 months

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions, or death (by any cause in the absence of progression). The primary analysis for PFS was the log rank test stratified by last endocrine therapy received prior to fulvestrant (AO vs. AI). The treatment effect was estimated using the HR of 500 mg fulvestrant to 250 mg fulvestrant together with the corresponding 95% CI and p value.

Time to Disease Progression (TTP)
Time to Progression (TTP)
RECIST(Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors ) tumour assessments carried out every 12 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) from randomisation for study duration (48 months)

Median time (in months) from randomisation until objective disease progression or death (in the absence of objective progression).

time to tumor progression
Every 3 months
PSA Reduction ≥ 50%
3 months

Number of subjects with serum PSA reduction ≥ 50% at 3 months

Objective Response (ORR)
The planned data cut-off for this study was when all patients, except withdrawals, had been followed up for at least 24 weeks. Patients received treatment up to approximately 2 years.

Objective response rate was defined as percentage of patients with either complete response (CR - disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR - at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions). All patients were to be followed up every 12 weeks for progression, defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST v1.1).

Patients Event-free at 12 Months (Where Event = Death (From Any Cause), Disseminated Tumour Cells (DTC) Positive at 12 Months or Clinical Disease Recurrence)
12 month period following randomisation

Number of patients event-free

Objective Response Rate (ORR)
baseline and every 12 weeks (+/- 2weeks) from randomization data up to data cut-off (19th march 2008)

An objective response (OR) is defined as a patient having a best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). A patient has best overall response of CR if she had overall response of CR or PR on one visit and met the confirmation criteria per RECIST. ORR is defined as percentage of patients with objective response. Each patient with measurable disease at baseline was assessed for OR from the sequence of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) scan data up to data cut-off. RECIST scans were performed every 12 weeks (+/- 2weeks) from randomization

Clinical Benefit Rate
From randomisation to data cut off (DCO) for primary analysis. The first and the last patients were enrolled on 6 Feb 2006 and 11 Jul 2007 respectively. The DCO for primary analysis was on 10th Jan 2008, 6 months after the last patient was enrolled.

A Clinical Benefit (CB) responder is defined as a patient having a best overall response of either complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) for at least 24 weeks evaluated according to modified RECIST. The Clinical Benefit Rate is the percentage of patients with CB.

Change in Frequency of Annualized Days of Vaginal Bleeding on Treatment Compared to Baseline
Baseline (6 month pre-treatment observation period) through Month 12 treatment period

Vaginal bleeding days are defined as the number of days in which vaginal bleeding, (including spotting) occurred. In order to annualize, a 12-month period is defined as 360 days and a 6-month period is defined as 180 days. Frequency of annualized vaginal bleeding days = \[(number of vaginal bleeding days)/(total number of days of the time interval under consideration)\] multiplied by 360. Change in frequency is equal to the on-treatment frequency minus the baseline frequency. Diary cards will capture days of vaginal bleeding during the 12-month treatment period. Change in the frequency of annualized days of vaginal bleeding during the 12-month treatment period compared to the 6-month baseline period, based on a worst-case scenario calculation (ie, missing diary card days counted as bleeding days) are reported.

Percentage of Participants With Baseline Vaginal Bleeding Who Experienced ≥ 50% Reduction in the Number of Vaginal Bleeding Days on Treatment Compared to Baseline
Baseline (6 month pre-treatment observation period) through Month 12 treatment period

The percentage change in frequency is defined as 100% times the difference (the on-treatment period frequency minus the baseline period frequency), divided by the baseline period frequency. The percentage of participants with baseline vaginal bleeding days who experienced ≥ 50% reduction in the number of vaginal bleeding days during the 12 month treatment period compared to the 6 month baseline period based on a worst-case approach (ie, missing diary card days counted as bleeding days) are reported.

Percentage of Participants With Baseline Vaginal Bleeding Who Experienced Cessation of Vaginal Bleeding Over a 6-month Treatment Period
Baseline (6-month pre-treatment observation period) through Month 12 treatment period

Percentage of participants with baseline vaginal bleeding who experienced cessation of vaginal bleeding days over a 6-month treatment period based on a worst-case approach (ie, missing diary card days counted as bleeding days) are reported.

Percentage of Participants With Baseline Vaginal Bleeding Who Experienced Cessation of Vaginal Bleeding Over the Whole 12-month Treatment Period
Baseline (6 month pre-treatment observation period) through Month 12 treatment period

Percentage of participants with baseline vaginal bleeding who experienced cessation of vaginal bleeding days over a 12-month treatment period based on a worst-case approach (ie, missing diary card days counted as bleeding days) are reported.

Change in Rate of Bone Age (BA) Advancement Over First 6-month Treatment Period Compared to Baseline
Baseline (6-month pre-treatment observation period) through Month 6 of treatment period

Change in rate of BA advancement over first 6-month treatment period compared to baseline (6-month pre-treatment observation period) is reported. Increase in BA is defined as BA (expressed as fractional years) at end of time period minus BA at beginning of time period (unit: years). Rate of increase in BA for a particular time interval is increase in BA during this time interval adjusted (ie, normalized) for the length of this time interval. Rate of BA advancement is change in BA (years) divided by change in chronological age (CA) (years). Change in rate of increase in BA from baseline period to on-treatment period is defined as increase in BA divided by change in CA (in fractional years) between BA radiograph dates. It is calculated as \[(BA6 - BA0)/(CA6 - CA0)\] - \[(BA0 - BA\*)/(CA0 - CA\*)\], where 6, 0, \* stand for first Month 6 Visit, Month 0 Visit, and the 6-month retrospective visit, respectively.

Change in Rate of BA Advancement Over Second 6-month Treatment Period Compared to Baseline
Baseline (6-month pre-treatment observation period) through second Month 6 of treatment period

Change in rate of BA advancement over second 6-month treatment period compared to baseline (6-month pre-treatment observation period) is reported. Increase in BA is defined as BA (expressed as fractional years) at end of time period minus BA at beginning of time period (unit: years). Rate of increase in BA for a particular time interval is increase in BA during this time interval adjusted (ie, normalized) for the length of this time interval. Rate of BA advancement is change in BA (years) divided by change in CA (years). Change in rate of increase in BA from baseline period to on-treatment period is defined as increase in BA divided by change in CA (in fractional years) between the BA radiograph dates. It is calculated as \[(BA6 - BA0)/(CA6 - CA0)\] - \[(BA0 - BA\*)/(CA0 - CA\*)\], where 6, 0, \* stand for second Month 6 Visit, Month 0 Visit, and the 6-month retrospective visit, respectively.

Change in Rate of BA Advancement Over the Whole 12-month Treatment Period Compared to Baseline
Baseline (6-month pre-treatment observation period) through Month 12 of treatment period

Change in rate of BA advancement over whole 12-month treatment period compared to baseline (6-month pre-treatment observation period) is reported. Increase in BA is defined as BA (expressed as fractional years) at end of time period minus BA at beginning of time period (unit: years). Rate of increase in BA for a particular time interval is increase in BA during this time interval adjusted (ie, normalized) for the length of this time interval. Rate of BA advancement is change in BA (years) divided by change in CA (years). Change in rate of increase in BA from baseline period to on-treatment period is defined as increase in BA divided by change in CA (in fractional years) between the BA radiograph dates. It is calculated as \[(BA12 - BA0) / (CA12 - CA0)\] - \[(BA0 - BA\*) / (CA0 - CA\*)\], where 12, 0, \* stand for Month 12 Visit, Month 0 Visit, and the 6-month retrospective visit, respectively.

Change in Growth Velocity (Annualized Growth Velocity in cm/Year) Over First 6-month Treatment Period Compared to Baseline
Baseline (6 month pre-treatment observation period) through first 6-month of treatment period

Change in growth velocity (annualized growth velocity in cm/year) from the baseline (pre-treatment period) to first 6-month treatment period is reported. Growth velocity for a particular time period was calculated as the increase in height over that time period divided by the length of that time period (expressed in cm/year). Baseline growth velocity was calculated from 6-month observational/retrospective period of the study. Change in growth velocity was calculated as growth velocity on treatment minus change in growth velocity during baseline.

Change in Growth Velocity (Annualized Growth Velocity in cm/Year) Over Second 6-month Treatment Period Compared to Baseline
Baseline (6 month pre-treatment observation period) through second 6-month treatment period (ie, through 12-month treatment period)

Change in growth velocity (annualized growth velocity in cm/year) from the baseline (pre-treatment period) to second 6-month treatment period is reported. Growth velocity for a particular time period was calculated as the increase in height over that time period divided by the length of that time period (expressed in cm/year). Baseline growth velocity was calculated from 6-month observational/retrospective period of the study. Change in growth velocity was calculated as growth velocity on treatment minus change in growth velocity during baseline.

Change in Growth Velocity (Annualized Growth Velocity in cm/Year) Over Whole 12-month Treatment Period Compared to Baseline
Baseline (6 month pre-treatment observation period) through Month 12 of treatment period

Change in growth velocity (annualized growth velocity in cm/year) from the baseline (pre-treatment period) to the 12-month treatment period is reported. Growth velocity for a particular time period was calculated as the increase in height over that time period divided by the length of that time period (expressed in cm/year). Baseline growth velocity was calculated from 6-month observational/retrospective period of the study. Change in growth velocity was calculated as growth velocity on treatment minus change in growth velocity during baseline.

Change in Growth Velocity (Z-score) Over the First 6-month Treatment Period Compared to Baseline
Baseline (6 month pre-treatment observation period) through first 6-month treatment period

Change in growth velocity (Z-score) from baseline period to the first 6 months of treatment period is reported. The Z-score (also known as Standard Deviation Score \[SDS\]) is defined as \[(growth velocity from the previous visit to the current visit minus mean growth velocity) divided by standard deviation (SD)\], where the mean and SD are the age- and gender-specific statistics for growth velocity from the National Center for Health Statistics, Fels study and age is the age at the current visit. Baseline growth velocity was calculated from 6-month observational/retrospective period of the study. Z-score of 0 represents the population mean for growth velocity. For McCune-Albright Syndrome, Z-score below mean is a better outcome.

Change in Growth Velocity (Z-score) Over the Second 6-month Treatment Period Compared to Baseline
Baseline (6 month pre-treatment observation period) through second 6-month treatment period

Change in growth velocity (Z-score) from baseline period to the second 6 months of treatment period is reported. The Z-score (also known as SDS) is defined as \[(growth velocity from the previous visit to the current visit minus mean growth velocity) divided by SD\], where the mean and SD are the age- and gender-specific statistics for growth velocity from the National Center for Health Statistics, Fels study and age is the age at the current visit. Baseline growth velocity was calculated from 6-month observational/retrospective period of the study. Z-score of 0 represents the population mean for growth velocity. For McCune-Albright Syndrome, Z-score below mean is a better outcome.

Change in Growth Velocity (Z-score) Over the Whole 12-month Treatment Period Compared to Baseline
Baseline (6 month pre-treatment observation period) through Month 12 of treatment period

Change in growth velocity (Z-score) from baseline period to 12 months of treatment period is reported. The Z-score (also known as SDS) is defined as \[(growth velocity from the previous visit to the current visit minus mean growth velocity) divided by SD)\], where the mean and SD are the age- and gender-specific statistics for growth velocity from the National Center for Health Statistics, Fels study and age is the age at the current visit. Baseline growth velocity was calculated from 6-month observational/retrospective period of the study. Z-score of 0 represents the population mean for growth velocity. For McCune-Albright Syndrome, Z-score below mean is a better outcome.

Change in Uterine Volume From Baseline to Month 6 as Assessed by Ultrasound
Baseline (pre-treatment baseline visit) and Month 6 of treatment period

Uterine volume was calculated via ultrasound using the formula: 0.5 multiplied by (longitudinal multiplied by anteroposterior multiplied by transverse), if all 3 linear dimensions were recorded. If all 3 linear dimensions were not recorded, uterine volume was not calculated. Change in uterine volume from baseline to Month 6 was calculated as Month 6 volume (by ultrasound) minus screening visit volume (by ultrasound). Baseline (screening visit) is the pre-treatment baseline visit.

Change in Uterine Volume From Month 6 to Month 12/Final Visit as Assessed by Ultrasound
At Month 6 and Month 12/final visit treatment period

Uterine volume was calculated via ultrasound using the formula: 0.5 multiplied by (longitudinal multiplied by anteroposterior multiplied by transverse), if all 3 linear dimensions were recorded. If all 3 linear dimensions were not recorded, uterine volume was not calculated. Change in uterine volume from Month 6 to Month 12/final visit was calculated as Month 12/finial visit volume (by ultrasound) minus Month 6 volume (by ultrasound).

Change in Uterine Volume From Baseline to Month 12/Final Visit as Assessed by Ultrasound
Baseline (pre-treatment screening visit) and Month 12 treatment period

Uterine volume was calculated via ultrasound using the formula: 0.5 multiplied by (longitudinal multiplied by anteroposterior multiplied by transverse), if all 3 linear dimensions were recorded. If all 3 linear dimensions were not recorded, uterine volume was not calculated. Change in uterine volume from baseline to Month 12/final visit was calculated as End of Study volume (by ultrasound) minus Screening Visit volume (by ultrasound). Baseline (screening visit) is the pre-treatment baseline visit.

Change in Mean Ovarian Volume From Baseline to Month 6 as Assessed by Ultrasound
Baseline (pre-treatment screening visit) and Month 6 of treatment period

The mean ovarian volume was the average of both ovaries. Average volume was calculated as 0.5 multiplied by (volume of left ovary plus volume of right ovary) if both volumes were calculated; otherwise, average ovarian volume was considered missing. The volume of each ovary was calculated via ultrasound using the formula: 0.5 multiplied by longitudinal dimension multiplied by anterior-posterior dimension multiplied by transverse dimension. Change in mean ovarian volume from baseline to Month 6 was calculated as Month 6 mean volume minus Screening Visit mean volume. Baseline (screening visit) is the pre-treatment baseline visit.

Change Mean in Ovarian Volume From Month 6 to Month 12/Final Visit as Assessed by Ultrasound
At Month 6 and Month 12/final visit treatment period

The mean ovarian volume was the average of both ovaries. Average volume was calculated as 0.5 multiplied by (volume of left ovary plus volume of right ovary) if both volumes were calculated; otherwise, average ovarian volume was considered missing. The volume of each ovary was calculated via ultrasound using the formula: 0.5 multiplied by longitudinal dimension multiplied by anterior-posterior dimension multiplied by transverse dimension. Change in mean ovarian volume from Month 6 to Month 12/final visit was calculated as Month 12/final visit mean volume minus Month 6 mean volume.

Change in Mean Ovarian Volume From Baseline to Month 12/Final Visit as Assessed by Ultrasound
Baseline (pre-treatment baseline visit) and Month 12/final visit treatment period

The mean ovarian volume was the average of both ovaries. Average ovarian volume was calculated as 0.5 multiplied by (volume of left ovary plus volume of right ovary) if both volumes were calculated; otherwise, average ovarian volume was considered missing. The volume of each ovary was calculated via ultrasound using the formula: 0.5 multiplied by longitudinal dimension multiplied by anterior-posterior dimension multiplied by transverse dimension. Change in mean ovarian volume from baseline to the end of the study was calculated as End of Study mean volume minus Screening Visit mean volume. Baseline (screening visit) is the pre-treatment baseline visit.

Mean Clearance of Fulvestrant
Post-dose: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and pre-dose: Week 4 of Month 1 for first 6 participants, then pre-dose steady state samples on 2 occasions between Months 6 and 12 with at least 1 month in between wherein first sample drawn at least 30 days following sixth dose

Mean clearance of fulvestrant is reported.

Mean Volume of Distribution (V1/F) of Fulvestrant
Post-dose: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and pre-dose: Week 4 of Month 1 for first 6 participants, then pre-dose steady state samples on 2 occasions between Months 6 and 12 with at least 1 month in between wherein first sample drawn at least 30 days following sixth dose

Total apparent volume of distribution (Vss/F) is the total apparent volume in the body into which Fulvestrant distributes at equilibrium. Vss/F = V1/F + V2/F. V1/F is the volume of the first compartment and V2/F is the volume of the second compartment. V1/F of fulvestrant is reported. The measure of variability presented is the inter-individual error.

Mean Volume of Distribution (V2/F) of Fulvestrant
Post-dose: Weeks 1, 2, 3, and pre-dose: Week 4 of Month 1 for first 6 participants, then pre-dose steady state samples on 2 occasions between Months 6 and 12 with at least 1 month in between wherein first sample drawn at least 30 days following sixth dose

Total apparent volume of distribution (Vss/F) is the total apparent volume in the body into which Fulvestrant distributes at equilibrium. Vss/F = V1/F + V2/F. V1/F is the volume of the first compartment and V2/F is the volume of the second compartment. V2/F of fulvestrant is reported. The measure of variability presented is the inter-individual error.

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Day 1 through 68.7 weeks (maximum observed duration)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug.

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs
Day 1 through 68.7 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Number of participants with abnormal clinical laboratory parameters reported as TEAEs are reported. Clinical laboratory parameter analysis included hematology and clinical chemistry.

Number of Participants With Compliance to Study Treatment
Day 1 through Month 12 of treatment period

Number of participants with compliance to study treatment are reported. Treatment compliance was ensured at each treatment visit whether each participant received all protocol-defined injections up until the point they either withdrew from the study or completed the main study period. Compliance with study treatment for each participant for the 12-month treatment period was calculated as total number of injections divided by number of visits between first injection (Month 0) and last injection (at Month 11).

Number of Participants With Withdrawals From Study Treatment Due to TEAE
Day 1 through 68.7 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Number of participants with withdrawals from study treatment due to TEAE are reported.

Hormone Assay: Serum Oestradiol Level
Month 12 (final visit) of treatment period

Serum oestradiol level at Month 12 (final visit) is reported.

Hormone Assay: Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Level
Month 12 (final visit) of treatment period

Serum LH level collected at Month 12 (final visit) is reported.

Hormone Assay: Serum Follicle-stimulating Hormone (FSH) Level
Month 12 (final visit) of treatment period

Serum FSH level collected at Month 12 (final visit) is reported.

Hormone Assay: Serum Testosterone Level
Month 12 (final visit) of treatment period

Serum testosterone level at Month 12 (final visit) is reported.

Anti-proliferative effect after 4 weeks of treatment.
Percentage Change From Baseline to Time of Surgery in Oestrogen Receptor (ER) H-score: Antitumour Effects of Fulvestrant, Anastrozole and a Combination of Both as Measured by the ER H-score.
Surgery (SRG) was to be performed between days 15 and 22 after baseline (BL)

For each sample, the ER H-score is calculated from the percentage of cells staining very weak (+/-); weak (+); moderate (++); or strong (+++) as follows: H-score = \[(0.5 x percent +/-) + (1 x percent +) + (2 x percent ++) + (3 x percent +++)\]. Range 0-300. The greater the change from baseline (randomization) in ER H-score, the greater the blockage of ER expression and the greater the potential anti-tumour activity. Percentage change from baseline=\[(SRG - BL)/BL\]x100

Percentage Change From Baseline to Time of Surgery in Progesterone Receptor (PgR) H-score: Antitumour Effects of Fulvestrant, Anastrozole and a Combination of Both as Measured by the PgR H-score.
Surgery (SRG) was to be performed between days 15 and 22 after baseline (BL)

For each sample, the PgR H-score is calculated from the percentage of cells staining very weak (+/-); weak (+); moderate (++); or strong (+++) as follows: H-score = \[(0.5 x percent+/-) + (1 x percent+) + (2 x percent++) + (3 x percent+++)\]. Range 0-300. The greater the change from baseline (randomization in PgR H-score, the greater the blockage of PgR expression and the greater the potential anti-tumour activity. Percentage change from baseline=\[(SRG - BL)/BL\]x100

Percentage Change From Baseline to Time of Surgery in Ki67 Labelling Index: Antitumour Effects of Fulvestrant, Anastrozole and a Combination of Both as Measured by the Ki67 Labelling Index.
Surgery (SRG) was to be performed between days 15 and 22 after baseline (BL)

For each sample, the Ki67 labelling index is calculated as the percentage of cells stained positive for Ki67. Range 0-100. The greater the change from baseline (randomization) in Ki67 labelling index, the greater the blockage of Ki67 expression and the greater the potential anti-tumour activity. Percentage change from baseline=\[(SRG - BL)/BL\]x100

Determination (for ITT (Intet-to-Treat Set): Efficacy of a Monthly Administration of Fulvestrant in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Endometrial Carcinoma by Assessment of the Clinical Tumour Response After 3 Injections of Fulvestrant
up to 1 year

Number of patients with Complete Remission (CR) and Partial Response (PR), as determined by an independent expert panel according to the WHO response criteria.

Pharmacodynamics changes to estrogen receptor (ER) expression following treatment with AZD9496 or fulvestrant
Tumour biopsy taken at baseline within 6 weeks of planned start of study treatment; on-treatment tumour biopsy taken following 5-14 day on study treatment

Evaluation of AZD9496 and fulvestrant activity in the tumour by assessment of pharmacodynamics biomarker changes i.e. ER expression

The primary objective of this study is to assess the tolerability of 500mg fulvestrant
assessed when all patients have been in the study for 6 months

Secondary Endpoints

Number of patients with AEs.
From enrollment up to at least 30 days (+7 days) after last dose of capivasertib + fulvestrant treatment
Time to first Subsequent Chemotherapy (TFSC)
From start of capivasertib+fulvestrant treatment to the first Subsequent Chemotherapy, death, withdrawal of consent or the end of study (approximately 24 months)
Progression-free survival (PFS)
From date of first dose of Capivasertib + fulvestrant until date of disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent or the end of study (approximately 24 months)
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationNA
MaskingNONE
ModelSINGLE_GROUP
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
Capivasertib + fulvestrantEXPERIMENTALFulvestrant: 2 intramuscular injections of 500 mg given on Day 1 of Weeks 1 and 3 of cycle 1, and then on Day 1, Week 1 of each cycle thereafter. Capivasertib: 400 mg (2 oral tablets) BD given on an intermittent weekly dosing schedule. Dosed on Days 1 to 4 in each week of a 28-day treatment cycle.
Placebo + fulvestrantPLACEBO_COMPARATORFulvestrant: 2 intramuscular injections of 500 mg given on Day 1 of Weeks 1 and 3 of cycle 1, and then on Day 1, Week 1 of each cycle thereafter. Placebo: 400 mg (2 oral tablets) BD given on an intermittent weekly dosing schedule. Dosed on Days 1 to 4 in each week of a 28-day treatment cycle.
faslodex+placeboEXPERIMENTALBlinded: Fulvestrant 500mg intramuscular injection (2x250mg) plus dummy Anastrozole tablets
arimidex +placeboACTIVE_COMPARATORBlinded: Anastrozole 1mg tablets plus dummy Fulvestrant intramuscular injection (2x0mg)
Fulvestrant 500mgEXPERIMENTALFulvestrant 500mg (2 syringes of Fulvestrant 250mg), Fulvestrant 500 mg i.m. every 28 (+/- 3) days plus an additional 500 mg on day 14 (+/-3) of first month only
Fulvestrant 250mgACTIVE_COMPARATORFulvestrant 250mg (1 syringe of fulvestrant 250mg + 1 syringe matching placebo), Fulvestrant 250 mg and matching placebo i.m. every 28 (+/- 3) days plus an additional 2 placebo syringes on day 14 (+/-3) of first month only
1EXPERIMENTALfulvestrant and anastrozole
2EXPERIMENTALfulvestrant and placebo
3ACTIVE_COMPARATORexemestane alone
FulvestrantEXPERIMENTAL -
Standard armACTIVE_COMPARATORFulvestrant, 500 mg
AZD9496EXPERIMENTAL250 mg bd taken orally for 5-14 days

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
FulvestrantDRUG2 intramuscular injections of 500 mg given on Day 1 of Weeks 1 and 3 of cycle 1, and then on Day 1, Week 1 of each cycle thereafter.
CapivasertibDRUG400 mg (2 oral tablets) BD given on an intermittent weekly dosing schedule. Dosed on Days 1 to 4 in each week of a 28-day treatment cycle
PlaceboDRUGPlacebo to match 400 mg BD (2 tablets of placebo to match 200 mg taken twice daily = placebo to match total daily dose of 800 mg) given on an intermittent weekly dosing schedule. Patients will be dosed on Days 1 to 4 in each week of a 28-day treatment cycle
faslodex 500mgDRUG2 x intramuscular injections at day 1, 14, 28 and every 28 days thereafter
arimidex 1mgDRUGoral tablet 1 daily
faslodex dummyDRUG2 x intramuscular injections at day 1, 14, 28 and every 28 days thereafter
arimidex dummyDRUGoral tablet 1 daily
anastrozoleDRUGTablet, oral, once daily until disease progression.
exemestaneDRUGTablet, oral, once daily until disease progression.
TamoxifenDRUG20 mg oral tablet
AnastrazoleDRUGoral tablet
Standard Arm - FulvestrantDRUG500 mg Fulvestrant administered as two consecutive 5 ml intramuscular injections on Day 1, one in each buttock
AZD9496DRUGAdministered at 250 mg bd orally for 5-14 days commencing on Day 1, and continuing up to the day of biopsy
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range18 Years to 130 Years
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites17

Key Inclusion Criteria Histologically confirmed HR+/HER2- breast cancer (primary or metastatic): * HR+ defined as ER+ with or without PRg+ * HER2- defined as IHC 0 or 1+, or IHC 2+/ISH- Patient with tumours harbouring at least one PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN qualifying alteration detected by a validated tes...

Countries:SpainUnited StatesArgentinaAustraliaBelgiumCanadaChinaFranceGermanyHungaryIsraelItalyJapanPeruPolandRussiaSouth KoreaTaiwanUnited KingdomBrazilCzechiaMexicoRomaniaSlovakiaSouth AfricaTurkey (Türkiye)UkraineChileColombiaIndiaMaltaVenezuelaCosta RicaFinlandGuatemalaIcelandNorwayPortugalSwedenDenmarkAustriaIrelandNetherlandsNew ZealandBulgariaSwitzerland
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Competitive Landscape -Breast Cancer 609 trials (matched to "Advanced Breast Cancer")

Recent Changes (Last 90 Days)

LOWOct 15, 2026NCT06764186primaryCompletionDate: changed
LOWOct 15, 2026NCT06764186primaryCompletionDate: changed
LOWSep 15, 2026NCT00099437lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 15, 2026NCT00099437lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 15, 2026NCT00099437lastUpdatePostDate: changed

Frequently asked questions about Fulvestrant

What is Fulvestrant used for?

Fulvestrant is used to treat advanced breast cancer, including locally advanced (inoperable) or metastatic breast cancer, and breast neoplasms. It is also being studied in endometrial carcinoma. It is an oncology drug developed by AstraZeneca PLC and is given as an injection.

What does Fulvestrant target?

Fulvestrant targets ESR1, the estrogen receptor, and acts as an antagonist. By binding and blocking this receptor, it interferes with estrogen-driven signaling in breast cancer cells. This target class and mechanism underlie its use in hormone receptor positive breast cancer, including HR+/HER2- disease.

Who makes Fulvestrant?

Fulvestrant is developed by AstraZeneca PLC, which trades under the ticker AZN. The company sponsors the clinical trial program evaluating fulvestrant in breast cancer, including combination studies with capivasertib and comparisons against other endocrine therapies.

What phase is Fulvestrant in?

Fulvestrant is in Phase 3 clinical development. It is an investigational small molecule studied in controlled, randomized, double-blind trials, with biomarker-selected patient populations. Seven trials are listed in its program, of which six are completed and one is active but not recruiting.

What clinical trials is Fulvestrant in?

Fulvestrant trials include NCT06764186, a Phase 3b study of capivasertib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer in Spain, and NCT04305496, a Phase 3 trial of capivasertib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant in HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Other studies include NCT03236974 and NCT01300351.

Is Fulvestrant the same as Fulvestrant injection?

Yes. Fulvestrant is also known as Fulvestrant injection, Standard Arm - Fulvestrant, and Standard Arm- Fulvestrant. These names refer to the same AstraZeneca drug, which is administered as an injection and studied across breast cancer and endometrial carcinoma indications.