Alpelisib

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause. PFS will be assessed by the Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) according to RECIST 1.1.

Incidence of DLTs during the first 6 weeks of treatment for each dose level associated with administration of alpelisib in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab

PFS is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause. PFS is based on local investigator assessment and using RECIST 1.1 criteria

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause. PFS was assessed via a local radiology assessment according to RECIST 1.1. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. The PFS distribution was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.

The primary outcome is the percentage change in Ki67 expression comparing pre-treatment to on-treatment specimens. Ki67 values were log-transformed for analysis, and results are summarized as the mean percentage change with 95% confidence intervals.

Incidence of adverse events by type, frequency, and severity, as graded by the NCI CTCAE version 4.03.

Confirmed objective response is defined as achieving radiological response, confirmed by a subsequent assessment performed at least after 4 weeks. The achievement of radiological response requires ≥20% reduction from baseline in the sum of target lesion volumes (1 to 3 target lesions, assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC)), provided that none of the individual target lesions has ≥20% increase from nadir, and in absence of progression of non-target lesions and without new lesions.

Individualized Response is a composite outcome determined by the combined results of the following 3 distinct study assessments after cycle 6: Radiologic evaluation, PROMIS Patient reported outcome (PRO) measurements, and Clinical Benefit Assessments (CBA). The results of these 3 distinct assessments will be evaluated using a set of specific criteria to determine the Individualized Response to treatment (i.e. "Substantial Response" = Improvement in Radiologic assessment by 20%, AND improvement in Global Health PROs by 3T-score points, AND improvement in at least 1 CBA, AND no clinically meaningful worsening of disease). Each subject will be determined to have: 1) Substantial Response, or 2) Intermediate Response, or 3) Stable disease, or 4) Worsening disease. A subject that is found to have a Substantial Response or Intermediate Response is considered to have a "beneficial response." Statistical analyses will be run to determine the percentage of subjects with a beneficial response.

\*\*For subjects with radiologically evaluable disease only\*\* The target lesion(s) will be measured at screening using imaging modality of choice based on underlying vascular anomaly (e.g. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography (MRL), US, X-rays, CT scan). MRI or MRL imaging will be recommended as primary imaging modality. For subjects with disease manifestation better characterized by alternative quantitative imaging modality (e.g. X-ray or ultrasound) this may be substituted and used as alternative imaging. Up to 3 lesions will be identified as target lesions and recorded and measured at screening. The same method of assessment and the same technique will be used to characterize each target lesion at the specified follow-up timepoints. CBA can be substituted for radiologic evaluation in subjects without radiologically evaluable disease.

Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) questionnaires will be distributed to subjects and caregivers (if applicable.) A raw score will be calculated for each PROMIS subscale. Raw scores will then be translated into a T-score metric with mean of 50 (standard deviation of 10). A higher T-score means more of the outcome being measured. Global health measures will be used as the primary outcome. Change in quality of life will be evaluated and applied to the Individualized Response Criteria using the PROMIS global health T-scores.

Radiological response defined by achieving at least 20% reduction in the sum of target lesion volumes (1 to 3 lesions), assessed by MRI by a BIRC at Week 24, provided that none of the individual target lesions has at least 20% increase from baseline and in absence of progression of non-target lesions and without new lesions. The percentage of participants with a radiological response at Week 24 of Stage 2 in adult and pediatric (6-17 years of age) groups will be assessed

The PFS is the length of time during and after the treatment of a disease that a patient lives with the disease but it does not get worse.

Incidence of new or worsening grade ≥3 treatment emergent AEs (by system organ class and preferred term)

A responder is defined by achieving a \>=20% reduction from baseline in the sum of target lesion volumes (via BIRC), provided that none of the individual target lesions have a \>=20% increase from baseline and in absence of progression of non target lesions and without new lesions. Confirmation of response requires a subsequent imaging assessment performed at least 4 weeks after the onset of response. Participants who permanently discontinued alpelisib prior to confirmation of response, and participants who received surgery as rescue therapy prior to confirmation of response are considered as non-responders.

To estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) of alpelisib with continued endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant) following progression in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, PIK3CA mutant metastatic breast cancer. PFS defined as time from D1 of treatment with alpelisib with endocrine therapy.

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause. The primary analysis for PFS will be performed based on local radiology assessment according to RECIST 1.1.

A DLT is defined as an AE or abnormal laboratory value assessed as unrelated to disease, disease progression, inter-current illness, or concomitant medications that occurs within the first 2 cycles (the first 56 days) of treatment with alpelisib in combination with fulvestrant and meets any of the criteria specified in the protocol .

ORR is defined as the proportion of participants with best overall response (BOR) of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1.

Percentage of participants who were alive without disease progression at 6-month follow-up based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1 in Cohort A, Cohort B and Cohort C. Participants who progressed, died, or discontinued study before 6 months were counted as a failure.

Overall response rate is the proportion of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria (Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR). Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Pathologic complete response (pCR) defined as absence of any residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes following completion of 24 weeks of treatment by local assessment (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Patients who experienced progression of disease while undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, or who did not receive surgery for any reason, or received antineoplastic treatment other than study drug(s) before surgery were considered as non-responders for the calculation of pCR rate.

Pathologic complete response (pCR) defined as absence of any residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes following completion of 24 weeks of treatment by local assessment (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Patients who experienced progression of disease while undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, or who did not receive surgery for any reason, or received antineoplastic treatment other than study drug(s) before surgery were considered as non-responders for the calculation of pCR rate.

Objective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of patients with a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) 1.1. BOR was assessed per MRI or Ultrasound and defined as per RECIST 1.1 as CR for a disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions (TL)/non-target lesions (NTL) and a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes assigned as TL/NTL and no new lesion; as PR if not qualifying for CR but with a decrease from baseline ≥ 30% in the sum of diameter of all TL, no progression of NTL and no new lesion.

Objective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the proportion of patients with a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) 1.1. BOR was assessed per MRI or Ultrasound and defined as per RECIST 1.1 as CR for a disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions (TL)/non-target lesions (NTL) and a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes assigned as TL/NTL and no new lesion; as PR if not qualifying for CR but with a decrease from baseline ≥ 30% in the sum of diameter of all TL, no progression of NTL and no new lesion.

MTD of tucatinib and alpelisib in combination, summary of all AEs and SAEs on study as evaluated by NCI-CTCAE v 5.0

PFS in the overall study population (the time from allocation to the first documented disease progression by RECIST1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first)

Measurement of effect of hepatic impairment on PK of alpelisib by assessment of the maximum plasma concentration (PK parameter Cmax). Cmax directly determined from the plasma concentration-time profile.

Measurement of effect of hepatic impairment on PK of alpelisib by assessment of the PK parameter AUClast (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration sampling time). AUC determined from the plasma concentration-time profile using non-compartmental analysis.

Measurement of effect of hepatic impairment on PK of alpelisib by assessment of the PK parameter AUCinf (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity ). AUC determined from the plasma concentration-time profile using non-compartmental analysis.

Phase I was a 3+3 dose escalation design (three dose levels of alpelisib: 250mg, 300mg, and 350mg orally once daily, continuous dosing) with dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) assessed during the first treatment cycle. If two or more of the six patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity, dosing escalation would cease and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) would be reached. RP2D was the next lower dose at which \<1/6 subjects experienced a DLT.

ORR includes complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR). As evaluated per RECIST version 1.1.

The MTD is defined as per the Continual Reassessment Method. The RDE will be determined by the Principal Investigator with input from other investigators and Novartis, and will be based on the MTD, review of required intra-patient dose de-escalations, pharmacodynamic evaluations, and consideration of toxicities occurring in cycles 2+.

To determine the MTD and/or RDE of alpelisib in combination with everolimus, and the MTD and/or RDE of alpelisib in combination with everolimus and exemestane. A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is an adverse event or abnormal laboratory value assessed as being unrelated to disease, disease progression, inter-current illness, or concomitant medications, and that occurs within the first 35 days of treatment with alpelisib plus everolimus or alpelisib plus everolimus plus exemestane and meets any of the pre-defined criteria.

Type, intensity, severity and seriousness of adverse events according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Advers Events (NCI CTC AE) v4.03. Dose interruptions, reductions and dose intensity

To estimate the MTD(s) and/or the RP2D(s) of a) alpelisib in combination with tamoxifen plus goserelin acetate (Group 1) and b) buparlisib in combination with Tamoxifen plus goserelin acetate (Group 2) in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive locally advanced or MBC patients.

A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is an adverse event or abnormal laboratory value assessed as being unrelated to disease, disease progression, inter-current illness, or concomitant medications, and that occurs within the first cycle of treatment with BYL719 plus paclitaxel and meets any of the pre-defined criteria.

type, intensity, severity and seriousness of adverse events according to the NCI CTC AE v4.03. Dose interruptions, reductions and dose intensity.

MTD (or RP2D) of oral BYL719 as single agent and in combination with fulvestrant.