Approval Probability
TA Base Rate
Adjusted LOA
ML Risk
Dacomitinib · 10 trials · 9 indications
PFS: time from randomization to date of progression of disease (PD) as determined by IRC review as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. In presence of stable disease (did not achieve partial response, complete response or PD) or partial response (\>=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions, short diameter used in the sum for target nodes, longest diameter used in sum for all other target lesions) in target disease; for new lesions: appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion indicated PD.
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) v1.1 per Independent Radiologic Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions.
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by RECIST v1.1 per Independent Radiologic Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. Tumor tissue from participants' original diagnostic biopsies or recently obtained biopsies were analyzed to determine KRAS status.
To allow access to dacomitinib for participants who received dacomitinib on prior studies (A7471009 \[NCT01360554\] and A7471050 \[NCT01774721\]) in Japan and who had the potential to derive continued clinical benefit from single-agent dacomitinib treatment without unacceptable toxicity based upon the investigator's judgment.
BOR was best response from start of treatment until disease progression, according to the RECIST,v1.1. CR=disappearance of all preexisting lesions except nodal disease, with all nodal lesions decreased to normal size (short axis \<10 mm) and no appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions. PR= ≥30% decrease from baseline of sum of diameters of all target lesions with no unequivocal progression of preexisting non-target lesions or appearance of new lesions. CR and PR were confirmed on a follow-up imaging assessment ≥4 weeks after the initial response documentation. Progression= ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed, with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. Stable disease=not qualify for CR, PR or progression. BOR was analyzed only for participants with T790M mutation according to the primary study objective.
ORR was calculated as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR or PR relative to the total number of participants enrolled. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version (v) 1.1 were used to define CR and PR. CR=disappearance of all preexisting lesions except nodal disease, with all nodal lesions decreased to normal size (short axis \<10 mm) and no appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions. PR= ≥30% decrease from baseline of sum of diameters of all target lesions with no unequivocal progression of preexisting non-target lesions or appearance of new lesions. CR and PR were confirmed on a follow-up imaging assessment ≥4 weeks after the initial response documentation. ORR was analyzed only for participants with T790M mutation according to the primary study objective.
SDAEI of all causality and all grades were evaluated in participants in Cohort I. These SDAEIs included dermatitis acneiform, dry skin, exfoliative rash, nail discoloration, nail disorder, paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin infection, skin laceration and skin ulcer. 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution. After protocol amendment 1, Arm C was removed from Cohort I and enrollment to Arm C was terminated. Only 7 participants were enrolled in Cohort I Arm C as a result. Given the smaller sample size, analyse of Outcome Measure 1 was not conducted in Cohort I Arm C.
SDAEI of all causality and Grade ≥2 were evaluated in participants in Cohort I. These SDAEIs included dermatitis acneiform, dry skin, exfoliative rash, nail discoloration, nail disorder, paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin infection, skin laceration and skin ulcer. Adverse events (AEs) were graded for severity using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0). 95% CI calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution. After protocol amendment 1, Arm C was removed from Cohort I and enrollment to Arm C was terminated. Only 7 participants were enrolled in Cohort I Arm C as a result. Given the smaller sample size, analyse of Outcome Measure 2 was not conducted in Cohort I Arm C.
Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) \& disease/treatment-related symptoms were assessed using Dermatologic Survey (Skindex-16) that assesses "bother". It includes 3 multi-item scales: symptoms, emotions \& functioning. Individual scaled scores \& total scores were determined. Skindex questions were transformed to a linear scale of 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered). Subscale scores are an average of non-missing questions in a given scale if greater than (\>) 75% of total subscale questions are non-missing. The Total Score is an average of all non-missing questions in the Skindex if \>75% of total questions are non-missing. A negative change score represents a better quality of life. A change score of 10 points is considered clinically significant. Skindex completion criteria were defined as completion of 3 out of 4 items for questions 1 to 4, 6 out of 7 items for questions 5 to 11, 4 out of 5 items for questions 12 to 16 for the visit.
Diarrhea AEs of all causality, all grade and Grade ≥2 were evaluated in participants in Cohort II. AEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0. 95% CI calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution.
Diarrhea severity was assessed using the modified-OMDQ. This questionnaire is comprised of 6 questions in total; however, only two items relate to diarrhea symptoms (item 5 and item 6). Symptoms scores were developed for both the full questionnaire and for the diarrhea-only questions for each completed survey. Mucositis questions were transformed to a score range of 0 to 10. Increasing OMDQ values are associated with greater symptom burden. Modified OMDQ completion criteria were defined as completion of all 4 questions (questions 2, 4, 5 and 6). M/T = mouth and throat.
SDAEI of all causality and all grades were evaluated in participants in Cohort II. These SDAEIs included dermatitis acneiform, dry skin, exfoliative rash, nail discoloration, nail disorder, paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin infection, skin laceration and skin ulcer. 95% CI calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution.
SDAEI of all causality and Grade ≥2 were evaluated in participants in Cohort II. These SDAEIs included dermatitis acneiform, dry skin, exfoliative rash, nail discoloration, nail disorder, paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin infection, skin laceration and skin ulcer. AEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0. 95% CI calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution.
PROs of HRQoL and disease/treatment-related symptoms were assessed using Dermatologic Survey (Skindex-16) that assesses "bother". It includes 3 multi-item scales: symptoms, emotions \& functioning. Individual scaled scores \& total scores were determined. Skindex questions were transformed to a linear scale of 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered). Subscale scores are an average of non-missing questions in a given scale if \> 75% of total subscale questions are non-missing. The Total Score is an average of all non-missing questions in the Skindex if \>75% of total questions are non-missing. A negative change score represents a better quality of life. A change score of 10 points is considered clinically significant. Skindex completion criteria were defined as completion of 3 out of 4 items for questions 1 to 4, 6 out of 7 items for questions 5 to 11, 4 out of 5 items for questions 12 to 16 for the visit.
AUC0-24 is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC0-120 is the AUC from time 0 to 120 hours post-dose. AUC was calculated by the linear trapezoidal method using a non-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. ng\*hr/mL = nanogram hours per milliliter
Cmax was obtained from direct inspection of the data. ng/mL = nanograms per milliliter
Tmax was obtained from direct inspection of the data as the time of first occurence of Cmax.
PFS at Month 4 was defined as percentage of participants who were alive and event free (event defined as progressive disease \[PD\] or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first) at 4 months after the first dose of study treatment. Documentation of progression was based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0 (RECIST v1.0) criteria. PD = greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the start of treatment, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions.
Cmax of Dacomitinib was analyzed.
AUCinf = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf).
AUC (0-t)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to time of last quantifiable concentration (0-t)
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Apparent volume of distribution after oral dose (Vz/F) is influenced by the fraction absorbed.
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. Clearance was estimated from population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood.
AUC is a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time. It is used to characterize drug absorption. normalized to the administered dose
AUC is a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time. It is used to characterize drug absorption. normalized to the administered dose
Maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) for dacomitinib
| Arm | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) | EXPERIMENTAL | Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) is provided as 45 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing. |
| gefitinib | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | Gefitinib is provided as 250 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing. |
| A | EXPERIMENTAL | Blinded active PF-00299804 + blinded placebo comparator (erlotinib) |
| B | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | Blinded active comparator (erlotinib) + blinded placebo PF-00299804 |
| Dacomitinib | EXPERIMENTAL | 3 dose strengths (45 mg, 30 mg, and 15 mg), continuous oral daily dosing |
| Cohort A | EXPERIMENTAL | Patients with NSCLC whose tumor has a documented T790M mutation in exon 20 of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. |
| Cohort B | EXPERIMENTAL | Patients with NSCLC. No requirement of a specific molecular signature, but excluding known T790M mutations. |
| Cohort I | EXPERIMENTAL | Arm A: Dacomitinib 45 mg orally daily on a continuous schedule until disease progression, toxicity, death or withdrawal of consent Doxycycline placebo orally BID for 4 weeks Arm B: Dacomitinib 45 mg orally daily on a continuous schedule until disease progression, toxicity, death or withdrawal of consent Doxycycline 100 mg orally BID for 4 weeks |
| Cohort II | EXPERIMENTAL | Dacomitinib 45 mg orally daily on a continuous schedule until disease progression, toxicity, death or withdrawal of consent Topical alclometasone diproprionate cream 0.05% applied to face, hands, feet, neck, back and chest at bedtime for 4 weeks VSL#3 probiotic 4 capsules orally daily or 1 sachet orally daily for up to 5 weeks (starting between Day minus 7 to Day minus 4 and continuing through Day 28) |
| Cohort III | EXPERIMENTAL | Cohort III is an interrupted dosing schedule of dacomitinib in the first cycle only |
| Cohort 1 (Dacomitinib) | EXPERIMENTAL | severe hepatic impairment group |
| Cohort 2 (Dacomitinib) | EXPERIMENTAL | normal hepatic function |
| Treatment | EXPERIMENTAL | Dacomitinib will be administered as a single oral dose and as an intravenous infusion |
| Group 1 | EXPERIMENTAL | Healthy Subjects to receive dacomitinib |
| Group 2 | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects with mildly impaired hepatic function to receive dacomitinib |
| Group 3 | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects with moderately impaired hepatic function to receive dacomitinib |
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) | DRUG | Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) 45 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing. |
| Gefitinib | DRUG | Gefitinib 250 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing. |
| Active Comparator (erlotinib) | DRUG | Active comparator (erlotinib) provided as 150 mg tablet, continuous oral daily dosing |
| Placebo erlotinib | DRUG | placebo erlotinib, provided as 150 mg tablet, continuous oral daily dosing. |
| Placebo PF00299804 | DRUG | placebo PF-00299804, provide as 45 mg tablet, continuous oral daily dosing |
| Dacomitinib | DRUG | Starting at the current dose level in the prior study. Dose reductions and re-escalations are allowed based on tolerability. Patients may continue to be treated with dacomitinib on this protocol as long as there is evidence of clinical benefit in the judgment of the investigator. |
| Doxycycline | DRUG | Doxycycline or Doxycycline placebo BID for 4 weeks |
| Probiotic | DRUG | VSL#3 probiotic 4 capsules orally daily or 1 sachet orally daily for up to 5 weeks (starting between Day minus 7 to Day minus 4 and continuing through Day 28) |
| Alclometasone cream | DRUG | Topical alclometasone diproprionate cream 0.05% applied to face, hands, feet, neck, back and chest at bedtime for 4 weeks |
| dacomitinib oral | DRUG | Dacomitinib 45 mg oral tablet |
| dacomitinib intravenous | DRUG | Dacomitinib 20 mg solution will be given as 1 hour intravenous infusion |
Inclusion Criteria: * Evidence of histo or cytopathology confirmed, advanced NSCLC (with known histology) with the presence of EGFR-activating mutation (exon 19 deletion or the L858R mutation in exon 21). * It is acceptable for subjects with the presence of the exon 20 T790M mutation together with ...
Top 20 of 84 competitors
Dacomitinib is an investigational small molecule being studied for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including NSCLC with EGFR-activating mutations. It has also been evaluated in healthy volunteers and in patients with severe hepatic impairment for pharmacokinetic studies. It is not approved and remains in clinical development.
Dacomitinib is being developed by Pfizer, Inc. (NYSE: PFE). The company has sponsored clinical trials of the drug across multiple phases and indications.
Dacomitinib has completed Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 clinical trials. The most advanced completed study was a Phase 3 trial (ARCHER 1009) comparing dacomitinib to erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. It remains investigational and is not FDA approved.
Dacomitinib has been studied in several completed trials, including NCT01360554 (Phase 3, ARCHER 1009, comparing to erlotinib in advanced NSCLC), NCT01796327 (Phase 1, healthy volunteers), NCT01858389 (Phase 2, advanced NSCLC), and NCT03865446 (Phase 1, severe hepatic impairment).
Yes, Dacomitinib is also known as PF-00299804. Clinical trial titles for the drug reference both names, such as in the ARCHER 1009 study of dacomitinib (PF-00299804) versus erlotinib.