Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Dacomitinib

Phase 3

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Small molecule | Oncology |Pfizer, Inc.|Last Updated: Nov 14, 2023

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedDouble-BlindCONTROLLEDDMC
Total Trials2
Total Enrollment919

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

Clinical trial landscape

Dacomitinib · 10 trials · 9 indications

Phase 3 2Phase 2 4Phase 1 4
NCT01774721ARCHER1050: A Study of Dacomitinib vs. Gefitinib in 1st-Line Treatment Of Advanced NSCLC.Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR-Activating Mutations
COMPLETED452 Analytics
NCT01360554ARCHER 1009 : A Study Of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) Vs. Erlotinib In The Treatment Of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung CancerNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer
COMPLETED878 Analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
ARCHER1050: A Study of Dacomitinib vs. Gefitinib in 1st-Line Treatment Of Advanced NSCLC.
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR-Activating MutationsUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
ARCHER 1009 : A Study Of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) Vs. Erlotinib In The Treatment Of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Radiologic Central (IRC) Review
Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)

PFS: time from randomization to date of progression of disease (PD) as determined by IRC review as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: \>=20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions (TLs), referring smallest sum on study, sum must be an absolute increase of \>=5 mm, appearance of \>=1 new lesions; unequivocal progression of existing non TLs. Overall tumor burden increased sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy. In presence of stable disease (did not achieve partial response, complete response or PD) or partial response (\>=30% decrease under baseline of sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions, short diameter used in the sum for target nodes, longest diameter used in sum for all other target lesions) in target disease; for new lesions: appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion indicated PD.

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review.
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) v1.1 per Independent Radiologic Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions.

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review in KRAS Wild-type (WT) Participants.
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by RECIST v1.1 per Independent Radiologic Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. Tumor tissue from participants' original diagnostic biopsies or recently obtained biopsies were analyzed to determine KRAS status.

Number of Participants Who Were Previously Treated With Dacomitinib on the Parent Study in Japan and Who Got Access to Dacomitinib in This Extension Study
4 years

To allow access to dacomitinib for participants who received dacomitinib on prior studies (A7471009 \[NCT01360554\] and A7471050 \[NCT01774721\]) in Japan and who had the potential to derive continued clinical benefit from single-agent dacomitinib treatment without unacceptable toxicity based upon the investigator's judgment.

Best Overall Response (BOR) in Participants With T790M Mutation
From baseline until disease progression, up to 61 weeks.

BOR was best response from start of treatment until disease progression, according to the RECIST,v1.1. CR=disappearance of all preexisting lesions except nodal disease, with all nodal lesions decreased to normal size (short axis \<10 mm) and no appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions. PR= ≥30% decrease from baseline of sum of diameters of all target lesions with no unequivocal progression of preexisting non-target lesions or appearance of new lesions. CR and PR were confirmed on a follow-up imaging assessment ≥4 weeks after the initial response documentation. Progression= ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed, with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. Stable disease=not qualify for CR, PR or progression. BOR was analyzed only for participants with T790M mutation according to the primary study objective.

Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With T790M Mutation
From baseline to disease progression, up to 61 weeks.

ORR was calculated as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR or PR relative to the total number of participants enrolled. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version (v) 1.1 were used to define CR and PR. CR=disappearance of all preexisting lesions except nodal disease, with all nodal lesions decreased to normal size (short axis \<10 mm) and no appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions. PR= ≥30% decrease from baseline of sum of diameters of all target lesions with no unequivocal progression of preexisting non-target lesions or appearance of new lesions. CR and PR were confirmed on a follow-up imaging assessment ≥4 weeks after the initial response documentation. ORR was analyzed only for participants with T790M mutation according to the primary study objective.

Percentage of Participants With Select Dermatologic Adverse Events of Interest (SDAEI) (All Causality, All Grade) in the First 8 Weeks of Treatment by Treatment Arm for Cohort I
First 8 Weeks of Treatment

SDAEI of all causality and all grades were evaluated in participants in Cohort I. These SDAEIs included dermatitis acneiform, dry skin, exfoliative rash, nail discoloration, nail disorder, paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin infection, skin laceration and skin ulcer. 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution. After protocol amendment 1, Arm C was removed from Cohort I and enrollment to Arm C was terminated. Only 7 participants were enrolled in Cohort I Arm C as a result. Given the smaller sample size, analyse of Outcome Measure 1 was not conducted in Cohort I Arm C.

Percentage of Participants With SDAEI (All Causality, Grade Greater Than or Equal to [≥] 2) in the First 8 Weeks of Treatment by Treatment Arm for Cohort I
First 8 Weeks of Treatment

SDAEI of all causality and Grade ≥2 were evaluated in participants in Cohort I. These SDAEIs included dermatitis acneiform, dry skin, exfoliative rash, nail discoloration, nail disorder, paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin infection, skin laceration and skin ulcer. Adverse events (AEs) were graded for severity using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0). 95% CI calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution. After protocol amendment 1, Arm C was removed from Cohort I and enrollment to Arm C was terminated. Only 7 participants were enrolled in Cohort I Arm C as a result. Given the smaller sample size, analyse of Outcome Measure 2 was not conducted in Cohort I Arm C.

Mean Change From Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) Skindex-16 Scale Scores (Total Score, Symptoms Score, Emotion Score, and Functioning Score) by Treatment Arm for Cohort I
First 8 Weeks of Treatment

Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) \& disease/treatment-related symptoms were assessed using Dermatologic Survey (Skindex-16) that assesses "bother". It includes 3 multi-item scales: symptoms, emotions \& functioning. Individual scaled scores \& total scores were determined. Skindex questions were transformed to a linear scale of 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered). Subscale scores are an average of non-missing questions in a given scale if greater than (\>) 75% of total subscale questions are non-missing. The Total Score is an average of all non-missing questions in the Skindex if \>75% of total questions are non-missing. A negative change score represents a better quality of life. A change score of 10 points is considered clinically significant. Skindex completion criteria were defined as completion of 3 out of 4 items for questions 1 to 4, 6 out of 7 items for questions 5 to 11, 4 out of 5 items for questions 12 to 16 for the visit.

Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea AEs (All Causality, All Grade and Grade ≥2) in the First 8 Weeks of Treatment for Cohort II
First 8 Weeks of Treatment

Diarrhea AEs of all causality, all grade and Grade ≥2 were evaluated in participants in Cohort II. AEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0. 95% CI calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution.

Mean Change From Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) Modified Oral Mucositis Daily Questionnaire (OMDQ) Scores (Mouth and Throat Soreness Categories and Scale, and Diarrhea Categories and Scale) for Cohort II
Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, EoT and Follow-up

Diarrhea severity was assessed using the modified-OMDQ. This questionnaire is comprised of 6 questions in total; however, only two items relate to diarrhea symptoms (item 5 and item 6). Symptoms scores were developed for both the full questionnaire and for the diarrhea-only questions for each completed survey. Mucositis questions were transformed to a score range of 0 to 10. Increasing OMDQ values are associated with greater symptom burden. Modified OMDQ completion criteria were defined as completion of all 4 questions (questions 2, 4, 5 and 6). M/T = mouth and throat.

Percentage of Participants With SDAEI (All Causality, All Grade) in the First 8 Weeks of Treatment for Cohort II
First 8 Weeks of Treatment

SDAEI of all causality and all grades were evaluated in participants in Cohort II. These SDAEIs included dermatitis acneiform, dry skin, exfoliative rash, nail discoloration, nail disorder, paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin infection, skin laceration and skin ulcer. 95% CI calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution.

Percentage of Participants With SDAEI (All Causality, Grade ≥2) in the First 8 Weeks of Treatment for Cohort II
First 8 Weeks of Treatment

SDAEI of all causality and Grade ≥2 were evaluated in participants in Cohort II. These SDAEIs included dermatitis acneiform, dry skin, exfoliative rash, nail discoloration, nail disorder, paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin infection, skin laceration and skin ulcer. AEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0. 95% CI calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution.

Mean Change From Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) Skindex-16 Scale Scores (Total Score, Symptoms Score, Emotion Score, and Functioning Score) for Cohort II
Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, EoT and Follow-up

PROs of HRQoL and disease/treatment-related symptoms were assessed using Dermatologic Survey (Skindex-16) that assesses "bother". It includes 3 multi-item scales: symptoms, emotions \& functioning. Individual scaled scores \& total scores were determined. Skindex questions were transformed to a linear scale of 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered). Subscale scores are an average of non-missing questions in a given scale if \> 75% of total subscale questions are non-missing. The Total Score is an average of all non-missing questions in the Skindex if \>75% of total questions are non-missing. A negative change score represents a better quality of life. A change score of 10 points is considered clinically significant. Skindex completion criteria were defined as completion of 3 out of 4 items for questions 1 to 4, 6 out of 7 items for questions 5 to 11, 4 out of 5 items for questions 12 to 16 for the visit.

Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) and From 0 to 120 Hours (AUC0-120) for Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 on Cycle 1 Days 10 to 15 for Cohort III
Cycle 1 Day 10: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose (the 120 hour sample was obtained on Day 15 pre-dose).

AUC0-24 is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC0-120 is the AUC from time 0 to 120 hours post-dose. AUC was calculated by the linear trapezoidal method using a non-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. ng\*hr/mL = nanogram hours per milliliter

Mean Maximum Observed Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 on Cycle 1 Days 10 to 15 for Cohort III
Cycle 1 Day 10: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose (the 120 hour sample was obtained on Day 15 pre-dose).

Cmax was obtained from direct inspection of the data. ng/mL = nanograms per milliliter

Median Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) for Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 on Cycle 1 Days 10 to 15 for Cohort III
Cycle 1 Day 10: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose (the 120 hour sample was obtained on Day 15 pre-dose).

Tmax was obtained from direct inspection of the data as the time of first occurence of Cmax.

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at Month 4: Cohort A
Baseline up to Month 4

PFS at Month 4 was defined as percentage of participants who were alive and event free (event defined as progressive disease \[PD\] or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first) at 4 months after the first dose of study treatment. Documentation of progression was based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0 (RECIST v1.0) criteria. PD = greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the start of treatment, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions.

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Dacomitinib
Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216 and 264 hours post dose on Day 1

Cmax of Dacomitinib was analyzed.

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Dacomitinib
Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216 and 264 hours post dose on Day 1

AUCinf = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf).

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Dacomitinib
predose, 1, 2 ,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48 ,72 ,96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 ,264 hours post-dose
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC (0-t)]of Dacomitinib
predose, 1, 2 ,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48 ,72 ,96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 ,264 hours post-dose

AUC (0-t)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to time of last quantifiable concentration (0-t)

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast)of Dacomitinib
predose, 1, 2 ,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48 ,72 ,96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 ,264 hours post-dose
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F)of Dacomitinib
predose, 1, 2 ,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48 ,72 ,96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 ,264 hours post-dose

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Apparent volume of distribution after oral dose (Vz/F) is influenced by the fraction absorbed.

Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2)of Dacomitinib
predose, 1, 2 ,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48 ,72 ,96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 ,264 hours post-dose

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.

Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F)of Dacomitinib
predose, 1, 2 ,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48 ,72 ,96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 ,264 hours post-dose

Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. Clearance was estimated from population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood.

Dacomitinib Dose-normalized Area under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time following oral dose
0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216 hours post-dose

AUC is a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time. It is used to characterize drug absorption. normalized to the administered dose

Dacomitinib Dose-normalized Area under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time following intravenous dose
0, 0.5, 1, 1.083, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216 hours post-dose

AUC is a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time. It is used to characterize drug absorption. normalized to the administered dose

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
2 weeks

Maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) for dacomitinib

Plasma area under plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time infinity post dose (AUCinf) for dacomitinib
2 weeks

Secondary Endpoints

Overall Survival (OS)
From randomization until death or last date known as alive, up to 45 months
OS at 30 Months (OS30m)
Up to 30 months from date of randomization
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment
Day 28 of Cycle 1, Cycle 2 then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 48 months)
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingNONE
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)EXPERIMENTALDacomitinib (PF-00299804) is provided as 45 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing.
gefitinibACTIVE_COMPARATORGefitinib is provided as 250 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing.
AEXPERIMENTALBlinded active PF-00299804 + blinded placebo comparator (erlotinib)
BACTIVE_COMPARATORBlinded active comparator (erlotinib) + blinded placebo PF-00299804
DacomitinibEXPERIMENTAL3 dose strengths (45 mg, 30 mg, and 15 mg), continuous oral daily dosing
Cohort AEXPERIMENTALPatients with NSCLC whose tumor has a documented T790M mutation in exon 20 of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.
Cohort BEXPERIMENTALPatients with NSCLC. No requirement of a specific molecular signature, but excluding known T790M mutations.
Cohort IEXPERIMENTALArm A: Dacomitinib 45 mg orally daily on a continuous schedule until disease progression, toxicity, death or withdrawal of consent Doxycycline placebo orally BID for 4 weeks Arm B: Dacomitinib 45 mg orally daily on a continuous schedule until disease progression, toxicity, death or withdrawal of consent Doxycycline 100 mg orally BID for 4 weeks
Cohort IIEXPERIMENTALDacomitinib 45 mg orally daily on a continuous schedule until disease progression, toxicity, death or withdrawal of consent Topical alclometasone diproprionate cream 0.05% applied to face, hands, feet, neck, back and chest at bedtime for 4 weeks VSL#3 probiotic 4 capsules orally daily or 1 sachet orally daily for up to 5 weeks (starting between Day minus 7 to Day minus 4 and continuing through Day 28)
Cohort IIIEXPERIMENTALCohort III is an interrupted dosing schedule of dacomitinib in the first cycle only
Cohort 1 (Dacomitinib)EXPERIMENTALsevere hepatic impairment group
Cohort 2 (Dacomitinib)EXPERIMENTALnormal hepatic function
TreatmentEXPERIMENTALDacomitinib will be administered as a single oral dose and as an intravenous infusion
Group 1EXPERIMENTALHealthy Subjects to receive dacomitinib
Group 2EXPERIMENTALSubjects with mildly impaired hepatic function to receive dacomitinib
Group 3EXPERIMENTALSubjects with moderately impaired hepatic function to receive dacomitinib

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)DRUGDacomitinib (PF-00299804) 45 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing.
GefitinibDRUGGefitinib 250 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing.
Active Comparator (erlotinib)DRUGActive comparator (erlotinib) provided as 150 mg tablet, continuous oral daily dosing
Placebo erlotinibDRUGplacebo erlotinib, provided as 150 mg tablet, continuous oral daily dosing.
Placebo PF00299804DRUGplacebo PF-00299804, provide as 45 mg tablet, continuous oral daily dosing
DacomitinibDRUGStarting at the current dose level in the prior study. Dose reductions and re-escalations are allowed based on tolerability. Patients may continue to be treated with dacomitinib on this protocol as long as there is evidence of clinical benefit in the judgment of the investigator.
DoxycyclineDRUGDoxycycline or Doxycycline placebo BID for 4 weeks
ProbioticDRUGVSL#3 probiotic 4 capsules orally daily or 1 sachet orally daily for up to 5 weeks (starting between Day minus 7 to Day minus 4 and continuing through Day 28)
Alclometasone creamDRUGTopical alclometasone diproprionate cream 0.05% applied to face, hands, feet, neck, back and chest at bedtime for 4 weeks
dacomitinib oralDRUGDacomitinib 45 mg oral tablet
dacomitinib intravenousDRUGDacomitinib 20 mg solution will be given as 1 hour intravenous infusion
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range18 Years to 99 Years
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites52

Inclusion Criteria: * Evidence of histo or cytopathology confirmed, advanced NSCLC (with known histology) with the presence of EGFR-activating mutation (exon 19 deletion or the L858R mutation in exon 21). * It is acceptable for subjects with the presence of the exon 20 T790M mutation together with ...

Countries:ChinaHong KongItalyJapanPolandSouth KoreaSpainUnited StatesAustriaBelgiumDenmarkFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIndiaIrelandMexicoRussiaSlovakiaSouth AfricaSwedenSwitzerlandUnited KingdomTaiwan
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Competitive Landscape -Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 389 trials

Frequently asked questions about Dacomitinib

What is Dacomitinib used for?

Dacomitinib is an investigational small molecule being studied for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including NSCLC with EGFR-activating mutations. It has also been evaluated in healthy volunteers and in patients with severe hepatic impairment for pharmacokinetic studies. It is not approved and remains in clinical development.

Who makes Dacomitinib?

Dacomitinib is being developed by Pfizer, Inc. (NYSE: PFE). The company has sponsored clinical trials of the drug across multiple phases and indications.

What phase is Dacomitinib in?

Dacomitinib has completed Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 clinical trials. The most advanced completed study was a Phase 3 trial (ARCHER 1009) comparing dacomitinib to erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. It remains investigational and is not FDA approved.

What clinical trials is Dacomitinib in?

Dacomitinib has been studied in several completed trials, including NCT01360554 (Phase 3, ARCHER 1009, comparing to erlotinib in advanced NSCLC), NCT01796327 (Phase 1, healthy volunteers), NCT01858389 (Phase 2, advanced NSCLC), and NCT03865446 (Phase 1, severe hepatic impairment).

Is Dacomitinib the same as PF-00299804?

Yes, Dacomitinib is also known as PF-00299804. Clinical trial titles for the drug reference both names, such as in the ARCHER 1009 study of dacomitinib (PF-00299804) versus erlotinib.