Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Standard taxane therapy

Phase 2

Breast Cancer | Small molecule | Oncology |Roche Holding AG|Last Updated: Mar 29, 2018

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

UNCONTROLLED
Total Trials1
Total Enrollment33

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

Clinical trial landscape

Standard taxane therapy · 1 trial · 1 indication

Phase 2 1
NCT00885755A Study of Herceptin (Trastuzumab)and Biomarkers in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast CancerBreast Cancer
COMPLETED33 Analytics
PHASE2COMPLETED
A Study of Herceptin (Trastuzumab)and Biomarkers in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
Breast CancerUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Part I: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Biomarker
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months

Progression was defined as an increase by at least 20 percent (%) from the smallest value in the Sum of Longest Diameter (SLD) of lesions. Biomarkers investigated: p95 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (p95HER2) positive (+ve) and negative (-ve) , insulin growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) less than (\<) median and greater than or equal to (≥) median membrane H score, c-MET \<median and ≥median membrane H score, phosphatase and tensin homolog gene (PTEN) \<median and ≥median cytoplasm H score, HER2 \<median and ≥median membrane H score, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) catalytic subunit wild type (WT) and mutation (M), and FC gamma receptors IIIa homozygous Phenyl alanine (FF), heterozygous Phenyl alanine/Valine (VF) and homozygous Valine (VV), receptor IIa Phenotypes homozygous Histidine (HH), heterozygous Histidine/Arginine (HR) and homozygous Arginine (RR) IIb phenotypes homozygous Isoleucien (II),heterozygous Isoleucine/Threonine (IT) and homozygous Threonine (TT) .

Part II: Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Biomarker
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months

PFS was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression or death.The relationship between PFS and the following biomarker variables was investigated in each of study Part 1 and 2: p95HER2 +ve and -ve population, IGF1R \<median and ≥ median membrane H score, c-MET \<median and ≥median membrane H score, PTEN \<median and ≥median cytoplasm H score, HER2 \<median and ≥median membrane H score, PI3K catalytic subunit WT and M, and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb Phenotypes FF, VF and VV, HH, HR and RR, and II, IT and TT.

Part I: Time to Progression (TTP) by Biomarker
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 weeks

Progression was defined as an increase by at least 20% from the smallest value in the SLD of lesions.TTP was determined as the time in months from the date of screening until first progression.The relationship between PFS and the following biomarker variables was investigated in each of study Part 1 and 2: p95 HER2 +ve and -ve population, IGF1R \<median and ≥median, c-MET \<median and ≥median, PTEN \<median and ≥median, HER2 \<median and ≥median, PI3K catalytic subunit WT and M, and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb Phenotypes FF, VF and VV, HH, HR and RR, and II, IT and TT . The correlation between the biomarker variables and TTP were investigated using a univariate Cox regression model and time-to-event methods (Kaplan-Meier).

Part II: TTP by Biomarker
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months

TTP was calculated from first study medication in Part II to date of progression. The relationship between TTP and the following biomarker variables was investigated in each of study Part 1 and 2: p95 HER2 +ve and -ve population, IGF1R \<median and ≥median, c-MET \<median and ≥median, PTEN \<median and ≥median, HER2 \<median and ≥median, PI3K catalytic subunit WT and M, and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb Phenotypes FF, VF and VV, HH, HR and RR, and II, IT and TT .

Part I: Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD) or Progrerssive Disease (PD) by Biomarker
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 weeks

BOR was defined according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions. The relationship between best response and the following biomarkers was investigated: p95 HER2 (+ve/-ve), IGF1R, c-MET, PTEN, HER2 (median/≥median), PI3K catalytic subunit (WT/M), and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb (phenotypes FF, VF, VV, HH, HR, RR and II, IT and TT respectively). The correlation between the biomarker variables and percentage of participants with best response were investigated using a univariate regression analysis.

Part II: Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR, PR, SD or PD by Biomarker
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months

Best Overall response was defined according to RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes below 10 mm.PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or persistence of non-target lesions. The relationship between best response and the following biomarkers was investigated: p95 HER2 (+ve/-ve), IGF1R, c-MET, PTEN, HER2 (\<median/≥median) , PI3K catalytic subunit (WT/M), and FC gamma receptors IIIa, IIa and IIb (phenotypes FF, VF, VV, HH, HR, RR and II, IT and TT respectively). The correlation between the biomarker variables and percentage of participants with best response were investigated using a univariate regression analysis.

Secondary Endpoints

Part I: TTP in Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months
Part I: PFS in ITT Population
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months
Part II: TTP in Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
End of first 2 Cycles (Weeks 3 and 6), every 3 Cycles for 18 weeks, then every 4 cycles until progression, unacceptable toxicity or participant decision to cease treatment up to 46 months
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationNA
MaskingNONE
ModelSINGLE_GROUP
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
1EXPERIMENTAL -

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
Standard taxane therapyDRUGAs prescribed
capecitabine [Xeloda]DRUG1000mg/m2 po bid on days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle (only in patients who have progressed)
trastuzumab [Herceptin]DRUG8mg/kg iv loading dose on day 1 of first 3-week cycle, and 6mg/kg iv on day 1 of each subsequent cycle
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range18 Years to N/A
SexFEMALE
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites13

Inclusion Criteria: * female patients, \>=18 years of age; * HER2-positive breast cancer; * al least one metastatic site amenable for core biopsy; * left ventricular ejection fraction \>50%. Exclusion Criteria: * prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant Herceptin within past 6 months; * prior adjuvant taxane t...

Countries:AustraliaSpainSwedenUnited Kingdom
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Competitive Landscape -Breast Cancer 402 trials

Top 20 of 92 competitors

CompanyTickerTrialsLead PhaseDrugs
AstraZeneca PLCAZN47PHASE3Fulvestrant, Capivasertib
Merck & Co., Inc.MRK12PHASE3Pembrolizumab, Paclitaxel, Doxorubicin, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide
Eli Lilly and CompanyLLY27PHASE3Abemaciclib, Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy
BioNTech SE Sponsored ADRBNTX7PHASE3DB-1303/BNT323, T-DM1
Gilead Sciences, Inc.GILD13PHASE3Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy, Eribulin, Capecitabine Product, Gemcitabine, Vinorelbine
Novartis AG Sponsored ADRNVS30PHASE3Ribociclib
Pfizer Inc.PFE34PHASE3ARV-471, Fulvestrant
BeOne Medicines Ltd. Sponsored ADRONC5PHASE3BGB-43395, Letrozole, Abemaciclib, Palbociclib, Ribociclib
Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc.OLMA5PHASE3Palazestrant, Fulvestrant, Anastrozole, Letrozole, Exemestane
Jazz Pharmaceuticals Public Limited CompanyJAZZ3PHASE3Zanidatamab, Trastuzumab, Eribulin, Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine
Celcuity Inc.CELC3PHASE3Gedatolisib, Palbociclib, Fulvestrant, Alpelisib
Relay Therapeutics, Inc.RLAY2PHASE3Zovegalisib, Capivasertib, Fulvestrant
GSK plc Sponsored ADRGSK2PHASE3Niraparib
Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc.GLSI1PHASE3GLSI-100
Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyBMY5PHASE2Iza-bren, Nab-paclitaxel, Paclitaxel, Capecitabine, Carboplatin
BriaCell Therapeutics CorpBCTX2PHASE3SV-BR-1-GM, Cyclophosphamide, Interferon infiltration of the inoculation site, Retifanlimab, Treatment of Physician's Choice
Incyte CorporationINCY4PHASE2Ruxolitinib, Capecitabine, Regorafenib
Natera, Inc.NTRA3PHASE2Discontinuation of the anti-HER2 maintenance therapy
Puma Biotechnology, Inc.PBYI3PHASE2Neratinib, Loperamide, Colesevelam
Atossa Therapeutics, Inc.ATOS1PHASE2endoxifen, goserelin
Unlock Competitive Intelligence

Frequently asked questions about Standard taxane therapy

What is Standard taxane therapy used for in breast cancer?

Standard taxane therapy is a small molecule oncology treatment studied for use in breast cancer. It was evaluated in a Phase 2 clinical trial for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The trial has been completed, and the therapy remains investigational for this indication.

Who makes Standard taxane therapy?

Standard taxane therapy is developed by Roche Holding AG, which trades under the ticker RHHBY. The company conducted a Phase 2 clinical trial of the therapy in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The trial has been completed.

What phase is Standard taxane therapy in?

Standard taxane therapy is in Phase 2 clinical development for breast cancer. It has completed one Phase 2 trial, which was an uncontrolled study of 33 female patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The therapy is investigational and not yet approved.

What clinical trials is Standard taxane therapy in?

Standard taxane therapy has been studied in one completed clinical trial, NCT00885755, titled 'A Study of Herceptin (Trastuzumab) and Biomarkers in Patients With HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.' This Phase 2 trial enrolled 33 female patients aged 18 years and older across Australia, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.

Is Standard taxane therapy the same as Herceptin?

Standard taxane therapy is not the same as Herceptin (trastuzumab). The completed clinical trial NCT00885755 studied Standard taxane therapy in combination with Herceptin and biomarkers in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Standard taxane therapy is a separate small molecule treatment.