Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Isentress

Phase 4FDA approved 2011

HIV Infections | Small molecule | Infectious Disease |Merck & Company, Inc.|Trials Updated: Apr 13, 2026

Isentress development status

FDA approval Dec 21, 2011
Approval holderMsd Sub Merck
ApplicationNDA203045
Highest phase Phase 4 (NCT02210715)
Phase scored for MRKPhase 3
Registered trials 47 across 27 sponsors since Aug 2002

Label indication Adult Patients: ISENTRESS and ISENTRESS HD are human immunodeficiency virus integrase strand transfer inhibitors (HIV- FDA label

Isentress target and mechanism

ModalitySmall molecule

Also known as Raltegravir

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedNO_TREATMENT_CONTROLLED
Total Trials10
Total Enrollment1,082

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

Isentress clinical trials

Isentress · 10 trials · 6 indications

Phase 3 5Phase 2 1Phase 1 4
NCT00935480IntensVIH: Impact Of Therapy Intensification By An Integrase Inhibitor +/- CCR5 Inhibitor On The Lymphoid Reservoir For Hiv-1 In Chronically Infected PatientsHIV Infections
COMPLETED17 Analytics
NCT01453192Renal Transplantation and Raltegravir in HIV-Infected PatientsHIV-1 Infection
COMPLETED27 Analytics
NCT00764946A Study of Raltegravir in a Diverse Cohort of HIV-Infected Patients (0518-055)Human Immunodeficiency Virus
COMPLETED209 Analytics
NCT00293254A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Raltegravir (MK0518) in HIV-Infected Patients Failing Current Antiretroviral Therapies (0518-019)HIV Infections
COMPLETED351 Analytics
NCT00293267A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Raltegravir (MK0518) in HIV-Infected Patients Failing Current Antiretroviral Therapies (MK0518-018 EXT2)HIV Infections
COMPLETED352 Analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
IntensVIH: Impact Of Therapy Intensification By An Integrase Inhibitor +/- CCR5 Inhibitor On The Lymphoid Reservoir For Hiv-1 In Chronically Infected Patients
HIV InfectionsUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Renal Transplantation and Raltegravir in HIV-Infected Patients
HIV-1 InfectionUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study of Raltegravir in a Diverse Cohort of HIV-Infected Patients (0518-055)
Human Immunodeficiency VirusUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Raltegravir (MK0518) in HIV-Infected Patients Failing Current Antiretroviral Therapies (0518-019)
HIV InfectionsUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Raltegravir (MK0518) in HIV-Infected Patients Failing Current Antiretroviral Therapies (MK0518-018 EXT2)
HIV InfectionsUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

residual plasma replication between 0 and 50 copies/ml
one year
intracellular HIV RNA levels in circulating lymphocytes (PBMC) and lymphocytes in gut-associated rectal lymphoid tissue (RL
one year
proviral HIV DNA levels in PBMC and RL
one year
Incidence of acute clinical renal graft rejection
6 months

Incidence of acute clinical renal graft rejection defined by 20% increase of serum creatinine, associated to histological features (Banff classification) 6 months after renal transplantation

Number of Participants Who Achieved HIV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/mL at Week 48
Week 48

Numbers of participants with HIV RNA copies \<50 copies/mL were summarized by race for each time point.

Number of Participants With One or More Adverse Events
Week 48

Numbers of participants with one or more adverse events were summarized by race.

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to an Adverse Event
Week 48

Numbers of participants who discontinued due to an adverse event were summarized by race.

Percentage of Participants Achieving HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 16
16 Weeks

Percentage of participants who achieved HIV RNA \<400 copies/mL at Week 16

Percentage of Participants Achieving HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL at Week 48
48 Weeks

Percentage of participants who achieved HIV RNA \<400 copies/mL at Week 48

Double-Blind Extension - Week 156: Percentage of Participants Achieving HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL
156 Weeks

Percentage of participants who achieved HIV RNA \<400 copies/mL at Week 156

Open-Label Extension - Week 240: Percentage of Participants Achieving HIV RNA <400 Copies/mL
240 Weeks

Percentage of participants who achieved HIV RNA \<400 Copies/mL at Week 240

Change in alkaline phosphatase levels
12 months

Mean changes in alkaline phosphatase levels after 12 months treatment with combination antiretroviral therapy or placebo.

Change in exposure to TMC278 following co-administration with raltegravir and vice versa
Measured on Days 5, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 (TrtC). Reference for exposure to raltegravir only (TrtB), measured on Days 1, 2, 3, and 4. Reference for exposure to TMC278 only (TrtA), measured on Days 1, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hrs (AUC 0-24hr) of Raltegravir Following Once Daily Administration of Raltegravir
Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

In Period 1 participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir alone; followed by Period 2 where participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir and three tablets of TUMS Ultra Strength (US) 1000 taken orally concomitantly; followed by Period 3 where participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir and 12 hours later with 20 mL Leader Antacid Maximum Strength (MS) taken orally; followed by Period 4 where participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir and 12 hours later with three tablets of TUMS US 1000 taken orally. The wait between Periods was a maximum of 7 days, during which participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir once daily. To determine the plasma concentration of raltegravir, blood samples were collected from pre-dose up to 24 hours post-dose, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) modeling was performed on natural log-transformed values to derive geometric least-squares means.

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Raltegravir Following Once Daily Administration of Raltegravir
Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

In Period 1 participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir alone; followed by Period 2 where participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir and three tablets of TUMS US 1000 taken orally concomitantly; followed by Period 3 where participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir and 12 hours later with 20 mL Leader Antacid MS taken orally; followed by Period 4 where participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir and 12 hours later with three tablets of TUMS US 1000 taken orally. The wait between Periods was a maximum of 7 days, during which participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir once daily. To determine the plasma concentration of raltegravir, blood samples were collected from pre-dose up to 24 hours post-dose, and ANOVA modeling was performed on natural log-transformed values to derive geometric least-squares means.

Plasma Concentration at 24 Hrs Post-dose (C24hr) of Raltegravir Following Once Daily Administration of Raltegravir
24 hours post-dose

In Period 1 participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir alone; followed by Period 2 where participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir and three tablets of TUMS US 1000 taken orally concomitantly; followed by Period 3 where participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir and 12 hours later with 20 mL Leader Antacid MS taken orally; followed by Period 4 where participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir and 12 hours later with three tablets of TUMS US 1000 taken orally. The wait between Periods was a maximum of 7 days, during which participants were treated with 1200 mg raltegravir once daily. To determine the plasma concentration of raltegravir, blood samples were collected at 24 hours post-dose, and ANOVA modeling was performed on natural log-transformed values to derive geometric least-squares means.

Plasma Concentration of Raltegravir at 12 Hours (C 12 Hrs) in Part 1
12 hours after dosing on Day 1 of each period

Blood was drawn 12 hours after dosing with raltegravir in order to determine the geometric mean plasma concentration.

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC 0-12 Hrs) of Raltegravir in Part 1
Predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose on Day 1 of each period

Blood was drawn at time 0, and at various intervals up to 12 hours after dosing with raltegravir in order to determine the geometric mean area under the curve plasma concentration versus time.

Maximum Plasma Concentration (C Max) of Raltegravir in Part 1
Predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose on Day 1 of each period

Blood was drawn at time 0, and at various intervals up to 12 hours after dosing with raltegravir, in order to determine the geometric mean maximum plasma concentration.

Plasma Concentration of Raltegravir at 12 Hours (C 12 Hrs) in Part 2
12 hours after dosing on Day 1 of each period

Blood was drawn 12 hours after dosing with raltegravir in order to determine the geometric mean plasma concentration.

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC 0-12 Hrs) of Raltegravir in Part 2
Predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose on Day 1 of each period

Blood was drawn at time 0, and at various intervals up to 12 hours after dosing with raltegravir, in order to determine the geometric mean area under the curve plasma concentration versus time.

Maximum Plasma Concentration (C Max) of Raltegravir in Part 2
Predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose on Day 1 of each period

Blood was drawn at time 0, and at various intervals up to 12 hours after dosing with raltegravir, in order to determine the geometric mean maximum plasma concentration.

Least Squares Mean Steady State Plasma Concentration (C12hrs) of Raltegravir After Coadministration of Antacid (Primary Hypothesis)
12 hours postdose

Participant blood samples were collected to measure the steady state plasma concentration of raltegravir 12 hours after administration alone or with a single dose of antacid. The primary hypothesis compared C12hrs of raltegravir when administered alone with C12hrs of raltegravir when coadministered with TUMS® or MINTOX®.

Least Squares Mean Steady State Plasma Concentration (C12hrs) of Raltegravir After Staggered Administration of Antacid (Secondary Hypothesis)
12 hours postdose

Participant blood samples were collected to measure the steady state plasma concentration of raltegravir 12 hours after administration alone or before or after a single dose of antacid. The secondary hypothesis compared C12hrs of raltegravir when administered alone with C12hrs of raltegravir when administered 2 hours before or after MINTOX®.

Least Squares Mean Steady State Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC0-12hrs) of Raltegravir After Coadministration of Antacid (Primary Hypothesis)
Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Participant blood samples were collected to measure the steady state AUC of raltegravir up to 12 hours after administration alone or with a single dose of antacid. The primary hypothesis compared AUC0-12hrs of raltegravir when administered alone with AUC0-12hrs of raltegravir when coadministered with TUMS® or MINTOX®.

Least Squares Mean Steady State Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time (AUC0-12hrs) of Raltegravir After Staggered Administration of Antacid (Secondary Hypothesis)
Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Participant blood samples were collected to measure the steady state AUC of raltegravir up to 12 hours after administration alone or before or after a single dose of antacid. The secondary hypothesis compared AUC0-12hrs of raltegravir when administered alone with AUC0-12hrs of raltegravir when administered 2 hours before or after MINTOX®.

Least Squares Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Raltegravir After Coadministration of Antacid (Primary Hypothesis)
Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Participant blood samples were collected to measure the steady state maximum plasma concentration of raltegravir when administered alone or with a single dose of antacid. The primary hypothesis compared Cmax of raltegravir when administered alone with Cmax of raltegravir when coadministered with TUMS® or MINTOX®.

Least Squares Mean Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Raltegravir After Staggered Administration of Antacid (Secondary Hypothesis)
Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Participant blood samples were collected to measure the maximum steady state plasma concentration of raltegravir after administration alone or before or after a single dose of antiacid. The secondary hypothesis compared Cmax of raltegravir when administered alone with Cmax of raltegravir when administered 2 hours before or after MINTOX®.

Mean Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Raltegravir
Predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Participant blood samples were collected to measure the time to achieve the maximum steady state plasma concentration of raltegravir when administered alone or with a single dose of antacid

Number of Participants With Any Clinical or Laboratory Adverse Event (AE)
Up to 7 days after the last dose of study drug

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the study drug is also an adverse experience.

Secondary Endpoints

CD4 counts
one year
CD8 activation levels
one year
Incidence of acute clinical and subclinical renal graft rejection
1 year
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingNONE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
HAART+Raltegravir 12 months (+/-) MaravirocEXPERIMENTAL -
HAARTNO_INTERVENTION -
RaltegravirEXPERIMENTALRaltegravir associated to an antiretroviral regimen without ritonavir boosted antiprotease
1EXPERIMENTALraltegravir
2PLACEBO_COMPARATORPlacebo
Emtricitabine (FTC)/Tenofovir Disoproxil (TDF) & RaltegravirEXPERIMENTALone Emtricitabine 200mg and Tenofovir Disoproxil 300mg tablet two Raltegravir 600mg tablets
PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATORIdentical tablets resembling one Emtricitabine 200mg and Tenofovir Disoproxil 300mg tablet two Raltegravir 600mg tablets
001EXPERIMENTALTMC278 One 25 mg tablet once daily for 11 days (TrtA and C)
002EXPERIMENTALRaltegravir One 400 mg tablet twice daily for 4 days (Trt B) and for 11 days (TrtC)
Raltegravir Pre- and 4 Period SequenceEXPERIMENTALStarting five days prior to Period 1 participants will be treated with 1200 mg raltegravir, once daily for five days. In Period 1 participants will be treated with 1200 raltegravir alone; this is followed by Period 2 where participants will be treated with 1200 mg raltegravir and TUMS concomitantly; this is followed by Period 3 where participants will be treated with 1200 mg raltegravir and 12 hours later with Leader Antacid; followed by Period 4 where participants will be treated with 1200 mg raltegravir and 12 hours later with TUMS. The wait between Periods is 2-7 days.
Ralt→MAL4Ralt→Ralt4MAL→MAL6Ralt→Ralt6MALEXPERIMENTALPart 1 was comprised of periods 1, 2 and 3; Part 2 was comprised of periods 4 and 5; with each study period separated by a washout period of at least 2 days. Part 1 was separated from Part 2 by a Pause. Each period had single oral dose treatments as follows: Raltegravir (Ralt) alone in Period 1, MAALOX (MAL) followed 4 hrs later by Ralt in Period 2, Ralt followed 4 hrs later by MAL in Period 3, MAL followed 6 hrs later by Ralt in Period 4, Ralt followed 6 hrs later by MAL in Period 5
MAL4Ralt→Ralt4MAL→Ralt→MAL6Ralt→Ralt6MALEXPERIMENTALPart 1 was comprised of periods 1, 2 and 3; Part 2 was comprised of periods 4 and 5; with each study period separated by a washout period of at least 2 days. Part 1 was separated from Part 2 by a Pause. Each period had single oral dose treatments as follows: MAL followed 4 hrs later by Ralt in Period 1, Ralt followed 4 hrs later by MAL in Period 2, Ralt alone in Period 3, MAL followed 6 hrs later by Ralt in Period 4, Ralt followed 6 hrs later by MAL in Period 5
Ralt4MAL→Ralt→MAL4Ralt→MAL6Ralt→Ralt6MALEXPERIMENTALPart 1 was comprised of periods 1, 2 and 3; Part 2 was comprised of periods 4 and 5; with each study period separated by a washout period of at least 2 days. Part 1 was separated from Part 2 by a Pause. Each period had single oral dose treatments as follows: Ralt followed 4 hrs later by MAL in Period 1, Ralt alone in Period 2, MAL followed 4 hrs later by Ralt in Period 3, MAL followed 6 hrs later by Ralt in Period 4, Ralt followed 6 hrs later by MAL in Period 5
Ralt→Ralt4MAL→MAL4Ralt→Ralt6MAL→MAL6RaltEXPERIMENTALPart 1 was comprised of periods 1, 2 and 3; Part 2 was comprised of periods 4 and 5; with each study period separated by a washout period of at least 2 days. Part 1 was separated from Part 2 by a Pause. Each period had single oral dose treatments as follows: Ralt alone in Period 1, Ralt followed 4 hrs later by MAL in Period 2, MAL followed 4 hrs later by Ralt in Period 3, Ralt followed 6 hrs later by MAL in Period 4, MAL followed 6 hrs later by Ralt in Period 5
MAL4Ralt→Ralt→Ralt4MAL→Ralt6MAL→MAL6RaltEXPERIMENTALPart 1 was comprised of periods 1, 2 and 3; Part 2 was comprised of periods 4 and 5; with each study period separated by a washout period of at least 2 days. Part 1 was separated from Part 2 by a Pause. Each period had single oral dose treatments as follows: MAL followed 4 hrs later by Ralt in Period 1, Ralt alone in Period 2, Ralt followed 4 hrs later by MAL in Period 3, Ralt followed 6 hrs later by MAL in Period 4, MAL followed 6 hrs later by Ralt in Period 5
Ralt4MAL→MAL4Ralt→Ralt→Ralt6MAL→MAL6RaltEXPERIMENTALPart 1 was comprised of periods 1, 2 and 3; Part 2 was comprised of periods 4 and 5; with each study period separated by a washout period of at least 2 days. Part 1 was separated from Part 2 by a Pause. Each period had single oral dose treatments as follows: Ralt followed 4 hrs later by MAL in Period 1, MAL followed 4 hrs later by Ralt in Period 2, Ralt alone in Period 3, Ralt followed 6 hrs later by MAL in Period 4, MAL followed 6 hrs later by Ralt in Period 5
RAL, TUMS+RAL, MINTOX+RAL, MINTOX Before RAL, MINTOX After RALEXPERIMENTALParticipants received Raltegravir in treatment period 1, followed by TUMS® + Raltegravir in treatment period 2, followed by MINTOX® + Raltegravir in treatment period 3, followed by MINTOX® 2 hours before Raltegravir in treatment period 4, followed by MINTOX® 2 hours After Raltegravir in treatment period 5. There was a 2-day washout between treatment periods.
TUMS+RAL, MINTOX+RAL, RAL, MINTOX Before RAL, MINTOX After RALEXPERIMENTALParticipants received TUMS® + Raltegravir in treatment period 1, followed by MINTOX® + Raltegravir in treatment period 2, followed by Raltegravir in treatment period 3, followed by MINTOX® 2 hours before Raltegravir in treatment period 4, followed by MINTOX® 2 hours after Raltegravir in treatment period 5. There was a minimum 2-day washout between treatment periods.
MINTOX+RAL, RAL, TUMS+RAL, MINTOX Before RAL, MINTOX After RALEXPERIMENTALParticipants received MINTOX® + Raltegravir in treatment period 1, followed by Raltegravir in treatment period 2, followed by TUMS® + Raltegravir in treatment period 3, followed by MINTOX® 2 hours before Raltegravir in treatment period 4, followed by MINTOX® 2 hours after Raltegravir in treatment period 5. There was a minimum 2-day washout between treatment periods.
RAL, MINTOX+RAL, TUMS+RAL, MINTOX After RAL, MINTOX Before RALEXPERIMENTALParticipants received Raltegravir in treatment period 1, followed by MINTOX® + Raltegravir in treatment period 2, followed by TUMS® + Raltegravir in treatment period 3, followed by MINTOX® 2 hours after Raltegravir in treatment period 4, followed by MINTOX® 2 hours before Raltegravir in treatment period 5. There was a minimum 2-day washout between treatment periods.
TUMS+RAL, RAL, MINTOX+RAL, MINTOX After RAL, MINTOX Before RALEXPERIMENTALParticipants received TUMS® + Raltegravir in treatment period 1, followed by Raltegravir in treatment period 2, followed by MINTOX® + Raltegravir in treatment period 3, followed by MINTOX® 2 hours after Raltegravir in treatment period 4, followed by MINTOX® 2 hours before Raltegravir in treatment period 5. There was a minimum 2-day washout between treatment periods.
MINTOX+RAL, TUMS+RAL, RAL, MINTOX After RAL, MINTOX Before RALEXPERIMENTALParticipants received MINTOX® + Raltegravir in treatment period 1, followed by TUMS® + Raltegravir in treatment period 2, followed by Raltegravir in treatment period 3, followed by MINTOX® 2 hours after Raltegravir in treatment period 4, followed by MINTOX® 2 hours before Raltegravir in treatment period 5. There was a minimum 2-day washout between treatment periods.

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
Isentress®DRUGP.O, 1 tablet containing 400 mg every 12 hours
Celsentri®DRUGp.o.: 1 tablet containing 150 mg morning and evening (due to combination with PI/r) or containing 300 mg if fosamprenavir/r is used as the PI (MA)
RaltegravirDRUGIntroduction of Raltegravir 2 days after renal transplantation within an antiretroviral regimen without ritonavir boosted antiprotease
Comparator: raltegravirDRUG400 mg tablets taken twice daily. Total treatment period is 48 weeks.
raltegravir potassiumDRUGRaltegravir 400 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) by mouth (p.o.) with optimized background therapy. Treatment period of 48 weeks.
Comparator: placeboDRUGPlacebo p.o. b.i.d. with optimized background therapy. Treatment period of 48 weeks.
Emtricitabine (FTC)/Tenofovir Disoproxil (TDF)DRUGEmtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/Tenofovir Disoproxil (TDF) 300 mg by mouth once per day
Placebo Oral Capsule [CEBOCAP]DRUGTwo capsules identical to Raltegravir and one capsule identical to Truvada with no active ingredients by mouth once per day
TMC278DRUGOne 25 mg tablet, once daily, for 11 days (TrtA and C)
Raltegravir 1200 mgDRUGTwo tablets of 600 mg raltegravir administered orally, once daily, over 5 days of Pre-treatment, and once at the start of Periods 1-4.
TUMSDRUGThree tablets of TUMS Ultra Strength (US) 1000, taken orally, concomitantly with raltegravir in Period 2, and 12 hours after raltegravir in Period 4
Leader AntacidDRUG20 mL Leader Antacid Maximum Strength (MS) taken orally 12 hours after raltegravir, in Period 3
Raltegravir (ISENTRESS™)DRUGRaltegravir 400 mg oral tablet once every 12 hours. Participants will continue with their other prescribed antiretroviral agents throughout the study.
MAALOX (MAL)DRUGMAL (or generic equivalent) 20 mL oral single dose on Day 1
TUMS® Ultra StrengthDRUG3 tablets TUMS® Ultra Strength (US) 1000 mg Throughout the study, participants will continue to take raltegravir every 12 hours along with their other HIV medications. There will be a minimum of 2 days washout between treatment periods. On the day of co-dosing and intensive PK sampling, raltegravir will be dosed in the morning in a fasted state in all periods.
MINTOX® Maximum StrengthDRUG20 mL MINTOX® Maximum Strength (MS) Throughout the study, participants will continue to take raltegravir every 12 hours along with their other HIV medications. There will be a minimum of 2 days washout between treatment periods. On the day of co-dosing and intensive PK sampling, raltegravir will be dosed in the morning in a fasted state in all periods.
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range18 Years to N/A
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites2

Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female patients, aged over 18 years * HIV infection confirmed by Western Blot * Karnofsky score \> 80% * Treatment-experienced patients having received combined antiretroviral therapy including at least 2 RTI and 1 PI/r for at least 12 months with plasma viral load \<5...

Countries:FranceCanada
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Frequently asked questions about Isentress

What is Isentress?

Isentress is a small molecule medicine developed by Merck & Company, Inc. (ticker MRK) for the treatment of HIV Infections. It is an infectious disease therapy studied in Phase 3 clinical development. It has been evaluated in a completed Phase 3 trial in chronically HIV-1 infected patients in France.

What is Isentress used for in HIV Infections?

Isentress is used for the treatment of HIV Infections. It is a small molecule antiviral developed by Merck & Company, Inc. (MRK) in the infectious disease therapeutic area. Its clinical development includes a completed Phase 3 study in chronically HIV-1 infected adults, where it was evaluated as part of therapy intensification.

Who makes Isentress?

Isentress is made by Merck & Company, Inc., which trades under the ticker MRK. Merck is the developer of the drug, a small molecule treatment for HIV Infections. The company sponsored the Phase 3 IntensVIH trial (NCT00935480) evaluating Isentress in chronically HIV-1 infected patients.

What phase is Isentress in?

Isentress is in Phase 3 clinical development for HIV Infections. One Phase 3 trial has been completed, and no active trials are currently listed. The completed study, IntensVIH (NCT00935480), enrolled 17 participants in France and evaluated therapy intensification in chronically HIV-1 infected patients.

What clinical trials is Isentress in?

Isentress has been studied in the Phase 3 IntensVIH trial, registered as NCT00935480. The trial evaluated therapy intensification with an integrase inhibitor, with or without a CCR5 inhibitor, on the lymphoid reservoir for HIV-1 in chronically infected patients. It enrolled 17 adults in France and is completed.

Is Isentress the same as Isentress®?

Yes, Isentress and Isentress® refer to the same medicine. Isentress® is the registered trademark form of the name, while Isentress is the plain-text version. Both refer to Merck's small molecule treatment for HIV Infections, developed under ticker MRK and studied in the Phase 3 IntensVIH trial.