WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) in past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (higher pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.

Physical function referred to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty.

The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.

The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.

The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.

The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.

Peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity was evaluated by electrical stimulation of the nerve and recorded the compound muscle action potential from surface electrodes overlying a muscle supplied by the nerve. Change from baseline in peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity at Week 16 was reported.

Peroneal motor nerve action potential amplitude was evaluated at ankle by electrical stimulation of the nerve and recorded the compound muscle action potential from surface electrodes overlying a muscle supplied by the nerve. Change from baseline in peroneal motor nerve action potential amplitude at Week 16 was reported.

Sural sensory nerve conduction velocity was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline in sural sensory nerve conduction velocity at Week 16 was reported.

Sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline in sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude at Week 16 was reported.

Ulnar sensory nerve conduction velocity was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline in ulnar sensory nerve conduction velocity at Week 16 was reported.

Ulnar sensory nerve action potential amplitude was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline ulnar sensory nerve action potential amplitude at Week 16 was reported.