Investigational medical product administered in parent study

Occipital-frontal head circumference of participants in centimeter (cm) was reported.

Occipital-frontal head circumference of participants in centimeter (cm) was reported.

Occipital-frontal head circumference of participants in centimeter (cm) was reported.

Occipital-frontal head circumference of participants in centimeter (cm) was reported.

Occipital-frontal head circumference of participants in cm was reported.

Occipital-frontal head circumference of participants in cm was reported.

Occipital-frontal head circumference of participants in cm was reported.

Occipital-frontal head circumference of participants in cm was reported.

Occipital-frontal head circumference of participants in cm was reported.

Body length of participants in cm was reported.

Body length of participants in cm was reported.

Body length of participants in cm was reported.

Body length of participants in cm was reported.

Body length of participants in cm was reported.

Body length of participants in cm was reported.

Body length of participants in cm was reported.

Body length of participants in cm was reported.

Body length of participants in cm was reported.

Body weight of participants in kilogram (kg) was reported.

Body weight of participants in kilogram (kg) was reported.

Body weight of participants in kilogram (kg) was reported.

Body weight of participants in kilogram (kg) was reported.

Body weight of participants in kg was reported.

Body weight of participants in kg was reported.

Body weight of participants in kg was reported.

Body weight of participants in kg was reported.

Body weight of participants in kg was reported.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of participants in millimeter of mercury (mmHg) was reported.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of participants in millimeter of mercury (mmHg) was reported.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of participants in millimeter of mercury (mmHg) was reported.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of participants in millimeter of mercury (mmHg) was reported.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of participants in mmHg was reported.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of participants in mmHg was reported.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of participants in mmHg was reported.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of participants in mmHg was reported.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure of participants in mmHg was reported.

Pulse rate of participants in beats per minute was reported.

Pulse rate of participants in beats per minute was reported.

Pulse rate of participants in beats per minute was reported.

Pulse rate of participants in beats per minute was reported.

Pulse rate of participants in beats per minute was reported.

Pulse rate of participants in beats per minute was reported.

Pulse rate of participants in beats per minute was reported.

Pulse rate of participants in beats per minute was reported.

Pulse rate of participants in beats per minute was reported.

Temperature of participants in degree Celsius was reported.

Temperature of participants in degree Celsius was reported.

Temperature of participants in degree Celsius was reported.

Temperature of participants in degree Celsius was reported.

Temperature of participants in degree Celsius was reported.

Temperature of participants in degree Celsius was reported.

Temperature of participants in degree Celsius was reported.

Temperature of participants in degree Celsius was reported.

Temperature of participants in degree Celsius was reported.

Respiratory rate of participants in breaths per minute was reported.

Respiratory rate of participants in breaths per minute was reported.

Respiratory rate of participants in breaths per minute was reported.

Respiratory rate of participants in breaths per minute was reported.

Respiratory rate of participants in breaths per minute was reported.

Respiratory rate of participants in breaths per minute was reported.

Respiratory rate of participants in breaths per minute was reported.

Respiratory rate of participants in breaths per minute was reported.

Respiratory rate of participants in breaths per minute was reported.

Neurologic examination evaluated all cranial nerves except I (smell), IX (taste) and XI (shoulder shrug). Motor examination included evaluation of muscle tone, bulk and movement. Sensory examination included test of temperature and superficial pain (homologous dermatomes using cold tuning fork, neurological examination pin) and deep pain by pressure on achilles tendon. Reflex evaluation included biceps, brachioradialis, patellar, and achilles tendons. Evaluation for persistence of developmental reflexes including Moro reflex, palmar and planter grasp, and tonic neck response was evaluated. Autonomic nervous system evaluation included examination of pupillary reaction, heart rate changes in response to activity, and inquiring about abnormal sweating. Abnormality was determined by the assessor.

Neurologic examination evaluated all cranial nerves except I (smell), IX (taste) and XI (shoulder shrug). Motor examination included evaluation of muscle tone, bulk and movement. Sensory examination included test of temperature and superficial pain (homologous dermatomes using cold tuning fork, neurological examination pin) and deep pain by pressure on achilles tendon. Reflex evaluation included biceps, brachioradialis, patellar, and achilles tendons. Evaluation for persistence of developmental reflexes including Moro reflex, palmar and planter grasp, and tonic neck response was evaluated. Autonomic nervous system evaluation included examination of pupillary reaction, heart rate changes in response to activity, and inquiring about abnormal sweating. Abnormality was determined by the assessor.

Neurologic examination evaluated all cranial nerves except I (smell), IX (taste) and XI (shoulder shrug). Motor examination included evaluation of muscle tone, bulk and movement. Sensory examination included test of temperature and superficial pain (homologous dermatomes using cold tuning fork, neurological examination pin) and deep pain by pressure on achilles tendon. Reflex evaluation included biceps, brachioradialis, patellar, and achilles tendons. Evaluation for persistence of developmental reflexes including Moro reflex, palmar and planter grasp, and tonic neck response was evaluated. Autonomic nervous system evaluation included examination of pupillary reaction, heart rate changes in response to activity, and inquiring about abnormal sweating. Abnormality was determined by the assessor.

Neurologic examination evaluated all cranial nerves except I (smell), IX (taste) and XI (shoulder shrug). Motor examination included evaluation of muscle tone, bulk and movement. Sensory examination included test of temperature and superficial pain (homologous dermatomes using cold tuning fork, neurological examination pin) and deep pain by pressure on achilles tendon. Reflex evaluation included biceps, brachioradialis, patellar, and achilles tendons. Evaluation for persistence of developmental reflexes including Moro reflex, palmar and planter grasp, and tonic neck response was evaluated. Autonomic nervous system evaluation included examination of pupillary reaction, heart rate changes in response to activity, and inquiring about abnormal sweating. Abnormality was determined by the assessor.

Neurologic examination evaluated all cranial nerves except I (smell), IX (taste) and XI (shoulder shrug). Motor examination included evaluation of muscle tone, bulk and movement. Sensory examination included test of temperature and superficial pain (homologous dermatomes using cold tuning fork, neurological examination pin) and deep pain by pressure on achilles tendon. Reflex evaluation included biceps, brachioradialis, patellar, and achilles tendons. Evaluation for persistence of developmental reflexes including Moro reflex, palmar and planter grasp, and tonic neck response was evaluated. Autonomic nervous system evaluation included examination of pupillary reaction, heart rate changes in response to activity, and inquiring about abnormal sweating. Abnormality was determined by the assessor.

BINS: a validated instrument designed specifically for a high-risk infant population. It consisted of 11-13 items for different age levels (11 items for participants aged from 3-4 months, 11-15 months, 16-20 months; 13 items for participants aged from 5-6 months, 7-10 months, 21-24 months) to assess cognitive, social, language, gross, and fine motor skills. Each item was scored on a range 0 = non-optimal performance to 1 = optimal performance; BINS total score was sum of scores of each item and it ranged for 11 items from 0 (non-optimal performance) to 11 (optimum performance) and for 13 items from 0 (non-optimal performance) to 13 (optimum performance), higher score indicated better performance.

BINS: a validated instrument designed specifically for a high-risk infant population. It consisted of 11-13 items for different age levels (11 items for participants aged from 3-4 months, 11-15 months, 16-20 months; 13 items for participants aged from 5-6 months, 7-10 months, 21-24 months) to assess cognitive, social, language, gross, and fine motor skills. Each item was scored on a range 0 = non-optimal performance to 1 = optimal performance; BINS total score was sum of scores of each item and it ranged for 11 items from 0 (non-optimal performance) to 11 (optimum performance) and for 13 items from 0 (non-optimal performance) to 13 (optimum performance), higher score indicated better performance.

BINS: a validated instrument designed specifically for a high-risk infant population. It consisted of 11-13 items for different age levels (11 items for participants aged from 3-4 months, 11-15 months, 16-20 months; 13 items for participants aged from 5-6 months, 7-10 months, 21-24 months) to assess cognitive, social, language, gross, and fine motor skills. Each item was scored on a range 0 = non-optimal performance to 1 = optimal performance; BINS total score was sum of scores of each item and it ranged for 11 items from 0 (non-optimal performance) to 11 (optimum performance) and for 13 items from 0 (non-optimal performance) to 13 (optimum performance), higher score indicated better performance.

BINS: a validated instrument designed specifically for a high-risk infant population. It consisted of 11-13 items for different age levels (11 items for participants aged from 3-4 months, 11-15 months, 16-20 months; 13 items for participants aged from 5-6 months, 7-10 months, 21-24 months) to assess cognitive, social, language, gross, and fine motor skills. Each item was scored on a range 0 = non-optimal performance to 1 = optimal performance; BINS total score was sum of scores of each item and it ranged for 11 items from 0 (non-optimal performance) to 11 (optimum performance) and for 13 items from 0 (non-optimal performance) to 13 (optimum performance), higher score indicated better performance. Data collected at age of 26 months used 24 months' age items.

REEL-3, was designed to identify infants and toddlers who had language impairments or who had other disabilities that affect language development. Caregiver answered interview questionnaire by pediatrician, pediatric neurologist or clinical psychologist for receptive language and expressive language subtests. Each of these 2 sub tests had 66 questions with answer of 'yes = 1' or 'no = 0'. Sum of receptive and expressive language subtests answers was used to calculate REEL-3 language ability total score, with following ranges: \<70 (very poor), 70-79 (poor), 80-89 (below average), 90-110 (average), 111-120 (above average), 121-130 (superior), and \>130 (very superior). Higher scores indicated better language ability.

REEL-3, was designed to identify infants and toddlers who had language impairments or who had other disabilities that affect language development. Caregiver answered interview questionnaire by pediatrician, pediatric neurologist or clinical psychologist for receptive language and expressive language subtests. Each of these 2 sub tests had 66 questions with answer of 'yes = 1' or 'no = 0'. Sum of receptive and expressive language subtests answers was used to calculate REEL-3 language ability total score, with following ranges: \<70 (very poor), 70-79 (poor), 80-89 (below average), 90-110 (average), 111-120 (above average), 121-130 (superior), and \>130 (very superior). Higher scores indicated better language ability.

REEL-3, was designed to identify infants and toddlers who had language impairments or who had other disabilities that affect language development. Caregiver answered interview questionnaire by pediatrician, pediatric neurologist or clinical psychologist for receptive language and expressive language subtests. Each of these 2 sub tests had 66 questions with answer of 'yes = 1' or 'no = 0'. Sum of receptive and expressive language subtests answers was used to calculate REEL-3 language ability total score, with following ranges: \<70 (very poor), 70-79 (poor), 80-89 (below average), 90-110 (average), 111-120 (above average), 121-130 (superior), and \>130 (very superior). Higher scores indicated better language ability.

REEL-3, was designed to identify infants and toddlers who had language impairments or who had other disabilities that affect language development. Caregiver answered interview questionnaire by pediatrician, pediatric neurologist or clinical psychologist for receptive language and expressive language subtests. Each of these 2 sub tests had 66 questions with answer of 'yes = 1' or 'no = 0'. Sum of receptive and expressive language subtests answers was used to calculate REEL-3 language ability total score, with following ranges: \<70 (very poor), 70-79 (poor), 80-89 (below average), 90-110 (average), 111-120 (above average), 121-130 (superior), and \>130 (very superior). Higher scores indicated better language ability.

Following the TJR surgery on Day 1, the orthopedic surgeon was asked to answer the following question: "taking into consideration the participant's medical history and physical condition prior to surgery would you classify the operative procedure as Uneventful, Minor complications or Major complications." Participants were reported based on these categories for knee, hip and shoulder joint. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

SAPS contained four questions; How satisfied are you with the 1) results of your surgery 2) results of surgery for improving pain 3) results of surgery for improving ability to do home or yard work, and 4) results of surgery for improving your ability to do recreational activities. Items scored on a 4-point Likert scale with response of 'very satisfied' (100 points), 'somewhat satisfied' (75 points), 'somewhat dissatisfied' (50 points), and 'very dissatisfied' (25 points). The scale score calculated as mean of the scores of individual items, ranging from 25 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. Here, number of participants are summarized as, satisfied (very satisfied and somewhat satisfied categories combined) and dissatisfied (somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied categories combined). Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

Post-surgical complications are adverse events occurring after TJR surgery that were considered clinically significant as assessed by investigator and attributable to the total joint replacement procedure. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

Participants were asked whether they had been told by their orthopedic surgeon that additional or corrective procedures were necessary for their total joint replacement. Participants, who responded as yes have been reported here. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

Participants responded with a yes or no to the following question ''are you participating in physical rehabilitation activities related to your replaced joint''. Participants responded with a yes, have been reported here. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

Participants assessed their average pain in to be replaced (pre-surgery) knee/ hip joint or in the replaced joint (post-surgery) in the past 24 hours using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicated higher pain. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA of to be replaced/replaced index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions. Scores for each question and WOMAC Pain subscale score on NRS ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to OA in the replaced/to be replaced index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS. Scores for each question and WOMAC stiffness subscale score on NRS ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (extreme stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in replaced/ to be replaced index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions, which may not be a whole (integer) number, scored on a NRS. Scores for each question and WOMAC physical function subscale score on NRS ranged from 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated extreme difficulty/worse physical function. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

SPADI: self-administered questionnaire to measure pain and disability associated with shoulder pathology in participants with shoulder pain. It consists of two dimensions pain and function. Pain dimension:5 questions regarding severity of pain, scores ranged from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable, higher scores indicated extreme pain. Functional activities:8 questions to measure degree of difficulty with various activities of daily living that require upper extremity use, scores ranged from 0=no difficulty to 10=so difficult it requires help, higher scores=extreme difficulty. Pain and disability dimension score was calculated as the sum of non-missing scores divided by the maximum possible score (50 \[for pain\] and 80 \[for disability\]) multiplied by 100. A total score was calculated as the mean of two dimensions, ranged from 0=best to 100=worst, higher scores indicated worsening of condition.