Everolimus

The patients will be followed continuously for tolerability (i.e adverse events, serious adverse events)

Incidence of oral mucositis in Grade 1 or more, is evaluated by an oncologist.

Renal function was assessed by eGFR using the MDRD-4 formula at 12 months after transplant: eGFR = 186.3 \* (serum creatinine)-1.154 \* age-0.203 \* (0.742 for women) \* (1.21 if African American) where serum creatinine was in mg/dL and age in years.

Rate of composite efficacy failure of treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR ≥ RAI score 3), graft loss (GL) or death (D) in everolimus with reduced tacrolimus group compared to standard tacrolimus at 12 months

Comparison of response rates in the everolimus low-trough treatment arm (3-7 ng/mL), high-trough treatment arm (9-15 ng/mL) and placebo arm. Response means at least a 50% reduction from baseline in partial-onset seizure frequency during the maintenance period of the core phase.

Comparison of median percent change from baseline in weekly seizure frequency in the everolimus low-trough treatment arm (3-7 ng/mL), high-trough treatment arm (9-15 ng/mL) and placebo arm during maintenance period of the core phase. Percentage change from baseline in average weekly seizure frequency during the maintenance period of the Core phase (SFcfb) = 100 × (SFB - SFM) ÷ SFB where: SFB is the average weekly seizure frequency in the Baseline phase SFM is the average weekly seizure frequency in the maintenance period of the Core phase A positive percentage change from baseline (SFcfb) means a reduction in seizure frequency whereas a negative percentage change from baseline (SFcfb) means an increase in seizure frequency.

Adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), changes from baseline in vital signs and laboratory results (hematology, blood chemistry, lipid profile) qualifying and reported as AEs. Although a patient might had two or more adverse events the patient is only counted once in a category. The same patient might appear in different categories. AESI: Adverse events of special interest.

To demonstrate non-inferiority in renal function assessed by glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell formula) in at least one of the Certican® treatment regimens compared to the standard regimen group at month 12 post-transplantation in renal transplant patients. Nankivell formula: GFR = 6.7/Scr + BW/4 - Surea/2 - 100/(height)² + C where Scr is the serum creatinine concentration expressed in mmol/L, BW the body weight in kg, Surea the serum urea in mmol/L, height in m, and the constant C is 35 for male and 25 for female patients. The eGFR is expressed in mL/min per 1.73m². If a patient was on dialysis at the time of urea or creatinine assessment, the eGFR was set to 0. Analysis set = per protocol set

Change in renal function was measured by change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). GFR calculated using the abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease (aMDRD) formula. GFR in mL/min/1.73m\^2 for men of non-black ethnicity: 186 \* \[C/88\]\^-1.154 \* \[A\]\^-0.023\*G\*R ; C = serum creatinine (in μmol/L); A = Age (in years). G = 0.742 when the patient is a women; Otherwise G=1 R= 1.21 when the patient was of black ethnicity; Otherwise R = 1 Baseline was Day 28 visit.

To estimate the rate of the composite efficacy endpoint of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss or death at 12 months post transplantation in primary paediatric kidney transplant recipients converted at 4-6 weeks post-transplantation from MMF + standard TAC regimen and steroids, to everolimus + reduced dose TAC regimen and steroid withdrawal at 6 months, versus continuation of MMF + standard TAC regimen and steroids.

To evaluate renal function assessed by Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) estimated by the Schwartz Formula (abbreviated) (Schwartz, 2009).

The Overall response rate (ORR) is the proportion of patients with a best overall response of confirmed complete (CR) or partial (PR) response by Week 24. The best overall response is determined from the sequence of investigator overall lesion responses according to RECIST 1.1. To be assigned a best overall response of CR at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression are required. To be assigned a best overall response of PR at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression (and not qualifying for a CR) are required.

PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Progression was defined using modified RECIST 1.0 and as per central radiology assessment as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. Progression was assessed by cat scan (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For participants who had not progressed or died at the analysis cut-off date, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation date. An adequate tumour assessment is a tumour assessment with an overall response other than unknown. The percentage event-free probability estimate is the estimated probability that a patient will remain event-free in PFS up to the specified time point.

Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) according to Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD EPI) at 12 months The CKD-EPI equation, expressed as a single equation, is GFR = 141 × min(Scr/κ, 1)α × max(Scr/κ, 1)\^-1.209 × 0.993Age × 1.018 (if female) × 1.159 (if black), where Scr is serum creatinine, κ is 0.7 for females and 0.9 for males, α is -0.329 for females and -0.411 for males, min indicates the minimum of Scr/ĸ or 1, and max indicates the maximum of Scr/κ or 1

The percentage of participants without wound healing complications was assessed. Wound healing complications consisted of lymphorrhea, fluid collections, wound dehiscence, wound infections and incisional hernia. In the worst-case scenario, failure, i.e. at least one healing complication occurrence, was identified in one of the following cases: wound complication occurrence, missing information about wound complication occurrence, or study discontinuation due to any reason.

Assessment of renal function by comparing change from randomization to Month 12 in eGFR (MDRD4) between treatment arms (Full analysis set). Renal function was assessed by estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. MDRD formula: GFR \[mL/min/1.73m˄2\] = 186.3\*(C˄-1.154)\*(A˄-0.203)\*G\*R. DEFINITIONS: C = serum concentration of creatinine \[mg/dL\]; A = age \[years\]; G = 0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G = 1; R = 1.21 when race is black, otherwise R = 1

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. The comparison of OS between the 2 arms was done using a stratified log-rank test at one-sided 2.5% level of significance.

The number of participants who experienced composite efficacy failure was analyzed. Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death. A BPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.

The number of participants who experienced graft loss or death was analyzed. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.

Change in renal function was assessed by the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) using the abbreviated (4 variables) Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4) formula which was developed by the MDRD Study Group and has been validated in patients with chronic kidney disease. The MDRD-4 formula used for the eGFR calculation is: eGFR (mL/min/1.73m\^2) = 186.3\*(C\^-1.154)\*(A\^-0.203)\*G\*R, where C is the serum concentration of creatinine (mg/dL), A is age (years), G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1, R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1.

Efficacy failure rate used the composite endpoint of: (1) treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR)\*, (2) graft loss\*\*, (3) participant death or(4) loss to follow-up. \*A treated BPAR was defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III and which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. \*\*Graft loss is defined as when the allograft was presumed lost on the day the participant started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis.

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS primary analysis performed when 415 events were reached. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. This was assessed in the full patient population.

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. This was assessed in the HR-negative patient population.

Participants were assessed for SEGA response, defined as 50% reduction from baseline in SEGA volume (where SEGA volume was the sum of the volumes of all target SEGA lesions identified at baseline, and confirmed with a second scan performed approximately 12 weeks later), no unequivocal worsening of non-target SEGA lesions, no new SEGA lesions (≥ 1 cm in longest diameter), and no new or worsening hydrocephalus. Multi-phase brain MRI was utilized to identify SEGA lesions. SEGA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose best overall status was SEGA response as determined by Independent Central Radiology Review. The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for determining time to SEGA response.

DFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of event defined as the first documented relapse of the disease or death due to any cause. Relapse was based on investigator assessment and was assigned only if: It was documented according to Cheson guidelines by an objective radiological assessment method; It was documented by a biopsy proven lymphoma including new or recurrent bone marrow involvement; A new anticancer therapy for lymphoma started with subsequent confirmation of the relapse within 4 weeks of the start of this anticancer therapy

Progression-free survival, the primary endpoint in this study, is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented radiological progression or death due to any cause. Disease progression was based on the tumor assessment by the local radiologist or investigator using RECIST 1.0 criteria. If a patient did not progress or known to have died at the date of the analysis cut-off or start of another antineoplastic therapy, the PFS date was censored to the date of last adequate tumor assessment prior to cut-off date or start of antineoplastic therapy. For patients with lytic or mixed (lytic+sclerotic) bone lesions, the following is considered progression: appearance of ≥1 new lytic lesions in bone; the appearance of ≥ new lesions outside of bone and unequivocal progression of existing bone lesions.

Occurrence or not of treatment failure in each patient. Treatment failure was defined as a composite endpoint of biopsy-proven acute rejection (a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III according to Banff '97 grading with 2007 update), graft loss, death or lost to follow-up occurring after randomization (V5) and within M12 (V9).

Angiomyolipoma response defined as the combination of the following criteria: reduction in angiomyolipoma volume of ≥ 50% relative to baseline, where angiomyolipoma volume was sum of volumes of all target lesions identified at baseline, and with a confirmatory scan performed approximately 12 weeks later (no sooner than 8 weeks later); no new angiomyolipoma lesions ≥ 1.0 cm in longest diameter were identified; there were no kidney increases in volume \> 20% from nadir. The patient did not have any angiomyolipoma-related bleeding of ≥ grade 2. For the everolimus (core/extension periods) treatment group, the baseline means the latest value on or before starting everolimus.

The composite efficacy endpoint consisted of treated biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) episodes, graft loss, death or loss to follow-up. A treated BPAR was defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III and which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient starts dialysis and was not able to stop dialysis. If the patient underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was considered as the day of graft loss. For the individual components (including loss of follow-up)of the composite endpoint, patients are counted for the first event to occur.

Renal function was assessed by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using the MDRD formula: GFR \[mL/min/1.73m2\] = 186.3\*(C-1.154)\*(A-0.203)\*G\*R C is the serum concentration of creatinine \[mg/dL\] A is age \[years\] G = 0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1 R = 1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1 Loss to follow up (in In Primary Core Outcome Measure) is composite efficacy failure and contains incidence of treated BPAR, graft loss, death or loss to follow-up

Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death. A BPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, they received a graft re-transplant, or they died. The incidence rates of composite efficacy failure were estimated with a Kaplan-Meier product-limit formula.

Demonstrate superiority of CNI-Free vs Standard Regimen in GFR using the Nankivell formula (GFR = 6.7 / Scr + BW / 4 - Surea / 2-100 / (height)² + C where where Scr is the serum creatinine concentration expressed in mmol/L, BW the body weight in kilograms, Surea the serum urea in mmol/L, height in m, and the constant C is 35 for male and 25 for female patients. The calculated GFR is expressed in mL/min per 1.73m², last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for imputation of missing values, ANCOVA model, with treatment, center, donor type (deceased vs. living) as factors and BL2-value at V4/M3/BL2 as covariate. P-values are not adjusted

Progression of disease is defined as the time from study start to the date of first documented progression of disease or death due to any cause. Progression of disease is defined by RECIST criteria: Progression = 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, from the smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline; or a new lesion; or progression of non-target lesions.

Progression Free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death from any cause. The primary statistical analysis of PFS was based on central radiological assessments using a one-sided stratified log-rank test. Radiological assessments: every 8 weeks (+/-1 week) during the first year and every 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) during the second year and thereafter and at the end of the study. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate the median PFS for each treatment group.

Primary efficacy endpoint: between treatment analysis of change in iohexol plasmatic clearance (mL/min) from baseline to Month 12 (M12)

Primary efficacy endpoint: between treatment analysis of change in iohexol plasmatic clearance (mL/min) from baseline to Month 12 (M12)

This outcome measure evaluated renal function by assessing the calculated GFR based on the Cockcroft-Gault formula.

Composite efficacy failure was defined as Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection(BPAR) of International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation(ISHLT) grade ≥3A, Acute Rejection associated with Hemodynamic Compromise, Graft loss/Retransplant, Death or Loss to follow-up. Identification of acute rejection was based on the local pathologist's evaluation of endomyocardial biopsy slides. Hemodynamic compromise was present if 1 or more of the following were met: Ejection fraction ≤30% or 25% lower than Baseline or Fractional shortening ≤20% or 25% lower than Baseline and/or use of inotropic treatment.

The primary variable was renal function assessed by calculated creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and was assessed at all visits. CrCl\[mL/min\] = (140 - A) \* W / (72 \* C) \* R. Where A is age at sample date \[years\], W is body weight at specific visit \[kg\], C is the serum concentration of creatinine \[mg/dL\], R = 1 if the patient is male and = 0.85 if female.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the 12 month analysis of primary efficacy failure defined as a composite endpoint including treated biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or loss to follow-up. A treated BPAR episode was defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III that was treated with anti-rejection therapy. Graft loss was defined as the allograft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient started dialysis and was not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis as well as re-transplant.

The primary efficacy endpoint was the 12 month analysis of primary efficacy failure defined as a composite endpoint including treated biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or loss to follow-up. In the definition of composite efficacy failure, loss to follow-up includes patients who did not experience treated BPAR, graft loss or death on or after day 1 and whose last day of contact was prior to day 316, the start day of the 12 month visit window.

Nankivell's formula for calculated GFR is shown below: GFR \[mL/min\] = 6.7/C + W/4 - UREA/2 - 100/H2+ 35 (25 for females). Where W is body weight at specific visit \[kg\], H is height at specific visit \[m\], C is the serum concentration of creatinine \[mmol/L\], and UREA is the serum concentration of urea \[mmol/L\]. UREA was calculated from blood urea nitrogen (BUN) lab data by: UREA = 2.1441\*BUN. If a GFR value from Nankivell formula was less than 10 \[mL/min\], then the value was assigned as 10 \[mL/min\].

RECIST 1.1 criteria for Objective Response: Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by scan: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR

Evaluate if the combination of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus combined with the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab would result in a modest clinical benefit rate, which included confirmed partial and complete responses and disease stability for four or more treatment cycles based on WHO Response Criteria. Per WHO for target lesions: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all known disease, determined by two consecutive observations not less than 4 weeks apart. Partial Response (PR): A \> 50% decrease in the total tumor load of the lesions that have been measured to determine the effect of therapy not less than four weeks apart. The observations must be consecutive. Stable Disease (SD): A 50% decrease in total tumor area cannot be established nor has a 25% increase in the size of one or more measurable lesions been demonstrated.

Evaluation of the safety of RAD001 compared with placebo in patients with TSC focusing on NCI CTCAE Grade 3 and 4 adverse events, serious adverse events, and Grade 3 and 4 laboratory toxicities.

Baseline and 6 month Timepoint scores are reported for the following primary outcome measures: 1. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test 4 (PPVT-4; Receptive Language Measure). Scores reported as (mean, SD). Range=40-160, higher scores are better. 2. Expressive Vocabulary Test 2 (EVT-2; Expressive Language Measure). Scores reported as (mean, SD). Range=40-160, higher scores are better. 3. Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning 2 (WRAML2; Measure of Verbal Memory and Attention ). Scores reported as (mean, SD). Range=1-19, higher scores are better. 4. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-II (VABS-II; Measure of Adaptive Behavior). Scores reported as (mean, SD). Range = 40-160, higher scores are better. 5. Purdue Pegboard Test (Measure of Fine Motor Speed and Coordination). Scores reported as (mean, SD). Range = 40-160, higher scores are better.

Scores are reported for baseline and 6 month timepoints on the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) subscales below. For all subscales, scores are reported as the mean difference between the study subjects and a normative population matched for age, gender and IQ (e.g., subject subscale score - mean of matched normative group = reported score). Higher scores represent a better outcome. 1. Spatial Span (SSP) (spatial memory span) Range: -3 to 3 2. Spatial Working Memory (working memory) Range: -3 to 3 3. Pattern Recognition Memory (PRM) (visual pattern recognition memory) Range: -3 to 3 4. Spatial Recognition Memory (SRM) (spatial recognition memory) Range: -4 to 4 5. Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP) (sustained attention) Range: -4 to 4 6. Stockings of Cambridge (SOC) (spatial planning) Range: -4 to 4 7. Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift (IDED) (cognitive flexibility) Range: -5 to 5 8. Reaction Time (processing speed) Range: -5 to 5

Percentage of patients that have not progressed after 12 weeks of treatment.

Number of participants with response per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR."

Clinical benefit rate is defined as the number of patients with complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) that lasts at least 6 months. Response was assessed every 2 cycles of treatment (6 weeks) by computed tomography (CT), CT/positron emission tomography (PET), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Overall response evaluation is based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.0 (RECIST 1.0). Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.

Reported as percentage of patients who experienced grade 3 and higher hematological adverse events (AEs) related to the study drugs.

Reported as percentage of patients who experienced grade 3 and higher non-hematological AEs related to the study drugs.

Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from start of treatment to disease progression or death from any cause as estimated by Kaplan Meier methods. Progression is measured using RECIST 1.1 criteria, defined as at least a 20% increase in size in target lesion and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions and/or appearance of new lesions. Patients who have not progressed and are alive are censored at the date the patient is known to be progression-free.

Median PFS will be calculated based on time to first progression or death.

PFS was defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause. A patient who had not progressed or died at the date of the analysis cut-off or received another anticancer therapy had their PFS censored at the time of the last adequate tumor evaluation before the earlier of the cut-off date or the anticancer therapy date. Disease progression was assessed using the local investigator's tumor assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression model stratified by randomization stratification factors was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of PFS, along with 90% CI. As this was an estimation based approach, no p-value was provided.

Incidence of adverse events (AEs) overall and by severity, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Severity will be assessed using the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) for Adverse Events, version 4.03 (CTCAEv4.03). To evaluate tolerability and safety of everolimus in second-line treatment of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma / neuroendocrine carcinoma G3 according to WHO 2010 and neuroendocrine tumors G3.

Progression Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the first of either disease progression or death from any cause. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions

Any sign or symptom that occurs during the study treatment plus the 30 days post treatment.

PFS in the first line setting is defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the date of first documented progression based on local radiology review or death due to any cause. If a participant did not progress or was not known to have died at the date of the analysis cut-off or start of another antineoplastic therapy, the PFS date was censored to the date of last adequate tumor assessment prior to cut-off date or start of antineoplastic therapy. The median PFS was estimated and presented along with 95% confidence intervals. The primary analysis of PFS for first line was performed 12 months after the last patient's recruitment.

Response was be determined by bi-dimensional diameters. RECIST criteria will be collected and used for secondary evaluation. Patients will have brain MRI scans with and without gadolinium performed prior to therapy, after every second course in the first year, after every third course in the second year, and at the End of Study visit (if not done within prior 3 months). Spine MRIs should be performed prior to therapy and at the same time points as standard brain MRIs if clinically indicated.

PFS during second-line treatment was defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the date of the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause. The primary analysis of PFS was based on a local radiology review of CT scans and MRI collected until the participant experienced disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0.

Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of patients whose best overall response was either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.0 for target lesions and assessed by CT: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions for a period of at least one month; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (ORR) = CR + PR. Only descriptive statistics.

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression (PD) or death. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.

Blood samples (1 mL) for determination of VEGF-D were collected from a forearm vein (direct venipuncture or from an indwelling cannula) and 2 aliquots of serum were collected. VEGF-D levels were determined from only 1 of the 2 serum aliquots, with the second acting as a back-up. A serum VEGF-D \>800 pg/mL level supports a diagnosis of Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)

Venous blood samples (2 mL) for pharmacokinetic evaluation were collected pre dose and 2 hours post dose at preselected visits.

ORR: % of patients whose overall disease response was a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) in 8 cycles CR: Complete normalization of all index nodal \& extranodal lesions: Radiological regression to normal size of all lymph nodes \& nodal masses \& complete disappearance of all lesions PR: At least a 50% decrease in the SPD of all index nodal \& extranodal lesions FDG-avid or PET positive prior to therapy: one or more PET positive at previously involved site.At least a 50% increase in the SPD of all index nodal \& extranodal lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the product of the diameters of all index lesions recorded at or after baseline . Lesions PET positive if FDG-avid lymphoma or PET positive prior to therapy. Unknown (UNK): Progression not documented \& one or more of the index lesions not assessed or assessed using a different method than baseline at the time of radiologic evaluation. Each cycle was 28 days.

PFS\_1L based on investigator assessment of radiology data by RECIST 1.0, was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause during or after first-line treatment with everolimus or sunitinib. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.

PFSR at 6 months based on central review

Overall response rate (ORR) was based on RECIST central assessment and defined as the percentage of patients with best overall response (BOR) of a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). The BOR was calculated on basis of the tumor of overall lesion response evaluated at each visit. To be assigned a status of PR or CR, changes in tumor measurements had to be confirmed by repeat assessments obtained within 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Assessments was based on RECIST criteria 1.0. Measurable disease lesions had to be accurately measured in at least one dimension with longest diameter ≥ 20 mm using conventional techniques or ≥ 10 mm with spiral CT scan (with minimum lesion size no less than double the slice thickness). PR required at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters. CR required disappearance of all target and non-target lesions.

Overall Response Rate (ORR) was calculated for total PP population based on central review as confirmatory, primary analysis as well as for ITT population as sensitivity analysis. It was presented with relative frequencies and the exact 2-sided 80% confidence limit (CI) computed using the Clopper-Pearson method). If the lower limit of the CI did not include p0=5%, the hypothesis that p ≤ 5% was rejected. The primary analysis was based on the PP Set

The best overall response (BOR) was calculated on basis of the tumor of overall lesion response evaluated at each visit. To be assigned a status of PR or CR, changes in tumor measurements had to be confirmed by repeat assessments that should have been performed not less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. Assessments was based on RECIST criteria 1.0. Measurable disease lesions had to be accurately measured in at least one dimension with longest diameter ≥ 20 mm using conventional techniques or ≥ 10 mm with spiral CT scan (with minimum lesion size no less than double the slice thickness). PR required at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters. CR required disappearance of all target and non-target lesions.

Overall Response Rate (ORR) was presented for ITT population as sensitivity analysis. It was presented with relative frequencies and the exact 2-sided 80% confidence limit (CL; computed using the Clopper-Pearson method). If the lower limit of the CI did not include p0=5%, the hypothesis that p ≤ 5% was rejected.

Overall response is classified as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Progressive Disease (PD) on therapy.Description: Overall response is classified as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or Progressive Disease (PD) on therapy. Response for target lesions (up to5) is based on 3 dimensions with an elliptical model volume used: 0.5L\*W\*T; (L) tumor extent in plane perpendicular to the selected plane; (W) longest measurement of the tumor width; (T) transverse measurement perpendicular to the width. CR is disappearance all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR is \>/= 65% decrease in sum of the products (referent baseline). PD 40% or more increase in any target lesion (referent smallest product observed on therapy). SD is none of the above. PR and SD classification as long as absent new lesions and unequivocal progression for non-target lesions else PD.

Number of patients alive without progressive disease at 6 months. Assessment of progression was defined by RANO as a 25% increase in the sum of all the products of measurable lesions, clear worsening of any evaluable disease or any new lesion

Tumor response and disease progression were assessed using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST), version 1.0. All target and non-target lesions identified at baseline were assessed using the same method, CT scan with contrast or MRI with contrast, throughout the trial. All scans were reviewed by independent, central radiology. Disease progression was defined as: 1) a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline or 2) the appearance of a new lesions or 3) the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions overall.

Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall disease response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all extranodal lesions. PR was defined as at least a 50% decrease in the sum of the product of diameter (SPD) of all index nodal and extranodal lesions.

The best overall response is the best response recorded from treatment start until disease progression/recurrence (both measurement and confirmation criteria). Best lesion response was defined by (Resist Criteria V1 for target and non-target lesions): Complete Response (CR)=at least two determinations of CR 4 weeks apart before progression, Partial Response (PR)=at least two determinations of CR 4 weeks apart before progression (and not qualifying for a CR), Stable Disease (SD)=at least one SD assessment \>6 weeks after start of treatment and Progressive Disease (PD)=Progression or death due to underlying cancer ≤16 weeks after start of treatment. PD without radiologic evidence were classified as progression only, when clear evidence of clinical deterioration was available and patient discontinued due to "disease progression". Unknown (UNK) = all other cases.

Length of time, in months, that patients were alive from their first date of protocol treatment until worsening of their disease

RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) is a set of published rules that define when cancer patients improve ("respond"), stay the same ("stable") or worsen ("progression") during treatments. Disease Control Rate (DCR) defined as the percentage of participants with Disease Control best overall response (complete response, partial response or stable disease)and Objective Response Rate (ORR) defined as the percentage of participants with best overall Objective Response (complete response or partial response).

RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) is a set of published rules that define when cancer patients improve ("respond"), stay the same ("stable") or worsen ("progression") during treatments. Best Over Response (BOR): Complete Response (CR, No lesions), Partial Response (PR, 30% decrease in lesions), and Stable Disease (SD, none of the above)

Objective response rate was defined by RECIST criteria: Partial response (PR) must have ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of all target lesions, from the baseline sum. Complete response (CR) must have disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. For CR or PR, tumor measurements must be confirmed by 2nd assessments within 4 weeks. Progression = 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of all target lesions, from smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline; or a new lesion; or progression of non-target lesions.

The toxicities observed at each dose level will be summarized in terms of type (organ affected or laboratory determination such as absolute neutrophil count), severity (by NCI CTCAE version 4.0) and nadir or maximum values for the laboratory measures, time of onset (i.e. course number), duration, and reversibility or outcome. Tables will be created to summarize these toxicities and side effects by dose and by course.

MTD will be determined by testing increasing doses of everolimus with standard dose enzalutamide in 3-patient dose escalation cohorts. The MTD is defined as the highest dose at which ≤1 of 6 patients experiences a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during 1 cycle (28 days) of therapy, assessed according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0.

PSA response will be measured by the percent decreased from the reported baseline value. The proportion of patients with documented PSA decreases of 50% and 85% in PSA levels will be reported separately.

Evaluate the safety of the combination per CTCAE v4.0, every 4 weeks from date of first study treatment until the date of documented progression, up to 24 months.

Levels of everolimus in blood samples will be collected from patients at selected timepoints prior to dosing during the first 3 cycles of treatment.

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose limiting toxicities during the first cycle of treatment

Frequency of DLTs during the first cycle of treatment

Measured by abnormal safety laboratory parameters, changes in electrocardiograms (ECGs), changes in vital signs and changes in physical examination parameters.

To determine the safety and feasibility of treatment with everolimus in combination with vincristine, prednisone, PEG-asparaginase and doxorubicin in patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)

This phase 1 clinical trial used a standard 3 + 3 design. Four dose levels of everolimus were planned to be evaluated, and the standard 3 + 3 design with dose de-escalation was used in the trial. Namely, 3 patients were assigned to starting dose level 1. If no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed, the trial proceeded to the next dose level, and another cohort of 3 patients was enrolled. If at least 2 of the 3 patients experienced at least 1 DLT, then the dose level decreased; otherwise, if only 1 patient experienced DLT, then 3 more patients were enrolled at the same dose level. If none of the 3 additional patients experienced DLT, the dose was escalated; otherwise, the dose level decreased. Dose reduction continued until a dose level was reached at which 6 patients had been treated and at most 1 DLT was observed.

Dose limiting toxicity

The primary objective of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy of the dose level/regimen of everolimus recommended from the Phase I with trastuzumab and paclitaxel (PT) therapy in patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer whose disease progressed on/after trastuzumab mono-and/or combination therapy based on the evaluation of objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Only patients with measurable disease (the presence of at least one measurable lesion) at baseline were included in the study. CR = Disappearance of all target lesions; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters.

each cycle was 21 days

A dose limiting toxicity was defined as an adverse event or laboratory abnormality that occurs to patients on the Phase I portion of the trial, during the first 21 days following the first dose of RAD001/docetaxel during cycle 1, judged to be related to RAD001/docetaxel and meeting any of the following criteria: Hematologic Toxicity: CTCAE grade 4 neutropenia \> 7 days or any Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia with fever Or CTCAE grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia \> 7 days Non-hematologic toxicity: The occurrence of non-hematologic CTCAE grade 3 or 4 adverse events will be considered dose limiting, except for the following: 1. CTCAE grade 3 nausea or grade 3 or 4 vomiting CTCAE grade 3 or 4 vomiting will only be considered dose limiting if it occurs despite the use of standard anti-emetics. 2. CTCAE grade 3 or 4 fever identified with a source (i.e. infection, tumor) 3. CTCAE grade 3 or 4 alkaline phosphatase.

Assessed safety and tolerability of the combination administration of RAD001 and imatinib when given to patients with imatinib-refractory gastro-intestinal stromal tumors (GIST) by number of participants with adverse events.

Assessed clinical efficacy of the combination regimen in this patient population per BOR by Overall response (CR + PR). Complete response: Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial response: ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions compared to baseline (and not ≥20% increase compared to smallest sum).

Assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the combination administration of RAD001 and imatinib in this patient population.

Assessed clinical efficacy of the combination regimen in this patient population per Overall Survival (OS). Overall survival was defined as the time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause. For patients still receiving study medication at the time of the analysis, survival was censored at the date of last examination. If a patient was not known to have died but was no longer continuing with study medication, survival was censored at the date of last contact.

Assessed clinical efficacy of the combination regimen in this patient population per Progression-free survival (PFS). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the time from date of start of treatment to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause. Per protocol (PP) population includes patients with no known overall lesion response during 4 months +/- 2 weeks, or who later had response of CR/PR/stable disease (SD). PP population excludes patients with no known response during 4 months + / -2 weeks and no subsequent CR/PR/SD.

Assessed clinical efficacy of the combination regimen in this patient population per Progression-free survival (PFS). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the time from date of start of treatment to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient had not progressed or died, progression-free survival was censored at the time of last adequate tumor assessment. According to the study protocol no tumor assessments were performed after discontinuation of treatment with study drug. Therefore, for all patients who discontinued treatment without a documented progression but died thereafter, death was considered as PFS event only if it occurred within the regular safety follow-up of 28 days after discontinuation. Otherwise, the PFS time was censored at the last adequate tumor assessment.