Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Niacin

Phase 3

Dyslipidemia | Small molecule | Cardiovascular |Abbott Laboratories|Last Updated: Oct 9, 2009

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedDouble-BlindCONTROLLED
Total Trials2
Total Enrollment553

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

Clinical trial landscape

Niacin · 2 trials · 1 indication

Phase 3 2
NCT00626392Study to Evaluate the EFFECTS of Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) on Niaspan®-Induced Flushing in Subjects With DyslipidemiaDyslipidemia
COMPLETED277 Analytics
NCT00630877Evaluation of a Flushing ASsessment Tool (FAST) in Subjects Receiving Niacin Extended-release Plus AspirinDyslipidemia
COMPLETED276 Analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Study to Evaluate the EFFECTS of Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) on Niaspan®-Induced Flushing in Subjects With Dyslipidemia
DyslipidemiaUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Evaluation of a Flushing ASsessment Tool (FAST) in Subjects Receiving Niacin Extended-release Plus Aspirin
DyslipidemiaUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Maximum Severity of Flushing Events During Week 1 of Niacin Extended-release (NER) Treatment
From Baseline to end of Week 1

The maximum severity of flushing events subjects experienced during Week 1 of NER treatment was categorized as none, mild, moderate, severe, or very severe using the Flushing Assessment Tool via an e-diary. Flushing was assessed daily and the percentage of subjects with maximum flushing severity in each category was calculated.

Flushing ASsessment Tool (FAST) Test-retest Reliability--mean Flushing Severity Score
Week 1 to Week 2

Test-retest reliability of the mean flushing severity score was evaluated. The intraclass correlation coefficient comparing flushing severity scores for Week 1 and Week 2 was examined to determine test-retest reliability. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe.

FAST Test-retest Reliability--maximum Flushing Severity Score
Week 1 to Week 2

Test-retest reliability of the maximum flushing severity score was evaluated. The intraclass correlation coefficient comparing flushing severity scores for Week 1 and Week 2 was examined to determine test-retest reliability. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe.

FAST Cross-sectional Construct Validity--mean Flushing Severity Score
Week 1

The relationship between mean flushing severity and overall flushing troublesomeness was evaluated by examining the Spearman rank-order correlation. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. Overall flushing troublesomeness was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most troublesome.

FAST Cross-sectional Construct Validity--maximum Flushing Severity Score
Week 1

The relationship between maximum flushing severity and overall flushing troublesomeness was evaluated by examining the Spearman rank-order correlation. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. Overall flushing troublesomeness was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most troublesome.

FAST Longitudinal Construct Validity--mean Flushing Severity Score
Week 1 to Week 2

The relationship between the change in mean flushing severity scores from Week 1 to Week 2, and the subject-rated overall treatment effect scale administered at Week 2, was assessed by examining the Spearman rank-order correlation. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. The overall treatment effect was assessed on a scale of 1 (symptoms are worse since study start), 2 (symptoms are about the same since study start), or 3 (symptoms are better since study start).

FAST Longitudinal Construct Validity--maximum Flushing Severity Score
Week 1 to Week 2

The relationship between the change in maximum flushing severity scores from Week 1 to Week 2, and the subject-rated overall treatment effect scale administered at Week 2, was assessed by examining the Spearman rank-order correlation. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. The overall treatment effect was assessed on a scale of 1 (symptoms are worse since study start), 2 (symptoms are about the same since study start), or 3 (symptoms are better since study start).

FAST Responsiveness--mean Flushing Severity Score
Study start to Day 43

The change in mean flushing severity scores from study start to Day 43 was compared in subjects classified as responders vs. nonresponders. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. Changes in mean flushing severity scores were negative if flushing symptoms improved and positive if flushing symptoms worsened.

FAST Responsiveness--maximum Flushing Severity Score
Study start to Day 43

The change in maximum flushing severity scores from study start to Day 43 was compared in subjects classified as responders vs. nonresponders. Flushing severity was assessed using the FAST on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most severe. Changes in maximum flushing severity scores were negative if flushing symptoms improved and positive if flushing symptoms worsened.

Secondary Endpoints

Maximum Severity of Flushing Events Overall During 4 Weeks of Niacin Extended-release (NER) Treatment
4 weeks
Mean of Maximum Severity of Flushing Events Overall During 4 Weeks of Niacin Extended-release (NER) Treatment
4 weeks
Mean Number of Moderate or Greater Flushing Events Per Subject Per Week Overall During 4 Weeks of Niacin Extended-release (NER) Treatment
4 weeks
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingQUADRUPLE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
NER 500; ASA run-in, ASA coadminEXPERIMENTALAspirin (ASA) daily during run-in (1 week); ASA 30 min prior to niacin extended-release (\[NER\], 500 mg starting dose), daily during coadministration period (4 weeks)
NER 500; ASA Pbo run-in, ASA coadminEXPERIMENTALAspirin placebo (ASA Pbo) daily during run-in (1 week); ASA 30 min prior to niacin extended-release (\[NER\], 500 mg starting dose), daily during coadministration period (4 weeks)
NER 500; ASA Pbo run-in, ASA Pbo coadminEXPERIMENTALAspirin placebo (ASA Pbo) daily during run-in (1 week); ASA Pbo 30 min prior to niacin extended-release (\[NER\], 500 mg starting dose), daily during coadministration period (4 weeks)
NER 1000; ASA run-in, ASA coadminEXPERIMENTALAspirin (ASA) daily during run-in (1 week); ASA 30 min prior to niacin extended-release (\[NER\], 1000 mg starting dose), daily during coadministration period (4 weeks)
NER 1000; ASA Pbo run-in, ASA coadminEXPERIMENTALAspirin placebo (ASA Pbo) daily during run-in (1 week); ASA 30 min prior to niacin extended-release (\[NER\], 1000 mg starting dose), daily during coadministration period (4 weeks)
NER 1000; ASA Pbo run-in, ASA Pbo coadminEXPERIMENTALAspirin placebo (ASA Pbo) daily during run-in (1 week); ASA Pbo 30 min prior to niacin extended-release (\[NER\], 1000 mg starting dose), daily during coadministration period (4 weeks)
NER/ASAEXPERIMENTAL -
NER/ASA PlaceboEXPERIMENTAL -
NER Placebo/ASA PlaceboEXPERIMENTAL -

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
niacin extended-release (NER)DRUGTablets administered once daily; titrated to 2000 mg maximum dose during coadministration period
aspirin (ASA)DRUG325 mg tablets administered once daily
aspirin placebo (ASA Pbo)DRUGTablets administered once daily
Niacin extended-release (NER) placeboDRUGTablets administered once daily for 6 weeks
Aspirin (ASA) placeboDRUGTablets administered once daily for 6 weeks
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range18 Years to N/A
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites26

Inclusion Criteria: * Subject must be 18 years of age or older. * If female, subject is either not of childbearing potential, defined as postmenopausal for at least one year or surgically sterile, or is of childbearing potential and must agree to practice birth control for the duration of the study...

Countries:United States
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Frequently asked questions about Niacin

What is Niacin used for in dyslipidemia?

Niacin is used for dyslipidemia, a condition of abnormal lipid levels in the blood. It is being studied as an extended-release formulation, often combined with aspirin to manage flushing side effects. The drug is in Phase 3 clinical development for this cardiovascular indication.

Who makes Niacin?

Niacin is being developed by Abbott Laboratories, traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker ABT. The company is conducting Phase 3 clinical trials for the drug in dyslipidemia.

What phase is Niacin in?

Niacin is in Phase 3 clinical development for dyslipidemia. It is an investigational drug and has not been approved by the FDA. Two Phase 3 trials have been completed, with a total of 553 participants enrolled.

What clinical trials is Niacin in?

Niacin has two completed Phase 3 trials: NCT00626392, studying the effects of acetylsalicylic acid on Niaspan-induced flushing in 277 subjects, and NCT00630877, evaluating a flushing assessment tool in 276 subjects receiving niacin extended-release plus aspirin. Both were conducted in the United States.

Is Niacin the same as Niaspan?

Niacin is the active ingredient in the extended-release product Niaspan, which is the formulation used in the clinical trials. The trials specifically refer to Niaspan-induced flushing, indicating that Niaspan is a brand name for extended-release niacin.