Approval Probability
TA Base Rate
Adjusted LOA
ML Risk
Mepolizumab · 28 trials · 12 indications
A HES flare is defined as a HES related clinical manifestation based on a physician-documented change in clinical signs or symptoms (worsening symptoms and/or elevated blood eosinophil level) which resulted in need for either: an increase from the most recent dose in the maintenance Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) dose (prednisone/prednisolone equivalent) by at least 10 mg per day for 5 days or an increase in or addition of any immunosuppressive and/or cytotoxic HES therapy from/to the most recent dose of HES therapy. Data is presented by the number of HES flares (0, 1, 2, 3 ,4 and \>=5) in the participants.
Total endoscopic nasal polyp score is collected at clinical visits. Independent reviewers, blinded to treatment, reviewed image recordings of nasal endoscopies to determine total endoscopic NP score based on NP size. The right and left nostrils were scored from 0 to 4 (0 = No polyps; 1 = Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha; 2 = Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle concha; and 4 = Large polyps causing complete obstruction/congestion of the inferior meatus). The total score is the sum of the right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 to 8 (calculated by summing the scores \[0 to 4\] in each nostril), higher scores indicate worse status. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.
Total endoscopic nasal polyp score is collected at clinical visits. The assessments were performed by central video image recordings of nasal endoscopy (NE). The right and left nostrils were scored from 0 to 4 (0 = No polyps; 1 = Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha; 2 = Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle concha; and 4 = Large polyps causing complete obstruction/congestion of the inferior meatus). The total score is the sum of the right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 to 8 (calculated by summing the scores \[0 to 4\] in each nostril), "0" score represents better status while "8" represents worse status. Baseline was defined as last value prior to first dose (Day 1). Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.
Participants rated individual (nasal obstruction, nasal discharge, mucus in the throat, loss of smell, facial pain) and overall symptoms on a visual analog scale (VAS) using an electronic diary (eDiary). Captured scores ranged between 0 (none) and 100 (as bad as you can imagine), final scores derived from the electronically captured scores by dividing by 10. The final nasal obstruction VAS score ranged between 0 (none) and 10 (worst), with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and data is presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from the 7 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.
Participants rated individual (nasal obstruction, nasal discharge, mucus in the throat, loss of smell, facial pain) and overall symptoms on a visual analog scale (VAS) using an electronic diary (eDiary). Captured scores ranged between 0 (none) and 100 (as bad as you can imagine), final scores derived from the electronically captured scores dividing by 10. The final nasal obstruction VAS score ranged between 0 and 10, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and data is presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from the 7 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.
Annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations were assessed. Moderate exacerbations are defined as clinically significant exacerbations that require treatment with oral or systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined per protocol as clinically significant exacerbations that require in-patient hospitalization (that is greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 24 hours) or result in death.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Serious AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment. Non-serious AEs from start of study treatment until 28 days after last dose (up to Week 20) are reported. Number of participants with common (\>=3% incidence) non-serious AEs are presented.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Serious AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment. Number of participants with serious AEs are presented.
Blood samples were analyzed for the presence of anti-mepolizumab antibodies by binding anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay. The binding ADA assay results at each visit were summarized as negative or positive. The binding ADA assay was performed in three steps; screening, confirmation and titration. The screening assay produced a result of positive or negative relative to a screening cut point. Positive samples continued with the confirmation assay, which also produced a result of positive or negative relative to a confirmation cut point. For positive confirmation samples, a titre value was obtained to quantify the degree of binding in a titration assay. Participants were considered 'Positive' if they had a positive confirmation ADA assay result.
Independent reviewers, blinded to treatment, reviewed image recordings of nasal endoscopies to determine total endoscopic NP score based on NP size. The right and left nostrils were scored from 0 to 4 (0 = No polyps; 1 = Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha; 2 = Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle concha; and 4 = Large polyps causing complete obstruction/congestion of the inferior meatus). The total score is the sum of the right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 to 8, higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Data up to Week 52, including from participants who remained in the study after early discontinuation from IP, were included in analysis. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.
Participants rated individual (nasal obstruction, nasal discharge, mucus in the throat, loss of smell, facial pain) and overall symptoms on a visual analog scale (VAS) using an electronic diary (eDiary). Captured scores ranged between 0 (none) and 100 (as bad as you can imagine), final scores derived from the electronically captured scores by dividing by 10. The final nasal obstruction VAS score ranged between 0 and 10, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Data up to Week 52, including from participants who remained in the study after early discontinuation from IP, were included in analysis. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and data is presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from the 7 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.
Due to differences in the labelling requirements among regulatory authorities around the world, two different labelling approaches were included in this global study: labelling that includes a pictogram plus standard labelling elements, or a standard labelling without the pictogram. Participants (and/or their caregiver) attended three on treatment visits at Week 0, 4, 8, and End of Study Visit. Training on the study treatment, device handling and administration technique was provided by the investigator or qualified site staff at Week 0 and then first dose was self-administered under observation of investigator/site staff in clinic. Second dose self-administered unobserved, at home (Week 4) and third dose was self-administered under the observation of investigator/site staff in clinic (Week 8). All Subjects (Safety) Population included all enrolled participants attempting at least one self-administration of mepolizumab. Only participants with data available at Week 8 were analyzed.
Due to differences in the labeling requirements among regulatory authorities around the world, two different labeling approaches were included in this global study: labeling that includes a pictogram plus standard labeling elements, or a standard labeling without the pictogram. Participants (and/or their caregiver) attended three on treatment visits at Week 0, Week 4, Week 8, and the End of Study Visit. Training on the study treatment, device handling and administration techniques was provided by the investigator or qualified site staff at Week 0 and then first dose was self-administered under observation of investigator/site staff in clinic. Second dose self-administered unobserved, at home (Week 4) and third dose was self-administered under the observation of investigator/site staff in clinic (Week 8). Only participants with data available at Week 8 were analyzed.
Percentage of participants who experienced \>=1 HES flare during the 32-Week treatment period or who withdrew from the study has been presented. A HES flare is defined as a HES related clinical manifestation based on a physician-documented change in clinical signs or symptoms which resulted in need for an increase in the maintenance Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) dose by at least 10 mg per day for 5 days or an increase in or addition of any cytotoxic or immunosuppressive HES therapy. HES flare is also defined as receipt of two or more courses of blinded active OCS during the treatment period. Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population comprises of all randomized participants. This population was based on the treatment to which the participants were randomized. Any participant who received a treatment randomization number were considered to be randomized.
During the clinic visits the Investigator or designee evaluated if the participants were able to self-administer the third dose at Week 8 by visual inspection immediately following injection and by using an 'Observer checklist' based on the safety syringe Instructions for Use (IFU). The 'self-administration' was defined as administration of mepolizumab liquid drug product in safety syringe either by the participants themselves or by their caregiver. Failure to perform one of the critical steps was deemed to be failure to successfully administer the injection. Participants with data available at Week 8 have been analyzed. Analysis was performed on All Subjects (Safety) Population which comprised of all enrolled participants attempting at least one self administration of mepolizumab liquid drug product in a safety syringe.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Cmax following a single dose administration of liquid mepolizumab using a safety syringe and an autoinjector were compared with reconstituted lyophilized drug product from the vial. Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population comprised of all participants receiving study drug for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained and analyzed.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf) following a single dose administration of liquid mepolizumab using a safety syringe and an autoinjector were compared with lyophilized drug product. Fixed effects analysis of covariance model was used for analysis. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in category titles).
Clinically significant exacerbation was defined as worsening of asthma which requires use of systemic corticosteroids (e.g., prednisone) for at least 3 days or a single intramuscular (IM) corticosteroid dose and/or hospitalization and/or emergency department (ED) visits. For participants on maintenance systemic corticosteroids, at least double the existing maintenance dose for at least 3 days is required. Percentage of participants with clinically significant exacerbation over time during the on-treatment period of Part C and 95% confidence interval were estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Intent-to-Treat Population includes all randomized participants who received at least one dose of double-blind study medication within Part C.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events based on medical or scientific judgment; and is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. Additionally, systemic (that is, allergic/hypersensitivity and non-allergic) reactions and local injection site reactions were recorded throughout the treatment and follow-up period.
SGRQ consisted of 50 questions (scored from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates best and 100 indicates worst health) designed to measure Quality of Life in par. with diseases of airway obstruction, measuring symptoms, impact, and activity. Questions were completed by the par. with a recall over the past 4 weeks. SGRQ Total Score was calculated by summing the pre-assigned weights of answers, dividing by the sum of the maximum weights for items in SGRQ and multiplying by 100 to get a %. Change from BL in SGRQ was calculated as value at Week 24 minus value at BL for each par. and was analyzed using mixed model repeated measures allowing for covariates of BL value, region, BL maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable), BL % predicted FEV1 and visit, plus interaction terms for visit by BL and visit by treatment group. Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population consisted of all randomized par. who received \>= 1 dose of drug.
Exacerbations are defined as the worsening of asthma which requires use of systemic corticosteroids intravenous (IV) or oral steroid like prednisone, for at least 3 days or a single intramuscular (IM) corticosteroid (CS) dose is required. For maintenance systemic corticosteroids, at least double the existing maintenance dose for at least 3 days was required) and/or hospitalization and/or emergency department (ED) visit. On-Treatment data between first dose date and earliest of Withdrawal date/last dose + 28 days was considered for analysis. Analysis of the number of exacerbations was performed using a negative binomial generalized linear model.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention or event associated with liver injury and impaired liver function were categorized as SAE. On-treatment AEs and on-treatment SAEs are the events occurring on/after the first dose of open-label mepolizumab date and before/on last dose+28 days.
Moderate exacerbations are defined as clinically significant exacerbations that require treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as clinically significant exacerbations that require in-patient hospitalization (\>=24 hours) or result in death. Moderate and severe exacerbations occurring from the start of investigational product (IP) up to the Week 52 visit, including exacerbations reported after early discontinuation from IP by participants who remained in the study, were included in the analysis. The analysis was performed on the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population (all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment).
Moderate exacerbations are defined as clinically significant exacerbations that require treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as clinically significant exacerbations that require in-patient hospitalization ( \>= 24 hours) or result in death. Moderate and severe exacerbations occurring from the start of investigational product (IP) up to the Week 52 visit, including exacerbations reported after early discontinuation from investigational product by subjects who remained in the study, were included in the analysis. The analysis was performed on the mITT high stratum (mITT-H) Population which comprised of participants in the mITT Population (all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment) with blood eosinophil counts \>=150 cells/µL at Screening or \>=300 cells/ µL in the 12 months prior.
Moderate and severe exacerbations occurring from the start of IP up to the Week 52 visit, including exacerbations reported after early discontinuation from IP by participants who remained in the study, were included in the analysis. The analysis was performed on the mITT Population which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of trial medication. The strata were combined as pre-specified in the protocol and reporting and analysis plan (RAP).
Total accrued duration of remission is the accrued number of weeks where Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) =0 plus prednisolone/prednisone dose \<=4 mg/day over the 52 week study treatment period was reported. The accrued duration was categorized into zero, \>0 to \<12 weeks, 12 to \<24 weeks, 24 to \<36 weeks and \>=36 weeks. Statistical analysis was based on a proportional odds regression model with covariates including treatment group, Baseline prednisolone/prednisone daily dose, Baseline BVAS score and region. Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population was used for the analysis and was defined as all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of trial medication. Randomized participants were assumed to have received study treatment unless definitive evidence to the contrary exists. The odds ratio for treatment difference and associated probability (p)-value and 95 percent confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
The number of participants who were in remission (i.e ., BVAS=0 and prednisolone /prednisone \<=4 mg/day) at both Weeks 36 and 48 of the study treatment period was reported. The statistical analysis was performed using a logistic regression model on ITT Population. The odds ratio for treatment difference and associated p-value and 95 percent CI were calculated.
AEs were collected from the Baseline visit until the follow-up visit (approx. 12 weeks post-last dose). Participants were monitored to evaluate the AEs of systemic and local site reaction. AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. On treatment AEs were defined as events occurring from the first dose until 28 days after the last dose of mepolizumab.
Clinically significant exacerbations of asthma are defined as worsening of asthma which required use of systemic corticosteroids (IV or oral steroid like prednisone, for at least 3 days or a single intramuscular (IM) corticosteroid (CS) dose is required. For maintenance of systemic corticosteroids, at least double the existing maintenance dose for at least 3 days was required) and/or hospitalization and/or emergency department (ED) visits. The frequency of clinically significant exacerbations of asthma over the 32-week treatment period is expressed as the number of exacerbations per year. Analysis of the number of exacerbations performed using a negative binomial model with covariates of treatment group, baseline maintenance OCS therapy (OCS vs. no OCS), region, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable) and baseline % predicted FEV1, and with logarithm of time on treatment as an offset variable.
Baseline (BL) dose was the prescribed optimized prednisone/prednisolone dose following the OCS Optimization Phase. Maintenance (MN) dose was the mean of all daily prednisone/prednisolone doses during the MN Phase (weeks 20 to 24). The percent reduction of OCS dose during weeks 20 to 24 compared to BL dose was calculated as: 100 x (BL dose minus MN dose)/BL dose. Asthma control between weeks 20 and 24 was defined as no clinically significant exacerbation (worsening of asthma that required use of systemic corticosteroids or hospitalization and/or emergency department visits) during this period. The percent reduction of OCS was categorized as: 90 to 100%; 75 to \<90%; 50 to \<75%; \>0 to \<50%; no decrease in prednisone dose, or lack of asthma control, or withdrawal (WD) from treatment. Analysis was performed using a proportional odds model with terms for treatment group, region, duration of OCS use at BL (\<5 years vs. \>=5 years) and BL OCS dose.
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with use of a medicinal product (MP), whether or not considered related to MP. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with use of MP. SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant or all events of possible drug induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinemia. As Treated (AT) Population consisted of participants who received at least one dose of open label mepolizumab. On-treatment AEs and on-treatment SAEs are the events occurring on/after the first dose of open-label mepolizumab date and before/on last dose of mepolizumab + 28 days.
Dysphagia will be assessed by the Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Activity Index (EEsAI) which measures dysphagia frequency, dysphagia severity, and food avoidance/modification behaviors. EEsAI scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. A decrease of ≥ 20 points is felt to be a meaningful clinical response and scores ≤ 20 representing clinical remission.
PK of mepolizumab was evaluated in participants using Cmax. PK samples were collected at pre-dose on Weeks 4 and 8; and at Weeks 9, 12, 16 and 20 post-dose. Cmax was evaluated by population PK methods and mean and standard error from the final model has been tabulated. Estimates have been presented from the final model centered to mean bodyweights of 27 kg, 50 kg and 70 kg. Note the average bodyweight of 70 kg (mean body weight observed in adults) was not investigated in the study. PK Population included all participants receiving at least one dose of mepolizumab beginning at Visit 2 (Week 0) and having at least one blood sample taken at Visit 3 (Week 4) or thereafter with measurable mepolizumab plasma concentration.
PK of mepolizumab was evaluated in participants using AUC (0-inf). PK samples were collected at pre-dose on Weeks 4 and 8; and at Weeks 9, 12, 16 and 20 post-dose. AUC (0-inf) was evaluated by population PK methods and mean and standard error from the final model has been tabulated. Estimates have been presented from the final model centered to mean bodyweights of 27 kg, 50 kg and 70 kg. Note the average bodyweight of 70kg (mean body weight observed in adults) was not investigated in the study.
PK of mepolizumab was evaluated in participants using t1/2. PK samples were collected at pre-dose on Weeks 4 and 8; and at Weeks 9, 12, 16 and 20 post-dose. T1/2 was evaluated by population PK methods and mean and standard error from the final model has been tabulated. Estimates have been presented from the final model centered to mean bodyweights of 27 kg, 50 kg and 70 kg. Note the average bodyweight of 70kg (mean body weight observed in adults) was not investigated in the study.
PK of mepolizumab was evaluated in participants using CL/F. PK samples were collected at pre-dose on Weeks 4 and 8; and at Weeks 9, 12, 16 and 20 post-dose. CL was evaluated by population PK methods and mean and standard error from the final model has been tabulated. Estimates have been presented from the final model centered to mean bodyweights of 27 kg, 50 kg and 70 kg. Note the average bodyweight of 70kg (mean body weight observed in adults) was not investigated in the study.
PD of mepolizumab was evaluated in participants using ratio to Baseline in absolute blood eosinophil count. Blood samples were collected at indicated time points. Baseline was defined as the latest value recorded prior to the first dose of mepolizumab. Ratio to Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value/Baseline value. It was evaluated by Pharmacodynamic Eosinophils (PDe) Population which included all participants receiving at least one dose of mepolizumab beginning at Visit 2 (Week 0) and having at least one Part A blood sample evaluable for blood eosinophil count.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinemia are to be categorized as SAE. On-treatment SAEs and non-SAEs are defined as events occurring from the first Part B dose until 28 days following the last Part B dose. Safety Population includes all participants who received at least one dose of mepolizumab beginning at Visit 9.
Blood sample were collected for the determination of anti-mepolizumab binding antibodies and neutralizing antibodies response in Part B at Weeks 44, 68 and 80 prior to study treatment administration. Participant was considered 'Positive' if they had at least one positive post-Baseline anti-drug antibody assay result. All Part B visits (including scheduled and unscheduled) post-Baseline were considered for Any-time Post-Baseline visit derivation. The number of participants with positive anti-mepolizumab binding antibodies and neutralizing antibodies response at Any Time Post Baseline has been presented. The neutralizing antibodies response results only presented for participants with positive anti-drug antibody assay.
Sitting blood pressure measurements included SBP and DBP. Measurements were done pre-infusion/injection with the participant sitting, having rested in this position for at least 5 minutes before each reading. The Baseline was defined as the latest value recorded prior to the first dose of mepolizumab. Change from Baseline was defined as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Sitting pulse rate measurements were performed pre-infusion/injection with the participant sitting, having rested in this position for at least 5 minutes before each reading. The Baseline was defined as the latest value recorded prior to the first dose of mepolizumab in Part A. Change from Baseline was defined as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).
Blood samples were collected for analysis of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), albumin, protein, bilirubin, creatinine, urate, direct bilirubin, calcium, carbon dioxide (CO2), chloride, glucose, potassium, sodium and urea. Baseline was defined as the latest value recorded prior to the first dose of mepolizumab in Part A. Change from Baseline was defined as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. All Part B visits (scheduled and unscheduled) post-Baseline were considered for Any-time Post-Baseline visit derivation. If participant had at least one value for categories "To Low" and/or "To High" along with "To Normal or No Change" then participant was counted under "To Low" and/or "To High". If participant had values which belong only to "To Normal or No Change" then participant was counted under "To Normal or No Change" only. Any Time Post-Baseline values have been presented.
Blood samples were collected for analysis of basophils, eosinophils, leukocyte, monocyte, neutrophils, lymphocyte, platelets, mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), hemoglobin (Hgb), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), erythrocytes, hematocrit, and reticulocytes/erythrocytes (Ret/Ery). Baseline was defined as the latest value recorded prior to first dose of mepolizumab in Part A. Change from Baseline was defined as value at indicated time point minus Baseline value. All Part B visits (scheduled and unscheduled) post-Baseline were considered for Any-time Post-Baseline visit derivation. If participant had at least one value for categories "To Low" and/or "To High" along with "To Normal or No Change" then participant was counted under "To Low" and/or "To High". If participant had values which belong only to "To Normal or No Change" then participant was counted under "To Normal or No Change" only. Any Time Post-Baseline values have been presented.
Urine samples were collected from participants at indicated time points for analysis of urinalysis parameters including Specific gravity and potential of hydrogen (pH) of urine, presence of glucose, protein, blood and ketones in urine by dipstick test. Microscopic examination was performed if blood or protein was abnormal. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.
Change from Baseline in blood eosinophils was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The change from Baseline in log-transformed blood eosinophil levels at Week 12 was analyzed using both a linear and non-linear (Imax) dose response models. The dose response was found to be non-linear and hence only the results of the non-linear model are presented. Mepolizumab 75mg IV assumed to equate to 100 mg SC within model. Prior to log10-transformation, zero values were imputed with half the minimum value across all dose groups and time points. An adjustment for Baseline eosinophil count was also incorporated into the model.
Area under the absolute blood eosinophil time curve to Day 84 (AUECeos\[0-day 84\]) determined using the linear trapezoidal rule for subset of participants with blood eosinophil data to Day 84. Blood samples for the analyses of AUEC(eos) (0-day 84) were collected at Days 1, 3, 7, 28, 56, 70 and 84.
Blood samples were collected at Days 1, 3, 7, 28, 56, 70, 84, 112 and 140 to assess the maximum reduction from Baseline in blood eosinophils between Day 1 pre-dose and last quantifiable study measurement. Change from Baseline was calculated as the ratio of the post-Baseline value divided by the Baseline value. The maximum reduction from Baseline in eosinophils is represented by the minimum ratio to Baseline.
Blood samples were collected at Days 1, 3, 7, 28, 56, 70, 84, 112 and 140 to assess the time to first occurrence of maximum reduction from baseline in blood eosinophil levels between Day 1 pre-dose and last quantifiable study measurement.
This summarizes the number of participants who returned to at least 50% of their Baseline blood eosinophil levels after maximum inhibition had been achieved and without any subsequent decrease in blood eosinophil levels. Blood samples were collected at Days 1, 3, 7, 28, 56, 70, 84, 112 and 140.
AUC of mepolizumab was estimated by population modeling techniques using non-linear mixed effect methods for the individual and population pharmacokinetic parameters from the sparse sampling. Individual cumulative plasma of mepolizumab AUC to Day 84 (cumAUC(0-day 84)), is the sum of the AUCs over each dosing interval after each of the three doses administered, for those participants with data up to Day 84. Individual cumulative plasma of mepolizumab AUC to Day 140 (cumAUC(0-day 140) is the sum of the AUCs over each dosing interval after each of the three doses administered plus the AUC post the last dose interval up to Day 140 (i.e. from Day 84 to Day 140). Blood samples for PK analyses were collected on dosing days (Days 1, 28 and 56) at pre-dose and 0.5 hour (h), 1 h and 2 h post-dose (time was relative to the end of infusion in the IV cohort) as well as on Days 3, 7, 70, 84, 112 and 140 (follow-up visit).
Maximum plasma concentration was estimated by population modelling techniques using non-linear mixed effect methods for the individual and population pharmacokinetic parameters from the sparse sampling. Blood samples for PK analyses of mepolizumab were collected on dosing days (Days 1, 28 and 56) at pre-dose and 0.5 h, 1 h and 2 h post-dose (time was relative to the end of infusion in the IV cohort) as well as on Days 3, 7, 70, 84, 112 and 140 (follow-up visit).
Time to maximum plasma concentration was estimated by population modelling techniques using non-linear mixed effect methods for the individual and population pharmacokinetic parameters from the sparse sampling. Blood samples for PK analyses of mepolizumab were collected on dosing days (Days 1, 28 and 56) at pre-dose and 0.5 h, 1 h and 2 h post-dose (time was relative to the end of infusion in the IV cohort) as well as on Days 3, 7, 70, 84, 112 and 140 (follow-up visit).
Terminal half-life (t1/2) was estimated by modelling techniques using non-linear mixed effect methods for the individual and population pharmacokinetic parameters for mepolizumab from the sparse sampling. Blood samples for PK analyses of mepolizumab were collected on dosing days (Days 1, 28 and 56) at pre-dose and 0.5 h, 1 h and 2 h post-dose (time was relative to the end of infusion in the IV cohort) as well as on Days 3, 7, 70, 84, 112 and 140 (follow-up visit).
Assessment of the nasal polyposis condition was performed after six months of dosing to determine the situation indicative of a reduction in the need for surgery. The components used to determine the need for surgery were endoscopic polyp (ENP) scores and a severity of condition as measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS). Surgery was still deemed required for a participant with an ENP score of \>=3, or an ENP score of 2 and a VAS symptom score of \>7. The number of participants with reduced need for polyp surgery are presented as missing data set to non-responders (NR) and missing data last observation carry forward (LOCF). LOCF is defined as missing responses at Week 25 imputed with the last non-missing post-dose observation for that participant.
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that Results in death, life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Drug-related AE's were considered to have a reasonable possibility of being related to treatment by the investigator. AE, SAE and drug-related AEs are summarized by TP and FP.
Blood samples were collected at Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 to estimate the following biochemistry parameters: alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), albumin (Ab), total protein (ToP), creatinine (Cr), total bilirubin (TB), calcium (Ca), bicarbonate (Bi), chloride (Cl), glucose (Glu), potassium (Pot), and sodium (Sod). Laboratory abnormalities outside the reference range (high and low values) at any time post baseline were presented. Any time post Baseline = all visits (including scheduled and unscheduled). If participant had given both high and low value at least once then participant is counted under both high and low category for this visit.
Blood samples were collected pre-infusion at Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8; and 24h and 72h post-infusion at Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8 time points and at Weeks 2, 6, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 34 to estimate the following hematology parameters: basophils (Bas), percentage of basophils (% Bas), lymphocytes (Lym), percentage of Lym (% Lym), monocytes (Mon), percentage of Mon (% Mon), platelet count (PC), total neutrophils (TN), percentage of TN (% TN), white blood cell count (WBC), hematocrit (He), hemoglobin (Hg), and red blood cell count (RBC). Laboratory abnormalities outside the reference range (high and low values) at any time post baseline were presented. Any time post Baseline = all visits (including scheduled and unscheduled). If participant had given both high and low value at least once then participant is counted under both high and low category for this visit.
12-lead ECG assessments were obtained at the following time points: screening, and Weeks 4, 8 and 12.. Overall ECG findings were summarized using the worst case findings without regard to visits ie. "any time post Baseline". Change from Baseline in ECG findings were categorized as clinically significant change from Baseline; no clinically significant change from Baseline and not applicable.
SBP and DBP measurements were obtained at the following time points: screening, pre-infusion, 10 minutes (m), 30m, 1 hour (h), 2h post-infusion on Day 1, Week 4, Week 8; and Weeks 12, 16, 20 and 24. Screening value was considered as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Heart rate measurements were obtained at the following time points: Screening, pre-infusion, 10m, 30m, 1h, 2h post-infusion on Day 1, Week 4, Week 8; and Weeks 12, 16, 20 and 24. Screening value was considered as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Temperature measurements were obtained at the following time points: Screening, Day 1, and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. Screening value was considered as the Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Blood samples for testing anti-mepolizumab antibodies were collected on Day 1, Week 4 and 8 Infusion Visit (before the IV infusion) and at Week 12, 24 and 34 Week follow-up visits. The presence of anti-human mepolizumab antibodies was assessed using an immunoelectrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay. To address transient positive results, an assessment of repeated results were made. For any visit category: results were considered as positive if it was positive at any visit during the study, and results were considered as negative if it were negative at all visits during the study. For repeat visit category: results were considered as postive if the result was positive at \>1 visit, and results were considered as negative if the result was negative at all visits or was positive at only one visit.
A responder was defined as a participant achieving a reduction in esophageal eosinophils to \<5 cells per HPF as the highest count of eosinophils per HPF in all the esophageal sites biopsied at Week 12, confirmed by biopsy at Week 12 or at an early withdrawal visit prior to Week 12. A worst case (WC) approach was considered, if a particiapant withdrew prematurely : If a particiapnt dropped out of the study without having a biopsy taken, due to lack of efficacy or an adverse event, their response was imputed as not achieved. Participants who withdrew, without a biopsy, for other reasons (e.g. lost to follow-up) were considered non-evaluable for the primary analysis. For participants who withdrew early from the study and had a biopsy, the biopsy was used to determine their response.
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug is uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Central volume of distribution is a hypothetical volume into which a drug initially distributes upon administration. Peripheral volume of distribution is the sum of all tissue spaces outside the central compartment. Steady state volume of distribution (Vss) is the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state. Blood samples were obtained at pre-infusion and 5m, 2h, 24h, 72-96h post-infusion at Day 1, Weeks 4, 8; and Weeks 2, 6 10, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 34 from each participant to estimate central (V1) and periperial (V2) and Steady State (Vss) volume of distribution of mepolizumab.
Clearance is defined as the removal of drug from a volume of plasma in a given unit of time (drug loss from the body). Blood samples were obtained at pre-infusion and 5m, 2h, 24h, 72-96h post-infusion at Day 1, Weeks 4, 8; and Weeks 2, 6 10, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 34 from each participant to estimate plasma clearance of mepolizumab.
IL8 cytokine mRNA and protein expression
IL5 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin cytokine mRNA and protein expression
IL1 receptor mRNA and protein expression
E-cadherin
alpha-smooth muscle actin protein expression
| Arm | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mepolizumab 100 mg SC | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants in the age group of 6 to 11 years with body weight less than (\<) 40 kilogram (kg) received Mepolizumab 100 milligram (mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks over a treatment period of 52 weeks. |
| Mepolizumab 300 mg SC | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants in the age group of 12 to 17 years received Mepolizumab 300 mg SC injection every 4 weeks over a treatment period of 52 weeks. |
| Mepolizumab 200/100 mg SC | EXPERIMENTAL | A participant in the age group of 6 to 11 years with body weight greater than or equal to (\>=) 40 kg received mepolizumab 200 mg SC injections every 4 weeks. During the conduct of the study, the mepolizumab dose was reduced to 100 mg SC injection every 4 weeks as body weight of the participant reduced to less than (\<) 40 kg over a treatment period of 52 weeks. |
| Mepolizumab 200/300 mg SC | EXPERIMENTAL | A participant in the age group of 6 to 11 years with body weight \>=40 kg received mepolizumab 200 mg SC injections every 4 weeks. During the conduct of the study, the mepolizumab dose was increased to 300 mg SC injection every 4 weeks as age of the participant increased to the age group of 12 to 17 years over a treatment period of 52 weeks. |
| Participants receiving mepolizumab + Standard of care (SoC) | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants will receive one dose of 100 mg mepolizumab SC on top of SoC every 4 weeks during the 52-week treatment period. |
| Participants receiving placebo + SoC | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Participants will receive one dose of placebo via SC route on top of SoC, every 4 weeks during the 52-week treatment period. |
| Mepolizumab 100 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) received a 100 milligrams (mg) dose of mepolizumab as a subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks. Participants remained in the study for an assessment period of minimum of 52 weeks and a maximum of 104 weeks. |
| Placebo | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants with COPD received matching placebo as a subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks. Participants remained in the study for an assessment period of minimum of 52 weeks and a maximum of 104 weeks. |
| Subjects who received mepolizumab | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects who were part of study 200622 and were randomized to receive either placebo or mepolizumab will be enrolled in this study as per study eligibility criteria. In this study, subjects will receive 300 mg of mepolizumab SC (three 100 mg SC injections) every 4 Weeks for a total of 5 doses during 20-Week treatment period. |
| Mepolizumab 100 mg SC + MF | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants will receive total thirteen doses of 100 mg SC of mepolizumab in thigh, abdomen or upper arm every 4 weeks for 52 weeks on top of SoC which includes daily nasal spray of mometasone furoate. |
| Placebo SC + MF | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Participants will receive total thirteen doses of SC matching placebo in thigh, abdomen or upper arm every 4 weeks for 52 weeks on top of SoC which includes daily nasal spray of mometasone furoate. |
| Mepolizumab SC 100 mg/milliliter (mL) in autoinjector | EXPERIMENTAL | Three doses of mepolizumab liquid drug product in autoinjector will be self-administered by the subject/caregiver at 4-weekly intervals; 2 doses will be administered under observation in the clinic (at Week 0 and 8). One dose will be administered outside the clinic and without observation (within 24 hours after attending the clinic at Week 4). |
| Mepolizumab | EXPERIMENTAL | Enrolled subjects will receive either mepolizumab 300 mg or placebo subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks while continuing their HES therapy. |
| Mepolizumab SC 100 mg/milliliter (mL) in Safety syringe | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects will receive 3 doses of 100 mg mepolizumab, liquid drug product in safety syringe, subcutaneously as a single injection that is self-administered in the thigh, abdomen or administered in the upper arm (by caregiver only) at 4-weekly intervals; 2 doses will be administered under observation in the clinic (at Week 0 and 8). One dose will be administered outside the clinic and without observation (within 24 hours after attending the clinic at Week 4). |
| Liquid mepolizumab in safety syringe | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects will receive a single dose of 100 mg liquid mepolizumab administered subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe within a safety syringe according to randomization. |
| Liquid mepolizumab in an autoinjector | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects will receive a single dose of 100 mg liquid mepolizumab administered subcutaneously using a prefilled autoinjector, according to randomization. |
| Lyophilised mepolizumab from vial | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | Subjects will receive a single dose of 100 mg reconstituted lyophilized mepolizumab manually administered subcutaneously according to randomization |
| Arm Mepolizumab 100 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | There will be 4 parts during the study. Part A will be Variable Open-Label Run-in (maximum up to 132 weeks). Part B- Fixed Open-Label Run-In (4 Weeks to 8 weeks). Part C will be randomized double-blind treatment period (Up to 52 weeks) and in case of clinically significant asthma exacerbation, optional open label switch Part D (Up to 52 weeks post randomization). Subjects will receive mepolizumab (100 mg SC) every 4 weeks throughout study |
| Arm Placebo | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | There will be 4 parts during the study. Part A will be Variable Open-Label Run-in (maximum up to 132 weeks). Part B- Fixed Open-Label Run-In (4 Weeks to 8 weeks). Part C will be randomized double-blind treatment period (Up to 52 weeks) and in case of clinically significant asthma exacerbation, optional open label switch Part D (Up to 52 weeks post randomization). During Part A, B and D, subjects will receive open label mepolizumab (100 mg SC) every 4 weeks and during Part C, subjects will receive placebo SC every 4 weeks. |
| Subjects from clinical study MEA115921 | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects who participated in clinical study MEA115921 and who require a dose of prednisolone (or equivalent) of 5 mg/day for adequate control of their EGPA will be included. Eligible subjects will receive subcutaneously administered mepolizumab at a dose of 300 mg SC every 4 weeks. |
| Mepolizumab SC | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants will receive Mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously (SC) into the upper arm or thigh every 4 weeks for a period of 24 weeks (total of 6 doses) along with their respective standard care of treatment |
| Placebo SC | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Participants will receive placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) subcutaneously into the upper arm or thigh every 4 weeks for a period of 24 weeks (total of 6 doses) along with their respective standard care of treatment |
| Arm 1 | EXPERIMENTAL | Each subject will receive 100 mg mepolizumab SC injection every 4 weeks (13 administrations during 52 week treatment period) along with their baseline standard of care COPD medication |
| Arm 2 | EXPERIMENTAL | Each subject will receive 300 mg mepolizumab SC injection every 4 weeks (13 administrations during 52 week treatment period) along with their baseline standard of care COPD medication |
| Arm 3 | EXPERIMENTAL | Each subject will receive placebo (0.9percent sodium chloride) SC injection every 4 weeks (13 administrations during 52 week treatment period) their baseline standard of care COPD medication |
| Mepolizumab 300 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Each subject will receive mepolizumab 300 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (13 administrations) along with standard care. It will be administered as 3 separate injections (100 mg each- total dose 300 mg); individual injection sites will be separated by at least 5 cm. It will be administered into any of the upper arm, thigh or anterior abdominal wall. |
| Mepolizumab Arm | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects will receive 100 mg of Mepolizumab (in polypropylene syringe) injected subcutaneously (SC) once every 4 weeks for 12 months |
| Mepolizumab IV | EXPERIMENTAL | Mepolizumab 75 mg will be administered intravenously approximately every 4 weeks with the last dose at week 32. Subjects in the Mepolizumab IV arm will receive mepolizumab 75 mg intravenously and placebo SC once every 4 weeks with the last dose at Week 28 (total of 8 doses) |
| Placebo, followed by Mepolizumab 100 mg | OTHER | This arm will receive placebo, followed by Mepolizumab 100 mg. Subjects will receive placebo subcutaneously (SQ) monthly for 3 months, followed by Mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously (SQ) monthly for 3 months. Mepolizumab will be administered with 2 SQ injections of placebo and 1 SQ injection of Mepolizumab 100 mg to maintain blinding. |
| Mepolizumab 40 mg in Part A and B | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants with bodyweight \< 40 kg will receive 0.4 milliliter (mL) of reconstituted mepolizumab subcutaneously, in upper arm or thigh. |
| Mepolizumab 100 mg in Part A and B | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants with bodyweight \>= 40 kg will receive 1.0 mL of reconstituted mepolizumab subcutaneously, in upper arm or thigh. |
| Mepolizumab 250 mg subcutaneous (SC) | EXPERIMENTAL | 250 mg subcutaneous (SC) |
| Mepolizumab 125 mg subcutaneous (SC) | EXPERIMENTAL | 125 mg subcutaneous (SC) |
| Mepolizumab 12.5 mg subcutaneous (SC) | EXPERIMENTAL | 12.5 mg subcutaneous (SC) |
| Mepolizimab 75 mg intravenously (I.V.) | EXPERIMENTAL | 75 mg intravenously (I.V.) |
| Treatment Periods 1-8 | EXPERIMENTAL | Part A comprises eight outpatient visits (Visits 1 - 8). For six of these visits, subjects will receive a dose of either 750 mg mepolizumab or placebo. Dosing occurs in four week intervals. Assessment for entry into Part B will take place at the last visit in Part A (Visit 8). Subjects not eligible for Part B will have study exit procedures performed and be discontinued. |
| Run In period | OTHER | 10-14 day run in period to assess the patients suitability for entry into Part A of the trial. |
| Treatment periods 9-13 | NO_INTERVENTION | Subjects eligible for Part B will attend the clinic for up to 5 more outpatient visits (Visits 9 - 13) for assessments. Visits occur every four weeks. There is no dosing in Part B. At the point when each subject meets Study Exit criteria, study exit procedures will be performed and the subject will exit the study. |
| Mepolizumab 0.55 mg/kg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received mepolizumab 0.55 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg) by intravenous (IV) infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8. |
| Mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received mepolizumab 2.5 mg/kg by IV infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8. |
| Mepolizumab 10 mg/kg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received mepolizumab 10 mg/kg by IV infusion for 30 minutes on Day 1, Week 4 and Week 8. |
| Mepolizumab treatment arm | EXPERIMENTAL | Nasal epithelial cells will be exposed in vitro to mepolizumab in culture. |
| Control arm | NO_INTERVENTION | Nasal epithelial cells will be exposed in vitro to media without mepolizumab in culture |
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mepolizumab | DRUG | Mepolizumab was provided in pre-filled safety syringe |
| Placebo | DRUG | Placebo will be available as a clear to opalescent, colorless sterile solution for SC injection in a single-use, safety syringe |
| Standard of care | DRUG | Participants will continue to receive Standard of care as they are used to before entry in the study. |
| Mometasone furoate | DRUG | All participants will receive mometasone furoate usually 400 micrograms (mcg), 2 actuations (50 mcg/actuation) in each nostril twice daily. Intolerant participants will use 200g (2 actuations \[50 g/actuation\] in each nostril once daily). |
| Mepolizumab 300 mg | DRUG | Mepolizumab is available as lyophilized powder for injection reconstituted with Sterile Water for Injection, just prior to use. |
| Placebo matching mepolizumab | DRUG | Placebo is available as 0.9% sodium chloride solution |
| Active OCS capsules (5 mg prednisolone or prednisone) | DRUG | All subjects will be provided with 2 bottles of blinded OCS capsules, one containing 5mg OCS capsules (active OCS treatment) and a second one containing matching placebo capsules (placebo OCS treatment). These will be dispensed to each subject at each scheduled clinic visit and as needed. Subjects with an increase in blood eosinophils above the pre-specified threshold will be instructed to start blinded OCS treatment from one of the bottles provided (active treatment) unless the subject's HES therapy has already been increased due to a symptom flare within the past 2 weeks. |
| Placebo matching OCS capsules | DRUG | All subjects will be provided with 2 bottles of blinded OCS capsules, one containing 5mg OCS capsules (active OCS treatment) and a second one containing matching placebo capsules (placebo OCS treatment). These will be dispensed to each subject at each scheduled clinic visit and as needed.A subject who does not reach the pre-specified blood eosinophil threshold with a similar blood draw date will be selected to initiate a placebo OCS treatment in a blinded manner, unless the subject's HES therapy has already been increased due to a symptom flare within the past 2 weeks. |
| Lyophilized mepolizumab | BIOLOGICAL | Mepolizumab will be provided as white, uniform, lyophilized cake in vials with unit dose strength of 100 mg/vial for reconstitution in 1.2 mL sterile water for injection (SWFI). Following reconstitution it forms a clear to opalescent, colorless to pale yellow solution for SC injection. |
| Liquid mepolizumab | BIOLOGICAL | Mepolizumab will be provided as a clear to opalescent, colorless to pale yellow sterile solution for SC injection, supplied in a single-use, prefilled autoinjector or safety syringe containing 100 mg/mL mepolizumab with sodium phosphate, citric acid, sucrose ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and polysorbate 80. |
| Prefilled autoinjector | DEVICE | Single use, disposable autoinjector will be assembled with the prefilled syringe containing the drug product. It will enable automatic delivery of the drug product under the power of a spring mechanism following activation of the device. Start and end of injection clicks will inform the user of correct use. A plastic needle will cover shield the needle before and after injection to minimize the potential for needle stick injuries. |
| Prefilled Safety Syringe | DEVICE | Single use, disposable safety syringe with a retracting needle guard and locking system. |
| Mepolizumab 100mg | BIOLOGICAL | Mepolizumab is a fully humanised Immunoglobulin (IgG) antibody (IgG1, kappa) with human heavy and light chain frameworks. Mepolizumab will be provided as a lyophilised cake in sterile vials for individual use. |
| Prednisolone | DRUG | Subjects who require a dose of prednisolone (or equivalent) of 5 mg/day for adequate control of their EGPA will be included. |
| SOC | DRUG | Standard of Care (SOC) will differ by participants, however it will include high dose ICS with at least one other controller, e.g. LABA, with or without maintenance OCS |
| Mepolizumab IV | DRUG | Mepolizumab 75 mg IV will be administered every 4 weeks with the last dose at Week 28 |
| Mepolizumab SC | DRUG | Mepolizumab 100 mg SC will be administered every 4 weeks with the last dose at Week 28 |
| IV Placebo | DRUG | Normal saline (placebo) will be administered IV every 4 weeks with the last dose at Week 28 |
| SC Placebo | DRUG | Normal saline (placebo) will be administered SC every 4 weeks with the last dose at Week 28 |
| OCS (prednisone/prednisolone) | DRUG | Oral Corticosteroid (prednisone/prednisolone) |
| Mepolizumab 100 mg | DRUG | Mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneous injection |
| Run In Medication | DRUG | subjects will undergo a run-in period of 10 - 14 days on a low dose of Intranasal Steroids (INS). |
Inclusion Criteria: * Participant must be aged 6 to 17 years inclusive, at Screening (Visit 1). * Participants who have been diagnosed with HES for at least 6 months prior to enrolment (Visit 2). * A history of 2 or more HES flares within the past 12 months prior to Screening (Visit 1). * Participa...
Mepolizumab is an investigational monoclonal antibody being developed for asthma, hypereosinophilia, eosinophilic esophagitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and hypereosinophilic syndrome. It is in Phase 3 clinical development for these respiratory and eosinophilic conditions.
Mepolizumab is a monoclonal antibody of the -mab antibody class. It is designed to target and neutralize interleukin-5, a key cytokine involved in the growth, activation, and survival of eosinophils, which are white blood cells implicated in eosinophilic diseases.
Mepolizumab is being developed by GSK plc, a global biopharma company listed on the stock exchange under the ticker GSK. GSK is conducting clinical trials to evaluate the drug's safety and efficacy across multiple eosinophilic conditions.
Mepolizumab is in Phase 3 clinical development. It is an investigational drug and has not been approved by regulatory authorities. GSK has completed Phase 3 trials, including studies in severe uncontrolled refractory asthma and an autoinjector study in asthmatics.
Mepolizumab has been studied in 12 completed clinical trials with a total enrollment of 3,481 participants. Key trials include NCT01366521, a Phase 2 dose-ranging study in asthma patients with elevated eosinophils, and NCT01691521, a Phase 3 efficacy and safety study in severe uncontrolled refractory asthma.
Mepolizumab is the generic name for the drug marketed under the brand name Nucala. GSK plc develops and commercializes this biologic therapy for eosinophilic conditions. The drug is administered subcutaneously and has been studied in both adult and pediatric populations.