Approval Probability
TA Base Rate
Adjusted LOA
ML Risk
Also known as GSK3511294 (Depemokimab), Depemokimab
GSK3511294 · 17 trials · 5 indications
A clinically significant exacerbation is defined as a worsening of asthma requiring the use of systemic corticosteroids.
Moderate exacerbations are defined as clinically significant exacerbations that require treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as clinically significant exacerbations that require in-patient hospitalization (that is greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 24 hours) or result in death. The frequency of moderate/ severe exacerbations expressed as an annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations will be reported.
Mean change from baseline in total mucus plug volume measured at TLC at Week 26 will be assessed.
A HES flare is defined as either: a HES-related clinical manifestation based on a physician documented change in clinical signs or symptoms resulting in the need for the following : An increase in the maintenance systemic corticosteroid dose by at least 10 mg/day (prednisone/prednisolone equivalent) for at least 5 days, and/or an increase in or addition of any cytotoxic and/or immunosuppressive HES therapy. OR 2 or more courses of blinded active oral corticosteroid (OCS) during the intervention period. The frequency of HES flares will be calculated for each participant as the number of unique starting dates for HES flares.
Participants must be in remission at both Weeks 36 and 52.
Total endoscopic nasal polyps (NP) score evaluated the size and extent of nasal polyps via endoscopy. The assessments were performed by central video image recordings of nasal endoscopy. The right and left nostrils were scored from 0 to 4 (0 = No polyps; 1 = Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha; 2 = Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle concha; and 4 = Large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior meatus). The scores were graded based on NP size, recorded as sum of the right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps), calculated by summing the scores \[0 to 4\] in each nostril; with higher scores indicating worse status. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.
This endpoint evaluated the change from baseline in the mean nasal obstruction score using a Verbal Response Scale (VRS) from Week 49 through to Week 52. Participants used a VRS to rate nasal obstruction severity, with scores averaged over the specified period to assess treatment impact on nasal obstruction symptoms. Participants were asked to indicate the severity of nasal obstruction at their worst over the last 24 hours using a 4-point VRS, with options of no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms. This was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating worse status. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and data are presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of electronic diary (eDiary) data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.
This endpoint evaluated the change from baseline in the mean nasal obstruction score using a Verbal Response Scale (VRS) from Week 49 through to Week 52. Participants used a VRS to rate nasal obstruction severity, with scores averaged over the specified period to assess treatment impact on nasal obstruction symptoms. Participants were asked to indicate the severity of nasal obstruction at their worst over the last 24 hours using a 4-point VRS, with options of no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms. This was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating worse status. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment.
Serum samples were collected for the determination of anti-GSK3511294 antibodies (ADA) using a validated electro-chemiluminescent immunoassay. The assay involved screening, confirmation and titration assays. If serum samples tested positive in the screening assay, they were considered 'potentially positive' and were further analyzed for specificity using the confirmation assay. Samples that confirmed positive in the confirmation assay were reported as 'positive'. Confirmed positive ADA samples were further characterized in the titration assay to quasi-quantitate the amount of ADA in the sample and were also further characterized in the Neutralizing antibody (Nab) assay. A participant was considered positive ADA if they had at least one positive worst case post-Baseline ADA result. Number of participants with worst case post-Baseline positive anti-GSK3511294 antibodies are presented.
Blood samples were collected for the determination of positive neutralizing antibodies. Neutralizing antibody (NAb) test was only carried out on samples that were positive in the confirmatory binding antibody assay. A participant was considered positive for NAb if they had at least one positive worst case post-Baseline neutralizing antibody result. Number of participants with worst case post-Baseline positive neutralizing antibodies are presented.
Clinically significant exacerbations recorded were defined as worsening of asthma requiring the use of systemic corticosteroids (CS) \[such as intramuscular (IM), intravenous (IV) or oral\] and/or hospitalization and/or Emergency Department (ED) visit. For all participants, IV or oral steroids (e.g., prednisone) for at least 3 days or a single IM corticosteroid dose is required. For participants on maintenance systemic corticosteroids, at least double the existing maintenance dose for at least 3 days is required. Exacerbations recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF) were considered as verified clinically significant exacerbations and included in the primary analysis. Exacerbations separated by less than 7 days was treated as a continuation of the same exacerbation.
Clinically significant exacerbations recorded were defined as worsening of asthma requiring the use of systemic corticosteroids (CS) \[such as intramuscular (IM), intravenous (IV) or oral\] and/or hospitalization and/or Emergency Department (ED) visit. For all participants, IV or oral steroids (e.g., prednisone) for at least 3 days or a single IM corticosteroid dose is required. For participants on maintenance systemic corticosteroids, at least double the existing maintenance dose for at least 3 days is required. Exacerbations recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF) were considered as verified clinically significant exacerbations and included in the primary analysis. Exacerbations separated by less than 7 days was treated as a continuation of the same exacerbation.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of depemokimab. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of depemokimab. PK analysis was conducted using standard non-compartmental methods.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC(0-Infinity). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. As the first dose of depemokimab was administered on Day 1, Week 26 post-dose correlates to Day 1 plus 182 days, that is, Day 183.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC(0-T). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. As the first dose of depemokimab was administered on Day 1, Week 26 post-dose correlates to Day 1 plus 182 days, that is, Day 183.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC(0-Week 4). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. As the first dose of depemokimab was administered on Day 1, Week 4 post-dose correlates to Day 1 plus 28 days, that is, Day 29.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC(0-Week 12). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. As the first dose of depemokimab was administered on Day 1, Week 12 post-dose correlates to Day 1 plus 84 days, that is, Day 85.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for AUC(0-Week 26). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. As the first dose of depemokimab was administered on Day 1, Week 26 post-dose correlates to Day 1 plus 182 days, that is, Day 183.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for percentage of AUC(0-Infinity) obtained by extrapolation. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. As the first dose of depemokimab was administered on Day 1, Week 26 post-dose correlates to Day 1 plus 182 days, that is, Day 183.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Tmax. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. Tmax was determined directly from the plasma concentration-time data. As the first dose of depemokimab was administered on Day 1, Week 26 post-dose correlates to Day 1 plus 182 days, that is, Day 183.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Tlast. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. As the first dose of depemokimab was administered on Day 1, Week 26 post-dose correlates to Day 1 plus 182 days, that is, Day 183.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Apparent Clearance. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. As the first dose of depemokimab was administered on Day 1, Week 26 post-dose correlates to Day 1 plus 182 days, that is, Day 183.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for apparent volume of distribution. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. As the first dose of depemokimab was administered on Day 1, Week 26 post-dose correlates to Day 1 plus 182 days, that is, Day 183.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Terminal elimination rate constant. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. As the first dose of depemokimab was administered on Day 1, Week 26 post-dose correlates to Day 1 plus 182 days, that is, Day 183.
Blood samples were collected from participants at indicated time points and analyzed for Terminal phase half-life. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard non compartmental analysis. As the first dose of depemokimab was administered on Day 1, Week 26 post-dose correlates to Day 1 plus 182 days, that is, Day 183.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events that may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed before; is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function.
AESIs were defined as Hypersensitivity (narrow) and Injection site reactions like hematoma and swelling.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like RBC count. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like MCV. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like MCH. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like hemoglobin. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of hematology parameters like hematocrit. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like hsCRP. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like total protein and albumin. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like total bilirubin, direct bilirubin and creatinine. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Urinary specific gravity measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine specific gravity is a measure of the concentration of solutes in the urine and provides information on the kidney's ability to concentrate urine. The concentration of the excreted molecules determines the urine's specific gravity.
SBP and DBP were assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Temperature was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Heart rate was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Respiration rate was assessed in a supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
12-lead ECG were performed in a supine position using an automated ECG machine that calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, QT and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. ECG measurements were performed in triplicate. When multiple ECGs were performed at the same planned timepoint, the average value of each parameter was used. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
12-lead ECG were performed in a supine position using an automated ECG machine that calculated PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QTcF interval. ECG measurements were performed in triplicate. When multiple ECGs were performed at the same planned timepoint, the average value of each parameter was used. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like ALP, AST and ALT. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for analysis of clinical parameters like glucose, calcium, potassium, sodium, BUN, and magnesium. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Urine samples were collected to analyze presence of ketones, occult blood, glucose, and protein in urine. In this dipstick test, the level of occult blood, glucose, ketones and urine protein in urine samples were recorded as negative, trace, 1+ and 2+ indicating proportional concentrations in urine. Only categories with abnormal significant values have been presented.
Urinary pH measurement is a routine part of urinalysis. Urine pH is an acid-base measurement. pH is measured on a numeric scale ranging from 0 to 14; values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic, and a pH greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acid pH (5.0 - 6.0).
Blood samples were collected at indicated timepoints for analysis for complement (C3 and C4). Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value.
| Arm | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Depemokimab | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants will receive depemokimab at doses based on their body weight. |
| Placebo | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Participants will be administered placebo along with SoC |
| Participants receiving depemokimab+placebo matching mepolizumab | EXPERIMENTAL | - |
| Participants receiving mepolizumab+placebo matching depemokimab | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | - |
| Participants diagnosed with asthma receiving GSK3511294 (Depemokimab) | EXPERIMENTAL | - |
| GSK3511294 | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received a 100 milligram (mg) dose of GSK3511294 SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26). Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance asthma SOC treatment throughout the study. |
| Depemokimab 100mg SC | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received GSK3511294 (Depemokimab) 100 milligrams (mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection administered every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) alongside placebo SC treatment matching the active comparator (participant's anti-IL-5/5R treatment prior to randomisation: either placebo matching mepolizumab every 4 weeks or placebo matching benralizumab every 8 weeks). |
| Mepolizumab 100 mg / Benralizumab 30 mg SC | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | Participants received their existing active comparator (either mepolizumab 100 mg every 4 weeks or benralizumab 30 mg every 8 weeks) according to the participant's treatment prior to randomisation plus placebo SC matching GSK3511294 (Depemokimab) administered every 26 weeks. |
| Depemokimab via SSD | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received a single subcutaneous dose of 100 milligrams (mg) of depemokimab administered via a Safety Syringe Device (SSD) on Day 1. |
| Depemokimab via autoinjector | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received a single subcutaneous dose of 100 mg of depemokimab administered via an autoinjector on Day 1. |
| Depemokimab 100mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Healthy Chinese participants received a single dose of 100 mg Depemokimab subcutaneously on Day 1. |
| Depemokimab 300mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Healthy Chinese participants received a single dose of 300 mg Depemokimab subcutaneously on Day 1. |
| Subjects receiving GSK3511294 in Cohort 1 | EXPERIMENTAL | Six subjects in Cohort 1 will receive a single SC dose of 2 mg GSK3511294. |
| Subjects receiving placebo in Cohort 1 | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Two subjects in Cohort 1 will receive a single SC dose of placebo. |
| Subjects receiving GSK3511294 in Cohort 2 | EXPERIMENTAL | Six subjects in Cohort 2 will receive a single SC dose of 10 mg GSK3511294. |
| Subjects receiving placebo in Cohort 2 | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Two subjects in Cohort 2 will receive a single SC dose of placebo. |
| Subjects receiving GSK3511294 in Cohort 3 | EXPERIMENTAL | Nine subjects in Cohort 3 will receive a single SC dose of 30 mg GSK3511294. |
| Subjects receiving placebo in Cohort 3 | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Three subjects in Cohort 3 will receive a single SC dose of placebo. |
| Subjects receiving GSK3511294 in Cohort 4 | EXPERIMENTAL | Nine subjects in Cohort 4 will receive a single SC dose of 100 mg GSK3511294. |
| Subjects receiving placebo in Cohort 4 | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Three subjects in Cohort 4 will receive a single SC dose of placebo. |
| Subjects receiving GSK3511294 in Cohort 5 | EXPERIMENTAL | Six subjects in Cohort 5 will receive a single SC dose of 300 mg GSK3511294. |
| Subjects receiving placebo in Cohort 5 | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Two subjects in Cohort 5 will receive a single SC dose of placebo. |
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Depemokimab | BIOLOGICAL | Depemokimab will be administered. |
| Placebo | DRUG | Placebo will be administered |
| Mepolizumab | BIOLOGICAL | Mepolizumab will be administered |
| Placebo matching mepolizumab | DRUG | Placebo matching to mepolizumab will be administered. |
| Placebo matching depemokimab | DRUG | Placebo matching to depemokimab will be administered. |
| Depemokimab (GSK3511294) | BIOLOGICAL | Depemokimab (GSK3511294) was administered using a pre- filled syringe. |
| GSK3511294 (Depemokimab) | BIOLOGICAL | GSK3511294 (Depemokimab) will be administered using a pre-filled safety syringe. |
| GSK3511294 | BIOLOGICAL | GSK3511294 was administered using a pre-filled syringe. |
| Benralizumab | BIOLOGICAL | Benralizumab 30 mg will be administered in a single-use PFS. |
| Standard of care (SoC) | DRUG | Non-biologic SoC will include inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus at least one other controller, long-acting beta-2-agonist (LABA), long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), with or without maintenance oral corticosteroids (OCS). |
| Pre-filled Syringes (PFS) | DEVICE | PFS will include glass barrel with pre-staked needle and plunger. |
| Salbutamol/albuterol | DRUG | Salbutamol/albuterol will be supplied to all subjects for use as rescue medication during the study. |
Inclusion Criteria: * Participants who have a documented physician diagnosis of asthma for at least 12 months prior to Visit 1 that meets the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines \[NHLBI, 2007\] or Global Initiative of Asthma (GINA) guidelines \[GINA, 2025\] or Japanese Pediatric Gu...
Top 16 of 18 competitors
| Company | Ticker | Trials | Lead Phase | Drugs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis AG Sponsored ADR | NVS | 5 | PHASE3 | QVM149, QMF149, Glycopyrronium bromide |
| GSK plc Sponsored ADR | GSK | 10 | PHASE3 | Trelegy Ellipta, Depemokimab, HFA-152a, GSK5784283, Ventolin |
| Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited Sponsored ADR | TEVA | 4 | PHASE3 | TEV-56248, ProAir (albuterol sulfate eMDPI), Budesonide/Formoterol SPIROMAX, Reslizumab |
| Sanofi SA Sponsored ADR | SNY | 8 | PHASE3 | Dupilumab, Lunsekimig |
| AstraZeneca PLC | AZN | 28 | PHASE3 | Benralizumab, Tezepelumab, Budesonide/formoterol, Albuterol/budesonide, PT007 |
| Pfizer Inc. | PFE | 4 | PHASE3 | Tilrekimig, PF-07275315, PF-08103402 |
| Generate Biomedicines, Inc. | GENB | 3 | PHASE3 | GB-0895 |
| Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. | KYMR | 1 | PHASE2 | KT-621 |
| Eli Lilly and Company | LLY | 1 | PHASE2 | Brenipatide |
| Incyte Corporation | INCY | 1 | PHASE2 | povorcitinib |
| Upstream Bio, Inc. | UPB | 1 | PHASE2 | Verekitug |
| Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | ARWR | 1 | PHASE2 | ARO-RAGE |
| Amgen Inc. | AMGN | 1 | PHASE1 | AMG 691 |
| Johnson & Johnson | JNJ | 1 | PHASE2 | JNJ-95597528 |
| Apogee Therapeutics, Inc. | APGE | 1 | PHASE1 | APG777 |
| Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. | CLDX | 1 | PHASE1 | CDX-622 |
GSK3511294 is being developed for the treatment of asthma, specifically severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype. It is an investigational therapy in Phase 3 clinical development and has been studied in adults and adolescents 12 years and older with this condition.
GSK3511294 is developed by GSK plc, which trades under the ticker GSK. The company sponsors the clinical program evaluating the drug in severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype, including placebo-controlled and active-comparator Phase 3 studies.
GSK3511294 is in Phase 3 clinical development. Five Phase 3 trials have been completed, including placebo-controlled studies and an open-label extension, with total enrollment of approximately 3,200 participants. It is an investigational drug and is not approved for commercial use.
GSK3511294 has been evaluated in five completed Phase 3 trials: NCT05243680, an open-label extension study; NCT04719832, a placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study; NCT04718389, comparing it with mepolizumab or benralizumab; and NCT04718103. All enrolled participants with severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype.
Yes, GSK3511294 is also known as depemokimab. Both names refer to the same investigational compound developed by GSK plc for severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype, so search results and trial records under either name describe the same drug asset.
GSK3511294 is described as a small molecule in its development program. It is being studied in biomarker-selected patients with severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype, a population defined by elevated eosinophil levels, and the trials enrolled participants based on this biomarker profile.