Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin

Phase 4FDA approved

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | ADC | Oncology |Pfizer, Inc.|Trials Updated: Sep 24, 2026

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin development status

FDA approval on record Aug 17, 2017 as Besponsa
Approval holderWyeth Pharms Inc
ApplicationBLA761040
Highest phase Phase 4 (NCT05687032)
Phase scored for PFEPhase 3
Registered trials 21 across 5 sponsors since Dec 2003

Label indication 1. INDICATIONS AND USAGE BESPONSA is indicated for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD22-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adult and pediatric patients 1 year and older . BESPONSA is a CD22-directed antibody and cytotoxic drug conjugate indicated for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD22-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adult and pediatric… FDA label

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin target and mechanism

Molecular targetCD22
Target classBinding Agent
ModalityADC

Also known as Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (CMC-544), Besponsa, CMC-544

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedACTIVE_CONTROLLEDDMCBiomarker
Total Trials10
Total Enrollment967

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin clinical trials

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin · 10 trials · 5 indications

Phase 3 1Phase 2 4Phase 1 5
NCT01564784A Study Of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Versus Investigator's Choice Of Chemotherapy In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
COMPLETED326 Analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study Of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Versus Investigator's Choice Of Chemotherapy In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Remission (Complete Remission [CR]/Complete Remission With Incomplete Hematologic Recovery [CRi]) as Assessed by the Endpoint Adjudication Committee (EAC)
Screening, Day 16 to 28 of Cycles 1, 2 and 3, then every 1 to 2 cycles (or as clinically indicated) up to approximately 4 weeks (end of treatment [EoT]) from the last dose

CR was the disappearance of leukemia indicated by less than (\<) 5 percent (%) marrow blasts \& absence of peripheral blood leukemic blasts, with recovery of hematopoiesis defined by absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to (≥)1000 per microliter (/μL) \& platelets ≥100,000/μL. C1 extramedullary disease status (i.e. complete disappearance of measurable \& non-measurable extramedullary disease with the following exceptions: for participants with at least 1 measurable lesion, all nodal masses greater than (\>) 1.5 centimeters (cm) in greatest transverse diameter (GTD) at baseline must have regressed to less than or equal to (≤) 1.5 cm in GTD; all nodal masses ≥1 cm \& ≤1.5 cm in GTD at baseline must have regressed to \<1 cm GTD or reduced by 75% in sum of products of greatest diameters, no new lesions, spleen \& other previously enlarged organs must have regressed in size \& must not be palpable) was required. CRi was defined as CR except ANC \<1000/μL \&/or platelets \<100,000/μL.

Overall Survival (OS)
Up to 5 years after randomization or 2 years from randomization of the last participant, whichever occurs first.

OS was defined as the time from randomization to date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact.

Minimum Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity in participants achieving complete response (CR), complete response with incomplete platelet count recovery (CRp), or complete response with incomplete count recovery (CRi)
After 1 treatment cycle: Day 28 +/- 2 days

MRD negativity status is determined based on the minimum MRD percentage between the date of CR/CRp/CRi and end of treatment test as assessed by RQ-PCR, with reflex to FC result if MRD is non-evaluable by RQ-PCR

Percentage of Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) During the Phase 1 Dose-Finding Phase
Cycle 1

DLT was any of the following in the first cycle \& attributable to inotuzumab ozogamicin: any greater than or equal to (≥) Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity except nausea/vomiting (if manageable with supportive care), alopecia, \& toxicities secondary to neutropenia \& sepsis; prolonged myelosuppression (absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] less than \[\<\] 500 per microliter \[/µL\] or platelet count \<25,000/µL in bone marrow with \<5 percent (%) blasts \& no evidence of leukemia more than 45 days beyond the most recent dose of test article); any Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity (excluding toxicities such as alopecia or those secondary to neutropenia \& sepsis) not resolving to ≥ Grade 2 within 7 days of the most recent dose of test article or was clinically significant irrespective of duration; any ≥ Grade 3 elevation of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase or bilirubin lasting ≥7 days; any test article related toxicity resulting in permanent discontinuation of test article.

Percentage of Participants With Preliminary Satisfactory Response (Complete Response [CR], CR With Incomplete Count Recovery [CRi], Partial Response [PR], or Resistant Disease [RD]) Indicating Disease Stability After First Dose During Phase 1 Dose-Finding
From screening to progressive disease or another induction therapy started, up to approximately 2 years

CR was the disappearance of leukemia indicated by \<5% marrow blasts and absence of peripheral blood leukemic blasts, with recovery of hematopoiesis defined by ANC ≥1000/µL and platelets ≥100,000/µL. C1 extramedullary disease status was required. CRi was as for CR except with ANC \<1000/µL and/or platelets \<100,000/µL. PR was an improved or no worsening of acute lymphocytic leukemia indicated by no peripheral blood blasts, and/or at least a 50% decrease in the marrow blast percentage, compared to pre-treatment value, and marrow blast percentage ≥5% and less than or equal to (≤)25% and/or C2 extramedullary disease status. RD occurred if a participant survived ≥7 days following completion of initial treatment course and had persistent leukemia in the most recent peripheral blood smear or bone marrow and/or persistent disease involvement at any extramedullary site after completion of therapy.

Percentage of Participants With CR or CRi During Phase 2
From screening to progressive disease or another induction therapy started, up to approximately 2 years

CR was defined as a disappearance of leukemia as indicated by \<5% marrow blasts and the absence of peripheral blood leukemic blasts, with recovery of hematopoiesis defined by ANC ≥1000/µL and platelets ≥100,000/µL. C1 extramedullary disease status was required. CRi was defined as CR except with ANC \<1000/µL and/or platelets \<100,000/µL.

Percentage of Participants With CR, CRi or PR During the Phase 1 Expansion Phase
From screening to progressive disease or another induction therapy started, up to approximately 2 years

CR was defined as a disappearance of leukemia as indicated by \<5% marrow blasts and the absence of peripheral blood leukemic blasts, with recovery of hematopoiesis defined by ANC ≥1000/µL and platelets ≥100,000/µL. C1 extramedullary disease status was required. CRi was defined as CR except with ANC \<1000/µL and/or platelets \<100,000/µL. PR was defined as an improved or no worsening of acute lymphocytic leukemia as indicated by no peripheral blood blasts, and either or both of the following: at least a 50% decrease in the marrow blast percentage, compared to the pre-treatment value, and marrow blast percentage ≥5% and ≤25% and/or C2 extramedullary disease status.

Percentage of Participants With Indolent NHL Achieving CR or Partial Response (PR) According to International Response Criteria for NHL
Assessed for up to 2 years, including planned assessments every 8 to 12 weeks from first dose of study drug. Follow-up period may have been extended beyond 2 years due to dosing delays and allowed study visit windows.

CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and disease-related symptoms; all nodes must have decreased to normal (less than or equal to \[≤\]1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter \[GTD\] for nodes more than \[\>\]1.5 cm before therapy) or ≤1 cm (short axis) in previously involved node; enlarged spleen prior to therapy must have regressed and be non-palpable; bone marrow lymphoma: infiltrate must have been cleared on repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. PR was defined as \>50% decrease in the sum of the product diameters (SPD) of up to 6 index lesions. No increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by greater than or equal to \[≥\]50% in the SPD or GTD (for single nodules). With exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs was usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. No progression of non-target disease or new lesions.

Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) After 3 Cycles of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Plus Rituximab Therapy
Up to 2 years (9 weeks of 3 21-day cycles and every 3 to 6 months during the long-term follow-up period)

Response criteria based on National Cancer Institute (NCI) International Response Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. CR: no detectable clinical \& radiographic evidence of disease/disease-related symptoms; lymph nodes/nodal masses regressed to normal size (less than or equal to \[≤\] 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter for nodes greater than \[\>\] 1.5 cm pre-therapy); spleen \& other organs (if enlarged pre-therapy) regressed in size \& spleen not palpable on physical examination; repeat bone marrow infiltrate clear. PR: \> or equal to (≥) 50% decrease in sum of product diameters (SPD) of 6 largest dominant nodes/nodal masses; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; splenic \& hepatic nodules regressed by ≥ 50% in SPD; involvement of other organs usually assessable \& no measurable disease present; no new sites of disease. Participants achieving CR, but with persistent morphologic bone marrow involvement or no bone marrow assessment after treatment were partial responders.

Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 1
From the first dose of study medication (Study Day 1) to the completion of the first 21-day cycle.

DLT was defined as: febrile neutropenia, Grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia ≥7 days, Gr 4 thrombocytopenia ≥7 days, Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding requiring a transfusion, Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (except alopecia) ≥7 days or treatment-related and clinically significant irrespective of duration, ≥Gr 3 QTc prolongation, Gr 4 alanine or aspartate aminotransferase, Gr 2 hyperbilirubinemia (greater than (\>)1.5 x upper normal limit) \>7 days, delayed recovery from a treatment-related toxicity that prevented re-dosing by \>7 days, or Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment during the first cycle.

Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 2
From the first dose of study medication (Study Day 1) to the completion of the first 21-day cycle.

DLT was defined as: febrile neutropenia, Grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia ≥7 days, Gr 4 thrombocytopenia ≥7 days, Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding requiring a transfusion, Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (except alopecia) ≥7 days or treatment-related and clinically significant irrespective of duration, ≥Gr 3 QTc prolongation, Gr 4 alanine or aspartate aminotransferase, Gr 2 hyperbilirubinemia (greater than (\>)1.5 x upper normal limit) \>7 days, delayed recovery from a treatment-related toxicity that prevented re-dosing by \>7 days, or Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment during the first cycle.

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the MTD and EE Cohorts
From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks.

OR was evaluated according to the International Response Criteria for NHLs. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all lesions and disease-related symptoms; all nodes must have decreased to normal (less than or equal to \[≤\]1.5 centimeters \[cm\] in their greatest transverse diameter (GTD) for nodes \>1.5 cm before therapy) or ≤1 cm (short axis) in previously involved node; enlarged spleen prior to therapy must have regressed and be non-palpable; bone marrow lymphoma: infiltrate must have been cleared on repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. PR was defined as \>50% decrease in the sum of the product diameters (SPD) of up to 6 index lesions. No increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by ≥50% in the SPD or GTD (for single nodules). With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. No progression of non-target disease or new lesions.

Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE
SAEs were assessed from informed consent through and including the end of treatment visit (at least 28 calendar days after last study drug administration). Non-SAEs were recorded from time of the first dose of study drug through last participant visit.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event may not necessarily have had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as those occurring on or after the first study drug dose day through and including 56 days post last dose of study drug. The severity of all AEs was graded by the investigator using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AE Version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE v3.0).

Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Chemistry Abnormality During Therapy
Within 3 days prior to the start of each cycle, on Day 8 of each cycle, on Day 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3, and the end-of-treatment visit. Each Cycle is 21 Days.

The following parameters were analyzed for blood chemistry: blood urea nitrogen (or urea), creatinine, glucose, calcium, sodium, potassium, phosphorus, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin (and direct bilirubin, if total bilirubin was elevated), alkaline phosphatase, uric acid (or urate), albumin and total protein. Laboratory test results were graded using the NCI CTCAE v3.0 where CTCAE Grade 3 equals "severe" and CTCAE Grade 4 equals "life threatening or disabling."

Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Hematology Abnormality During Therapy
Within 3 days prior to the start of each cycle, Day 8 of each cycle, Day 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3, and the end-of-treatment visit. Each Cycle is 21 Days.

The following parameters were analyzed for hematology: lymphocytes, basophils, eosinophils, erythrocytes, hematocrit, hemoglobin, leukocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, prothrombin international normalized ratio, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Laboratory test results were graded using the NCI CTCAE v3.0 where CTCAE Grade 3 equals "severe" and CTCAE Grade 4 equals "life threatening or disabling."

Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLT)
Up to 28 days

A DLT was defined as the following drug-related adverse event which occurred during the first 28 days: 1) Any National Cancer Institute (NCI) Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity (except Grade 3 nausea or vomiting without optimal treatment), 2) Febrile neutropenia, 3) Grade 4 absolute neutrophil count lasting \>=7 days, 4) Grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting \>=3 days, 5) Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia associated with a bleeding episode requiring platelet transfusion, 6)Delayed recovery (to grade \<=1 or baseline, except alopecia) from a drug-related toxicity that delayed the next dose \>2 weeks

Incidence and severity of adverse events, dose-limiting toxicities, and changes in laboratory test results.
4 months
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Combination With Rituximab (375 mg/m^2 )
First 28-day cycle

Inotuzumab ozogamicin was dose escalated (3 to 6 evaluable participants enrolled per dose cohort) during the first 28 days after the first administration of inotuzumab ozogamicin + rituximab. Enrollment at the next dose level or enrollment of additional subjects into a cohort proceeded according to the following criteria: 0 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) by Day 28 of first dose move to higher dose, 1 participant reporting DLT but no others in cohort by Day 28 of first dose move to higher dose, greater than 2 participants reporting DLT by Day 28 of first dose stop and prior dose level considered MTD. The worldwide medical monitor and investigators reviewed all significant study drug-related toxicities to determine if the dose escalation rules were satisfied and whether the dose escalation schedule required modification.

Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) (Safety Population)
Protocol reporting period of from informed consent to at least 28 days after the last dose. This outcome measure time frame: From the first dose of study drug to up to 56 days after the last dose of either study drug.

A TEAE is any event that occurred after the first dose of study drug up to 56 days post the last dose of study drug (either rituximab or inotuzumab ozogamicin).

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Baseline up to 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 225)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) are defined as any new event reported after first dose of study drug up to 42 days after last dose of study drug, or any event that is worse in severity than at any time during the baseline period. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious adverse events (non-SAEs).

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Grades Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Based on Severity
Baseline up to 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 225)

AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AE severity was defined to be the maximum toxicity grade of the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) experienced by the participants during the study. AE was assessed according to severity; Grade 1 (mild AE), Grade 2 (moderate AE), Grade 3 (severe AE), Grade 4 (life-threatening or disabling AE), Grade 5 (death related to AE). Participants with Grade 3 or higher grades TEAEs were reported.

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD): Part 1 (Dose Escalation Cohorts)
Baseline up to Day 28

MTD was defined as highest dose level for which no more than 1 participant in a dose cohort experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT was defined as any of the following events occurring during the first 21 days (or 28 days for participants treated every 4 weeks) days of study medication and considered at least possibly-related to study medication: any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity except grade 3 alopecia, nausea, or vomiting, any grade 4 febrile neutropenia, any grade 4 thrombocytopenia or any bleeding episode requiring platelet transfusion, any grade 4 absolute neutrophil count (for a duration of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 7 days), delayed recovery (less than or equal to \[\<=\] grade 1 or baseline) from a toxicity that delays the initiation of the next dose by more than 2 weeks.

Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)
Baseline up to Day 28

DLT was classified as per National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0 and defined as any of the following events occurring during the first 21 days (or 28 days for participants treated every 4 weeks) days of study medication and considered at least possibly-related to study medication: any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity except grade 3 alopecia, nausea, or vomiting, any grade 4 febrile neutropenia, any grade 4 thrombocytopenia or any bleeding episode requiring platelet transfusion, any grade 4 absolute neutrophil count (for a duration of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 7 days), delayed recovery (less than or equal to \[\<=\] grade 1 or baseline) from a toxicity that delays the initiation of the next dose by more than 14 days.

Secondary Endpoints

Duration of Remission (DoR) for Participants Who Achieved CR/CRi (Per Investigator Assessment)
Up to 2 years from randomization
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Up to 2 years from randomization
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant (HSCT)
Up to 19 weeks from last dose
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingNONE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
Arm AEXPERIMENTAL -
Arm BACTIVE_COMPARATOR -
Inotuzumab ozogamicinEXPERIMENTALEach participant in the InO arm will receive 1 course (3 doses) of InO, as follows: * Day 1: 0.8 mg/m2 * Days 8 (±1 day) and Day 15 (±1 day): 0.5 mg/m2/dose
ALLR3ACTIVE_COMPARATORMitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 2 Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 (max single dose 2 mg) administered on Days 3, 10, 17 and 24 Dexamethasone 20 mg/m2/day administered orally (or IV) divided into two daily doses (maximum 40 mg/day) as two 5-day blocks on Days 1-5 and Days 15-19. PEG-asparaginase 1000 units/m2 IV administered on Days 3 and 17. In case of hypersensitivity/allergic reaction to PEG-asparaginase, each dose of PEG-asparaginase will be replaced by Erwinia-asparaginase at a dose of 20,000 units/m² IV or IM every other day for a total of 6 doses
Rituximab 375 mg/m^2 + Inotuzumab Ozogamicin 1.8 mg/m^2EXPERIMENTALInotuzumab ozogamicin, in combination with rituximab, will be administered to patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma prior to an autologous stem cell transplant (aSCT).
Arm 1 (R-CVP)EXPERIMENTALSubjects in arm 1 will be enrolled in dose escalation cohorts that will initially evaluate an escalating dose of cyclophosphamide in combination with set doses of inotuzumab ozogamicin, vincristine, prednisone, and rituximab.
Arm 2 (R-GDP)EXPERIMENTALSubjects in arm 2 will be enrolled in dose escalation cohorts that will initially evaluate escalating doses of gemcitabine and/or cisplatinum in combination with set doses of inotuzumab ozogamicin, dexamethasone, and rituximab.
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin + RituximabEXPERIMENTAL -
1EXPERIMENTAL -
INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN MTD + RITUXIMAB (FOLLICULAR)EXPERIMENTALFollicular
INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN MTD + RITUXIMAB (DLBCL)EXPERIMENTALDiffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN MTD + RITUXIMAB (REFRACTORY)EXPERIMENTALRefractory Aggressive NHL

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
inotuzumab ozogamicinDRUGDose: inotuzumab ozogamicin 0.8-0.5 mg/m\^2 IV, weekly, 3 times per cycle Cycle length: 21-28 days Total number of cycles: 6
FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF)DRUGDose: cytarabine 2.0 g/m\^2/day IV days 1-6 fludarabine30 mg/m\^2/day IV days 2-6 Cycle length: 28 days Total number of cycles: 4
HIDAC (high dose cytarabine)DRUGcytarabine 3 g/m\^2 IV every 12 hours for up to 12 times
cytarabine and mitoxantroneDRUGmitoxantrone 12 mg/m\^2 IV days 1-3 cytarabine 200 mg/m\^2/day IV over 7 days cycle length: 15-20 days Total number of cycles: 4
ALLR3DRUGThe ALLR3 chemotherapy regimen (vincristine, mitoxantrone, dexamethasone, and PEG-asparaginase \[or erwinia-asparaginase in the event of an allergic reaction to PEG-asparaginase\]) has been adopted by pediatric oncology groups as treatment for pediatric relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (CMC-544)DRUGAdministered intravenously at 1.8 mg/m2 every 4 weeks for a planned 4 - 8 cycles
rituximabDRUG375 mg/m\^2 two days before cycle 1 by intravenous infusion; 375 mg/m\^2 every 21 days by intravenous infusion, 3 to 6 doses
inotuzumab ozogamicin+rituximab +cyclophosphamide+vincristine+prednisoneDRUGDay 1: Rituximab at 375 mg/m2 Cyclophosphamide at 375 mg/m2 (cohort 1), 550mg/m2 (cohort 2), 750 mg/m2 (cohort 3, 4) Vincristine at 1.4 mg/m2 (max 2 mg) Day 2 Inotuzumab ozogamicin at 0.8 mg/m2 (cohort 1, 2, 3), 1.3 mg/m2 (cohort 4) Days 1-5: Prednisone at 40 mg/m2 Each cycle is 3 weeks, with a maximum of 6 cycles total.
inotuzumab ozogamicin+rituximab+gemcitabine+cisplatinum+dexamethasoneDRUGDay 1: Rituximab at 375 mg/m2 Gemcitabine at 500 mg/m2 (cohort 1, 2b, 3b), 1000mg/m2 (cohort 2a, 3a, 4, 5) Cisplatin at 37.5 mg/m2 (cohort 1, 2a), 50mg/m2 (cohort 2b, 3a), 75mg/m2 (cohort 3b, 4, 5) Day 2: Inotuzumab ozogamicin at 0.8 mg/m2 (cohort 1, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4), 1.3mg/m2 (cohort 5) Days 1-4: Dexamethasone at 40 mg Each cycle is 3 weeks, with a maximum of 6 cycles total.
Rituximab (Rituxan)DRUG375 mg/m2, IV on day 1 of each 28 day cycle; up to 8 cycles unless PD, unacceptable toxicity, or subject's refusal occurs.
Inotuzumab ozogamicin [CMC-544]DRUGCMC-544, IV, dose escalation trial
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range18 Years to N/A
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites198

Inclusion Criteria: * CD22 expression * Adequate liver and renal functions Exclusion Criteria: * Isolated extramedullary disease * Active Central Nervous System \[CNS\] disease

Countries:United StatesArgentinaAustraliaCanadaChinaCzechiaFinlandFranceGermanyHungaryItalyJapanNetherlandsPolandSingaporeSouth KoreaSpainSwedenTaiwanUnited KingdomAustriaBelgiumDenmarkIsraelNorwaySlovakiaSwitzerlandHong Kong
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Recent Changes (Last 90 Days)

LOWSep 24, 2026NCT05748171lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 24, 2026NCT05748171lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWAug 14, 2026NCT05748171lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWAug 14, 2026NCT05748171lastUpdatePostDate: changed

Frequently asked questions about Inotuzumab Ozogamicin

What is inotuzumab ozogamicin used for?

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is an oncology therapy being studied and used in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia, B-cell lymphoma, and lymphoma. It is an antibody-drug conjugate developed by Pfizer, Inc. (PFE) and is in Phase 3 development across these blood cancer indications.

What does inotuzumab ozogamicin target?

Inotuzumab ozogamicin targets CD22, a B-cell surface antigen. It is an antibody-drug conjugate that binds CD22, a binding agent target class, allowing delivery of a cytotoxic payload to CD22-expressing malignant B cells in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and related B-cell malignancies.

Who makes inotuzumab ozogamicin?

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is developed by Pfizer, Inc., which trades under the ticker PFE. Pfizer is the sponsor of the clinical development program for this CD22-targeted antibody-drug conjugate across acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia, B-cell lymphoma, and lymphoma.

What phase is inotuzumab ozogamicin in?

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is in Phase 3 development. Its clinical program includes six trials in total, with one currently active and six completed, and a combined enrollment of 426 patients. The studies include randomized, active-controlled designs and biomarker-selected populations.

What clinical trials is inotuzumab ozogamicin in?

Inotuzumab ozogamicin trials include NCT05748171, a recruiting Phase 2 study in children aged 1 to under 18 with first relapse acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and NCT01564784, a completed Phase 3 study versus investigator's choice chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Other completed trials include NCT01363297 and NCT01055496.

Is inotuzumab ozogamicin the same as CMC-544?

Yes, CMC-544 is an alternative designation for inotuzumab ozogamicin. The compound is also referenced in combination regimens such as inotuzumab ozogamicin plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone. All of these names refer to the same CD22-targeted antibody-drug conjugate developed by Pfizer.