Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts
MRNA Negative Sentiment

FDA Refuses To Review Moderna’s mRNA Flu Vaccine, Claims Trial Inadequacies

Key Takeaway: The FDA has refused to review Moderna's mRNA flu vaccine, mRNA-1010, citing inadequate trial support. This decision, made by CBER Director Vinay Prasad, has significant implications for Moderna's financial outlook and future vaccine applications. Analysts suggest that the refusal could delay the re-filing of another vaccine candidate, mRNA-1083, and reflects broader regulatory challenges in the U.S. vaccine landscape.
Price reaction · baseline $41.995 (2026-02-10 close) · hit after-hours · 6 other MRNA headline(s) in the window, move may be shared
day 0 close
-3.5%
day 1
-4.5%
day 3
+4.6%

Market Sentiment Analysis

POSITIVE FACTORS

  • Moderna's mRNA-1010 showed effectiveness over standard flu vaccines.
  • The company has conducted several late-stage studies to support its application.

CONCERNS & RISKS

  • FDA declined to review mRNA-1010 due to inadequate trial support.
  • The refusal impacts Moderna's financial goals and future vaccine applications.
  • New regulatory policies may hinder vaccine development and approvals.

BiopharmaWatch Analysis

From our catalyst data and publicly available data · not financial advice
Best trade, last catalyst
+47%
120-day peak, hindsight
Typical move
5.1%
average across 3 past catalysts
Cash runway
~22 mo
Low dilution risk
Lead asset
mRNA-1645-eODGT8
Phase 1 · HIV Infections

Full Press Release Details

The FDA has declined to even consider Moderna’s application for the investigational mRNA flu vaccine mRNA-1010, a move that comes amid controversial immunization policies from the Trump administration.
The refusal-to-file letter (RTF) was signed by Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Director Vinay Prasad himself, who has been vocal about tightening regulations on vaccines. In the RTF, the regulator claimed that Moderna failed to support mRNA-1010’s application with an “adequate and well-controlled” trial, according to the company’sTuesday news release. Specifically, Moderna’s comparator group “does not reflect the best-available standard of care,” Prasad said in the letter, which Modernapublished in fullon its website.
In a statement on Monday, CEO Stéphane Bancel hit back at the FDA’s decision to refuse a review: “This decision by CBER, which did not identify any safety or efficacy concerns with our product, does not further our shared goal of enhancing America’s leadership in developing innovative medicines.”
William Blair analysts said the rebuff represents a major blow to the already struggling vaccine maker’s financial goals. “The RTF letter for mRNA-1010 represents a big hit to the company’s vaccine franchise and its prospect of achieving its breakeven guidance in 2028,” the analysts wrote in a Wednesday morning note.
Moderna’s shareswere down 10% $37.76 in premarket trading Wednesday morning.
And it’s not just mRNA-1010 that could be affected by the FDA’s decision, with analysts at Jefferies noting that the RTF could impact the timing of a potential U.S. refiling of mRNA-1083, Moderna’s combination shot for COVID-19 and flu.
In May 2025, the companypulledits approval application for mRNA-1083 and decided to wait for data from mRNA-1010 before resubmitting. The company, Jefferies said on Tuesday, was “planning to seek [additional] FDA guidance” after the mRNA-1010 submission. But after the RTF, the path forward could change, Jefferies speculated in a note to investors.
William Blair agreed. “We will know more after the Type A meeting minutes are issued, but this is a substantial hit to the probability of success for mRNA-1010, and in turn mRNA-1083’s (combo flu/COVID vaccine) U.S. approvability, in our view.”
Moderna backed its application for mRNA-1010 withseverallate-stage studies, the company said last month. One of which,announced in June 2025, compared the investigational shot against a currently licensed, standard-dose seasonal flu vaccine. Data showed that Moderna’s candidate was 26.6% more effective than the comparator vaccine at preventing flu in adults 50 years and up.
The company pointed out in its news release that the FDA’s own regulation on the use of adequate and well-controlled studies, as well as guidance for flu vaccine development, do not “contain any reference to the use of a comparator reflecting the ‘best-available standard of care.’”
Moderna likewise argued that the refusal “is inconsistent with previous written communications” with CBER, which had found a standard-dose flu shot to be an “acceptable” comparator. “It should not be controversial to conduct a comprehensive review of a flu vaccine that uses an FDA-approved vaccine as a comparator in a study that was discussed and agreed on with CBER prior to starting,” Bancel said in his statement.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced in May 2025 that all new vaccines would require placebo-controlled trials, a move that expertswidely questioned. “HHS’s judgment appears questionable and risky, in our view,” Leerink Partners wrote at the time, adding that “placebo-controlled trials are unnecessary and unethical for many populations.”
In a statement toSTAT News, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services said that “the FDA generally does not comment on regulatory communications to individual sponsors.”
Tuesday’s rebuff to Moderna compounds the already-mounting worries that vaccine developers face in the U.S., fueled largely by controversial policies under the Trump administration. In addition to the new placebo requirement, Prasad suggested the agency would enactstricter regulationsfor COVID-19 vaccines, afterfalsely claimingthat at least 10 children had died from the shots.
Over at the CDC, recommendations for vaccine use have also been shifting. Last month, the agencyunilaterally scrappedthe recommendation that children be immunized against flu and five other diseases. In December 2025, the CDC alsopushed backinfant hepatitis B vaccination from being given at birth to two months of age.
As a result of these policy headwinds, Moderna announced late last month that it willno longer investin Phase 3 vaccine studies—though it remains unclear if this directive will only affect its infectious disease programs or will apply broadly to its entire vaccine portfolio.
“You cannot make a return on investment if you don’t have access to the U.S. market,” Bancel toldBloombergat the time.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the FDA refuse to review Moderna's vaccine?

The FDA cited inadequate trial support and a comparator group that did not reflect the best standard of care.

What impact does the FDA's decision have on Moderna?

The refusal significantly affects Moderna's financial goals and could delay the re-filing of its mRNA-1083 vaccine.

What did Moderna's CEO say about the FDA's decision?

CEO Stéphane Bancel criticized the decision, stating it does not support the goal of advancing innovative medicines.

What are the implications of new vaccine regulations?

New regulations may hinder vaccine development and approvals, affecting Moderna and other developers.

Last updated: Feb 11, 2026