Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts
BNTX

DuoBody -PD-L1 4-1BB (GEN1046) induces superior immune-cell activation, cytokine production and cytotoxicity by combining PD-L1 blockade with conditional 4-1BB co-stimulation Alexander Muik 1 , Isil Altintas 2 , Rachelle

Key Takeaway: MECHANISM OF ACTION OF FC-SILENCED PD-L1 4-1BB BSABS Fc-silenced PD-L1 4-1BB bsAbs are designed to re-activate anti-tumor immune responses by blockade of the PD-1:PD-L1 axis and conditional 4-1BB stimulation. PD-1:PD-L1 checkpoint blockade by the PD-L1-specific arm is constitut

Full Press Release Details

MECHANISM OF ACTION OF
FC-SILENCED PD-L1 4-1BB BSABS
Fc-silenced PD-L1 4-1BB bsAbs are designed to re-activate anti-tumor immune responses by blockade of the PD-1:PD-L1 axis and conditional 4-1BB stimulation. PD-1:PD-L1 checkpoint blockade by the PD-L1-specific arm is constitutively active, whereas co-stimulatory activity mediated by the 4-1BB specific arm strictly depends
on cell-cell crosslinking by simultaneous binding to both 4-1BB and PD-L1. The resulting clustering of 4-1BB provides a local co-stimulatory signal to T cells, further enhancing its T-cell receptor (TCR)-mediated activity and leading to tumor destruction. PD-L1 4-1BB bsAbs are expected to support priming processes in lymphatic tissue, re-activate anti-tumor immune responses in tumor tissue and promote survival of
antigen-specific T cells.
combines checkpoint blockade and conditional 4-1BB agonist activity
Figure 1A. DuoBody-PD-L1 4-1BB was generated by controlled Fab-arm exchange of monoclonal
PD-L1 and 4-1BB antibodies using the DuoBody bispecific antibody platform.7-8 B. The effect of indicated antibodies on the interaction between PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1 was determined in a bioluminescent cell-based PD-1:PD-L1 Blockade Bioassay. C.
4-1BB- agonist activity of the indicated antibodies was determined in a modified luciferase-based
4-1BB-activation reporter assay with or without adherent human PD-L1+ ES-2 tumor cells.
induces expression of genes associated with enhanced immune responses
CD8+ T cells and CD14+ monocytes were isolated from PBMCs, and co-cultured in the presence of 10-90 ng/mL anti-CD3 and 3 g/mL anti-CD28, as well as 0.2 g/mL
DuoBody-PD-L1 4-1BB or atezolizumab. After 48 hours the cells were harvested and subjected to transcriptomic analysis by RNA-sequencing.
demonstrates enhanced proliferation and cytokine secretion of activated T cells in the presence of PD-L1+ cells in vitro
Antigen-specific T-cell proliferation assay: CD8+ T cells were electroporated with RNA encoding an
HLA-A2/CLDN6-specific TCR and PD-1 (A. 5 g; B. w/o, 2 or 10 g, as indicated), and labeled with CFSE,
co-cultured with autologous DCs electroporated with CLDN6-encoding RNA in presence of the indicated antibodies for 4 days. Polyclonal T-cell proliferation assay:
CFSE-labeled human PBMCs were stimulated with 0.1 g/mL anti-CD3 and incubated with the indicated antibodies for 4 days. CFSE dilution in CD8+ T cells
was analyzed by flow cytometry and the expansion index was calculated. C. Cell culture supernatants were collected 48 h after the start of the polyclonal T-cell proliferation assays, and cytokine
concentrations measured using the MSD V-PLEX Pro-inflammatory Panel 1 Human Kit. D: Naive CD8+ T cells were co-cultured with immature or LPS-matured (24 h prior to start of the co-culture) allogeneic dendritic cells in the presence of DuoBody-PD-L1 4-1BB or isotype control for 5 days. IFN- and TNF- concentrations
were determined in the culture supernatant.
demonstrates enhanced antigen-specific T-cell mediated cytotoxicity in vitro
PBMC-derived CD8+ T cells were electroporated with a CLDN6-specific TCR, and preactivated in co-culture with adherent MDA-MB-231 cells stably transduced with CLDN6, or co-cultured with untransduced parental cells. One day later, 4-1BB expression
in preactivated T cells was verified. The T cells were transferred to new co-cultures with CLDN6-transduced or untransduced
MDA-MD-231 cells as before, and incubated in the presence of the indicated antibodies. After 48 hours, T cell intracellular Granzyme B and
LAMP-1 expression was analyzed by flow cytometry (A-B). Separate co-cultures with the identical setup were
subjected to impedance analysis in 30-minute intervals over 5 days using an x CELLigence Real-Time Cell Analyzer (C). D. Naive CD8+ T cells
were co-cultured with LPS-matured (24 h prior to start of the co-culture) allogeneic dendritic cells in the presence of DuoBody-PD-L1 4-1BB or isotype control for 5 days, and GzmB concentrations were determined in the culture supernatant.
increases tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) expansion in human tumor tissue cultures ex vivo
Figure 5. A. Tumor tissue of a NSCLC patient was
resected, cut into pieces of 1-2 mm3, and cultured in the presence of IL-2 (10 U/mL) and the indicated antibodies.
On day 10, viable TIL were counted and the fold expansion of the indicated subpopulations was analyzed by flow cytometry. Data shown represents mean SD of n=5 individual wells. B. Clonotype repertoire analysis was performed on TCR
sequencing of the CDR3 region of the expanded TIL and the frozen tumor. The ten most frequent clones (1-10) for well 1 of DuoBody-PD-L1 4-1BB-treated cultures were used as reference and the frequency rank of these sequences in all other samples is visualized according to the
color scheme. About 200 sequences were obtained per sample. Each sample contained about 100,000 cells.
An Fc-silenced bsAb targeting mouse
PD-L1 and 4-1BB (mbsAb-PD-L1 4-1BB) induces
tumor regression and increases the frequency of tumor-reactive T cells in CT26-tumor bearing mice
Figure 6. BALB/c mice bearing subcutaneous CT26 tumors
were treated after tumors reached a size 30 mm3. Antibody was dosed every 2-3 days for three weeks starting at day 11 (indicated by arrows). A. Individual tumor growth curves; CR: complete regression. B. Kaplan-Meier analysis of animal survival. C. On day 18, blood
was drawn and the relative frequency of CD8+ T cells specific for gp70, the immunodominant antigen expressed by CT26, was determined by flow cytometry. ****, p<0.0001, One-way ANOVA with Dunnett s multiple comparisons test.
shows superior efficacy compared to a combination of Fc-silenced PD-L1 or 4-1BB monovalent control
Figure 7. BALB/c mice bearing subcutaneous CT26 tumors
were treated after tumors reached a mean size of approximately 100 mm3. Antibody was dosed at 100 g per mouse every 4 days, for three weeks starting at day 20 (indicated by arrows).
A. Individual tumor growth curves, CR: complete regression. B. Kaplan-Meier analysis of animal survival. *, p<0.05; log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.
shows superior efficacy compared to PD-L1 blockade
Figure 8. BALB/c mice bearing subcutaneous CT26 tumors
were treated after tumors reached a mean size of approximately 76 mm3. Antibody was dosed at 100 g per mouse every 3-4 days for three weeks starting
at day 14 (indicated by arrows). A. individual tumor growth curves, CR: complete regression. B. Kaplan-Meier analysis of animal survival. ***, p<0.001, log-rank
modulates tumor-draining lymph node and intratumoral immune-cell composition in favor of anti-tumor immunity
Figure 9. BALB/c mice bearing subcutaneous CT26 tumors
were treated with the indicated antibodies after tumors reached a median size of 38 mm3. Antibody was dosed at 100 g per mouse on days 12 and 17. Mice were sacrificed on day 18 after
inoculation for analysis. A. Flow cytometry analysis of tdLNs. B-C. tdLN cell suspensions were either left unstimulated (B) or restimulated with a gp70 peptide or CT26 cells
(C), and IFN- secretion was assessed by ELISpot. D. IFN- ELISpot using distant non-draining LN cell (ndLN) suspensions of mbsAb-PD-L1 4-1BB treated mice. E. Flow cytometry analysis of enzymatically dissociated tumors. Data from individual mice are shown, as well as group mean
( SD). *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001; ****, P<0.0001; One-way ANOVA with Dunnett s multiple comparisons test.
References
1 Zou et al., 2016, Sci Transl Med 5 Segal et al., 2018, Clin Cancer Res
2 Perez-Ruiz et al., 2017, Clin Cancer Res 6 Wei et al., 2014, Oncoimmunol
3 Bartkowiak et al., 2015, Front Oncol 7 Labrijn et al., 2013, PNAS
4 Segal et al., 2017, Clin Cancer Res 8 Labrijn et al., 2014, Nat Protoc
PD-(L)1 AND 4-1BB AS TARGETS
MOA AND PRECLINICAL DATA
Figure 1. GEN1046: IgG1 bispecific PD-L1 4-1BB antibody and mechanism of action
Figure 2. Trial design (dose escalation)
Patient characteristics and disposition
Table 1. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics
Dose escalation cohort All patients N=61
Median (range) age, years 59 (23 79)
Age group, n (%)
<65 years 44 (72.1)
> 65 years 17 (27.9)
Female, n (%) 28 (45.9)
Cancer type, n (%) a
Colorectal 12 (19.7)
Ovarian 9 (14.8)
Pancreatic 6 (9.8)
NSCLC 6 (9.8)
Other 28 (45.9)
ECOG performance status, n (%)
0 32 (52.5)
1 29 (47.5)
Median (range) number of prior regimens 3 (1 11)
Prior treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitor, n (%) 23 (37.7)
Data cut-off: August 31, 2020.
aCancer types occurring in <5 patients were categorized as Other .
ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PD-(L)1, programmed death (ligand) 1.
Table 2. Patient disposition and exposure
Dose escalation cohort All patients N=61
Median (range) duration of follow-up, months 6.0 (0.3 14.7)
Treatment ongoing, n (%) 10 (16.4)
Treatment discontinuation due to, n (%)
Progressive disease 44 (72.1)
AE 6 (9.8)
Death 1 (1.6) a
Median (range) number of GEN1046 dose infusions 4 (1 18)
Median (range) duration of exposure, months 3 (0.7 13.9)
Data cut-off: August 31, 2020.
AE, adverse event. a Related to disease progression.
Table 3. TRAEs occurring in 10% of patients
Dose escalation cohort All patients
(N=61)
All grades, n (%) Grade 3, n (%) Grade 4, n (%)
Any TRAE 43 (70.5) 15 (24.6) 3 (4.9)
TRAEs in > 10% of patients, by preferred term
Transaminase elevation 16 (26.2) 6 (9.8) 0
Hypothyroidism 11 (18.0) 0 1 (1.6)
Fatigue 8 (13.1) 1 (1.6) 0
Data cut-off: August 31, 2020.
Adverse events graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.5.0.
TRAE, treatment-related adverse event.
Table 4. Summary of dose-limiting toxicities
Dose level Patients, n Patients with DLTs, n DLT
25 mg 4 1 Grade 4 febrile neutropenia
50 mg 5 0
80 mg 9 1 Grade 4 febrile neutropenia
100 mg 6 a 0
140 mg 6 2 Grade 3 nephritis; Grade 3 ALT increased
200 mg 9 1 Grade 3 AST increased/ALT increased
400 mg 9 0
800 mg 9 b 1 Grade 3 transaminases increased
1200 mg 4 0
Data cut-off: August 31, 2020.
aOne patient in the 100-mg cohort died due to disease progression on study
bOne backfill patient in the 800-mg cohort did not complete the
C1D8 and C1D15 assessments. The patient elected not to attend follow-up visits to avoid contracting COVID-19.
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; DLT, dose-limiting toxicity.
Efficacy Dose escalation Of 61 patients, 56 were evaluable. Disease control occurred in 40/61 (65.6%) patients in the dose escalation phase ( Figure 6 ). Partial response (PR) was achieved in four patients with triple-negative breast cancer (n=1), ovarian cancer (n=1), or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n=2); 36 patients maintained stable disease (SD). Data cut-off: September 29, 2020. Post-baseline scans were not conducted for five patients. a Minimum duration of response (5 weeks) per RECIST v1.1 not reached. b PR was not confirmed on a subsequent scan. NE, non-evaluable; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PD, progressive disease; PD-(L)1, programmed death (ligand) 1; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; SoD, sum of diameters; uPR, unconfirmed partial response.
Of six patients with NSCLC, all of whom had received prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, two achieved unconfirmed PR, two maintained SD, and two experienced progressive disease ( Figure 7 ). Data cut-off: September 29, 2020. a PR was not confirmed by a subsequent scan. b PD-L1 expression was assessed in archival tumor specimens. BOR, best overall response; CR, complete response; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; NA, not available; PD, progressive disease; PD-(L)1, programmed death (ligand) 1; PR, partial response; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SD, stable disease; SoD, sum of diameters; TPS, tumor proportion score; uPR, unconfirmed partial response. Expansion cohort As of October 12, 2020, 24 patients were enrolled in expansion cohort 1, which includes patients with NSCLC with progression on or after ICI therapy ( Figure 8 ). 12 patients had post-baseline scans; six patients continued treatment with GEN1046, six patients discontinued. Preliminary efficacy in 12 patients who could be objectively assessed showed two patients who achieved confirmed PR, one with unconfirmed PR, and four patients with SD. Data cut-off: October 12, 2020. *Denotes patients with ongoing treatment. a PR was not confirmed by a subsequent scan. b PD-L1 expression was assessed in tumor biopsies obtained prior to initiation of GEN1046 treatment. Includes all patients who had at least one post-baseline tumor assessment (schedule is every 6 weeks), and thus could be assessed for clinical benefit; 6 of 12 patients are still on treatment. Of the remaining 12 patients not shown, three patients had clinical progression prior to first response assessment, and nine patients are still receiving treatment and have not had a first response assessment. BOR and time point response assessed using RECIST 1.1; NA: Assessment succeeding first PD. BOR, best overall response; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; NA, not available, NE, non-evaluable; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PD, progressive disease; PD-(L)1, programmed death (ligand) 1; PR, partial response; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SD, stable disease; SoD, sum of diameters; TPS, tumor proportion score; uPR, unconfirmed partial response.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Manish Gupta, Gaurav Bajaj, Lei Pang, Brandon Higgs, and Thomas Breuer at Genmab A/S; Alice Bexon, Alexander Muik, and Friederike Gieseke at BioNTech SE; and Zuzana Jirakova (formerly at BioNTech SE) for their valuable contributions. This trial was funded by Genmab A/S and BioNTech SE. Professional medical writing support was provided by Lindsay Craik, at Caudex, and was funded by Genmab A/S.
Disclosures IM reports receiving commercial research grants from Alligator, AstraZeneca, BMS, and Roche and serves as a consultant/advisory board member for Alligator, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bioncotech, BMS, F-star, Genentech, Genmab, Merck Serono, Molecular Partners, Numab, Roche-Incyte, and Tusk. Copies of this poster obtained though Quick Response (QR) Code are for personal use only and may not be reproduced without permission from the authors of this poster.
Presented at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), November 11 14, 2020 Poster #412
Figure 1. Intratumoral mRNA-based cancer immunotherapy: Local approach with systemic antitumor effects
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of all treated patients
Monotherapy (N = 17) Combination Therapy (N = 6)
Age (years)
Mean (SD) 65.9 (11.5) 52.5 (7.7)
Median 67 55.5
Range 46; 83 38; 58
Sex, n (%)
Male 6 (35.3) 2 (33.3)
Female 11 (64.7) 4 (66.7)
Prior therapy, n (%) a
Immunotherapy 11 (64.7) 5 (83.3)
Chemotherapy 8 (47.1) 4 (66.6)
Other 10 (58.8) 6 (100.0)
Surgery 15 (88.2) 6 (100)
External radiotherapy 12 (70.6) 5 (83.3)
Internal radiotherapy 2 (11.8) 0
Anti-cancer therapy 17 (100) 6 (100)
Tumor diagnosis, n (%)
Melanoma 7 (41.1) 3 (50.0)
Breast carcinoma 4 (23.5) 3 (50.0)
Sarcoma 2 (11.7)
Squamous cell carcinoma 2 (11.7)
Basal cell carcinoma 1 (5.8)
Merkel cell carcinoma 1 (5.8)
Disease site, n (%)
Skin 6 (35.3) 1 (16.7)
Breast 4 (23.5) 3 (50.0)
Head 1 (5.9) 0
Limb 3 (17.6) 0
Lymph node 2 (11.8) 1 (16.7)
Other 1 (5.9) 1 (16.7)
Table 2. Frequency of patients with a treatment emergent AEa related to SAR441000 by dose group and grade
Escalation Monotherapy
DL1 DL2 DL3 DL4 DL5 DL6 DL7 All
(N = 1) (N = 1) (N = 3) (N = 3) (N = 3) (N = 3) (N = 3) (N = 17)
All grades Grade 3 All grades Grade 3 All grades Grade 3 All grades Grade 3 All grades Grade 3 All grades Grade 3 All grades Grade 3 All grades Grade 3
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Any TRAE a 1 (100) 0 1 (100) 0 2 (66.7) 0 2 (66.7) 0 2 (66.7) 0 2 (66.7) 0 2 (66.7) 0 11 (64.7) 0
Fatigue 1 (100) 0 1 (100) 0 0 0 0 0 1 (33.3) 0 1 (33.3) 0 1 (33.3) 0 5 (29.4) 0
Chills 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (33.3) 0 1 (33.3) 0 0 0 2 (11.7) 0
Vomiting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (33.3) 0 1 (33.3) 0 2 (11.7) 0
Arthralgia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (33.3) 0 0 0 1 (5.9) 0
Axillary pain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (33.3) 0 0 0 1 (5.9) 0
Injection site reaction 0 0 0 0 2 (66.7) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 (11.7) 0
Myalgia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (33.3) 0 1 (5.9) 0
Nausea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (33.3) 0 1 (5.9) 0
Pruritis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (33.3) 0 0 0 1 (5.9) 0
Pyrexia 1 (100) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (5.9) 0
Rash 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (33.3) 0 0 0 0 0 1 (5.9) 0
Tumor pain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (33.3) 0 0 0 1 (5.9) 0
a TRAE, treatment related adverse event; refers to a treatment emergent adverse event assessed as related to study treatment by both the investigator and the sponsor
Table 3. Frequency of patients with a treatment emergent AEa related to SAR441000 and/or cemiplimab by dose group and grade
Escalation Combination Therapy
DL4 (N = 3) DL5 (N = 3) All (N = 6)
All grades Grade 3 All grades Grade 3 All grades Grade 3
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Any TRAE a 2 (66.7) 0 3 (100) 0 5 (83.3) 0
Fatigue 2 (66.7) 0 3 (100) 0 5 (83.3) 0
Diarrhea 0 0 2 (66.7) 0 2 (33.3) 0
Nausea 0 0 2 (66.7) 0 2 (33.3) 0
Vomiting 0 0 2 (66.7) 0 2 (33.3) 0
Dermatitis acneiform b 1 (33.3) 0 0 0 1 (16.7) 0
Decreased appetite 1 (33.3) 0 0 0 1 (16.7) 0
a TRAE, treatment related adverse event; refers to a treatment emergent adverse event assessed as related to study treatment by both the investigator and the sponsor b Dermatitis acneiform included in the term rash for the summation of TRAEs occurring in both treatment groups
Figure 2. Pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic markers in monotherapy-Maximum fold change from baseline measured at any cycle in plasma for IL15 (a), IFNg (b), IP10 (c)
BCC, basal cell cancer; CSCC, cutaneous squamous cell cancer; MCC, Merkel cell carcinoma; TNBC, triple negative breast
CONCLUSIONS
SAR441000 administered as monotherapy and in combination with cemiplimab was generally well tolerated In monotherapy, initial signals at DL6 and DL7 are suggestive of an immunomodulatory effect by downstream effector cytokines. These data support further clinical evaluation of SAR441000
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Patients and investigators at participating sites Research and analyses were supported by Sanofi and BioNTech The authors were responsible for all content and editorial decisions Strategic oversight, study design and logistics support was provided by Nicolas Acquavella, MD Editorial support was provided by Michelle Daniels, MD of inScience Communications, funded by Sanofi DISCLOSURE Dr. Oliver Bechter has received consultancy honorarium from Sanofi REFERENCE 1. Sahin U, Karik K, T reci O, mRNA-based therapeutics--developing a new class of drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov . 13, 759-780 (2014). The study was approved by each participating Institution s Ethics or Institutional Review Board(s) and each patient provided signed informed consent to participate in the study.
Presented at the SITC 2020 Virtual Scientific Program. November 9 14, 2020; Poster 391 For any medical questions please contact Oliver Bechter: oliver.bechter@uzleuven.be
A Personal Neoantigen Vaccine NEO-PV-01, in
Combination with Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab, Induces Broad De Novo Immune
Responses in First-Line Non-Squamous NSCLC
Mark M. Awad1, David R. Spigel2, Edward B. Garon3, Saiama Waqar4, Aaron Lisberg3, Melissa Moles5, Jennifer Tepper5, April Lamb5, Amy Wanamaker5, Zak Khondker5, John Srouji5, Jesse Dong5, Asaf Poran5, Kristen Balogh5, Meghan Bushway5, Mark DeMario5, Lakshmi Srinivasan5, Richard B. Gaynor5, Ramaswamy
1Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; 2The Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN;
3Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; 4Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; 5BioNTech US Inc., Cambridge, MA
Figure 1: Neoantigens Are Key Targets of Tumor-Directed T cell Responses
NT-002 is a Phase 1B trial of NEO-PV-01 in
combination with chemotherapy and pembrolizumab, in first-line therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC (NCT03380871). Target enrollment = 15 patients across 4 US sites.
Primary: To evaluate the safety of NEO-PV-01 with pembrolizumab
Last updated: Nov 9, 2020