Recombinant factor IX

Assessment by the operating surgeon on a 4 point ordinal scale (according to the definitions provided below): - Excellent: Intraoperative blood loss was less than or equal to that expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (≤ 100% ) - Good: Intraoperative blood loss was up to 50% more than expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (101 - 150%) - Fair: Intraoperative blood loss was more than 50% of that expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (\> 150%) - None: Uncontrolled hemorrhage that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating a change of Factor IX concentrate

Actual intraoperative blood loss was determined by the drainage volume, if a drain was placed, and the estimated blood loss into swabs and towels during the procedure.

Predicted average/maximum blood loss minus actual blood loss. Prior to the surgery, the surgeon predicted the estimated volume (mL) of the expected average and maximum blood loss for the planned surgical intervention in a hemostatically normal individual of the same sex, age, and stature as the study participant for the intraoperative period.

The postoperative hemostatic efficacy was to be assessed by the operating surgeon according to the following criteria (4-point ordinal scale): - Excellent: Volume in drain was less than or equal than that expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (≤ 100% ) - Good: Volume in drain was up to 50% more than expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (101% - 150%) - Fair: Volume in drain was more than 50% of that expected for the type of procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant (\> 150%) - None: Uncontrolled bleeding that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating a change of Factor IX concentrate

Assessment by the operating surgeon on a 4 point ordinal scale: - Excellent: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with BAX326 was as good or better than that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant - Good: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with BAX326 was probably as good as that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant - Fair: Postoperative hemostasis with BAX326 was clearly less than optimal for the type of procedure performed but was maintained without the need to change the Factor IX concentrate - None: Participant experienced uncontrolled bleeding that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating a change of Factor IX concentrate

Assessment by the operating surgeon on a 4 point ordinal scale: - Excellent: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with BAX326 was as good or better than that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant - Good: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with BAX326 was probably as good as that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a hemostatically normal participant - Fair: Postoperative hemostasis with BAX326 was clearly less than optimal for the type of procedure performed but was maintained without the need to change the Factor IX concentrate - None: Participant experienced uncontrolled bleeding that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating a change of Factor IX concentrate

Postoperative blood loss was based on the drainage fluid and was only assessed for participants who had a drain placed during surgery.

Predicted average/maximum blood loss minus actual blood loss for participants who had a drain placed during surgery. Prior to the surgery, the surgeon will predict the estimated volume (mL) of the expected average and maximum blood loss for the planned surgical intervention in a hemostatically normal individual of the same sex, age, and stature as the study subject for the postoperative period until drain removal.

Daily weight-adjusted doses of BAX326 per participant were recorded from the day of surgery until postoperative Days 11+. Each category in outcome measure includes number of all, major and minor surgeries, respectively, if different from the totals.

Assessed for the intra- and postoperative periods.

Blood product transfusions consisted of packed red blood cells (PRBC) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or both.

Blood product transfusions consisted of packed red blood cells (PRBC) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or both.

If there was more than 2-dilution increase as compared to pre-study level at screening.

AUC0-72h (area under the plasma concentration/time curve from time 0 to 72 hours) was computed using the linear trapezoidal method. The concentration at 72 hours was interpolated from the two nearest sampling time points or extrapolated using the last quantifiable concentration and the terminal rate constant λz. λz was estimated from the slope of natural log-linear fitting to latter quantifiable concentrations, with largest adjusted R2.

Total AUC/Dose is also AUC0-inf (area under the plasma concentration/time curve from time 0 to infinity) and was defined as AUC0-t + Ct / λz, where t is the time of last quantifiable concentration, Ct is the last quantifiable concentration and λz is the terminal rate constant.

The MRT is the average time that the study product stays in the body (or plasma) and is calculated as: AUMC 0-inf / AUC 0-inf, where AUMC 0-inf was determined in a similar manner as AUC 0-inf.

CL is the volume of plasma which is completely cleared of study product per unit time and is calculated as the dose divided by the total area under the curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf).

IR was defined as (C post-infusion - C pre-infusion) / Dose, where C post-infusion is the measured concentration achieved at 30±5 minutes for pre-surgical PK.

T1/2 was determined as ln2 / λz.

Vss was computed as CL·MRT.

IR was defined as (C post-infusion - C pre-infusion) / Dose, where C post-infusion is the measured concentration achieved at 15±5 minutes for the loading dose.

Possibly or probably related adverse events that occurred during or after first BAX326 infusion.

Computed using the linear trapezoidal method. The concentration at 72 hours was interpolated from the two nearest sampling time points or extrapolated using the last quantifiable concentration and the terminal rate constant λz. λz was estimated from the slope of natural log-linear fitting to latter quantifiable concentrations, with largest adjusted R\^2.