Approval Probability
TA Base Rate
Adjusted LOA
ML Risk
Also known as Palbociclib, palbociclib
PD-0332991 · 5 trials · 4 indications
PFS was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective progression of disease (PD) or death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD, whichever occurred first. PD is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. In this outcome measure, PFS was based on investigator's assessment.
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) or death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data include more than 1 date, the first date will be used. PFS (in months) will be calculated as (first event date - randomization date +1)/30.4. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions.
DLT was classified as per common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0 as any of the events occurring during 28 days of Cycle 1,attributed to study drug:grade 4 neutropenia(for a duration of greater than \[\>\]7 days); febrile neutropenia (grade greater than or equal to \[\>=\]3 neutropenia,body temperature \>=38.5 degree Celsius);grade \>=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding episode;grade 4 thrombocytopenia;grade \>=3 non-hematologic toxicity except grade 3 or more nausea, vomiting,electrolyte abnormality(if controllable by therapy);grade 3 QTc prolongation(\>500 millisecond \[msec\])persist after correction of reversible cause such as electrolyte abnormalities or hypoxia. Lack of hematologic recovery (platelets less than \[\<\]50,000/microliter \[mcL\],absolute neutrophil count \<1,000/mcL,hemoglobin \<8.0 gram/deciliter \[g/dL\]) or prolonged non hematologic toxicities that delays initiation of next dose by \>7 days;receipt of \<75 percent of planned dose in first cycle due to toxicity.
A treatment related AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Relatedness was judged by investigator. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An AE was considered treatment emergent if occurred for the first time after the start of study treatment or occurred prior to the start of treatment but increased in National Cancer Institute (NCI) CTCAE grade during study treatment period. AE severity was defined to be the maximum toxicity grade of the TEAEs experienced by the participants during the study. AE was assessed according to severity as: Grade 1 (mild AE), Grade 2 (moderate AE), Grade 3 (severe AE), Grade 4 (life-threatening consequences) and Grade 5 (death related to AE).
PFS was defined as the time from first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of objective progression of disease (PD) or death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD, whichever occurred first. PD was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.1-year PFS was defined as the percentage of participants without PFS events (PD or death due to any cause) at 12 months based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. Percentage of participants with 1-year PFS with 90% confidence interval (CI) were reported.
Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was defined as the maximum value attained for the ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at any time and the injected radioactivity concentration divided by the body weight (in kilogram \[kg\]). Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique. Change from baseline in \[(18)F\]-FLT-PET SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 and change from baseline in Phospho-Rb percent positive cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 were analyzed. The change values of FLT-PET SUVmax and Phospho-Rb percent positive cells were then correlated. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was defined as the maximum value attained for the ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at any time and the injected radioactivity concentration divided by the body weight (in kilogram \[kg\]). Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique. Change from baseline in \[(18)F\]-FDG-PET SUVmax at Cycle 1 Day 21 and change from baseline in Phospho-Rb percent positive cells at Cycle 1 Day 21 were analyzed. The change values of FLT-PET SUVmax and Phospho-Rb percent positive cells were then correlated. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.
Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was defined as the maximum value attained for the ratio of tissue radioactivity concentration at any time and the injected radioactivity concentration divided by the body weight (in kilogram \[kg\]). Change from baseline in SUVmax was assessed using \[(18)F\]-FLT-PET and \[(18)F\]-FDG-PET techniques.
PET response was defined as complete response (CR) = mean SUVmax same as of background; partial response (PR) = mean SUVmax less than (\<) 75 percent (%) of baseline; progressive disease (PD) = mean SUVmax greater than (\>) 125% of baseline; stable disease (SD) = mean SUVmax greater than or equal to (\>=) 75% of baseline and mean SUVmax less than or equal to (\<=) 125% of baseline. PFS was defined as the time from first dose of study medication to the first documentation of objective tumor progression, or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Tumor progression was defined as \>50% increase in sum of products of diameters, of dominant nodes and documented non-nodal sites or appearance of new sites of disease.
OR: CR= disappearance of all clinical/radiographic evidence of disease, disease related symptoms and biochemical abnormalities, nodal masses regressed to normal size, if spleen and bone marrow were involved, spleen regressed to normal size and not palpable and clear infiltrate on repeat bone marrow aspiration; PR= dominant nodes decreased by \>50% in sum of products of diameters (SPD), no increase in size of other nodes/liver/spleen, lesions regressed by \>50% in SPD, no new sites of disease; SD= response \<PR and no PD, documented \>=1 time after start of therapy, no new sites of disease; PD= \>50% increase in SPD of dominant nodes and other nodes or appearance of new sites of disease. PET response: CR= mean SUVmax same as background; PR= mean SUVmax \<75% of baseline; PD= mean SUVmax \>125% of baseline; SD= mean SUVmax \>=75% of baseline but \<=125% of baseline. Correlation was reported as conjoint number of participants with PET response at Cycle 1 Day 21 and OR at end of study.
Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique.
Phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein in the tumor cells, expressed as phospho-Rb percent positive cells, was assessed using Immunohistochemical staining technique.
Percentage of Ki-67 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity).
Percentage of Ki-67 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity).
Percentage of Cyclin D1 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity).
Percentage of Cyclin D1 positive cells was determined by Immunohistochemical staining technique. Composite score = (sum of each intensity category multiplied by percent of cells in that category). Intensity categories of staining (0 = no staining; 1 = weak staining; 2 = moderate staining; 3 = strong staining). Composite score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 300 (100% of cells with 3 staining intensity).
Criteria for laboratory test abnormality: Hematology (Hemoglobin \[\<0.8\*lower limit of normal {LLN}\], Platelets \[\<0.5\*LLN/ \>1.75\*upper limit of normal {ULN}\], White blood cells \[\<0.6\*LLN/ \>1.5\*ULN\], Lymphocytes, Neutrophils \[\<0.8\*LLN/ \>1.2\*ULN\], Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes \[\>1.2\*ULN\]); Liver Function (Total bilirubin \[\>1.5\*ULN\], Aspartate aminotransferase, Alanine aminotransferase, Lactate dehydrogenase, Alkaline phosphatase \[\>0.3\*ULN\], Total protein, Albumin \[\<0.8\*LLN/ \>1.2\*ULN\]); Renal Function (Blood urea nitrogen, Creatinine \[\>1.3\*ULN\], Uric acid \[\>1.2\*ULN\]); Electrolytes (sodium \[\<0.95\*LLN/ \>1.05\*ULN\], potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium \[\<0.9\*LLN/ \>1.1\*ULN\], phosphate \[\<0.8\*LLN/ \>1.2\*ULN\]); Other (Glucose \[\<0.6\*LLN/ \>1.5\*ULN\]).
AE = any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Severity was assessed as: Grade 1 (Mild); Grade 2 (Moderate); Grade 3 (Severe) = unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, and requiring systemic medication therapy/other treatment; Grade 4 (Life-threatening) = events causing participant to be in imminent danger of death; Grade 5 (Death) = death related to an AE. Treatment-emergent events = between first dose of study medication and up to 28 days after last dose, that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. A participant may be represented in more than 1 category.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The events which were considered treatment-related by sponsor and/or investigator were reported.
DLT: an adverse event occurring after initiation of PD 0332991 that met any following criteria: 1) Grade 4 hematologic toxicity (platelets less than \[\<\] 25000 per microliter (mcL), absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] \<500/mcL, hemoglobin \[Hb\] \<6.5 gram per deciliter \[g/dL\]; 2) ANC \<1000/mcL associated with documented infection or fever greater than or equal to (\>=) 38.5 degrees Celsius; 3) \>=Grade 3 non-hematologic treatment-related toxicity. In an asymptomatic participant, Grade 3 corrected QT (QTc) prolongation (\>500 millisecond) (only if persisted with repeat testing and after correction of reversible causes \[electrolyte abnormalities or hypoxia\]); and 4) Inability to receive next dose of PD 0332991 within 1 week (+/-1 day) of last dose due to lack of hematologic recovery (platelets \<50000/mcL, ANC \<1000/mcL, and Hb \<8.0 g/dL) or due to prolonged non-hematologic toxicities of \>=Grade 3 severity. Occurrence of a DLT necessitated immediate interruption of scheduled study treatment.
Three new evaluable participants were to be assessed at each new dose level. The minimum time that these participants were to be followed after starting treatment was 1 cycle (28 or 21 days) before a new dose level could be opened. If none of these 3 participants experienced a DLT, the next higher dose level was to be opened on that schedule. If 1 participant developed a DLT, 3 more evaluable participants were to be enrolled at that dose level; if none of these additional 3 participants developed a DLT, the next higher dose level was to be opened on that schedule. If \>=2 participants experienced a first cycle DLT at the same dose level and schedule, that dose level was to be defined as the MAD for that schedule. No additional participants were to be entered at the MAD for that dosing schedule. DLT is defined in Outcome Measure 1.
MTD was defined as the highest dose level studied for which the incidence of first cycle DLT was \<33%. Once MTD was determined, it was defined as RP2D. DLT is defined in Outcome Measure 1.
DLT is defined in Outcome Measure 1. Hematologic (Grade 4 \[life-threatening or disabling\]) and non-hematologic (Grade 3 \[severe\], 4 \[life-threatening and disabling\], 5 \[resulting in death\]) DLTs are reported separately. A single participant may experience more than one DLT. Both treatment-related and treatment-unrelated DLT events were reported for this outcome measure.
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. For clinical description of nature (severity) of AEs, AEs were grades as: Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling AE; and Grade 5: death related to AE. AEs during Cycle 1 and AEs post Cycle 1 are reported separately.
A treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs during Cycle 1 and AEs post Cycle 1 are reported separately.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Relatedness \[to study drug\] was assessed by the investigator (Yes/No).
The mean Cmax for 200 mg dose group (dose corrected to 125 mg) on Cycle 1 Day 14 (C1D14) and 125 mg dose group on Cycle 1 Day 21 (C1D21) was calculated. Only participants from 125 mg and 200 mg dose groups were reported.
To determine the impact of food (specifically a high-fat meal) on PD 0332991 PK, participants were tested under fed and fasted conditions in crossover fashion. Each participant served as their own control. In this crossover fashion first dose was administered under either fed (high-fat meal) or fasted (10-hour fast) condition on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 2. The first 6 participants were tested under fed (on C1D1) followed by fasted (on C2D1) conditions, the next 6 participants were tested under fasted (on C1D1) followed by fed (on C2D1) conditions. Only participants in PD 0332991 200 mg (14/21 days) and 125 mg (21/28 days) groups participated in food effect crossover and results are reported as per fed and fasted conditions. The high-fat meal was composed of around 800 to 1000 calories total, with fat composing around 50% of the total caloric content.
The median Tmax for 200 mg dose group (dose corrected to 125 mg) on Cycle 1 Day 14 (C1D14) and 125 mg dose group on Cycle 1 Day 21 (C1D21) was calculated. Only participants from 125 mg and 200 mg dose groups were reported.
To determine impact of food (specifically high-fat meal) on PD 0332991 PK, participants were tested under fed and fasted conditions in crossover fashion. Each participant served as their own control. In crossover fashion first dose was administered under either fed (high-fat meal) or fasted (10-hour fast) condition on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 2. First 6 participants were tested under fed (on C1D1) followed by fasted (on C2D1) conditions, next 6 participants were tested under fasted (on C1D1) followed by fed (on C2D1) conditions. Only participants in PD 0332991 200 mg (14/21 days) and 125 mg (21/28 days) groups participated in food effect crossover and results are reported as per fed and fasted conditions. High-fat meal was composed of around 800 to 1000 calories total, with fat composing around 50% of total caloric content.
Terminal half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
Terminal half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
Terminal half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. The mean t1/2 for 200 mg dose group (dose corrected to 125 mg) on Cycle 1 Day 14 (C1D14) and 125 mg dose group on Cycle 1 Day 21 (C1D21) was calculated. Only participants from 125 mg and 200 mg dose groups were reported.
To determine impact of food (specifically high-fat meal) on PD 0332991 PK, participants were tested under fed and fasted conditions in crossover fashion. Each participant served as their own control. In crossover fashion first dose was administered under either fed (high-fat meal) or fasted (10-hour fast) condition on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 2. First 6 participants were tested under fed (on C1D1) followed by fasted (on C2D1) conditions, next 6 participants were tested under fasted (on C1D1) followed by fed (on C2D1) conditions. Only participants in PD 0332991 200 mg (14/21 days) and 125 mg (21/28 days) groups participated in food effect crossover and results were to be reported as per fed and fasted conditions. High-fat meal was composed of around 800 to 1000 calories total, with fat composing around 50% of total caloric content.
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast).
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast).
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast). The mean AUClast for 200 mg dose group (dose corrected to 125 mg) on Cycle 1 Day 14 (C1D14) and 125 mg dose group on Cycle 1 Day 21 (C1D21) was calculated. Only participants from 125 mg and 200 mg dose groups were reported.
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast). To determine impact of food (specifically high-fat meal) on PD 0332991 PK, participants were tested under fed and fasted conditions in crossover fashion. Each participant served as their own control. In crossover fashion first dose was administered under either fed (high-fat meal) or fasted (10-hour fast) condition on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 2. First 6 participants were tested under fed (on C1D1) followed by fasted (on C2D1) conditions, next 6 participants were tested under fasted (on C1D1) followed by fed (on C2D1) conditions. Only participants in PD 0332991 200 mg (14/21 days) and 125 mg (21/28 days) groups participated in food effect crossover and results are reported as per fed and fasted conditions. High-fat meal was composed of around 800 to 1000 calories total, with fat composing around 50% of total caloric content.
Area under the curve from time zero to end of the dosing interval (24 hours) \[AUC (0-tau)\]. The mean AUC (0-tau) for 200 mg dose group (dose corrected to 125 mg) on Cycle 1 Day 14 (C1D14) and 125 mg dose group on Cycle 1 Day 21 (C1D21) was calculated. Only participants from 125 mg and 200 mg dose groups were reported.
AUC (0 - ∞) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞).
AUC (0 - ∞) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞).
AUC (0 - ∞) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). To determine impact of food (specifically high-fat meal) on PD 0332991 PK, participants were tested under fed and fasted conditions in crossover fashion. Each participant served as their own control. In crossover fashion first dose was administered under either fed (high-fat meal) or fasted (10-hour fast) condition on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 2. First 6 participants were tested under fed (on C1D1) followed by fasted (on C2D1) conditions, next 6 participants were tested under fasted (on C1D1) followed by fed (on C2D1) conditions. Only participants in PD 0332991 200 mg (14/21 days) and 125 mg (21/28 days) groups participated in food effect crossover and results were to be reported as per fed and fasted conditions. High-fat meal was composed of around 800 to 1000 calories total, with fat composing around 50% of total caloric content.
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. Clearance was estimated from population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood.
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. Clearance was estimated from population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood.
Clearance of a drug is a measure of rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of dose absorbed. Clearance was estimated from population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood. The mean CL/F for 200 mg dose group (dose corrected to 125 mg) on Cycle 1 Day 14 (C1D14) and 125 mg dose group on Cycle 1 Day 21 (C1D21) was calculated. Only participants from 125 mg and 200 mg dose groups were reported.
Clearance of a drug is a measure of rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. To determine impact of food (specifically high-fat meal) on PD 0332991 PK, participants were tested under fed and fasted conditions in crossover fashion. Each participant served as their own control. In crossover fashion first dose was administered under either fed (high-fat meal) or fasted (10-hour fast) condition on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 2. First 6 participants were tested under fed (on C1D1) followed by fasted (on C2D1) conditions, next 6 participants were tested under fasted (on C1D1) followed by fed (on C2D1) conditions. Only participants in PD 0332991 200 mg (14/21 days) and 125 mg (21/28 days) groups participated in food effect crossover and results were to be reported as per fed and fasted conditions. High-fat meal was composed of around 800 to 1000 calories total, with fat composing around 50% of total caloric content.
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Apparent volume of distribution after oral dose (Vz/F) is influenced by the fraction absorbed.
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Apparent volume of distribution after oral dose (Vz/F) is influenced by the fraction absorbed.
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Apparent volume of distribution after oral dose (Vz/F) is influenced by the fraction absorbed. The mean Vz/F for 200 mg dose group (dose corrected to 125 mg) on Cycle 1 Day 14 (C1D14) and 125 mg dose group on Cycle 1 Day 21 (C1D21) was calculated. Only participants from 125 mg and 200 mg dose groups were reported.
Volume of distribution: theoretical volume in which total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce desired plasma concentration. To determine impact of food (specifically high-fat meal) on PD 0332991 PK, participants were tested under fed and fasted conditions in crossover fashion. Each participant served as their own control. In crossover fashion first dose was administered under either fed (high-fat meal) or fasted (10-hour fast) condition on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 2. First 6 participants were tested under fed (on C1D1) followed by fasted (on C2D1) conditions, next 6 participants were tested under fasted (on C1D1) followed by fed (on C2D1) conditions. Only participants in PD 0332991 200 mg (14/21 days) and 125 mg (21/28 days) groups participated in food effect crossover and results were to be reported as per fed and fasted conditions. High-fat meal was composed of around 800 to 1000 calories total, with fat composing around 50% of total caloric content.
Rac at Day 8 = AUC (0-tau) at Day 8 divided by AUC (0-tau) at Day 1.
Rac at Day 14/21 = AUC (0-tau) at Day 14/21 divided by AUC (0-tau) at Day 1. The mean Rac for 200 mg dose group (dose corrected to 125 mg) on Cycle 1 Day 14 (C1D14) and 125 mg dose group on Cycle 1 Day 21 (C1D21) was calculated. Only participants from 125 mg and 200 mg dose groups were reported.
Terminal phase rate constant is the absolute value of the slope of a linear regression during the terminal phase of the natural--logarithm transformed concentration--time profile.
Terminal phase rate constant is the absolute value of the slope of a linear regression during the terminal phase of the natural-logarithm transformed concentration-time profile.
Terminal phase rate constant is the absolute value of the slope of a linear regression during the terminal phase of the natural-logarithm transformed concentration-time profile. The mean lambda (z) for 200 mg dose group (dose corrected to 125 mg) on Cycle 1 Day 14 (C1D14) and 125 mg dose group on Cycle 1 Day 21 (C1D21) was calculated. Only participants from 125 mg and 200 mg dose groups were reported.
Terminal phase rate constant: absolute value of slope of a linear regression during terminal phase of natural-logarithm transformed concentration-time profile. To determine impact of food (specifically high-fat meal) on PD 0332991 PK, participants were tested under fed and fasted conditions in crossover fashion. Each participant served as their own control. In crossover fashion first dose was administered under either fed (high-fat meal) or fasted (10-hour fast) condition on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 2. First 6 participants were tested under fed (on C1D1) followed by fasted (on C2D1) conditions, next 6 participants were tested under fasted (on C1D1) followed by fed (on C2D1) conditions. Only participants in PD 0332991 200 mg (14/21 days) and 125 mg (21/28 days) groups participated in food effect crossover and results were to be reported as per fed and fasted conditions. High-fat meal was composed of around 800 to 1000 calories total, with fat composing around 50% of total caloric content.
Ae is the cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine over the 10 hour collection interval. Cumulative amount was calculated as sum of urine drug concentration in sample volume for each collection interval. Urine PK analysis was performed only in the MTD/RP2D groups (125 mg \[21/28 Days\] and 200 mg \[14/21 Days\]).
The Ae is defined in Outcome Measure 42. To determine impact of food (specifically high-fat meal) on PD 0332991 PK, participants were tested under fed and fasted conditions in crossover fashion. Each participant served as their own control. In crossover fashion first dose was administered under either fed (high-fat meal) or fasted (10-hour fast) condition on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 2. First 6 participants were tested under fed (on C1D1) followed by fasted (on C2D1) conditions, next 6 participants were tested under fasted (on C1D1) followed by fed (on C2D1) conditions. Only participants in PD 0332991 200 mg (14/21 days) and 125 mg (21/28 days) groups participated in food effect crossover and results were to be reported as per fed and fasted conditions. High-fat meal was composed of around 800 to 1000 calories total, with fat composing around 50% of total caloric content.
Percent of dose recovered unchanged in urine over the 10 hour collection interval=100\*(Ae divided by dose). Ae is the cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine over the 10 hour collection interval. Cumulative amount was calculated as sum of urine drug concentration in sample volume for each collection interval.
The percent Ae is defined in Outcome Measure 44. To determine impact of food (specifically high-fat meal) on PD 0332991 PK, participants were tested under fed and fasted conditions in crossover fashion. Each participant served as their own control. In crossover fashion first dose was administered under either fed (high-fat meal) or fasted (10-hour fast) condition on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 2. First 6 participants were tested under fed (on C1D1) followed by fasted (on C2D1) conditions, next 6 participants were tested under fasted (on C1D1) followed by fed (on C2D1) conditions. Only participants in PD 0332991 200 mg (14/21 days) and 125 mg (21/28 days) groups participated in food effect crossover and results were to be reported as per fed and fasted conditions. High-fat meal was composed of around 800 to 1000 calories total, with fat composing around 50% of total caloric content.
Number of participants with best response. Complete response (CR): disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Partial Response (PR): \>=30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of lesions taking as reference baseline sum LD and no unequivocal progression in non-target lesions. Progressive disease (PD): \>=20% increase in sum of LD of lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of the LD since treatment start, or the appearance of \>=1 new lesion or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Stable disease (SD): neither shrinkage for PR nor increase for PD taking as reference smallest sum of LD since treatment start. SD was assessed following the first 2 cycles of treatment (\>=2 cycles), 4 cycles of treatment (\>=4 cycles), and 10 cycles of treatment (\>=10 cycles). Participants may be reported in more than 1 category of SD. Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response.
Phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein by Cdk4/6 is typically required for human cancer cell proliferation. Tumor biopsies were to be performed, to demonstrate inhibition of Cdk4/6 based on reduction in phosphorylated Rb (p-Rb) in tumor tissue and p-Rb levels (fold decrease) were to be reported.
Phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein by Cdk4/6 is typically required for human cancer cell proliferation. Tumor biopsies were to be performed, to demonstrate inhibition of Cdk4/6 based on reduction in phosphorylated Rb (p-Rb) in tumor tissue, in correlation with respect to PD 0322991 dose.
Phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein by Cdk4/6 is typically required for human cancer cell proliferation. Tumor biopsies were to be performed, to demonstrate inhibition of Cdk4/6 based on reduction in phosphorylated Rb (p-Rb) in tumor tissue, in correlation with PD 0322991 exposure.
Phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein by Cdk4/6 is typically required for human cancer cell proliferation. Tumor biopsies were to be performed, to demonstrate inhibition of Cdk4/6 based on reduction in phosphorylated Rb (p-Rb) in tumor tissue, in correlation with tumor response.
| Arm | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib + Letrozole | EXPERIMENTAL | Palbociclib, 125mg, orally once daily on Day 1 to Day 21 of every 28-day cycle followed by 7 days off treatment in combination with Letrozole, 2.5mg, orally once daily (continuously) |
| Placebo + Letrozole | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | Placebo, 125mg, orally once daily on Day 1 to Day 21 of every 28-day cycle followed by 7 days off treatment in combination with Letrozole, 2.5mg, orally once daily (continuously). |
| PD-0332991 + Letrozole | EXPERIMENTAL | PD-0332991, 125mg, orally once daily on Day 1 to Day 21 of every 28-day cycle followed by 7 days off treatment in combination with Letrozole, 2.5mg, orally once daily (continuously). |
| Single-agent PD-0332991 | EXPERIMENTAL | Phase 1 Part 1 |
| PD-0332991 in combination with letrozole | EXPERIMENTAL | Phase 1 Part 2 |
| PD-0332991 with letrozole | EXPERIMENTAL | Phase 2 |
| PD-0332991 | EXPERIMENTAL | - |
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Palbociclib | DRUG | Palbociclib, 125mg, orally once daily on Day 1 to Day 21 of every 28-day cycle followed by 7 days off treatment |
| Letrozole | DRUG | Letrozole, 2.5mg, orally once daily (continuously) |
| Placebo | DRUG | Placebo, 125mg, orally once daily on Day 1 to Day 21 of every 28-day cycle followed by 7 days off treatment |
| PD-0332991 | DRUG | PD-0332991, 125mg, orally once daily on Day 1 to Day 21 of every 28-day cycle followed by 7 days off treatment |
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult Asian women with locoregionally recurrent or metastatic disease not amenable to curative therapy * Confirmed diagnosis of ER positive breast cancer * No prior systemic anti-cancer therapy for advanced ER+ disease * Postmenopausal women * Measurable disease as per Respons...
PD 0332991, also known as palbociclib, is an investigational small molecule being studied for the treatment of breast cancer, including advanced breast cancer and metastatic breast cancer. It is also being evaluated in Ewing sarcoma and other neoplasms. The drug is in Phase 2 clinical development and is not yet approved.
PD 0332991 targets cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), specifically CDK4 and CDK6, as indicated by its target class of -ciclib (CDK). It is a CDK4/6 inhibitor being developed as an oral therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
PD 0332991 is being developed by Pfizer, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol PFE. The drug is also known as palbociclib and is currently in Phase 2 clinical trials for oncology indications.
PD 0332991 is in Phase 2 clinical development. It is an investigational drug and has not received FDA approval. The compound is being studied across multiple oncology indications, including advanced breast cancer and Ewing sarcoma, with several trials already completed.
PD 0332991 has been studied in several clinical trials, including NCT00141297, a Phase 1 study in advanced cancer; NCT01684215, a Phase 2 study in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors or breast cancer; NCT01942135 (PALOMA-3), a Phase 3 study in metastatic breast cancer; and NCT03447132, a Phase 3 study in operable breast cancer.
Yes, PD 0332991 is the same as palbociclib. The drug is known by both names, with palbociclib being the generic name and PD 0332991 the research code. Pfizer is developing this CDK4/6 inhibitor for breast cancer and other oncology indications.