Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Sativex and rifampicin

Phase 3

Cerebral Palsy | Small Molecules | Neurology |Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc|Trials Updated: May 6, 2023

Sativex and rifampicin development status

Highest phase Phase 3
Registered trials 1 across 1 sponsor since Mar 2011

Sativex and rifampicin target and mechanism

ModalitySmall Molecules

Also known as Sativex, Sativex Low Dose

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedDouble-BlindPLACEBO_CONTROLLEDDMC
Total Trials20
Total Enrollment3,510

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

Sativex and rifampicin clinical trials

Sativex and rifampicin · 20 trials · 12 indications

Phase 3 15Phase 2 1Phase 1/2 2Phase 1 2
NCT01898520A Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability Study of Sativex for the Treatment of Spasticity in Children Aged 8 to 18 YearsCerebral Palsy
COMPLETED72 Analytics
NCT00681538A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Sativex®, for the Relief of Symptoms of Spasticity in Subjects, From Phase B, With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)Spasticity
COMPLETED572 Analytics
NCT00702468Evaluate the Maintenance of Effect After Long-term Treatment With Sativex® in Subjects With Symptoms of Spasticity Due to Multiple SclerosisSpasticity
COMPLETED36 Analytics
NCT00713817A Study to Determine the Maintenance of Effect After Long-term Treatment of Sativex® in Subjects With Neuropathic PainPain
COMPLETED19 Analytics
NCT00391079Sativex Versus Placebo When Added to Existing Treatment for Central Neuropathic Pain in MSMultiple Sclerosis
COMPLETED339 Analytics
NCT00713323A Study to Compare the Safety and Tolerability of Sativex® in Patients With Neuropathic Pain.Pain
COMPLETED380 Analytics
NCT00710554A Study of Sativex® for Pain Relief of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain, Associated With AllodyniaPain
COMPLETED246 Analytics
NCT00710424A Study of Sativex® for Pain Relief Due to Diabetic NeuropathyPain
COMPLETED297 Analytics
NCT01599234A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Sativex in Relieving Symptoms of Spasticity Due to Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis
COMPLETED337 Analytics
NCT00678795A Parallel Group Study to Compare Sativex® With Placebo in the Treatment of Detrusor Overactivity in Patients With Multiple SclerosisDetrusor Overactivity
COMPLETED135 Analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability Study of Sativex for the Treatment of Spasticity in Children Aged 8 to 18 Years
Cerebral PalsyUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Sativex®, for the Relief of Symptoms of Spasticity in Subjects, From Phase B, With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
SpasticityUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Evaluate the Maintenance of Effect After Long-term Treatment With Sativex® in Subjects With Symptoms of Spasticity Due to Multiple Sclerosis
SpasticityUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study to Determine the Maintenance of Effect After Long-term Treatment of Sativex® in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain
PainUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Sativex Versus Placebo When Added to Existing Treatment for Central Neuropathic Pain in MS
Multiple SclerosisUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study to Compare the Safety and Tolerability of Sativex® in Patients With Neuropathic Pain.
PainUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study of Sativex® for Pain Relief of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain, Associated With Allodynia
PainUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study of Sativex® for Pain Relief Due to Diabetic Neuropathy
PainUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Sativex in Relieving Symptoms of Spasticity Due to Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple SclerosisUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Parallel Group Study to Compare Sativex® With Placebo in the Treatment of Detrusor Overactivity in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
Detrusor OveractivityUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Change from baseline to the end of 12 weeks' treatment in mean spasticity 0-10 NRS score
Day 0 - Day 84

The spasticity 0-10 NRS was completed daily at bedtime using a paper study diary. The difference between spasticity and spasm was clearly explained to the caregiver. The primary caregiver was asked the following question: "This question is about your child's muscles and how soft or tight/hard they have felt today. Think carefully about how your child's muscles have felt today and circle a number from 0 to 10 that best describes this, where: 0 = 'my child's muscles have felt totally relaxed' and 10 = 'my child's muscles have felt the tightest/hardest they have ever felt'". A reduction in score indicates an improvement in condition. The mean spasticity 0-10 NRS score of the last 7 days of the baseline period was used for a patient's mean baseline score. The mean 0-10 NRS score of the last 7 days prior to completion/withdrawal was used for a patient's mean end of treatment score.

The Change in Mean Spasticity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to End of Treatment (Phase B).
Baseline (last 7 days of Week 4) - End of treatment (last 7 days of Week 17)

Subjects were asked "On a scale of '0 to 10' please indicate the average level of your spasticity over the last 24 hours" with the anchors: 0 = 'no spasticity' and 10 = 'worst possible spasticity'. They were asked to relate 'no spasticity' to the time prior to the onset of their spasticity.

Number of Subjects Who Experience Treatment Failure.
Week 1- Week 5

The time to treatment failure was calculated as the number of days from the first day of treatment up to the day of treatment failure. The day of treatment failure was the earliest of:the day of premature cessation of study medication;the first day of the longest period, ending on the last day of treatment, where the mean spasticity NRS had increased by at least 20% and at least 1 unit from the treatment baseline; the day of a clinically relevant increase in anti-spasticity or disease modifying medication. The number of subjects who failed treatment were calculated.

Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Pain Severity on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment (Average of Last 7 Days Treatment)
Day 0-35

The pain severity Numerical Rating Scale was complete at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain severity in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of neuropathic pain. A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline.

Change in Mean Pain Due to MS NRS Score
14 weeks: Baseline - End of Treatment (last 7 days of treatment)

The pain NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain due to multiple sclerosis. A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline.

Number of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score From Baseline
14 weeks: Baseline - end of treatment (last 7 days)

A positive 30% pain response is defined as a reduction of at least 30% in the mean NRS pain score from baseline to week 14 (last 7 days). The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain due to multiple sclerosis. The pain NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening.

Change From Parent Study Baseline in Mean Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score During the Last 4 Weeks of Open-label Treatment
38 weeks

The average pain NRS was complete at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain or average pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain. A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline.

Change From Baseline in Mean Peripheral Neuropathic Pain on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at the End of Treatment (15 Weeks)
Day 7 to Day 98

The peripheral neuropathic pain NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain or average pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain. A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline.

The Change From Baseline in Mean Diabetic Neuropathy Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment (Average of Last 7 Days Treatment)
Day 0 to Day 98

The diabetic neuropathy pain Numerical Rating Scale was complete at the end of every day. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your nerve pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain due to diabetic neuropathy. For those whose evaluable period ended before Day 7, the mean of the available post-randomisation data was used. Those with no post-baseline diary pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale scores were excluded from the analysis.

Number of Responders at the 30% Improvement Level at the End of Treatment
Day 0 - Day 98

A positive 30% pain response is defined as a reduction of at least 30% in the mean NRS average pain score from baseline to week 14 (last 7 days). The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain or average pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain. The average pain NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. Estimates were produced for a one-week period, with the evaluable period finishing at the end of the appropriate seven-day period.

Change From Baseline in Mean Spasticity 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score During the Last 14 Day of Treatment (End of Treatment)
0-15 weeks

The average spasticity NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The subject was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your spasticity in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no spasticity and 10 = worst possible spasticity. A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline.

Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Number of Incontinence Episodes at the End of Treatment
0 - 10 weeks

To assess the effect of Sativex in neurogenic overactive bladder, the incontinence episode frequency was selected as the primary endpoint. Baseline was the average of all available data recorded during the 14 days immediately prior to the randomisation visit. End of Treatment was the last average available from Week 3, Week 5, and Weeks 7-8. A negative value indicates an improvement in score from baseline.

Assessment of Change From Baseline in the Mean Spasticity 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score.
0-52 days

The spasticity Numerical Rating Scale was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your average spasticity in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no spasticity and 10 = worst ever spasticity. For the analysis, end of treatment was defined as the mean of the last seven days in the study or the last three days if the subject withdrew due to worsening spasticity or lack of efficacy. A negative value indicates an improvement in spasticity score from baseline.

Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Peripheral Neuropathic Pain on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score During the Last Seven Days of Treatment (End of Treatment)
Day 0 to Day 42

The neuropathic pain Numerical Rating Scale was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain or average pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline.

The Incidence of Adverse Events as a Measure of Subject Safety
0 - 657 days

The number of subjects who experienced an adverse event in this study is presented.

Change From Baseline in the Mean Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment (4 Weeks)
0 - 4 weeks

The average pain Numerical Rating Scale was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain or average pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline.

The Change in Mean Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to the End of the Treatment.
2 weeks: baseline - end of week 2 (last 3 days of treatment)

The pain NRS was complete at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain or average pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain due to cancer. A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline.

The Consumption of Escape Analgesic Medication.
2 weeks: baseline - end of week 2 (last 3 days of treatment)

Subjects recorded their use of escape medication each day on their diary card.

Number of Patients With at Least 30% Improvement in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Average Pain Score From Baseline
5 Weeks: Baseline (first 3 days) - Week 5 (last 3 days)

A positive 30% pain response is defined as a reduction of at least 30% in the mean NRS average pain score from baseline to week 5 (last 3 days). The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain or average pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. No pain relates to the time prior to the onset of pain due to cancer. The average pain NRS was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening.

Incidence of Adverse Events as a Measure of Patient Safety.
Study Day 1 - Day 358

Adverse events will be coded according to the current medical dictionary for regular activities graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria. The number of patients who experienced an adverse event whilst on treatment will be presented.

The incidence of adverse events in patients receiving Sativex in combination with dose-intense Temozolomide in the open-label phase of the study
Study Day 1 - Day 358

Adverse events will be coded according to the current medical dictionary for regular activities graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria. The number of patients who experienced an adverse event whilst on treatment will be presented.

Pharmacokinetic analysis - Unbound maximum plasma concentration (Cmax(u)) of Sativex® in healthy patients and in patients with hepatic impairment
Pre-dose (0),0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 24, 36 and 48 hours post dose.

All blood samples will be taken by either direct venipuncture or an indwelling cannula inserted in a forearm vein. For pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments, blood will be drawn from each patient into a five mL lithium-heparinised tube at the following intervals (±five min): Pre-dose (0),0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 24, 36 and 48 hours post dose. Collected blood samples will be used to confirm correct dosing, and to provide information about the plasma concentrations of unbound THC, CBD, 11-hydroxy-THC (11-OH-THC), 6-hydroxy-CBD (6-OH-CBD) and 7-hydroxy-CBD (7-OH-CBD).

Pharmacokinetic analysis - Unbound area under the concentration-time curve calculated to the last observable concentration at time t (AUC0-t(u)) of Sativex® in healthy patients and in patients with hepatic impairment
Pre-dose (0),0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 24, 36 and 48 hours post dose.

All blood samples will be taken by either direct venipuncture or an indwelling cannula inserted in a forearm vein. For pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments, blood will be drawn from each patient into a five mL lithium-heparinised tube at the following intervals (±five min): Pre-dose (0),0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 24, 36 and 48 hours post dose. Collected blood samples will be used to confirm correct dosing, and to provide information about the plasma concentrations of unbound THC, CBD, 11-OH-THC, 6-OH-CBD and 7-OH-CBD.

Pharmacokinetic analysis - Unbound Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf(u)) of Sativex® in healthy patients and in patients with hepatic impairment
Pre-dose (0),0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 24, 36 and 48 hours post dose.

All blood samples will be taken by either direct venipuncture or an indwelling cannula inserted in a forearm vein. For pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments, blood will be drawn from each patient into a five mL lithium-heparinised tube at the following intervals (±five min): Pre-dose (0),0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 24, 36 and 48 hours post dose. Collected blood samples will be used to confirm correct dosing, and to provide information about the plasma concentrations of unbound THC, CBD, 11-OH-THC, 6-OH-CBD and 7-OH-CBD.

Comparison of Subjective Drug Value (SDV)(Balance of effects) between Marinol and Sativex
Recorded at 6, 12 and 24 hours during each study arm

Mean difference in Mean peak effect (Emax) between: Marinol 20 mg vs Sativex 21.6 mg; Marinol 20 mg vs Sativex 43.2 mg; Marinol 40 mg vs Sativex 43.2 mg.

Comparison of Bipolar Drug Liking VAS (Balance of effects) between Marinol and Sativex
Recorded at 12 and 24 hours during each study arm

Mean difference in Mean peak effect (Emax) between: Marinol 20 mg vs Sativex 21.6 mg; Marinol 20 mg vs Sativex 43.2 mg; Marinol 40 mg vs Sativex 43.2 mg.

Comparison of Addiction Research Centre Inventory (ARCI) MBG (Positive effects) between Marinol and Sativex
Recorded at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours during each study arm

Mean difference in Mean peak effect (Emax) between: Marinol 20 mg vs Sativex 21.6 mg; Marinol 20 mg vs Sativex 43.2 mg; Marinol 40 mg vs Sativex 43.2 mg.

Secondary Endpoints

Change from baseline to the end of 12 weeks' treatment in mean MTS score of the most affected limb
Day 0 - Day 84
Change from baseline to the end of 12 weeks' treatment in mean MAS score of the main muscle groups of the upper and lower limb
Day 0 - Day 84
Change from baseline to the end of 12 weeks' treatment in mean sleep quality 0-10 NRS score
Day 0 - Day 84
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingQUADRUPLE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
SativexACTIVE_COMPARATOROromucosal spray containing delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (27 mg/mL):cannabidiol (CBD) (25 mg/mL). Each 100 μL spray to the sub-lingual or oral mucosa delivered THC 2.7 mg and CBD 2.5 mg. The maximum number of daily sprays was 12.
PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATOROromucosal spray containing ethanol: propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavouring and colourings FD\&C Yellow No.5 (E102 tartrazine) (0.0260%), FD\&C Yellow No.6 (E110 sunset yellow) (0.0038%), FD\&C Red No. 40 (E129 Allura red AC) (0.00330%) and FD\&C Blue No.1 (E133 Brilliant blue FCF) (0.00058%). Each 100 μL spray administered to the sub-lingual or oral mucosa delivered the colourants plus excipients. The maximum number of daily sprays was 12.
AEXPERIMENTAL -
BPLACEBO_COMPARATOR -
GW-2000-02EXPERIMENTALActive treatment
THC AloneEXPERIMENTALActive treatment
Sativex Low DoseEXPERIMENTALRange of 1 to 4 sprays per day. Each actuation of oromucosal spray delivers 2.7mg delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 2.5mg cannabidiol (CBD). Thus maximum daily dose is 10.8mg THC and 10mg CBD.
Sativex Medium DoseEXPERIMENTALRange of 6 to 10 sprays per day. Each actuation of oromucosal spray delivers 2.7mg delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 2.5mg cannabidiol (CBD). Thus maximum daily dose is 27mg THC and 25mg CBD.
Sativex High DoseEXPERIMENTALRange of 11 to 16 sprays per day. Each actuation of oromucosal spray delivers 2.7mg delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 2.5mg cannabidiol (CBD). Thus maximum daily dose is 43.2mg THC and 40mg CBD.
Sativex and Dose-Intense TemozolomideEXPERIMENTALPatients will received Sativex and Dose-Intense Temozolomide in a double-blind manner
Placebo and Dose-Intense TemozolomidePLACEBO_COMPARATORPatients will received placebo and Dose-Intense Temozolomide and in double-blind manner
Group 1: mild hepatic impairmentACTIVE_COMPARATORMild hepatic impairment: eight patients of Child-Pugh Grade A (Score 5-6). All patients received Sativex treatment.
Group 2: Moderate hepatic impairmentACTIVE_COMPARATORModerate hepatic impairment: eight patients of Child-Pugh Grade B (Score 7-9). All patients received Sativex treatment.
Group 3: Pugh Grade B (Score 7-9).EXPERIMENTALSevere hepatic impairment: eight patients of Child-Pugh Grade C (Score 10-15). All patients received Sativex treatment.
Group 4: Control groupACTIVE_COMPARATORControl Group: eight healthy subjects matched with respect to age (±10 years), weight (±10% body mass index \[BMI\]) and sex to the severe or most severe evaluable patients. All patients received Sativex treatment.
Sativex 4 spraysEXPERIMENTAL -
Sativex 8 spraysEXPERIMENTAL -
Sativex 16 spraysEXPERIMENTAL -
Marinol low doseACTIVE_COMPARATOR -
Marinol high doseACTIVE_COMPARATOR -

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
SativexDRUGOromucosal spray containing THC (27 mg/mL):CBD (25 mg/mL), in ethanol: propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavouring. Each 100 μL spray delivered THC 2.7 mg and CBD 2.5 mg. The maximum number of daily sprays was 12.
PlaceboDRUGOromucosal spray containing ethanol: propylene glycol(50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavouring and colourings FD\&C Yellow No.5 (E102 tartrazine) (0.0260%), FD\&C Yellow No.6 (E110 sunset yellow) (0.0038%), FD\&C Red No. 40 (E129 Allura red AC) (0.00330%) and FD\&C Blue No.1 (E133 Brilliant blue FCF) (0.00058%). Each 100 μL spray administered to the sub-lingual or oral mucosa delivered the colourants plus excipients. The maximum daily dose was 12 sprays per day.
Sativex®DRUGcontaining THC (27 mg/ml):CBD (25 mg/ml), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipients, with peppermint oil (0.05%) flavouring. Maximum dose within any 24-hour interval is 12 sprays (THC 32.4 mg: CBD 30 mg)
GW-2000-02DRUGContaining THC, 27 mg/ml, as extract of Cannabis sativa L. Subjects received study medication delivered in 100 µl actuations by a pump action oromucosal spray. Maximum permitted dose was eight actuations in any three hour period and 48 actuations (THC 130 mg) in 24 hours.
THC AloneDRUGContaining THC, 27 mg/ml, as extract of Cannabis sativa L. Subjects received study medication delivered in 100 µl actuations by a pump action oromucosal spray. Maximum permitted dose was eight actuations in any three hour period and 48 actuations (THC 130 mg) in 24 hours.
Sativex Low DoseDRUGRange of 1 to 4 sprays per day. Each actuation of oromucosal spray delivers 2.7mg delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 2.5mg cannabidiol (CBD). Thus maximum daily dose is 10.8mg THC and 10mg CBD.
Sativex Medium DoseDRUGRange of 6 to 10 sprays per day. Each actuation of oromucosal spray delivers 2.7mg delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 2.5mg cannabidiol (CBD). Thus maximum daily dose is 27mg THC and 25mg CBD.
Sativex High DoseDRUGRange of 11 to 16 sprays per day. Each actuation of oromucosal spray delivers 2.7mg delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 2.5mg cannabidiol (CBD). Thus maximum daily dose is 43.2mg THC and 40mg CBD.
MarinolDRUGMarinol dose level 1: 20 mg THC (2 marinol capsules) + 2 placebo capsules + 16 placebo sprays
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range8 Years to 18 Years
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites14

Inclusion Criteria: * Males and females aged between 8 and 18 years suffering from cerebral palsy or traumatic central nervous system injury. * Participant and/or authorised representative willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study. * To have been under treatment for t...

Countries:CzechiaIsraelUnited KingdomCanadaUnited StatesBelgiumChileFinlandFranceGermanyIndiaItalyMexicoPolandRomaniaSouth AfricaSpain
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Frequently asked questions about Sativex and rifampicin

What is Sativex?

Sativex is an investigational small molecule drug developed by Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc. It has been studied across several conditions, including multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, cancer, detrusor overactivity, hepatic impairment, and abuse potential evaluation. It is given in combination with other treatments in some studies, such as dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma.

What is Sativex used for in multiple sclerosis?

Sativex has been studied for the treatment of spasticity in multiple sclerosis and in children with cerebral palsy. A Phase 3 trial, NCT01898520, evaluated its safety, efficacy, and tolerability for spasticity in patients aged 8 to 18 years with cerebral palsy. The multiple sclerosis indication is part of its clinical development program.

Who makes Sativex?

Sativex is developed by Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc, which trades under the ticker JAZZ. The company sponsors the clinical trials evaluating Sativex across its various indications, including cancer, cerebral palsy, and multiple sclerosis.

What phase is Sativex in?

Sativex is in Phase 1 clinical development according to its overall program status. Individual trials have spanned Phase 1 and Phase 3, with six completed trials in total. It is an investigational drug and has not been approved by the FDA for the indications studied.

What clinical trials is Sativex in?

Sativex has been evaluated in six completed clinical trials, including NCT01898520 for spasticity in cerebral palsy, NCT01887301 in hepatic impairment, and NCT01812616 and NCT01812603 in recurrent glioblastoma. These trials enrolled a total of 1,110 participants and were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled.