Approval Probability
TA Base Rate
Adjusted LOA
ML Risk
Fluticasone propionate · 1 trial · 1 indication
| Arm | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | EXPERIMENTAL | Budesonide |
| 2 | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | Fluticasone propionate |
| 3 | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | - |
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Budesonide | DRUG | - |
| Fluticasone propionate | DRUG | - |
| Placebo | DRUG | - |
Inclusion Criteria: * At least a 2 year documented history of seasonal allergic rhinitis * who, in the opinion of the investigator, * is a candidate for treatment with nasal steroids based on a history of either * a)inadequate control of symptoms with antihistamines, decongestants and/or immunot...
Fluticasone propionate is used for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. It is a small molecule respiratory therapy being developed by AstraZeneca PLC. The drug is currently in Phase 3 clinical development and is being studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Fluticasone propionate is being developed by AstraZeneca PLC, a biopharmaceutical company listed on the stock exchange under the ticker AZN. The drug is being studied for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis and is currently in Phase 3 clinical development.
Fluticasone propionate is in Phase 3 clinical development. It is being investigated for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The drug is not yet approved and remains investigational, with an ongoing clinical trial program evaluating its safety and efficacy.
Fluticasone propionate is being studied in a Phase 3 clinical trial with the identifier NCT00641680. This trial is titled 'Rhinocort Aqua Versus Placebo and Fluticasone Propionate' and has completed enrollment of 750 participants aged 12 years and older with seasonal allergic rhinitis. The study is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled.
Fluticasone propionate is being compared to Rhinocort Aqua in a clinical trial. The Phase 3 study NCT00641680 is titled 'Rhinocort Aqua Versus Placebo and Fluticasone Propionate,' indicating that the two are distinct treatments being evaluated against each other for seasonal allergic rhinitis.