Approval Probability
TA Base Rate
Adjusted LOA
ML Risk
Romiplostim · 16 trials · 23 indications
No thrombocytopenia-induced modification of any myelosuppressive agent in the second and third cycles of the planned on-study chemotherapy regimen. Thrombocytopenia-induced modifications include chemotherapy dose reduction, delay, omission, or chemotherapy treatment discontinuation due to platelet counts below 100 x 109/L
Participants met the criteria of the primary endpoint if there was no thrombocytopenia-induced modification of any myelosuppressive treatment agent in the second and third cycles of the planned on-trial chemotherapy regimen (cycles were up to 3 weeks). A thrombocytopenia-induced modification was defined as any dose reduction, dose delay, dose omission, and/or early chemotherapy treatment discontinuation due to low platelet counts less than 100 x 10\^9/L. The 95% confidence interval (CI) is based on the exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Platelet response was defined as a platelet count of ≥ 50 x 10⁹/L with no rescue medication use for ITP in the past 4 weeks. Monthly platelet response was calculated based on the median platelet count during each month. For each participant, the percentage of time with platelet response during the first 6 months was calculated as the number of months a platelet response was observed divided by the total number of months response was assessed.
The percentage of participants who developed collagen as evidenced by trichrome staining, defined as a Grade 4 on the modified Bauermeister grading scale: Grade 0: No reticulin fibers demonstrable Grade 1: Occasional fine individual fibers and foci of a fine fiber network Grade 2: Fine fiber network throughout most of the section; no coarse fibers Grade 3: Diffuse fiber network with scattered thick coarse fibers but no mature collagen (negative to trichrome staining) Grade 4: Diffuse, often course fiber network with areas of collagenization (positive trichrome staining)
The percentage of participants with an increased modified Bauermeister grade defined as an increase by ≥ 2 severity grades or an increase to grade 4 (i.e., grade 0 to 2-4, grade 1 to 3-4, grade 2 to 4, or grade 3 to 4 over baseline). The modified Bauermeister grading scale: Grade 0: No reticulin fibers demonstrable Grade 1: Occasional fine individual fibers and foci of a fine fiber network Grade 2: Fine fiber network throughout most of the section; no coarse fibers Grade 3: Diffuse fiber network with scattered thick coarse fibers but no mature collagen (negative to trichrome staining) Grade 4: Diffuse, often course fiber network with areas of collagenization (positive trichrome staining) Participants without an evaluable baseline result were assumed to have a baseline modified Bauermeister score of 0.
The percentage of participants with bone marrow abnormalities (eg, myelodysplastic syndrome, monosomy 7) based on analysis of bone marrow biopsy and aspirate samples using cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
A participant with durable platelet response was defined as achieving at least 6 weekly platelet counts of ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L during the last 8 weeks of treatment (platelet counts obtained from week 18 to week 25). If a platelet count from a participant was not available (missing) in a certain week, that week was imputed as non-response for that participant. Platelet counts were not deemed as a positive response for 4 weeks after the administration of rescue medication.
The adverse event (AE) severity grading scale used was the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 grading scale, where Grade 1 = Mild AE; Grade 2 = Moderate AE; Grade 3 = Severe AE; Grade 4 = Life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5 = Death related to AE. A serious adverse event was defined as an adverse event that met at least one of the following serious criteria: * fatal * life threatening (places the subject at immediate risk of death) * required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * congenital anomaly/birth defect * other medically important serious event. The investigator assessed whether each adverse event was possibly related to the investigational product.
Exposure adjusted rate was defined as the total number of events divided by the duration of time participants were under observation. The adverse event (AE) severity grading scale used was the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 grading scale, where Grade 1 = Mild AE; Grade 2 = Moderate AE; Grade 3 = Severe AE; Grade 4 = Life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5 = Death related to AE. A serious adverse event was defined as an adverse event that met at least one of the following serious criteria: * fatal * life threatening (places the subject at immediate risk of death) * required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * congenital anomaly/birth defect * other medically important serious event. The investigator assessed whether each adverse event was possibly related to the study drug.
Two validated assays were used to test for antibodies to romiplostim / the thrombopoietin-mimetic peptide component of romiplostim (TMP). The first was an immunoassay to confirm the presence of antibodies. The second was a cell-based bioassay to detect neutralizing or inhibitory effects in vitro. If a sample was positive in both assays, a participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies. Transient antibodies are those positive post-baseline but negative at the last time point tested. Persistent antibodies were those positive at the last time point tested.
Two validated assays were used to test for antibodies to endogenous thrombopoietin (TPO). The first was an immunoassay to confirm the presence of antibodies. The second was a cell-based bioassay to detect neutralizing or inhibitory effects in vitro. If a sample was positive in both assays, a participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies. Transient antibodies are those positive post-baseline but negative at the last time point tested. Persistent antibodies were those positive at the last time point tested.
One or more occurences of one or more adverse events within the participant during the study. Participants with more than one event were only counted once
evaluation of safety, defined by the incidence of grade \>/= 4 adverse events (NCI CTCAE v. 4.02 Dec 2009)
The primary endpoint was the number of months a participant achieved a platelet response during the 12-month treatment period. A platelet response for any 1 month was defined as the median of platelet counts measured in the month ≥ 50 x 10\^9/L. Platelet counts within 4 weeks following a rescue medication use or following splenectomy were considered non-response. Months without any platelet count measurement were considered as months with no platelet response.
A clinically significant bleeding event is defined as any bleeding event of grade ≥ 2 per the modified World Health Organization (WHO) bleeding scale: • Grade 0 = no bleeding • Grade 1 = petechia or mucosal or retinal bleeding not requiring intervention • Grade 2 = melena, hematemesis, hematuria, hemoptysis • Grade 3 = bleeding required red cell transfusion • Grade 4 = retinal bleeding with visual impairment • Grade 5 = non-fatal cerebral bleeding • Grade 6 = fatal cerebral bleeding • Grade 7 = fatal non-cerebral bleeding. Bleeding events that continue for more than 7 days were counted as separate events every eighth day. Multiple events that arose from one organ system on one day were collapsed into one single event. Bleeding events with a start date between the first dose date and the last dose date of the test treatment period+7 days are included.
The number of participants experiencing one or more adverse events during the treatment phase or extension phase of Part A.
The number of participants experiencing one or more adverse events during the treatment phase or extension phase of Part B.
The development of antibodies to romiplostim or to endogenous thrombopoietin (eTPO) was assessed using a neutralizing bioassay. Participants positive for neutralizing antibodies at any of the assessments during the study are reported.
The presence or development of antibodies to romiplostim and endogenous thrombopoietin was assessed using a neutralizing bioassay. Antibody analyses were conducted on study days 29 and at the end-of-study visit (day 78). The number of participants with positive antibody binding at any time during the study is reported.
Categorize and quantify AEs per CTCAE version 5.0
Improvement in at least one of the cell blood lineages by 24 weeks of therapy: 1. Platelet response (increase to 10 X 103/mL above baseline or stable platelet counts with transfusion independence for a minimum of 2 weeks in those who were transfusion dependent on entry into the protocol) 2. Erythroid response (when pretreatment hemoglobin was, below 7 g/dL, defined as an increase in hemoglobin by 1.5 g/dL or, in transfused patients, a reduction in the units of packed red blood cell transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 transfusions for 8 consecutive weeks, compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks) 3. Neutrophil response (when pretreatment absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] of 0.5 x103 /mL as at least a 100% increase in ANC, or an ANC increase by 0.5 x103 /mL)
| Arm | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Romiplostim + Predniso(lo)ne | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants will receive romiplostim administered subcutaneously (SC) in combination with predniso(lo)ne administered orally during Part 1 of the study. Participants who complete Part 1 of the study will enter Part 2 and continue participation for study assessments. |
| Predniso(lo)ne | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | Participants will receive predniso(lo)ne administered orally during Part 1 of the study. Participants who complete Part 1 of the study will enter Part 2 and continue participation for study assessments. |
| Romiplostim | EXPERIMENTAL | The study in a 2:1 randomization ratio(108 subjects to romiplostim). Amgen investigational product (romiplostim or placebo) will be administered in the clinic by a qualified healthcare provider as a subcutaneous injection. |
| Placebo | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | The study in a 2:1 randomization ratio (54 subjects to placebo) Amgen investigational product (romiplostim or placebo) will be administered in the clinic by a qualified healthcare provider as a subcutaneous injection. |
| 1 | EXPERIMENTAL | Romiplostim |
| Romiplostim 250 μg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received romiplostim 250 μg administered subcutaneously on Day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle. Chemotherapy consisted of 21-day cycles of gemcitabine/carboplatin (gemcitabine and carboplatin on Day 1 and gemcitabine again on Day 8) or 21-day cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin (gemcitabine and cisplatin on Day 1 and gemcitabine again on Day 8), up to a maximum of 5 cycles administered according to standard institutional practice. |
| Romiplostim 500 μg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received romiplostim 500 μg administered subcutaneously on Day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle. Chemotherapy consisted of 21-day cycles of gemcitabine/carboplatin (gemcitabine and carboplatin on Day 1 and gemcitabine again on Day 8) or 21-day cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin (gemcitabine and cisplatin on Day 1 and gemcitabine again on Day 8), up to a maximum of 5 cycles administered according to standard institutional practice. |
| Romiplostim 750 μg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received romiplostim 750 μg administered subcutaneously on Day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle. Chemotherapy consisted of 21-day cycles of gemcitabine/carboplatin (gemcitabine and carboplatin on Day 1 and gemcitabine again on Day 8) or 21-day cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin (gemcitabine and cisplatin on Day 1 and gemcitabine again on Day 8), up to a maximum of 5 cycles administered according to standard institutional practice. |
| Part A: 300 µg romiplostim | EXPERIMENTAL | Cohort 1 in Part A, participants received romiplostim 300 µg subcutaneously once weekly for 3 weeks. Participants who completed Part A could continue to receive weekly injections of romiplostim for up to 1 year in the extension treatment phase. |
| Part A: 700 µg romiplostim | EXPERIMENTAL | Cohort 2 in Part A, participants received romiplostim 700 µg subcutaneously once weekly for up to 3 weeks. Participants who completed Part A could continue to receive weekly injections of romiplostim for up to 1 year in the extension treatment phase. |
| Part A: 1000 µg romiplostim | EXPERIMENTAL | Cohort 3 in Part A, participants received romiplostim 1000 µg subcutaneously once weekly for up to 3 weeks. Participants who completed Part A could continue to receive weekly injections of romiplostim for up to 1 year in the extension treatment phase. |
| Part A: 1500 µg romiplostim | EXPERIMENTAL | Cohort 4 in Part A, participants received romiplostim 1500 µg subcutaneously once weekly for up to 3 weeks. Participants who completed Part A could continue to receive weekly injections of romiplostim for up to 1 year in the extension treatment phase. |
| Part B: 750 µg romiplostim SC QW | EXPERIMENTAL | Part B participants received romiplostim 750 µg subcutaneously (SC) once weekly (QW) for 8 weeks. Participants who complete Part B could continue to receive weekly injections of romiplostim for up to 1 year in the extension treatment phase. |
| Part B: 750 µg romiplostim SC Q2W | EXPERIMENTAL | Part B participants received romiplostim 750 µg subcutaneously every two weeks (Q2W) for 8 weeks. Participants who complete Part B could continue to receive injections of romiplostim for up to 1 year in the extension treatment phase. |
| Part B: 750 µg romiplostim IV Q2W | EXPERIMENTAL | Part B participants received romiplostim 750 µg intravenously (IV) once every two weeks for 8 weeks. Participants who complete Part B could continue to receive romiplostim for up to 1 year in the extension treatment phase. |
| Part A: Romiplostim 0.2 µg/kg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received 0.2 µg/kg romiplostim subcutaneously on day 1 and day 15 or 22, depending on platelet counts. |
| Part A: Romiplostim 0.5 µg/kg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received 0.5 µg/kg romiplostim subcutaneously on day 1 and day 15 or 22, depending on platelet counts. |
| Part A: Romiplostim 1.0 µg/kg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received 1.0 µg/kg romiplostim subcutaneously on day 1 and on day 15 or 22 depending on platelet counts. |
| Part A: Romiplostim 3 µg/kg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received 3.0 µg/kg romiplostim subcutaneously on day 1 and day 15 or 22, depending on platelet counts. |
| Part A: Romiplostim 6 µg/kg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received 6.0 µg/kg romiplostim subcutaneously on day 1 and day 15 or 22, depending on platelet counts. |
| Part A: Romiplostim 10 µg/kg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received 10.0 µg/kg romiplostim subcutaneously on day 1 and day 15 or 22, depending on platelet counts. |
| Part B: Placebo | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Participants received placebo subcutaneously once a week for 6 weeks. |
| Part B: Romiplostim 1.0 µg/kg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received 1.0 µg/kg subcutaneously once a week for 6 weeks. |
| Part B: Romiplostim 3.0 µg/kg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received 3.0 µg/kg subcutaneously once a week for 6 weeks. |
| Part B: Romiplostim 6.0 µg/kg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received 6.0 µg/kg subcutaneously once a week for 6 weeks. |
| Arm A | EXPERIMENTAL | Arm A will include acquired bone marrow failure (BMF) disorders including aplastic anemia, refractory cytopenia of childhood/Myelodysplastic Syndrome(MDS) without monosomy 7 and 5q deletion abnormalities, toxin induced myelosuppression due to infection and inherited cytopenia with or without involvement of other cell lines who are transfusion dependent and or showing progression to bone marrow failure. Arm A: Start at 5 microgram/kg/dose per week along with standard of care and escalate with 2.5 microgram/kg/dose increments (per week at physician's discretion depending on the clinical and laboratory response) (Maximum: 20 microgram/kg/dose) based on response for at least 24 weeks or until hematopoietic response is seen, whichever comes first. If patient shows response, therapy will be continued for a total of 52 weeks. |
| Arm B | EXPERIMENTAL | Arm B will include children with chemo and or radiotherapy induced thrombocytopenia/cytopenia and children undergoing stem cell transplantation (SCT). Arm B: Starting dose 2 microgram/kg/dose per week with increments at 1 microgram/kg/dose (Maximum: 10 micrograms/kg/dose) depending on the laboratory response. |
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Romiplostim | DRUG | Administered subcutaneously. |
| Predniso(lo)ne | DRUG | Administered orally. |
| Placebo | DRUG | Placebo comparator |
| Gemcitabine | DRUG | Intravenous infusion |
| Carboplatin | DRUG | Intravenous infusion |
| Cisplatin | DRUG | Intravenous infusion |
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years or adult legal age within country if older than 18 years. * Diagnosis of primary ITP according to the 2019 International Consensus (ICR) that is previously untreated and requires treatment. * Note: The investigator should ensure that the diagnosis of primary I...
Romiplostim is an investigational small molecule being studied for use in several hematologic conditions, including myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), immune thrombocytopenic purpura, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, lung cancer, and chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia. It is being developed by Amgen Inc. and is currently in Phase 1 clinical development.
Romiplostim is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist that targets the thrombopoietin receptor to stimulate platelet production. It is being investigated for its ability to increase platelet counts in patients with thrombocytopenia associated with conditions such as immune thrombocytopenic purpura, chemotherapy, and bone marrow failure disorders.
Romiplostim is being developed by Amgen Inc., a biopharmaceutical company traded on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol AMGN. Amgen is conducting clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Romiplostim for multiple hematologic indications.
Romiplostim is currently in Phase 1 clinical development. While some completed trials have been conducted in Phase 1 and Phase 2, the overall development program is in the early stages, and Romiplostim remains an investigational drug that has not been approved by regulatory authorities.
Romiplostim has been studied in four clinical trials, including NCT00117143 in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura, NCT00413283 in non-small cell lung cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia, NCT01516619 in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients, and NCT04478227 in children with bone marrow failure disorders.
Romiplostim was formerly known as AMG 531, as indicated in the clinical trial NCT00117143, which was titled 'Amgen Megakaryopoiesis Protein 2 (AMG 531) in Thrombocytopenic Subjects With Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)'. The drug is now referred to as Romiplostim in later trials.