Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

ABP 798

Phase 4

Arthritis, Rheumatoid | Small molecule | Immunology |Amgen Inc.|Trials Updated: Sep 10, 2022

ABP 798 development status

Highest phase Phase 4 run by Biogen (NCT00090038)
Phase scored for AMGNPhase 3
Registered trials 321+ across 123 sponsors since Jan 2002

ABP 798 target and mechanism

Molecular targetCD20
Target classProtein
ModalitySmall molecule

Also known as biosimilar to rituximab, Rituximab, BI 695500, C2B8 Monoclonal Antibody, Chimeric Anti-CD20 Antibody, CT-P10, IDEC-102, IDEC-C2B8

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedDouble-BlindACTIVE_CONTROLLEDDMC
Total Trials5
Total Enrollment1,058

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

ABP 798 clinical trials

ABP 798 · 5 trials · 5 indications

Phase 3 3Phase 2 2
NCT00140595ACVBP Plus Rituximab Versus CHOP Plus Rituximab in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and Age-adjusted IPI of 1Diffuse Large-Cell Lymphoma
COMPLETED380 Analytics
NCT02747043Study to Assess if ABP798 is Safe & Effective in Treating Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Compared to RituximabLymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
COMPLETED256 Analytics
NCT02792699Study to Assess if ABP 798 is Safe & Effective in Treating Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Compared to RituximabArthritis, Rheumatoid
COMPLETED311 Analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
ACVBP Plus Rituximab Versus CHOP Plus Rituximab in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and Age-adjusted IPI of 1
Diffuse Large-Cell LymphomaUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Study to Assess if ABP798 is Safe & Effective in Treating Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Compared to Rituximab
Lymphoma, Non-HodgkinUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Study to Assess if ABP 798 is Safe & Effective in Treating Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Compared to Rituximab
Arthritis, RheumatoidUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Event-free survival (EFS), events defined as death from any cause, relapse for complete responders (CR) and unconfirmed complete responders (CRu), progression during or after treatment, changes of therapy during allocated treatment.
Percentage of Participants Who Responded (Overall Response Rate - ORR) by Week 28 Based on Independent Central Assessment of Disease
Post treatment up to Week 28

Overall response within the first treatment cycle was assessed according to International Working Group - Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma criteria (IWG-NHL criteria \[Cheson et al, 1999\]) by a central reader. Response was evaluated using computerized tomography (CT) scans and positron emission tomography (PET) (to assess nodal disease/organ enlargement), and bone marrow biopsy (to assess bone marrow infiltration). ORR was the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu) or partial response (PR). Participants that do not meet the criteria for response were considered non-responders. CR was defined as no evidence of disease. CRu showed nodes in the original sum of the products (SPD) regressed by \>75% and/or indeterminate bone marrow results. PR was a ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes; \>=50% decrease in liver and spleen nodes, and no increase in size of other nodes nor any new sites of disease.

Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) After the Second Infusion of the First Dose
Day 15, pre-dose, end of infusion, and 3, 6, 24, and 48 hours, and 2, 6, and 10 weeks postdose.

Area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) following the second infusion of the first dose (day 15). Concentrations of ABP-798 and rituximab were quantified using a validated electrochemiluminescent method. AUCinf was estimated using the linear trapezoidal rule.

Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Cmax) After the Second Infusion of the First Dose
Day 15, pre-dose, end of infusion, and 3, 6, 24, and 48 hours, and 2, 6, and 10 weeks postdose.

Maximum observed concentration following the second infusion of the first dose (day 15). Concentrations of ABP-798 and rituximab were quantified using a validated electrochemiluminescent method.

Overall Response Rate (ORR), the Percentage of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment
18 Months

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

To evaluate the optimal combined dose intensity of the drug regimen

Secondary Endpoints

Response rate at the end of the treatment, progression rate, relapse rate, disease-free survival for complete responders, overall survival, neuromeningeal relapse rate and additional toxicities with ACVBP+rituximab combination
Percentage of Participants Who Responded (Overall Response Rate - ORR) at Week 12 Based on Independent Central Assessment of Disease
Week 12
Pharmacokinetic Serum Concentrations by Visit
Weeks 2, 3, 4, 12 and 20
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingNONE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
ABP 798EXPERIMENTALABP 798 was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m\^2 as an intravenous (IV) infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20.
RituximabACTIVE_COMPARATORRituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m\^2 as an IV infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20.
ABP 798 / ABP 798EXPERIMENTALParticipants received ABP 798 on days 1 and 15 (dose 1) and a second dose of ABP 798 at weeks 24 and 26 (dose 2). Each dose consisted of two 1000 mg intravenous infusions 2 weeks apart.
Rituximab (US) / ABP 798ACTIVE_COMPARATORParticipants received rituximab (United States \[US\] formulation) on days 1 and 15 (dose 1) and transitioned to receive ABP 798 at weeks 24 and 26 (dose 2). Each dose consisted of two 1000 mg intravenous infusions 2 weeks apart.
Rituximab (EU) / Rituximab (EU)ACTIVE_COMPARATORParticipants received rituximab (European Union \[EU\] formulation) on days 1 and 15 (dose 1) and a second dose of rituximab (EU formulation) at weeks 24 and 26 (dose 2). Each dose consisted of two 1000 mg intravenous infusions 2 weeks apart.
Cyclophosphamide/Vincristine/Rituximab +/- MitoxantroneEXPERIMENTALAll patients receive three courses of combination chemotherapy/rituximab followed by pegfilgrastim, administered at 21-day intervals. Treatment administered is as follows: cyclophosphamide 500mg/m2 IV day 1; mitoxantrone 10mg/m2 IV day 1; vincristine 1.0mg/m2 (maximum 2mg) IV day 1; prednisone 80mg PO days 1 - 5; rituximab 375mg/m2 IV day 1.

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
rituximabDRUG -
doxorubicinDRUG -
cyclophosphamideDRUG -
ABP 798BIOLOGICALABP 798 was supplied as a sterile, preservative-free liquid concentrate for IV infusion at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in either 100 mg/10 mL or 500 mg/50 mL single-dose vials. Subjects were to receive premedications before each infusion. Premedications were to be given according to local practice for administration of rituximab therapy.
Rituximab (US)DRUGSupplied as a 10 mg/mL liquid concentrate for IV administration.
Rituximab (EU)DRUGSupplied as a 10 mg/mL liquid concentrate for IV administration.
MitoxantroneDRUGMitoxantrone
VincristineDRUGVincristine
PrednisoneDRUGPrednisone
Rituximab + ACVBP regimen plus PegfilgrastimDRUG -
Autologous stem cell transplantPROCEDURE -
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range18 Years to 59 Years
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites10

Inclusion Criteria: Patient with histologically proven CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (WHO classification) Aged from 18 to 59 years. Age-adjusted International Prognostic Index equal to 1 (elevated LDH level OR stage III-IV OR ECOG status 2-3-4). Patient not previously treated. With a minimum...

Countries:BelgiumFranceUnited StatesAustraliaBulgariaCanadaColombiaCzechiaGeorgiaGermanyGreeceIndiaIsraelItalyJapanMexicoPolandRomaniaSouth KoreaSpainUkraineEstoniaHungary
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Frequently asked questions about ABP 798

What is ABP 798 used for?

ABP 798 is being developed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It is a proposed biosimilar to rituximab, studied in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis and in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Amgen Inc. is developing the asset, which has completed Phase 3 clinical testing.

What does ABP 798 target?

ABP 798 targets CD20, a protein found on the surface of B cells. By binding to CD20, the drug is designed to deplete B cells, the same mechanism of action as the reference product rituximab. This CD20-directed approach underlies its investigation in both autoimmune and B-cell lymphoma settings.

Who is developing ABP 798?

ABP 798 is being developed by Amgen Inc., which trades on Nasdaq under the ticker AMGN. Amgen is advancing the candidate as a proposed biosimilar to rituximab. The program has completed Phase 3 development across rheumatoid arthritis and non-Hodgkin lymphoma indications.

What phase is ABP 798 in?

ABP 798 has completed Phase 3 clinical development. It is an investigational biosimilar candidate and has not been approved by the FDA. Two Phase 3 studies have been completed, one in rheumatoid arthritis and one in non-Hodgkin lymphoma, comparing the drug to rituximab.

What clinical trials is ABP 798 in?

ABP 798 has been studied in two completed Phase 3 trials. NCT02792699 evaluated ABP 798 versus rituximab in moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis with 311 patients. NCT02747043 evaluated ABP 798 versus rituximab in non-Hodgkin lymphoma with 256 patients. Both were randomized, double-blind, and active-controlled studies.

Is ABP 798 the same as rituximab?

ABP 798 is not rituximab; it is a proposed biosimilar to rituximab developed by Amgen. A biosimilar is designed to be highly similar to an approved reference biologic, in this case rituximab. ABP 798 has been compared directly against rituximab in Phase 3 trials in rheumatoid arthritis and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.