Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

AG-348

Phase 4FDA approved 2022

Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency | Small molecule | Rare Disease |Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.|Trials Updated: Sep 28, 2026

AG-348 development status

FDA approval Feb 17, 2022 as Pyrukynd
Approval holderAgios Pharms Inc
ApplicationNDA216196
Highest phase Phase 4 (NCT05777993)
Phase scored for AGIOPhase 3
Registered trials 26 across 3 sponsors since Apr 2014

Label indication AQVESME is indicated for the treatment of anemia in adults with alpha- or beta-thalassemia. AQVESME is a pyruvate kinase activator indicated for the treatment of anemia in adults with alpha- or beta-thalassemia. ( 1.1 ) FDA label

AG-348 target and mechanism

Molecular targetpyruvate kinase-R (PKR)
Target classEnzyme
ModalitySmall molecule

Also known as Mitapivat, Mitapivat sulfate, AG-348 sulfate hydrate, PYRUKYND®, Mitapivat tablet, Mitapivat tablets, Mitapivat coated granules

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedDouble-BlindCONTROLLEDDMC
Total Trials14
Total Enrollment1,364

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

AG-348 clinical trials

AG-348 · 14 trials · 11 indications

Phase 3 10Phase 2 3Phase 1 1
NCT07506863A Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Mitapivat in Pediatric Participants With Transfusion-Dependent Alpha- or Beta-Thalassemia (α- or β-TDT)Transfusion-dependent Alpha-Thalassemia
RECRUITING54 Analytics
NCT07517133A Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Mitapivat in Pediatric Participants With α- or β-Non-Transfusion-Dependent ThalassemiaNon-Transfusion-dependent Alpha-Thalassemia
RECRUITING45 Analytics
NCT07656415A Study to Investigate the Effect of Mitapivat on Transfusion Burden in Subjects With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)Sickle Cell Disease
RECRUITING159 Analytics
NCT05144256A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Pediatric Participants With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD) Who Are Regularly Transfused, Followed by a 5-Year Extension PeriodPediatric Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency
ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING49 Analytics
NCT05175105A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Pediatric Participants With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD) Who Are Not Regularly Transfused, Followed by a 5-Year Extension PeriodPediatric Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency
ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING30 Analytics
NCT04770753A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Participants With Non-Transfusion-Dependent Alpha- or Beta-Thalassemia (α- or β-NTDT)Non-Transfusion-dependent Alpha-Thalassemia
ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING194 Analytics
NCT04770779A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Participants With Transfusion-Dependent Alpha- or Beta-Thalassemia (α- or β-TDT)Transfusion-dependent Alpha-Thalassemia
ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING258 Analytics
NCT03853798Extension Study of AG-348 in Adult Participants With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Previously Enrolled in AG-348-006 or AG348-C-007Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency
COMPLETED90 Analytics
NCT03548220A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of AG-348 in Not Regularly Transfused Adult Participants With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD)Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency
COMPLETED80 Analytics
NCT03559699A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of AG-348 in Regularly Transfused Adult Participants With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD)Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency
COMPLETED27 Analytics
PHASE3RECRUITING
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Mitapivat in Pediatric Participants With Transfusion-Dependent Alpha- or Beta-Thalassemia (α- or β-TDT)
Transfusion-dependent Alpha-ThalassemiaUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3RECRUITING
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Mitapivat in Pediatric Participants With α- or β-Non-Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia
Non-Transfusion-dependent Alpha-ThalassemiaUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3RECRUITING
A Study to Investigate the Effect of Mitapivat on Transfusion Burden in Subjects With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)
Sickle Cell DiseaseUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Pediatric Participants With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD) Who Are Regularly Transfused, Followed by a 5-Year Extension Period
Pediatric Pyruvate Kinase DeficiencyUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Pediatric Participants With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD) Who Are Not Regularly Transfused, Followed by a 5-Year Extension Period
Pediatric Pyruvate Kinase DeficiencyUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Participants With Non-Transfusion-Dependent Alpha- or Beta-Thalassemia (α- or β-NTDT)
Non-Transfusion-dependent Alpha-ThalassemiaUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Participants With Transfusion-Dependent Alpha- or Beta-Thalassemia (α- or β-TDT)
Transfusion-dependent Alpha-ThalassemiaUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Extension Study of AG-348 in Adult Participants With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Previously Enrolled in AG-348-006 or AG348-C-007
Pyruvate Kinase DeficiencyUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of AG-348 in Not Regularly Transfused Adult Participants With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD)
Pyruvate Kinase DeficiencyUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of AG-348 in Regularly Transfused Adult Participants With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD)
Pyruvate Kinase DeficiencyUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Reduction Response (TRR) Through Week 48
Baseline, through Week 48

TRR is defined as ≥50 percent (%) reduction in transfused red blood cells (RBC) volume (normalized by weight) in any consecutive 12-week period through Week 48 compared with historical RBC transfusion volume (normalized by weight) and standardized to 12 weeks.

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hemoglobin (Hb) Response
Baseline, Week 12 through Week 24

Hb response is defined as a ≥1.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL) increase in average Hb concentration from Week 12 through Week 24 compared with baseline.

Percentage of Subjects who are Transfusion Free From Week 4 Through Week 52
Week 4 through Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving Transfusion Reduction Response (TRR)
Week 9 to Week 32

TRR is defined as ≥33% reduction in total red blood cell (RBC) transfusion volume from Week 9 through Week 32 of the double-blind period, normalized by weight and actual study drug duration compared with the historical transfusion volume, standardized by weight, and to 24 weeks.

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Hemoglobin (Hb) Response
Baseline up to Week 20

Hb response is defined as a ≥1.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) (0.93 millimoles per liter \[mmol/L\]) increase in Hb concentration from baseline that is sustained at 2 or more scheduled assessments at Weeks 12, 16, and 20 during the double-blind period. The individual participant's baseline Hb concentration is defined as the average of all available Hb concentrations collected for that participant during the screening period up to the first dose of study drug.

Double-Blind Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hemoglobin (Hb) Response From Week 12 Through Week 24 Compared With Baseline
Double-Blind Period: Baseline up to Week 12 through Week 24

Hb response is defined as ≥10 grams/ liter (g/L) (1.0 gram per deciliter) (g/dL) increase in average Hb concentration from Week 12 through Week 24 compared with baseline. Hb response was tested using the Mantel-Haenszel stratum weighted method adjusting for randomization stratification factors. Baseline is defined as the average of all assessments within 42 days before randomization for subjects randomized and not dosed or within 42 days before the start of study treatment for subjects randomized and dosed.

Double-blind Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Reduction Response (TRR)
Double-blind Period: Baseline through Week 48

TRR is defined as ≥50% reduction in transfused red blood cells (RBC) units with a reduction of ≥2 units of transfused RBCs in any consecutive 12-week period through Week 48 compared with baseline transfusion burden standardized to 12 weeks. Baseline transfusion burden standardized to 12 weeks= (12/24) × total number of RBC units transfused during 24-week period before the randomization date for participants randomized and not dosed or the start of study treatment for participants randomized and dosed. Participants withdrawn from the study before Week 12 (Day 85) were considered nonresponders.

All Cohorts: Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Related TEAEs and TEAEs With Severity Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3
Up to 197 weeks

A clinical adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAEs are AEs with an initial onset date during the on-treatment period or worsening from baseline and include both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Severity of AEs was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE; Version 4.03): grade 1: mild; grade 2: moderate; grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; grade 4: life threatening or disabling; grade 5: death related to AE.

All Cohorts: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Dose Reduction, Treatment Interruption and Treatment Discontinuation
Up to 197 weeks

A clinical AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAEs are AEs with an initial onset date during the on-treatment period or worsening from baseline and include both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs leading to dose reduction, treatment interruption and treatment discontinuation are reported.

All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters Reported as Grade Greater Than or Equal to (≥)3 TEAEs
Up to 197 weeks

Clinical laboratory assessments including hematology, clinical chemistry, triglycerides, urate, coagulation, urinalysis, and liver function tests were performed in the study. Clinically significant treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the NCI CTCAE; Version 4.03: grade 1: mild; grade 2: moderate; grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; grade 4: life threatening or disabling; grade 5: death related to AE. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs Measurements and Physical Examinations Reported as TEAEs
Up to 197 weeks

Vital signs and physical examinations including height, weight, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, temperature were assessed. Number of participants who experienced clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs and physical examinations as TEAEs were reported. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Up to 192 weeks

BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans during the study. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities were reported. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Adjusted Spine T-score
Baseline, Week 192

T-score of adjusted spine were assessed by DXA scans. The T-score is the number of standard deviations that bone density is above or below the average. A score of ≥ -1 indicates normal bone density; score between \< -1 and \> -2.5 indicates a sign of osteopenia (bone density below normal), and score of ≤ -2.5 indicates a sign of osteoporosis.

All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Adjusted Spine Z-score
Baseline, Week 192

The Z-score is a statistical measure to describe whether a value was above or below the standard. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the standard. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the standard and higher numbers indicate values higher than the standard.

All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Femoral Total T-score
Baseline, Week 192

T-score of femoral total were assessed by DXA scans. The T-score is the number of standard deviations that bone density is above or below the average. A score of ≥ -1 indicates normal bone density; score between \< -1 and \> -2.5 indicates a sign of osteopenia (bone density below normal), and score of ≤ -2.5 indicates a sign of osteoporosis.

All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Femoral Total Z-score
Baseline, Week 192

The Z-score is a statistical measure to describe whether a value was above or below the standard. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the standard. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the standard and higher numbers indicate values higher than the standard.

All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters Reported as TEAEs
Up to 197 weeks

The following ECG parameters including RR, PR, heart rate-corrected QT interval using the Fridericia's formula (QRS), QT, and QTc were assessed during the study. Number of Participants with clinically significant abnormalities in ECG parameters as TEAEs were reported. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Hemoglobin (Hb) Response (HR)
Baseline, Weeks 16, 20, 24

Hemoglobin response (HR) is defined as a ≥1.5 g/dL (0.93 mmol/L) increase in Hb concentration from baseline that is sustained at 2 or more scheduled assessments at Weeks 16, 20, and 24. The baseline Hb concentration is the average of all available Hb concentrations for a participant during the Screening Period up to the first dose of study treatment. As pre-specified in the protocol, the data for this outcome measure is summarized between the active arm vs the placebo arm (AG-348 5 mg, 20 mg and 50 mg arms are analyzed and reported together in comparison to Placebo).

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction in Transfusion Burden in Part 2
From Part 2, Day 1 to Part 2 Week 24

Reduction in transfusion burden is defined as a ≥33% reduction in the number of RBC units transfused during the Fixed Dose Period standardized to 24 weeks compared with the historical transfusion burden standardized to 24 weeks (Standardized Control Period). The on-study (Fixed Dose Period) transfusion burden was calculated as the total number of transfused RBC units received in the Fixed Dose Period standardized to 24 weeks.

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin (Hb) Response
Week 12
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious AEs (SAEs)
Up to Week 12
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Hb Response
Week 52
Phase 3: Annualized Rate of Sickle Cell Pain Crises (SCPCs)
Up to Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Hemoglobin Response (HR)
Up to 12 weeks

HR was defined as a ≥1.0 gram per deciliter (g/dL) increase in Hb concentration from Baseline at 1 or more assessments between Week 4 and Week 12 (inclusive). A participant's Baseline Hb concentration was defined as the average of all the participant's available Hb concentrations during the screening period up to the first dose of study drug.

Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AEs) in the Core Period
Up to Week 24

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered study drug-related.

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 (Predose) to Extrapolated to Infinity Time (AUC∞) of Mitapivat
Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints post-dose up to Day 17
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of Mitapivat
Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints post-dose up to Day 17
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mitapivat
Pre-dose and at multiple timepoints post-dose up to Day 17

Secondary Endpoints

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved TRR2 From Week 13 to Week 24
Baseline, Week 13 through Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved TRR3 From Week 25 to Week 36
Baseline, Week 25 through Week 36
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved TRR4 From Week 37 to Week 48
Baseline, Week 37 through Week 48
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingQUADRUPLE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
MitapivatEXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive oral mitapivat twice daily (BID), with dose determined by age and weight, for 48 weeks during the double blind (DB) period. Enrollment is conducted sequentially by age cohort, beginning with the oldest cohort. Cohort 1: 12 to \<18 years Cohort 2: 6 to \<12 years Cohort 3: 1 to \<6 years Participants who complete the DB period may continue receiving mitapivat in the open label extension (OLE) period for up to 144 weeks.
PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATORParticipants will receive oral placebo matching mitapivat, administered BID, with dosing based on age and weight, for 48 weeks during the DB period. Enrollment is conducted sequentially by age cohort, beginning with the oldest cohort. Cohort 1: 12 to \<18 years Cohort 2: 6 to \<12 years Cohort 3: 1 to \<6 years Participants who complete the DB period may transition to receive mitapivat in the OLE period for up to 144 weeks.
Mitapivat (OLE period)EXPERIMENTALParticipants who have completed the double-blind period will be eligible to receive mitapivat for up to 5 years in the OLE period. Participants entering the OLE period will first receive blinded mitapivat and placebo for 8 weeks to maintain the double-blind treatment assignment before being transitioned to only receive active, open-label drug (mitapivat).
Cohort 1EXPERIMENTALParticipants who received placebo in Study AG348-C-006 and met the eligibility criteria of this extension study were enrolled to receive mitapivat tablets, 5 milligrams (mg), twice daily (BID), administered orally, for 4 weeks as a starting dose, followed by two potential sequential dose level increases to 20 mg and 50 mg BID at Weeks 4 and 8 respectively as determined by the investigator based on safety and efficacy. The optimized dose for each participant was determined at Week 12, and participants then received that optimized dose for a period of 12 weeks (Weeks 13-24) as a fixed dose and from Week 25 to Week 193, until study withdrawal, or the study was closed.
Cohort 2EXPERIMENTALParticipants who received mitapivat at a dose of 5 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, BID, in the fixed dose period of Study AG348-C-006 and met the eligibility criteria of this extension study continued to receive the same mitapivat dose up to Week 193 or until study withdrawal, or the study was closed.
Cohort 3EXPERIMENTALParticipants who received mitapivat at a dose of 5 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, BID, in the fixed dose period of Study AG348-C-007 and met the eligibility criteria of this extension study continued to receive the same mitapivat dose up to Week 193 or until study withdrawal, or the study was closed.
AG-348, 5 mgEXPERIMENTALParticipants received AG-348 tablets, 5 milligrams (mg) twice daily (BID), administered orally, for 4 weeks as a starting dose, followed by two potential sequential dose level increases to 20 mg and 50 mg BID at Weeks 4 and 8 respectively as determined by the investigator based on safety and efficacy. The optimized dose for each participant was determined as 5 mg BID at Week 12, and participants then received that optimized dose for a period of 12 weeks as a fixed dose.
AG-348, 20 mgEXPERIMENTALParticipants received AG-348 tablets, 5 mg BID, administered orally, for 4 weeks as a starting dose, followed by two potential sequential dose level increases to 20 mg and 50 mg BID at Weeks 4 and 8 respectively as determined by the investigator based on safety and efficacy. The optimized dose for each participant was determined as 20 mg BID at Week 12, and participants then received that optimized dose for a period of 12 weeks as a fixed dose.
AG-348, 50 mgEXPERIMENTALParticipants received AG-348 tablets, 5 mg BID, administered orally, for 4 weeks as a starting dose, followed by two potential sequential dose level increases to 20 mg and 50 mg BID at Weeks 4 and 8 respectively as determined by the investigator based on safety and efficacy. The optimized dose for each participant was determined as 50 mg BID at Week 12, and participants then received that optimized dose for a period of 12 weeks as a fixed dose.
AG-348EXPERIMENTALParticipants received AG-348 tablets, administered orally, at a starting dose of 5 milligrams (mg), twice daily (BID), followed by two sequential dose level increases to 20 mg and 50 mg BID, for a period of 16 weeks in Part 1. This was followed by optimized dose BID, as determined by the investigator in Part 1, for a period of 24 weeks in Part 2.
Phase 2: Mitapivat 50 mg BIDEXPERIMENTALDouble-blind Period: Mitapivat 50 milligrams (mg) twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks.
Phase 2: Mitapivat 100 mg BIDEXPERIMENTALDouble-blind Period: Mitapivat 100 mg BID for 12 weeks.
Phase 2: PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATORDouble-blind Period: Mitapivat-matching placebo for 12 weeks.
Phase 2: Open-Label Extension PeriodEXPERIMENTALParticipants who received mitapivat 50mg BID in the double-blind period may choose to receive mitapivat 50mg BID for 216 weeks after. Participants who received mitapivat 100mg BID in the double-blind period may choose to receive mitapivat 100 mg BID for 216 weeks after. Participants who received mitapivat-matching placebo in the double-blind period, may be randomized to receive either mitapivat 50 mg or 100 mg BID for 216 weeks after.
Phase 3: Mitapivat 100 mg BIDEXPERIMENTALDouble-blind Period: Mitapivat 100 mg BID for 52 weeks.
Phase 3: PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATORDouble-blind Period: Mitapivat-matching placebo for 52 weeks.
Phase 3: Open-Label Extension PeriodEXPERIMENTALParticipants may choose to receive mitapivat 100 mg BID for 216 weeks after the Double-blind Period. Participants who received mitapivat-matching placebo in the double-blind period, may choose to receive mitapivat 100 mg BID for 216 weeks after the Double-blind Period.
AG-348 50 mg BIDEXPERIMENTALParticipants with Pyruvate Kinase (PK) deficiency will receive AG-348, 50 milligrams (mg), as initial dose, twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks (Core Period). Participants will be assigned to initial doses, however, over the course of the Core Period they will be treated across a range of doses due to treatment emergent adverse events (AEs) and hemoglobin (Hb) levels exceeding mid-point of sex-adjusted ranges. At the Week 24 visit, Core Period participants who have safely tolerated AG-348 and demonstrating clinical activity in response to AG-348 will be rolled over to the Extension Period. During the extension period, participants will continue to receive AG-348 50 mg, BID, for up to 102 months.
AG-348 300 mg BIDEXPERIMENTALParticipants with PK deficiency will receive AG-348, 300 mg, as initial dose, BID for 24 weeks (Core Period). Participants will be assigned to initial doses, however, over the course of the Core Period they will be treated across a range of doses due to treatment emergent AEs and Hb levels exceeding mid-point of sex-adjusted ranges. At the Week 24 visit, Core Period participants who have safely tolerated AG-348 and demonstrating clinical activity in response to AG-348 will be rolled over to the Extension Period. During the extension period, participants will continue to receive AG-348 300 mg, BID, up to 102 months.

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
Mitapivat Matched PlaceboDRUGTablets or Granules
MitapivatDRUGTablets or Granules
Placebo Matching MitapivatDRUGTablets or Granules
Mitapivat-matching placeboDRUGTablets or granules
PlaceboDRUGPlacebo matching AG-348 tablets, administered to maintain the blind.
AG-348DRUGAG-348 tablets.
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range1 Year to 17 Years
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites4

Inclusion Criteria: * Written informed consent/assent from the participant (or their legally authorized representative, parent(s), or legal guardian) must be obtained before any study-related procedures are conducted and participants must be willing to comply with all study procedures for the durat...

Countries:United StatesCanadaCzechiaDenmarkGermanyNetherlandsSpainSwitzerlandTurkey (Türkiye)United KingdomFranceBrazilBulgariaGreeceItalyLebanonMalaysiaSaudi ArabiaTaiwanThailandUnited Arab EmiratesIrelandJapanSouth KoreaBelgiumIsraelKenyaNigeriaOman
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Recent Changes (Last 90 Days)

LOWSep 28, 2026NCT07656415lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 28, 2026NCT07506863lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 28, 2026NCT07517133lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 28, 2026NCT05144256lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 28, 2026NCT04770753lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 28, 2026NCT04770779lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 28, 2026NCT07656415lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 28, 2026NCT07506863lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 28, 2026NCT07517133lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 28, 2026NCT04770753lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 28, 2026NCT04770779lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 28, 2026NCT05144256lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWAug 27, 2026NCT07506863lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWAug 27, 2026NCT07517133lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWAug 27, 2026NCT04770779lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWAug 27, 2026NCT05144256lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWAug 27, 2026NCT05175105lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWAug 27, 2026NCT04770753lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWAug 27, 2026NCT07506863lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWAug 27, 2026NCT07517133lastUpdatePostDate: changed

Frequently asked questions about AG-348

What is AG-348 used for?

AG-348 is an investigational small molecule being developed for pyruvate kinase deficiency and thalassemia, both rare blood disorders. It is being studied in adults with pyruvate kinase deficiency, including those who receive regular transfusions and those who do not, and in adults with non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia.

What does AG-348 target?

AG-348 targets pyruvate kinase-R, also called PKR, an enzyme involved in red blood cell energy metabolism. By acting on this enzyme target, AG-348 is designed to address the underlying metabolic defect in conditions such as pyruvate kinase deficiency, where red blood cells break down prematurely.

Who is developing AG-348?

AG-348 is being developed by Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which trades on the Nasdaq under the ticker AGIO. Agios is the sponsor of the clinical program evaluating AG-348 in pyruvate kinase deficiency and thalassemia.

What phase is AG-348 in?

AG-348 is in Phase 3 clinical development and is investigational. Two Phase 3 trials in pyruvate kinase deficiency have been completed, and a Phase 2 trial in non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia is active but no longer recruiting participants.

What clinical trials is AG-348 in?

AG-348 has been studied in four registered trials. These include the Phase 3 trials NCT03559699 in regularly transfused adults with pyruvate kinase deficiency and NCT03548220 in not regularly transfused adults with the same condition, plus the Phase 2 trials NCT02476916 in pyruvate kinase deficiency and NCT03692052 in non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia.

Is AG-348 the same as mitapivat?

AG-348 is also known as mitapivat. The two names refer to the same investigational small molecule developed by Agios Pharmaceuticals for pyruvate kinase deficiency and thalassemia, so searches for either name describe the same clinical program.