Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts
VCYT Positive Sentiment Score: 70/100

Afirma GSC: Patient report

Key Takeaway: The Afirma GSC patient report highlights the significance of molecular profiles like BRAF-like and RAS-like in understanding tumor behavior. These profiles were developed from extensive research on thyroid cancers, revealing correlations between genetic alterations and tumor characteristics. The report emphasizes the complexity of cancer development and the utility of whole-transcriptome analysis in characterizing nodules.
Price reaction · baseline $34.31 (2024-11-01 close) · clean, no other VCYT news in the window
day 0 close · peak
+2%

Market Sentiment Analysis

POSITIVE FACTORS

  • Afirma GSC provides detailed molecular profiling of tumors.
  • The study enhances understanding of tumor behavior based on genetic alterations.
  • Research findings are based on comprehensive genomic studies.

Full Press Release Details

You may have seen references to “ BRAF -like”, “ RAS -like”, or “Non- BRAF -Non- RAS ” alterations in the Afirma GSC patient report. Shown below is the Results Summary section of a patient report with NRAS p.Q61R detected. Note how it describes the tumor as exhibiting a “ RAS -like profile”:
But what does this mean? BRAF -like, RAS -like, and Non- BRAF -Non- RAS are three different molecular profiles that describe different types of tumor behavior.

Cancer Genome Atlas Network, Cell , 2014.

The BRAF-like and RAS-like profiles were first conceived in 2014, when the Cancer Genome Atlas developed a 71-gene signature to classify alterations into one of two categories: as having either “BRAF– like” or “RAS-like” gene expression. 1 This was done by investigating 391 Papillary Thyroid Cancers, which often have two mutually exclusive cancer drivers (BRAFV600E and mutated RAS) and assigning a BRAFV600E – RAS Score (BRS).

Yoo et al, PLoS Genetics , 2016.

Yoo et al expanded on this 2 years later to include follicular thyroid cancers, follicular adenomas, and add one more molecular subtype: “non- BRAF -non- RAS ” (NBNR). 2

Tang AL, et al, Endocrine Practice , 2020.

The table below shows how several genomic alterations would be organized into the different molecular classes: 3
Tumor behavior by molecular profile
Yoo also provided insight into potential tumor behavior: a higher frequency of lymph node metastases was found in 37% of the BRAF -like group, compared to 15% of the RAS -like group. Similarly, a higher frequency of extrathyroidal extension was found in 62% of the BRAF -like group, compared to 11% of the RAS -like group. 1,2 It’s very important to note, however, that none of the values above reach 100%. While the different molecular profiles tend to correlate to different tumor behaviors, this is at a population level that does not take individual variability into account.

Conclusion

Cancer development is incredibly complex, and often is not caused by a single mutation. This is one of the reasons why Afirma GSC uses whole-transcriptome-derived analysis: it allows us to go beyond the variants to characterize nodules further. If you’re interested in conducting research of your own or would like to learn more about Afirma GSC, fill out the form below and a genomic specialist will be in touch with you shortly.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are BRAF-like and RAS-like profiles?

BRAF-like and RAS-like profiles are molecular classifications that describe different tumor behaviors based on genetic alterations.

How does Afirma GSC analyze tumors?

Afirma GSC uses whole-transcriptome-derived analysis to characterize nodules beyond just genetic variants.

What is the significance of the NRAS p.Q61R alteration?

The NRAS p.Q61R alteration indicates a tumor exhibiting a RAS-like profile, which has specific implications for tumor behavior.

What does the report say about lymph node metastases?

The report indicates that 37% of the BRAF-like group showed lymph node metastases compared to 15% in the RAS-like group.

Last updated: Nov 4, 2024