Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts
VCYT Positive Sentiment Score: 75/100

Afirma GSC: Fresh FNA Sample vs. Slide Scraping

Key Takeaway: Veracyte emphasizes the importance of using fresh Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) samples for its Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC). Studies indicate that slide scraping can lead to inadequate genomic material and missed molecular alterations. Consequently, Afirma GSC is exclusively available for dedicated FNA samples to ensure the highest accuracy in testing.
Price reaction · baseline $33.35 (2024-09-25 close) · hit after-hours · clean, no other VCYT news in the window
day 0 close
+0.5%

Market Sentiment Analysis

POSITIVE FACTORS

  • Fresh FNA samples provide a proven standard for molecular testing.
  • Higher accuracy and success rates are achieved with fresh samples.
  • Veracyte's Afirma GSC is designed for optimal genomic analysis.

CONCERNS & RISKS

  • Slide scraping has significant limitations in genomic material collection.
  • High failure rates for adequate genomic material in slide scraping.
  • Missed molecular alterations in slide scraping compared to fresh samples.

Full Press Release Details

To run the Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier (or GSC), Veracyte uses a dedicated FNA sample. This is because a fresh FNA sample is the proven standard for molecular testing. 1 Though some may view slide scraping as a convenient way to obtain genomic material for molecular testing, there are significant limitations to this collection methodology.

Lupo et al. Diagnostic Cytopathology 2020.

First, obtaining an adequate amount of genomic material can be a challenge. In the validation study of a molecular test touting the use of slide scraping authored by Lupo et al, 18% of samples failed to provide adequate genomic material. 2

Nikiforova et al. Cancer Cytopathology 2020.

A rate of 19% was seen in another molecular test’s validation study authored by Nikiforova et al. 3 Of greater concern, however, is the discordance of detection of molecular alterations between slide scraping and obtaining a fresh sample via FNA. In the Nikiforova publication, 17% of gene fusions and 14% of copy number alterations were missed on slide scraping relative to a matched fresh sample. 3
In fact, the discussion section of this manuscript states:
The collection of a portion of a fresh FNA sample directly into a nucleic acid preservative solution should be attempted whenever possible because this provides the highest success rate and accuracy of testing.”
Conclusion
Given these limitations, Afirma GSC is only available to order for use on a dedicated FNA pass. To learn more about implementing Afirma GSC or obtain a new test requisition form, get in touch with a Veracyte Genomic Specialist using the form below.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier?

The Afirma GSC is a molecular test by Veracyte that analyzes genomic material.

Why are fresh FNA samples preferred?

Fresh FNA samples provide higher accuracy and success rates for molecular testing.

What are the limitations of slide scraping?

Slide scraping can lead to inadequate genomic material and missed molecular alterations.

How often do slide scraping samples fail?

Studies show that up to 19% of slide scraping samples fail to provide adequate material.

How can I order the Afirma GSC?

Afirma GSC is available for order only with a dedicated FNA sample.

Last updated: Sep 26, 2024