Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts
RMD Positive Sentiment

Cleveland Medical Devices Reports Favorable PTAB Outcomes in Five of Six ResMed IPR Challenges

Key Takeaway: Cleveland Medical Devices Inc. reported positive outcomes in five of six inter partes review petitions against ResMed at the PTAB. The board found that ResMed failed to prove that the challenged patent claims were unpatentable in four cases, while one case was denied institution. However, ResMed did secure a favorable decision in one proceeding. Ongoing litigation regarding infringement remains pending.
Price reaction · baseline $198.5 (2026-07-13 close) · hit after-hours · clean, no other RMD news in the window
day 0 close · peak
-2.8%

Market Sentiment Analysis

POSITIVE FACTORS

  • Five out of six PTAB challenges resulted in favorable outcomes for Cleveland Medical Devices.
  • The PTAB determined that ResMed did not prove the challenged claims unpatentable.
  • Cleveland Medical Devices' intellectual property portfolio remains strong.
  • The company plans to continue enforcing its intellectual property rights.

CONCERNS & RISKS

  • ResMed obtained a favorable decision in one of the proceedings.
  • The litigation regarding infringement and damages remains unresolved.

Full Press Release Details

CLEVELAND,July 13, 2026/PRNewswire/ -- Cleveland Medical Devices Inc. announced that proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board have now produced favorable outcomes for Cleveland Medical Devices in five of the six inter partes review petitions filed by ResMed against patents involved in the parties' Ohio litigation.
In four of the five proceedings that reached final written decisions, the PTAB determined that ResMed had not established that the challenged claims were unpatentable. In a fifth proceeding, the PTAB denied institution of ResMed's petition. ResMed obtained a favorable final written decision in one proceeding.
"These are important results for Cleveland Medical Devices and its intellectual-property portfolio," said Robert N. Schmidt, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cleveland Medical Devices. "We are pleased that numerous challenged patent claims have survived ResMed's PTAB challenges over the cited prior art."
The PTAB proceedings addressed patentability and did not decide infringement, damages, or other issues pending in the district-court litigations. Cleveland Medical Devices' district-court cases against ResMed remain pending and involveallegedinfringement of Cleveland Medical Devices' CPAP and home-sleep-testing patents.
The Ohio PTAB results are separate from Cleveland Medical Devices' pending Delaware litigation involving additional home-sleep-testing patents. Those patents were not involved in the six Ohio IPR proceedings.
Cleveland Medical Devices has 44 patents covering sleep testing and sleep therapy.
Cleveland Medical Devices intends to continue enforcing its intellectual-property rights while respecting all pending judicial and administrative proceedings.

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the outcomes of the PTAB challenges?

Cleveland Medical Devices won five out of six PTAB challenges against ResMed.

What did the PTAB decide regarding the challenged claims?

The PTAB found that ResMed did not prove the challenged claims unpatentable.

Is there ongoing litigation between Cleveland Medical Devices and ResMed?

Yes, district-court cases regarding infringement are still pending.

How many patents does Cleveland Medical Devices hold?

Cleveland Medical Devices has 44 patents related to sleep testing and therapy.

Last updated: Jul 13, 2026