Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts
GHRS Positive Sentiment Score: 85/100

Suicidal Ideation and Behavior in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Treated With GH001 Sanjay J. Mathew 1,* , Bernhard T. Baune 2,3,4 , Narc s Cardoner 5 , Wies aw J. Cuba a 6 , Kelly Doolin 7 , Rosa Maria Due

Key Takeaway: A Phase 2b trial of GH001, a synthetic form of mebufotenin, has demonstrated its potential as a treatment for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The trial involved 81 patients and showed that GH001 resulted in significant improvements in depressive symptoms without increasing the risk of suicidal ideation or behavior. While one moderate treatment-emergent adverse event of suicidal ideation was noted, it resolved spontaneously, and overall, the therapy was well tolerated. These results suggest that GH001 may be a promising option for addressing the unmet needs in TRD management.

Market Sentiment Analysis

POSITIVE FACTORS

  • GH001 showed rapid and significant improvements in depressive symptoms.
  • It was well tolerated by patients during the trial.
  • There were no treatment-emergent events of suicidal ideation with intent or behavior reported.

CONCERNS & RISKS

  • One treatment-emergent adverse event of suicidal ideation occurred, though it was assessed as moderate and resolved spontaneously.

Full Press Release Details

Suicidal Ideation and Behavior in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Treated With GH001
Sanjay J. Mathew1,*, Bernhard T. Baune2,3,4, Narc s Cardoner5, Wies aw J. Cuba a6, Kelly Doolin7, Rosa Maria Due as
Herrero8, David Gregory7, Lubo Jan 9, John R. Kelly10,11, Rachael MacIssac7, Shane J. McInerney12, Alexander Nawka13, Tom P len ek14, V ctor P rez Sola15,16,17,18,
Andreas Reif19,20, Claire Sweeney7, Madhukar H. Trivedi21, Velichka Valcheva7, Eduard Vieta22, Michael E. Thase23,24
*Presenting author: Sanjay J. Mathew, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral
Sciences, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Texas A&M University Naresh K. Vashisht College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA;
2Department of Psychiatry, University of M nster, M nster, Germany; 3Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 4The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health,
Parkville, VIC, Australia; 5Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Mental Health Research Group, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau, Universitat Aut noma de Barcelona, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain; 6Department of Psychiatry, Medical
University of Gda sk, Gda sk, Poland; 7GH Research, Dublin, Ireland; 8Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu Hospital de Dia de Numancia, Barcelona, Spain; 9A-Shine SRO, Pilsen,Czechia; 10Psychedelic Research
Group: Trinity College Dublin and Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; 11Department of Psychiatry, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; 12Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Galway, Galway,
Ireland; 13Institut Neuropsychiatrick P e, Praha, Czechia; 14Psyon s.r.o., Prague, Czechia; 15Mental Health Institute, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; 16Neurosciences Research Group, Hospital
del Mar Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain; 17Department of Psychiatry and Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain; 18Centre for Biomedical Research in Mental Health
(CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain; 19Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt - Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; 20Fraunhofer Institute for Translational
Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; 21Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; 22Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institute
of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; 23Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 24Corporal Michael J Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical
Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Background: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is associated with reduced quality
of life, impairment in psychosocial function, and higher burden of treatment compared with treatment-responsive major depressive disorder. Patients with TRD also experience a disproportionately higher rate of suicide. Thus, there is a significant
unmet need for safe and effective therapies for TRD that do not exacerbate suicidal intent. In a Phase 2b trial, GH001, a synthetic form of mebufotenin (5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine [5-MeO-DMT]) for pulmonary inhalation, was well tolerated and
resulted in rapid and significant improvements in depressive symptoms. Here we describe the effects of GH001 on suicidal ideation and behavior in patients with TRD enrolled in the Phase 2b trial.
Methods: This trial (NCT05800860) included a 7-day, randomized, double-blind part
(Part 1) and a 6-month open-label extension (OLE; Part 2). In Part 1, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive an individualized dosing regimen (IDR) of up to three escalating doses of GH001 (6, 12, and 18 mg) or placebo IDR on a single day with a
1-hour interval between doses. The criteria for administration of the second and third doses in the IDR were based on patients' subjectively reported psychoactive effects, and the safety and tolerability at the previous dose level(s), according to
the trial physician's judgement. In Part 2, patients could receive up to five GH001 IDR re-treatments over 6 months as needed; criteria for re-treatment were based on Montgomery- sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score and safety and
tolerability of the previous dose(s). Trial eligibility criteria excluded patients with suicidal ideation with intent (with items 4 or 5 on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale [C-SSRS] endorsed) within the past year or at screening or
baseline; those with suicidal behaviors or non-suicidal self-injury in the past year; and those with a clinical assessment of significant suicidal risk. C-SSRS scores were assessed at all visits during Parts 1 and 2 of the trial. The
clinician-rated C-SSRS quantifies suicidal ideation and behavior through a semi-structured interview. In addition, MADRS item 10 provided further quantification of suicidal ideation at frequent timepoints throughout the trial. Results were analyzed
Results: Eighty-one patients enrolled in the trial; 40 were randomized to GH001 IDR
and 41 to placebo IDR in Part 1, and all transitioned directly into Part 2. Mean (SD) patient age was 42.8 (11.2) years, and 56.8% of patients were female. The number of patients with historic and current suicidal ideation were represented evenly
across the GH001 and placebo groups; at screening, 21 patients (GH001, n=10; placebo, n=11) reported a lifetime history of suicidal ideation and 19 patients (GH001, n=8; placebo, n=11) reported suicidal ideation during the 12 months before
screening, and at baseline, 14 patients reported current suicidal ideation via C- SSRS assessment (GH001, n=7; placebo, n=7). During Part 1, at Day 8, suicidal ideation without intent was reported for four patients in the GH001 group (all of whom
had reported it at baseline) and seven patients in the placebo group (5/7 reported suicidal ideation at baseline). In Part 2 of the trial, the numbers of patients reporting suicidal ideation at all timepoints assessed during the trial were lower
than that at baseline. The median (range) MADRS item 10 score was 0.0 (0 to 4) at baseline and the same at 6 months; median change from baseline (range) was 0.0 ( 3 to 2) at 6 months. Across both trial parts, there were no treatment-emergent events
of self- harm or suicidal behavior or of suicidal ideation with intent during follow-up. There was one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) of suicidal ideation during Part 2 that was assessed as moderate in intensity, not classified as serious,
and possibly related to GH001; this event lasted for 6 hours before resolving spontaneously. This TEAE was not accompanied by any changes in C-SSRS classification beyond the duration for which the thoughts occurred, and the patient did not report
any further TEAEs of suicidal ideation during the trial.
Conclusion: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a 6-month OLE in
patients with TRD, GH001 was not associated with treatment-emergent events of suicidal ideation with intent or behavior. These findings indicate that GH001 could potentially provide significant reductions in depressive symptoms without increasing
the risk of suicide in patients with TRD.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the focus of the GH001 trial?

The GH001 trial focuses on suicidal ideation and behavior in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

How many patients participated in the GH001 trial?

Eighty-one patients enrolled in the GH001 trial, with 40 receiving GH001 and 41 placebo.

What was the outcome of GH001 on suicidal ideation?

GH001 showed no increase in suicidal ideation with intent or behavior during the trial.

What were the age demographics of trial participants?

The mean age of trial participants was 42.8 years, with 56.8% being female.

Did any patients experience self-harm during the trial?

No treatment-emergent self-harm or significant suicidal ideation was reported during the trial.

Last updated: Oct 17, 2025