Corporate Presentation April 2026 Summary 2 Forward Looking Statements Statements in this presentation that are not statements of historical or current fact constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of t

Corporate Presentation April 2026

Summary 2 Forward Looking Statements Statements in this presentation that are

not statements of historical or current fact constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and

Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and "forward-looking information" within the meaning of Canadian securities laws (collectively, "forward-looking statements"). Such forward-looking statements involve known and

unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause the actual results of Grace Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company") to be materially different from historical results or from any future results expressed or implied by such

forward-looking statements. In addition to statements which explicitly describe such risks and uncertainties, readers are urged to consider statements containing the terms "believes," "belief," "expects," "intends," "anticipates,"

"estimates," "potential," "should," "may," "will," "plans," "continue," "targeted" or other similar expressions to be uncertain and forward-looking. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which

speak only as of the date of this presentation. The forward-looking statements in this presentation, including, but not limited to, statements regarding the Company's belief that it can address the items related to chemistry, manufacturing,

and controls ("CMC") and non-clinical information cited in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA") Complete Response Letter in a resubmission of its New Drug Application ("NDA") for GTx-104; the Company's intentions to request a Type

A meeting with the FDA to clarify the path forward and determine the appropriate next steps for GTx-104 and the expected outcome of such Type A meeting; expected cash runway; the potential exercise of outstanding warrants; the future

prospects of the Company's GTx-104 drug candidate; GTx-104's potential to bring enhanced treatment options to patients suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage ("aSAH"); GTx-104's potential to be administered to improve the

management of hypotension in patients with aSAH; gastrointestinal intolerance and dosing consistency compared with oral administration; the ability of GTx-104 to achieve a pharmacokinetic and safety profile similar to the oral form of

nimodipine; GTx-104's potential to provide improved bioavailability and the potential for reduced use of rescue therapies; GTx-104's potential to achieve medical and pharmacoeconomic benefit over the oral form of nimodipine; GTx-104's

commercial prospects; the Company's pre-commercial launch strategy for GTx104; the future prospects of the Company's GTx-102 drug candidate; GTx-102's potential to provide clinical benefits to decrease symptoms associated with Ataxia

Telangiectasia; the timing and outcomes of a Phase 3 efficacy and safety trial for GTx-102; the timing of an NDA filing for GTx-102; the future prospects of the Company's GTx-101 drug candidate; GTx-101's potential to be administered to

Postherpetic Neuralgia ("PHN") patients to treat severe nerve pain associated with the disease; the timing and outcomes of a Phase 3 efficacy and safety trial for GTx-101; the size of the addressable market for GTx-104 and GTx 102, and any

future patent and other intellectual property filings made by the Company for new developments, are based upon Grace Therapeutics, Inc.'s current expectations and involve assumptions that may never materialize or may prove to be incorrect.

Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of various risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation: (i) the success and timing of any

regulatory resubmission related to the STRIVE-ON Phase 3 safety trial for GTx-104; (ii) changes to regulatory requirements or regulatory pathways; (iii) the Company's ability to protect its intellectual property rights for its product

candidates; and (iv) legislative, regulatory, political and economic developments. The foregoing list of important factors that could cause actual events to differ from expectations should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in

conjunction with statements that are included herein and elsewhere, including the risk factors detailed in the "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements," "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial

Condition and Results of Operations" sections of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, Quarterly Reports on Forms 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended June 30, 2025, September 30, 2025 and December

31, 2025 and other documents that have been and will be filed by Grace Therapeutics, Inc. from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission and Canadian securities regulators. All forward-looking statements contained in this

presentation speak only as of the date on which they were made. Grace Therapeutics undertakes no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made, except as

required by applicable securities laws.

Summary GTx-104 - novel intravenous nimodipine - well positioned to solve oral

challenges and potentially displace oral as SoC Nimodipine is the SoC and clinically de-risked; however, significant unmet needs remain with its only available oral form Pivotal Phase 3 STRIVE-ON safety trial met primary endpoint; clinical

evidence of GTx-104 benefit vs oral 3 Executive Summary aSAH: aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. All dates based on calendar year in the presentation. GTx-104 | aSAH Potential to address a severe rare disease with efficient commercial

organization; concentrated patient care Orphan Drug Status with seven-year market exclusivity and additional multi-layered IP protection Regulatory Update April 2026 FDA Complete Response Letter received; Company intends to resubmit NDA

following resolution of cited items

4 FDA Complete Response Letter (CRL) - Key Findings & Path Forward CRL

driven by CMC data package completeness and manufacturing readiness No clinical deficiencies identified Clear path to resolution expected following FDA alignment at Type A meeting FDA Feedback Company Assessment Path Forward Leachable

data Insufficient baseline and longitudinal data from intended commercial site Dataset completeness related to commercial site Existing intermediate and long-term data generation in place No indication of new safety signal Generate

baseline data from commercial site Complete ongoing longitudinal dataset to support full shelf-life characterization Align dataset and analytical approach with FDA expectations Nonclinical Unable to complete tox risk assessment without

leachable dataset Additional assessment of excipient (Alcohol, USP) exposure requested. Maximum daily exposure of alcohol in drug product is within FDA inactive ingredient database Dependent on completion of leachable dataset Alcohol

concentration is less than 2% in infusion solution No novel excipient used in drug product No standalone tox signal identified Complete tox assessment based on updated leachable data Conduct targeted preclinical study for excipient

duration of exposure as required Manufacturing Facility Deficiencies identified during cGMP inspection of CDMO Manufacturing compliance observations requiring remediation No product-specific quality issues identified Ongoing

remediation activities at CDMO Potential reinspection prior to approval Evaluating manufacturing alternatives to support supply and regulatory readiness

aSAH is a Rare and Severe Acute Brain Injury Subarachnoid Hemorrhage aSAH

results in bleeding over the surface of the brain in the space between the brain and skull Primary cause is rupture of an aneurysm Condition can occur quickly, immediate intervention is key to survival Patients require surgical

intervention and oral nimodipine therapy 5 Sources: ClearView Analysis (2025). Forian Claims Data. Fletcher Spaght market research; Becske T. (2018). Steven (2020). Occurs in Relatively Young Patients (~50% <60 yrs) Significant

Mortality (~10-15% before reaching hospital) Est. Annual U.S. Hospital-Treated Patients (2023) Hospital-treated aSAH may be as high as ~70k

Oral Nimodipine - The aSAH Standard of Care for >3 Decades 6 Sources: Hoh

(2023). Hernandez-Duran (2019). Sandow (2016). DCI: Delayed Cerebral Infarction The Joint Commision is a hospital accredation agency 2023 AHA/ASA GuidelinesFor the management of patients with aSAH Nimodipine is the only approved therapy

to improve neurological outcomes Limited use of off-label therapies due to The Joint Commission monitoring adherence to care guidelines

Nimodipine - Consistent Drug Administration Drives Positive Patient

Outcomes 7 Sources: Hoh (2023). Hernandez-Duran (2019). Sandow (2016). aOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: Confidence Interval Nimodipine cessation or dose reduction independently associated with poor functional outcomes (aOR 0.89, 95% CI

0.80-0.99) P = 0.037 P = 0.061 Received Reduced Nimodipine Course Received Full Nimodipine Course Received Reduced Nimodipine Course Received Full Nimodipine Course Hunt Hess 1-3 Hunt Hess 4-5 Nimodipine is administered six times per

day for up to 21 days Limited use of off-label therapies due to Joint Commission monitoring adherence to care guidelines

8 Substantial Shortcomings of Oral Nimodipine Sources: Nimodipine Prescribing

Label, Sandow et al., Mahmoud et al., Abboud et al., Soppi et al., Rabaut et al., Ho et al., Fletcher Spaght market research. Administration Challenges High dosing burden of 60mg (2 x 30mg capsules), 6 times per day 45% of patients receive

nimodipine through nasogastric tube (NGT) - often via capsule extraction Capsule extraction and administration is labor intensive Dosing Interruption Increased Hypotension Too High Fatal Medication Errors Inadvertent parenteral

injection can result in death or serious life-threatening AEs Highest risk with capsule extraction NYMALIZE (oral liquid) tempers the risk of error, but has tolerability challenges (e.g., severe diarrhea) due to solubility limitations of

nimodipine 3 Sub-optimal Therapeutic Benefit with Oral Administration High Pharmacokinetic Variability Inconsistent plasma concentration in both inter and intra subject High first-pass metabolism, leads to low bioavailability and

frequent dosing Gastric motility issues and presence of food delay rate of absorption Potentially negligible concentration with NGT administration Hypotension drives missed doses and diminished efficacy Blood Concentration 55% of

patients do not receive the full daily dose due to hypotension Sub-optimal Outcomes Too Low

GTx-104 is a Novel IV Nimodipine Designed to Overcome Oral Delivery Challenges

Supported by Strong IP, Ph. III Trial Success 9 CMC: Critical micelle concentration. Orphan Drug Status with seven-year market exclusivity and additional multi-layered IP protection Drug loaded micelles Nimodipine 10- 15 nm Blank

micelles Surfactant Monomers Hydrophilic Part Hydrophobic Part A novel intravenous nimodipine that is well positioned to solve oral challenges and potentially displace oral as SoC Pivotal Phase 3 STRIVE-ON safety trial met primary

endpoint; clinical evidence of GTx-104 benefit vs. oral GTx-104 Overcomes solubility limitations of nimodipine in current formulations Patented formulation uses non-ionic surfactant micelles as the drug carrier to solubilize

nimodipine Simple to prepare in pharmacy, stable at room temperature GTx-104 drug delivery technology

GTx-104 Value Proposition 10 Risk of Fatal Parenteral Use Requires Feeding

Tube Excipient Intolerance Hemodynamic Control Dose Compliance Markets Nimodipine Capsules Yes Yes No Poor Poor U.S. / WW NYMALIZE (Oral Liquid) Yes (Reduced) Yes Yes Poor Poor U.S. / Select WW NIMOTOP

(Injectable) No No Yes * Unknown Rescue Only EU / China GTx-104 No No No Optimal Optimal Global Rights Sources: Nimodipine capsule packaging insert. Fletcher Spaght market research. Soppi V. (2007). * High alcohol content

(~24% volume/volume) also requires central catheter for administration WW: Worldwide DDI: drug-drug internation Predictable drug concentration & dose compliance Reduced drug intake, reduced DDIs & no food effects More effective

hypotension management Clinical Value Hospital Value Reduced hospital resources The Joint Commission compliance to aSAH care guidelines Reduced medication errors & nursing burden Patient Value Lower disease burden & faster

recovery Safer & more convenient treatment Improved functional outcomes

Phase 1 Trial Established Scientific Bridge between GTx-104 and Oral

Nimodipine 11 Source: GTx-104-002 CSR; results announced May 2022 Significantly lower dose variability relative to oral capsule Consistent and predictable plasma concentrations GTx-104 IV infusion vs Oral capsule: AUC Day_3

0-24hr GTx-104 Oral Capsule 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 AUC dav-3 0-24hour GTx-104 Trial met all primary and secondary endpoints; enabling the 505(b)2 regulatory pathway

STRIVE-ON Phase 3 Trial

GTx-104 STRIVE-ON Phase 3 Pivotal Safety Trial Design 13 mRS: modified Rankin

Scale STRIVE-ON (NCT05995405) is a ~100-patient prospective, open-label, randomized (1:1 ratio), parallel group trial of GTx-104 compared with oral nimodipine in patients hospitalized for aSAH Screening Period (within 96 hours of aSAH

onset) Day 1 Treatment Period Day 2-21 Onset of aSAH Follow up Period Day 30 and Day 90 Primary Endpoint Incidence of subjects with at least one episode of clinically significant hypotension Informed

Consent Inclusion/exclusion Randomize Initiate investigational product Hypotension events Relative dose intensity Safety Adverse events Functional outcomes (mRS) Pharmacoeconomic outcomes Trial complete and reported topline data

14 STRIVE-ON Trial Data Demonstrates Key Clinical, Pharmacoeconomic, and Dosing

/ Administration Benefits over Current SoC, Oral Nimodipine CLINICAL IMPROVED 90-DAY OUTCOMES (MRS*) +29% relative increase in patients with good recovery at 90 days vs. oral nimodipine FEWER HYPOTENSION EVENTS -19% reduction from oral

nimodipine BETTER RELATIVE DOSE INTENSITY 54% vs. 8% with oral nimodipine receive >95% prescribed dose PHARMACOECONOMIC FEWER ICU DAYS -1.5 days reduction from oral nimodipine LESS TIME ON VENTILATION -5 days reduction from

oral nimodipine REDUCED ICU READMISSION RATES -48% reduction from oral nimodipine DOSING & ADMIN. IMPROVED PATIENT REST No need to disrupt patient sleep every 4 hours EASIER ADMINISTRATION No feeding tube or swallowing of

large pills required LESS LABOR-INTENSIVE TREATMENT PREP No nimodipine capsule extraction and administration (laborious for staff) * mRS - modified Rankin Score

15 Demographics & Baseline Characteristics GTX-104 (N = 50) Oral

Nimodipine (N = 52) Age (mean) 55 56 Sex, n (%) Female Male 33 (66.0%) 17 (34.0%) 33 (63.5%) 19 (36.5%) Hunt & Hess Grade, n (%) I II III IV V 10 (20%) 15 (30%) 15 (30%) 6 (12%) 4 (8%) 8 (15%) 15 (29%) 16

(31%) 12 (23%) 1 (2%) Demographics well-balanced, except higher proportion of most severe with worst prognosis (Grade V) in GTx-104

16 Primary Endpoint - Clinically Significant Hypotension ~19% relatively

fewer patients with clinically significant hypotension in GTx-104 GTX-104 (N = 50) n (%) Oral Nimodipine (N = 52) n (%) Clinically Significant Hypotension 14 (28%) 18 (35%) Clinically significant hypotension: decrease in systolic BP

> 20 mm Hg or diastolic BP > 10 mm Hg or systolic BP <= 100 confirmed by two consecutive readings within five minutes AND requiring medical intervention.

17 Relative Dose Intensity (RDI) 54% of patients on GTx-104 had RDI of 95% or

higher versus 8% on Oral Nimodipine GTx-104 Oral Nimodipine RDI = (total dose administered / total amount of expected dose) * 100.

18 Clinical Outcomes - mRS (day 90) ~29% relative increase in patients with

good recovery in GTx-104 ~29% * 3 patients did not complete physician-conducted mRS at day-90. However, all 3 were confirmed alive at day-90 ** 6 patients did not complete physician-conducted mRS at day-90. 5 were confirmed alive at

day-90, and 1 survival status was unknown

19 Clinical Outcomes - QoL (Quality of Life; day 90) Patient-reported health

scores favor GTx-104 QoL GTx-104 (N = 381) Oral Nimodipine (N = 402) Your Health Today Score mean (0 = being worst -> 100 = great) 75 70 Mobility, n (%) I have no or some problems I am confined to bed 38 (100%) 0 35

(88%) 5 (12%) Self-Care, n (%) I have no or some problems I am unable to wash/dress 37 (97%) 1 (2.6%) 35 (88%) 5 (12%) Usual Activities, n (%) I have no or some problems I am unable to perform 35 (92%) 3 (8%) 33 (84%) 7

(16%) Pain/Discomfort, n (%) I have no or moderate pain I have extreme pain 36 (95%) 2 (5%) 38 (95%) 1 (2%) Anxiety/Depression, n (%) I am not or moderately I am extremely 36 (95%) 2 (5%) 36 (90%) 3 (7%) 1 GTx-104:

patient did not complete survey (4), dead (8 - all due to underlying disease, none were GTx-104 related). 2 Oral Nimodipine: patient did not complete survey (8), dead (4 - all due to underlying disease, none were Oral Nimodipine related).

Oral also had 2 incomplete (pain, anxiety).

20 Safety Overall safety was comparable between the two groups Summary of

Adverse Events (AEs) (entire study duration of 90 days) GTx-104 (N = 50) Oral Nimodipine (N = 52) All AEs, n (%) # of events 44 (88%) 157 43 (83%) 193 All AEs, events per n 3.6 4.5 All SAEs1, n (%) # of events 18 (36%) 34 25

(48%) 48 All SAEs, events per n 1.9 1.9 Treatment-Related SAEs, n (%) # of events2 0 2 (4%) 2 Mortality3, n (%) 8 (16%) 4 (8%) Cause of death4 (n) All deaths were due to severity of underlying disease No deaths due to