Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Zalviso

Phase 3

Moderate-to-severe Acute Pain | Small molecule | Pain |Talphera, Inc.|Trials Updated: Aug 8, 2018

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

UNCONTROLLED
Total Trials1
Total Enrollment320

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

Zalviso clinical trials

Zalviso · 1 trial · 1 indication

Phase 3 1
NCT02662764Study to Evaluate the Overall Performance of the Zalviso System™ (Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System) 15 mcgModerate-to-severe Acute Pain
COMPLETED320 Analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Study to Evaluate the Overall Performance of the Zalviso System™ (Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System) 15 mcg
Moderate-to-severe Acute PainUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Percentage of Patients Who Experienced at Least One System-generated Error Based on the Controller Data While Using the Zalviso System
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Patients, if Any, With Tablets Dispensed But Not Requested
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Patients, if Any, With Tablet Dispensed When the Zalviso System Was in Lockout
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Patients With Misplaced Tablet(s)
Up to 72 hours
Number of Misplaced Tablets (i.e., Tablet Found Outside the Patient's Mouth)
Up to 24 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Either a System-generated Error or a Misplaced Tablet (i.e., a Dispense Failure)
Up to 72 hours
Number of Zalviso System Notifications to the Nurse to Retrain Patient to Not Pull Down on the Controller While Dosing
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Experienced Either a System-generated Error or a Misplaced Tablet That Caused an Analgesic Gap
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Rate the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 24 Hours as "Good" or "Excellent"
Up to 24 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Rate the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 48 Hours as "Good" or "Excellent"
Up to 48 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Rate the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 72 Hours as "Good" or "Excellent"
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) as "Poor" at 24 Hours
Up to 24 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) as "Fair" at 24 Hours
Up to 24 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) as "Good" at 24 Hours
Up to 24 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) as "Excellent" at 24 Hours
Up to 24 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 48 Hours as "Poor"
Up to 48 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 48 Hours as "Fair"
Up to 48 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 48 Hours as "Good"
Up to 48 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 48 Hours as "Excellent"
Up to 48 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 72 Hours as "Poor"
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 72 Hours as "Fair"
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 72 Hours as "Good"
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Responded to the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) at 72 Hours as "Excellent"
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Rated the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 24 Hours as "Good" or "Excellent"
Up to 24 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Rate the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 48 Hours as "Good" or "Excellent"
Up to 48 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Rated the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) of Method of Pain Control Over 72 Hours as "Good" or "Excellent"
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professional (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) as "Poor" at 24 Hours
Up to 24 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) as "Fair" at 24 Hours
Up to 24 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) as "Good" at 24 Hours
Up to 24 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professional (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) as "Excellent" at 24 Hours
Up to 24 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 48 Hours as "Poor"
Up to 48 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 48 Hours as "Fair"
Up to 48 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA )at 48 Hours as "Good"
Up to 48 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 48 Hours as "Excellent"
Up to 48 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 72 Hours as "Poor"
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 72 Hours as "Fair"
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 72 Hours as "Good"
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) Who Responded to the Healthcare Professional Global Assessment (HPGA) at 72 Hours as "Excellent"
Up to 72 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Terminated From the Study Due to Inadequate Analgesia Over the 24-hour Study Period
Up to 24 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Terminated From the Study Due to Inadequate Analgesia After the 24-hour Study Period and Prior to or During the 48 Hour Study Period
Up to 48 hours
Percentage of Patients Who Terminated From the Study Due to Inadequate Analgesia Prior to or During the 72 Hour Study Period
Up to 72 hours
Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 24-hour Study Period (SPID24)
Up to 24 hours

The pain intensity difference (PID) at each evaluation time point after the dose of study drug is the difference in pain intensity at the specific evaluation time point and baseline pain intensity \[PID(evaluation time after the first dose) = PI(baseline) - PI(evaluation time after the first dose)\]. A pain intensity score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained at baseline and at protocol-specified time points throughout the 24 hour period. The time-weighted SPID24 is the time-weighted summed PID over the 24-hour study period. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and a higher score indicates a greater decrease in pain intensity.The scores ranged from - 72 to 204.

Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 48-hour Study Period (SPID-48) Study Period
Up to 48 hours

The pain intensity difference (PID) at each evaluation time point after the dose of study drug is the difference in pain intensity at the specific evaluation time point and baseline pain intensity \[PID(evaluation time after the first dose) = PI(baseline) - PI(evaluation time after the first dose)\]. A pain intensity score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained at baseline and at protocol-specified time points and throughout the 48 hour period. The time-weighted SPID48 is the time-weighted summed PID over the 48-hour study period. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and a higher score indicates a greater decrease in pain intensity.The scores ranged from -144 to 408.

Time-weighted Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over the 72-hour Study Period (SPID-72) Study Period
Up to 72 hours

The pain intensity difference (PID) at each evaluation time point after the dose of study drug is the difference in pain intensity at the specific evaluation time point and baseline pain intensity \[PID(evaluation time after the first dose) = PI(baseline) - PI(evaluation time after the first dose)\]. A pain intensity score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained at baseline and at protocol-specified time points throughout the 72 hour period. The time-weighted SPID72 is the time-weighted summed PID over the 72-hour study period. A negative score indicates an increase in pain intensity and a higher score indicates a greater decrease in pain intensity. The scores ranged from -239 to 624.

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Over the 24-hour Study Period (TOTPAR24)
Up to 24 hours

Total pain relief over the 24-hour study period. A higher TOTPAR score means a greater relief in pain. Range of scores was from 0.00 to 96.00.

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Over the 48-hour Study Period (TOTPAR48)
Up to 48 hours

Total pain relief over the 48-hour study period. A higher TOTPAR score means a greater relief in pain. Range of scores was from 0.00 to 192.00.

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) Over the 72-hour Study Period (TOTPAR72)
Up to 72 hours

Total pain relief over the 72-hour study period. A higher TOTPAR means a greater relief in pain. Range of scores was from 0.00 to 288.00.

Pain Intensity (PI) at Each Evaluation Time Point
Up to 72 hours

At protocol-specified time points, the patient is asked to self-record his/her current level of pain on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 equals no pain and 10 equals the worst possible pain.

Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at Each Evaluation Time Point
Up to 72 hours

The PID at each evaluation time point after the dose of study drug is the difference in pain intensity at the specific evaluation time point and baseline pain intensity \[PID(evaluation time after the first dose) = PI(baseline) - PI(evaluation time after the first dose)\]. The higher the PID score, the lower the pain intensity. The scores ranged from - 239 to 624.

Pain Relief (PR) at Each Evaluation Time Point
Up to 72 hours

At protocol-specified time points, the patient is asked to self-record his/her current level of pain relief on 5-point numerical rating scale where 0 equaled no pain relief and 4 equaled complete pain relief. The baseline score references the baseline pain intensity score and the following timepoints reference pain relief scores.

Patient Usability Questionnaire (PUQ)
Up to 72 hours

Questionnaire completed by patients at the end of his/her participation in the study regarding the usability of Zalviso.

Nurse Usability Questionnaire (NUQ)
Up to 72 hours

Questionnaire regarding the usability of Zalviso completed by HCPs who had set up at least 5 Zalviso Systems for patients

Number of Study Drug Doses Used
Up to 72 hours
Average Hourly Use of Study Drug
Up to 72 hours

Average number of study drug doses used per hour, adjusting by treatment exposure time and study period

Average Inter-dosing Interval (in Minutes)
Up to 72 hours
Total Amount of Supplemental Morphine (mg) Utilized
Up to 72 hours

Supplemental opioid medication (2 mg IV morphine) was allowed in the first 30 minutes after the first on-demand dose of study drug had been administered, if necessary, to keep a patient comfortable. Otherwise, supplemental opioid medication (2 mg IV morphine, no more frequently than hourly) was allowed for pain due to ambulation or with the initiation of passive range of motion therapy throughout the remainder of the study.

Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationNA
MaskingNONE
ModelSINGLE_GROUP
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
Zalviso™ 15 mcgEXPERIMENTALZalviso™(sufentanil sublingual tablet system) 15 mcg

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
Zalviso™ 15 mcgDRUGZalviso™ (sufentanil sublingual tablet system) 15 mcg. Tablets to be self-administered by the patient as needed for pain, no more than every 20 minutes, for 24 hours and up to 72 hours
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range18 Years to N/A
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites11

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male or female patients who were 18 years of age or older. 2. Patients who were scheduled to undergo surgery under general or spinal anesthesia that does not include intrathecal opioids during the operation. 3. Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA...

Countries:United States
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Frequently asked questions about Zalviso

What is Zalviso used for?

Zalviso is being developed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe acute pain. It is a small molecule therapeutic candidate studied in adult patients aged 18 years and older. The drug is not approved and remains in clinical development.

Who is developing Zalviso?

Zalviso is being developed by Talphera, Inc., which trades under the ticker TLPH. The company is responsible for the clinical program evaluating the drug in moderate-to-severe acute pain.

What phase is Zalviso in?

Zalviso is in Phase 3 clinical development. The program includes one completed Phase 3 trial, and no active trials are currently listed. The drug is investigational and has not been approved by the FDA.

What clinical trials is Zalviso in?

Zalviso has been evaluated in the Phase 3 trial NCT02662764, titled Study to Evaluate the Overall Performance of the Zalviso System (Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System) 15 mcg. The trial enrolled 320 participants in the United States and is completed.