Intestinal aGvHD Free Survival is the time from the date of first study drug administration (Day-1) to intestinal aGvHD event/death, where an event is defined as death due to any cause or Stage 1-4 intestinal involvement per Acute Graft versus-Host Disease Clinical Stage criteria. Data was censored for participants who have not had the intestinal aGvHD event or died or have had the event after pre-specified timing, e.g., last contact or Day +180 after allo HSCT whichever occurs first.

An Adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory value), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of drug whether or not it is considered related to drug. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life threatening.

AESI is defined as infections, including opportunistic infection, such as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), liver injury, malignancies, injection-related reactions or systemic reactions including anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity reactions.

Prespecified safety events will include serious infections, malignancies, PML, concerns about growth and pubertal development, and bowel surgery.

Clinical remission is defined as a CDAI score of less than (\<) 150 points. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI consists of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity.

Endoscopic response per SES-CD is defined as decrease in SES CD greater than (\>) 50% from baseline (or for participants with isolated ileal disease, SES-CD \<=4 or a \>=2-point reduction in SES-CD from baseline) read centrally. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size,percentage of ulcerated and affected surface area, presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum,right,transverse,and left colon,rectum). Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is most severe case, with sum of the scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. Overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

Clinical (mPDAI) remission is defined as mPDAI score \<5 and a reduction of mPDAI score by \>=2 points from Baseline. The mPDAI score is calculated as a sum of two subscales based on clinical symptoms (0 to 6) and endoscopic findings (0 to 6): 1) Clinical Symptoms: Stool Frequency (0=usual postoperative stool frequency to 2=three or more stools/day\>postoperative usual); Rectal bleeding (0=None or rare to 1=Present daily); Fecal urgency or abdominal cramps (0=None to 2=Usual), Fever (temperature \>37.8 degrees celsius \[C\]) (0=Absent and 1=Present); 2) Endoscopic Inflammation Findings: Edema (0=not present to 1=present); Granularity (0=not present to 1=present); Friability (0=not present to 1=present); Loss of vascular pattern (0=not present to 1=present); Mucous exudates (0=not present to 1=present); Ulcerations (0=not present to 1=present). The total mPDAI score can range from 0 to 12. A higher mPDAI score is indicative of worse disease.

Clinical response is defined as ≥8 point decrease in 2-component patient-reported outcome (PRO2) score from baseline. The PRO2 is constituted by abdominal pain and number of liquid stools components of the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI). The PRO-2 score is the sum of the abdominal pain and stool frequency subscores of the CDAI score. The average daily number of liquid or very soft stools and abdominal pain score (with 0 indicating no pain and 3 indicating severe pain) are weighted according to the CDAI multiplication factors (2 for stool frequency and 5 for abdominal pain).

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have causal relationship with this treatment. AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug whether or not it is considered related to drug.

Clinical remission is defined by PCDAI score ≤10. The PCDAI was specifically designed for use in children. The PCDAI includes a child-specific item: the height velocity variable as well as three laboratory parameters: hematocrit (HCT) (adjusted for age and sex), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and albumin level. The PCDAI score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more active disease. A score of \<10 will be consistent with inactive disease, 11 to 30 will indicate mild disease, and \>30 will indicate moderate to severe disease. A decrease of 12.5 points is taken as evidence of improvement.

Endoscopic response is defined as at least a 50% reduction in SES-CD score from Baseline. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is the sum of 4 variables (ie, size of ulcers \[cm\], ulcerated surface, affected surface \[%\], and presence of narrowing) across 5 bowel segments (ie, rectum, descending and sigmoid colon, transverse colon, ascending colon, and ileum). Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is the most severe case, with the sum of the scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The segmental SES-CD score is the sum of the 4 variables for each bowel segment and can range from 0 to 12, where each individual variable score ranges from 0 to 3.

Clinical remission based on the modified Mayo score was defined as stool frequency sub score 0 to 1 and a decrease of 1 or more from baseline, rectal bleeding sub score of 0, and endoscopy sub score 0 to 1 (modified so that a score of 1 does not include friability) and without presence of any intercurrent event. Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Modified Mayo score was a composite index of 3 disease activity variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and endoscopy). Each subscale was graded from 0 to 3 where higher score indicated more severe disease. These scores were summed to give a total score range of 0 to 9 where, higher score indicated more severe disease.

Clinical response was defined as a reduction of greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 points and \>=25 percent (%) in modified mayo score, and a decrease of \>=1 point in rectal bleeding sub-score or rectal bleeding sub-score of less than or equal to (\<=) 1 from baseline (Week 0). Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Modified mayo score consisted of 3 sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and mayo endoscopic sub-score (findings on endoscopy), each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These scores were summed to give a total score range of 0 to 9. Here, a higher score indicated more severe disease.

Clinical response was defined as a reduction of \>=70 points in Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score from baseline (Week 0). A CDAI was a multi-item instrument that measured severity of active Crohn's Disease monitored over 7 days included participant reported symptoms, physician-assessed signs, and laboratory markers. CDAI total score was equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective items (number of liquid/soft stools, degree of abdominal pain, general well-being); and objective items (use of anti-diarrhoeal medication, abdominal mass, haematocrit, presence of extraintestinal manifestation, body weight). CDAI scores ranged approximately from 0 to 600, higher scores indicated greater disease activity.

Enhanced clinical response was defined as ≥100-point decrease from Baseline in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score at Week 10. A CDAI is a multi-item instrument which measures severity of active Crohn's Disease monitored over 7 days includes participant reported symptoms, physician-assessed signs, and laboratory markers. CDAI score is equal to sum of weighted scores for subjective items (number of liquid/soft stools, degree of abdominal pain, general well-being); and objective items (use of anti-diarrhoeal medication, abdominal mass, haematocrit, presence of extraintestinal manifestation, body weight). CDAI scores range approximately from 0 to 600, higher scores indicating greater disease activity.

Clinical response is defined as ≥3 points reduction in complete Mayo clinical score and ≥30% decrease from baseline score accompanied with ≥1 point decrease in rectal bleeding subscore or absolute rectal bleeding subscore ≤1. Mayo clinical score is used to assess ulcerative colitis disease activity. It consists of 4 subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscale is scored on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0= normal condition and 3 = severe disease condition. The total Mayo clinic score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Clinical remission is defined as complete Mayo clinic score ≤2 with no subscore \>1. Mayo clinic score is used to assess ulcerative colitis disease activity. It consists of 4 subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy and physician's global assessment. Each subscale is scored on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = normal condition and 3 = severe disease condition. The total Mayo clinic score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) that started or worsened on or after study Day 1 (defined as day first dosed) and no more than 18 weeks after the last dose of study drug. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that occurs at any dose and resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was an important medical event such as acute liver failure, pulmonary hypertension, or confirmed or suspected transmission of an infectious agent by a medicinal product. Participant years is defined as the total exposure-time of the participants in the respective treatment group. Incidence per 100 participant years is defined as (Number of participants with events\*100/participant years). As per planned analysis, data for this outcome measure is grouped and presented per disease condition.

Clinical remission is defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score less than or equal to (\<=) 150 at Week 52. A CDAI is a multi-item instrument which measures severity of active Crohn's Disease monitored over 7 days includes participant reported symptoms, physician-assessed signs, and laboratory markers. CDAI score is equal to (=) sum of weighted scores for subjective items (number of liquid/soft stools, degree of abdominal pain, general well-being); and objective items (use of anti-diarrhoeal medication, abdominal mass, haematocrit, presence of extraintestinal manifestation, body weight). CDAI scores range approximately from 0 to 600, higher scores indicating greater disease activity.

Clinical remission was defined as a complete Mayo score of ≤2 points and no individual subscore \>1 point. The Mayo score was a standard assessment tool to measure ulcerative colitis disease activity in clinical trials. The index consisted of 4 subscores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, findings on endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Each subscore was scored on a scale from 0 to 3 and the complete Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 (higher scores indicate greater disease activity).

Endoscopic remission is defined as a simple endoscopic score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) score of ≤4. The SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, proportion of the surface area that is ulcerated, proportion of the surface area affected, and stenosis in 5 segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). The score for each endoscopic variable is the sum of values obtained for each segment. The SES-CD total is the sum of the 4 endoscopic variable scores from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate more severe disease.

Clinical response is defined as a reduction in complete Mayo score of ≥3 points and ≥30% from Baseline with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of ≤1 point. Mayo Score is a standard assessment tool to measure ulcerative colitis disease activity in clinical trials. The index consists of 4 subscores (rectal bleeding, stool frequency, findings on endoscopy, and physician's global assessment), a global assessment by the physician, and an endoscopic subscore. Each subscore is scored on a scale from 0 to 3 and the complete Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 (higher scores indicate greater disease activity).

Clinical Remission is defined as a complete Mayo score of ≤2 points and no individual subscore \>1 point. Mayo Score is a standard assessment tool to measure ulcerative colitis disease activity in clinical trials. The index consists of 4 subscores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, findings on endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Each subscore is scored on a scale from 0 to 3 and the complete Mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 (higher scores indicate greater disease activity).

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.

Vital signs included body temperature (axilla), sitting blood pressure (after the participant has rested for at least 5 minutes), and pulse (bpm).

The laboratory values outside the range (Hemoglobin \<=7 g/dL, Lymphocytes \<500 /µL, WBC \<2000 /µL, Platelets \<7.5 10\^4/µL, Neutrophils \<1000 /µL, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>3.0 U/L x upper limit of normal (ULN), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>3.0 U/L x ULN, Total Bilirubin \>2.0 mg/dL x ULN, Amylase \>2.0 (U/L) x ULN were considered markedly abnormal. Only laboratory parameters with events were represented.

A response to therapy is considered a decrease from baseline of at least 100 points in the CDAI score at Week 10. CDAI is scoring system for the assessment of Crohn's disease activity. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to approximately 600, where higher scores indicate more severe disease. Index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease.

Clinical remission is defined as the CDAI score ≤150. CDAI is scoring system for the assessment of Crohn's disease activity. Index values of 150 and below are associated with quiescent disease; values above that indicate active disease.

Reported events on this outcome measure were "Weight Decreased".

Reported events on this outcome measure were "Bundle Branch Block Right".

The laboratory values outside the range (Hemoglobin \<=7 g/dL, Lymphocytes \<500 /microL, White Blood Cell (WBC) \<2000 /microL, Platelets \<7.5 10\^4/microL, Neutrophils \<1000 /microL, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) (Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase; GPT) \>3.0 U/L x upper limit of normal (ULN), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) (Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase; GOT) \>3.0 U/L x ULN, Total Bilirubin \>2.0 mg/dL x ULN, Amylase \>2.0 (U/L) x ULN are considered markedly abnormal.

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant.

A laboratory value was considered a marked abnormality if it met the predefined criteria or parameters and the on-treatment value was more extreme than the Baseline value for the following parameters: hemoglobin \<= 70 g/L, absolute lymphocyte count \<0.5 X 10\^9/L, leukocytes \<2.0 X 10\^9/L (absolute value), platelets \<75.0 X 10\^9/L, absolute neutrophil Count \<1.0 X 10\^9/L, prothrombin time \>1.25 x upper limit of normal (ULN), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>3.0 x ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>3.0 x ULN, bilirubin \>2.0 x ULN, amylase \>2.0 x ULN, lipase \>2.0 x ULN.

Vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and temperature) measurements were collected throughout the study. Any clinically significant mean change in vital signs over time as assessed by the investigator was reported as a TEAE.

A standard 12-lead ECG was performed. Any ECGs assessed by the investigator to be clinically significant were reported as TEAEs.

IBD-related events included hospitalizations, surgeries, or procedures due to ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.

The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items). Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best). A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 8 scales, the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 8 scales, the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL. SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health. Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD). It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme. A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL. A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores. The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15. A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme. The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health. An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD). It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme. A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL. A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores. The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15. A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme. The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health. An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD). It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme. A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL. A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores. The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15. A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme. The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health. An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD). It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme. A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL. A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores. The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15. A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme. The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health. An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD). It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme. A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL. A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores. The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15. A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme. The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health. An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD). It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme. A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL. A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores. The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15. A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme. The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health. An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD). It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme. A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL. A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores. The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15. A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme. The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health. An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD). It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme. A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL. A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores. The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15. A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme. The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health. An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD). It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme. A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL. A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores. The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15. A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme. The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health. An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD). It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme. A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL. A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores. The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15. A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme. The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health. An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD). It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme. A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL. A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores. The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15. A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD. Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme. The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health. An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Defined as less than 10 mg of prednisone/day and grade 1 or lower diarrhea symptoms without the use of additional biologic rescue medication.

AE defined as any untoward medical occurrence in clinical investigation participants administered drug; it does not necessarily have to have causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug whether or not it was considered related to the drug. TEAE was defined as an AE whose date of onset occurred on or after the first dose of study drug, or an already-present AE that worsened in intensity or frequency following the treatment start, occurring from the first dose of study drug to the day of last dose of study drug.

DLTs was based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 and was defined as any of following events: Grade 3 or higher toxicity assessed by the investigator as related to vedolizumab treatment; Grade 4 or higher regimen-related organ toxicities; and failure to engraft by Day +28. Engraftment was defined as absolute neutrophils count (ANC) greater than (\>) 500 per cubic millimeter (/mm\^3) for 3 consecutive days or \>2000/mm\^3 for 1 day.

Bioavailability is defined as the rate and extent to which the active moiety of the e.g. subcutaneous administered drug reaches the systemic circulation. Population mean estimate for bioavailability was based on population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis to find one measure. The exposure data were pooled across visits and subjects to identify population PK parameter estimates and covariate effects. The outcome measure data was planned to be analyzed using a model collating all arms measures to report pooled data across arms, as per planned analysis. Bioavailability was estimated using population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analysis.