Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A

Phase 1

Late Infantile Metachromatic Leukodystrophy | Monoclonal antibody | Rare Disease |Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited|Last Updated: Jun 14, 2021

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

CONTROLLEDDMC
Total Trials1
Total Enrollment13

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

Clinical trial landscape

Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A · 2 trials · 2 indications

Phase 1 2
NCT01510028Multicenter Study of HGT-1110 Administered Intrathecally in Children With Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD)Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD)
COMPLETED24 Analytics
NCT00633139Long-term Metazym Treatment of Patients With Late Infantile Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD)Late Infantile Metachromatic Leukodystrophy
COMPLETED13 Analytics
PHASE1COMPLETED
Multicenter Study of HGT-1110 Administered Intrathecally in Children With Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD)
Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD)Unlock trial analytics
PHASE1COMPLETED
Long-term Metazym Treatment of Patients With Late Infantile Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD)
Late Infantile Metachromatic LeukodystrophyUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Type and Severity
From start of study treatment up to Week 42

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that occurred at or after the first dose of the investigational product or device implant surgery (whichever occurred earlier) and through the last follow-up date. Drug-related and device-related types of TEAEs were analyzed and reported. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.0 grading scale. Severity of all AEs or SAEs was recorded as grade 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 corresponding, respectively, to a severity of mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening, or fatal. Here SDI refers to surgical device implantation.

Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
From start of study treatment up to Week 40

Clinical laboratory test included serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Clinical laboratory abnormalities were recorded and reported as TEAE. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that occurred at or after the first dose of the investigational product or device implant surgery (whichever occurred earlier) and through the last follow-up date.

Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
From start of study treatment up to Week 40

Vital sign assessments included blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and body temperature. Vital sign abnormalities were recorded and reported as TEAE. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that occurred at or after the first dose of the investigational product or device implant surgery (whichever occurred earlier) and through the last follow-up date. Vital sign abnormalities included pyrexia which was considered as TEAE and was reported.

Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
From start of study treatment up to Week 40

12-lead ECG was recorded and measured with the participant in rested supine position for at least 10 minutes. ECG abnormalities were recorded and reported as TEAE. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that occurred at or after the first dose of the investigational product or device implant surgery (whichever occurred earlier) and through the last follow-up date.

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examination Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
From start of study treatment up to Week 40

Complete physical examination included evaluation of the port and catheter track. Height or length and weight were recorded and used to calculate growth. Body weight and height measurements were used to calculate the body mass index (BMI). Head circumference was measured in uniform manner for all participants. Clinical significance was defined as any variation in physical findings that had medical relevance resulting in an alteration in medical care. Clinically significant abnormalities related to physical examination were recorded and reported as TEAE. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that occurred at or after the first dose of the investigational product or device implant surgery (whichever occurred earlier) and through the last follow-up date.

Number of Participants With Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Chemistry Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
From start of study treatment up to Week 40

CSF chemistry assessments (including cell counts, glucose and protein) was measured. CSF chemistry abnormalities were recorded and reported as TEAE. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that occurred at or after the first dose of the investigational product or device implant surgery (whichever occurred earlier) and through the last follow-up date.

Number of Participants With Positive Anti-SHP611 Antibodies in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and or Serum
Baseline up to Week 40

Number of participants with positive anti-SHP611 antibody results in serum and in CSF were reported. A participant was considered positive if they had at least 1 positive result during the study.

Relative Changes (%) in Gross Motor Function Measurement (GMFM)
Baseline, 52 Weeks

Change (percent change) in GMFM is measured from baseline to end of study (Week 52). GMFM is measured using GMFM-88. The GMFM-88 item scores can be summed to calculate a total GMFM-88 score. For each GMFM-88 item, the score is between 0 (minimal) to 3 (maximum). The total GMFM-88 score is between 0 (minimal) to 264 (maximum). Relative changes in GMFM are calculated as percentage change from baseline divided by the age difference in months between first and last visit. The GMFM score decreases over time, which, indicates that the disease worsened over time. Score over time (SOT), data mentioned over mean represents the adjusted mean.

Relative Change in Mullen's Scales of Early Learning
Baseline, 52 Weeks

Changes in Mullen's Scales of Early Learning are measured from baseline to end of study (Week 52) using Mullen's Scales of Early Learning. T scores, percentile ranks, and age equivalents can be computed for the four scales separately (visual reception, fine motor, expressive language, and receptive language). Relative change is calculated as percentage change from baseline divided by the age-difference in months between first and last visit. When Mullen's score decreases over time, it indicates the disease worsened over time. Data mentioned over mean represents the adjusted mean.

Secondary Endpoints

Change From Baseline in Motor Function Using Gross Motor Function Measure 88 (GMFM-88) Total Score at Week 40
Baseline, Week 40
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Week 40
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
Week 40
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationNON_RANDOMIZED
MaskingNONE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
Cohort 1 (10 mg)EXPERIMENTAL6 patients treated with HGT-1110 10 mg EOW by IT injection
Cohort 2 (30 mg)EXPERIMENTAL6 patients treated with HGT-1110 30 mg EOW by IT injection
Cohort 3 (100 mg)EXPERIMENTAL6 patients treated with HGT-1110 100 mg EOW by IT injection
Cohort 4 (100 mg)EXPERIMENTAL6 patients treated with HGT-1110 100 mg EOW by IT injection
Cohort 1EXPERIMENTALCohort 1: 50 U/kg Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A (rhASA)
Cohort 2EXPERIMENTALCohort 2: 100 U/kg Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A (rhASA)
Cohort 3EXPERIMENTALCohort 3: 200 U/kg Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A (rhASA)

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
Recombinant human arylsulfatase ABIOLOGICAL6 patients treated with HGT-1110 EOW by IT injection
Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A (rhASA)BIOLOGICALintravenous infusion, every other week for 26 weeks
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age RangeN/A to 12 Years
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites5

Inclusion For Cohorts 1-4: 1. Confirmed diagnosis of metachromatic leukodystrophy by both: * Arylsulfatase A (ASA) deficiency by assay in leukocytes AND * Elevated sulfatide in urine 2. Appearance of the first symptoms of disease at or before 30 months of age. For Cohorts 1-3 only: 3. A...

Countries:AustraliaDenmarkFranceGermanyJapan
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Frequently asked questions about Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A

What is Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A used for?

Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A is an investigational enzyme replacement therapy being studied for Late Infantile Metachromatic Leukodystrophy and Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD), rare inherited disorders. It is developed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (TAK) and is currently in Phase 1 clinical development.

Who makes Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A?

Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A is developed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, which trades under the ticker TAK. The drug is being investigated as a potential treatment for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy, including the late infantile form.

What phase is Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A in?

Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A is in Phase 1 clinical development. It is an investigational drug and has not been approved by regulatory authorities. Two Phase 1 trials have been completed, both involving pediatric patients with Metachromatic Leukodystrophy.

What clinical trials is Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A in?

Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A has been studied in two completed Phase 1 trials. NCT00633139 evaluated long-term treatment in 13 patients with Late Infantile Metachromatic Leukodystrophy in Denmark. NCT01510028 studied intrathecal administration in 24 children with Metachromatic Leukodystrophy across Australia, Denmark, France, Germany, and Japan.

Is Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A the same as Metazym?

Recombinant human Arylsulfatase A is also known as Metazym, as referenced in the clinical trial NCT00633139 titled 'Long-term Metazym Treatment of Patients With Late Infantile Metachromatic Leukodystrophy'. The drug is developed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.