Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

HYQVIA

Phase 3

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy | Monoclonal antibody | Neurology |Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited|Last Updated: Aug 28, 2024

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedDouble-BlindPLACEBO_CONTROLLEDDMC
Total Trials2
Total Enrollment223

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

Clinical trial landscape

HYQVIA · 4 trials · 3 indications

Phase 3 3Phase 1 1
NCT03277313Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of HYQVIA in Pediatric PIDD SubjectsPrimary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PID)
COMPLETED44 Analytics
NCT02955355Long-Term Tolerability and Safety of HYQVIA/HyQvia in CIDPChronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
COMPLETED85 Analytics
NCT02549170A Study of HyQvia and Gammagard Liquid (Kiovig) in Adults With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
COMPLETED138 Analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of HYQVIA in Pediatric PIDD Subjects
Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PID)Unlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Long-Term Tolerability and Safety of HYQVIA/HyQvia in CIDP
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating PolyradiculoneuropathyUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study of HyQvia and Gammagard Liquid (Kiovig) in Adults With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating PolyradiculoneuropathyUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Rate Represented as Mean Number of Acute Serious Bacterial Infections (ASBI) Per Participant-year
From first dose of study drug up to end of Study Epoch 2 (up to approximately 37.2 months)

The rate of ASBI was defined as the mean number of ASBI per participant-year based on the United States (U.S.) Food and drugs Administration (FDA) guidance for industry to support marketing of human immune globulin intravenous (IGIV) as replacement therapy for primary humoral immunodeficiency and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) guideline on the clinical investigation of human normal immunoglobulin for SC and /or intramuscular administration. ASBI included bacteremia/sepsis, bacterial meningitis, osteomyelitis/septic arthritis, bacterial pneumonia, and visceral abscess, diagnosed according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Serious Bacterial Infections.

Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs), Regardless of Causality
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an investigational product (IP) that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An SAE was defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose met one or more of the following criteria: outcome was fatal/resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or resulted in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study.

Number of Participants With Causally Related Treatment-emergent SAEs and AEs
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An SAE was defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose met one or more of the following criteria: outcome was fatal/resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or resulted in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. Causality was used to determine whether there was a reasonable possibility that the IP was etiologically related to/associated with the AE.

Number of Participants With Adverse Reactions (ARs) or Suspected Adverse Reactions (SARs) Categorized as Serious and Non-serious
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AR plus SAR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Serious AR/SAR=any AR/SAR that is an untoward medical occurrence which at any dose meets one or more of following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity,is a congenital anomaly/birth defect,is a medically important event,thromboembolic events,hemolytic anemia. Nonserious AR/SAR=AR/SAR that does not meet the criteria.

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That May be a Result of Immune-Mediated Responses
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

Percentage of participants with TEAEs that may be a result of immune-mediated response to either immunoglobulin, rHuPH20, or other factors such as allergic reactions, immune complex-mediated reactions: local, complex-mediated reactions: systemic, thrombotic and embolic events were assessed. TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. The percentage was rounded off to the nearest decimal.

Number of Treatment-Emergent SAEs and AEs Associated With Infusions, Regardless of Causality
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An SAE was defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose met one or more of the following criteria: outcome was fatal/resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or resulted in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. AEs associated with an infusion are defined as AEs occurring after administration of IP (or any TEAE). Participants can have more than one TEAE associated with infusion.

Number of Causally Related Treatment-Emergent SAEs and AEs Associated With Infusions
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An SAE was defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose met one or more of the following criteria: outcome was fatal/resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or resulted in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. AEs associated with an infusion are defined as AEs occurring after administration of IP (or any TEAE). Causality was used to determine whether there was a reasonable possibility that the IP was etiologically related to/associated with the AE.

Number of TEAEs Temporally Associated With Infusions
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

TEAEs that occurred during infusion or within 72 hours post-infusion were considered to be temporally associated with infusions. TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. Participants can have more than one TEAE temporally associated with infusion.

Number of Serious and Non-Serious ARs or SARs Associated With Infusions
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AR/SAR=any AE that meets any of following criteria: AE considered by either investigator and/or sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following end of IP infusion,or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. ARs/SARs associated with an infusion=AEs considered by the investigator to be occurring after administration of IP. Serious AR/SAR=any AR/SAR that is an untoward medical occurrence which at any dose meets one or more of following criteria: outcome is fatal/results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or results in prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity,is a congenital anomaly/birth defect,is a medically important event,thromboembolic events,hemolytic anemia. Nonserious AR/SAR=AR/SAR that does not meet the criteria. Participants can have more than one AR/SAR associated with infusion.

Number of Infusions Associated With One or More Systemic TEAEs
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. Systemic TEAEs were defined as AEs that were not included in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" and did not contain the phrase "injection site". Infusions associated with one or more AEs are defined as follows: if an AE occurs after an infusion but prior to the next infusion that infusion is associated with that AE.

Number of Infusions Associated With One or More Local TEAEs
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. Local TEAEs were defined as AEs that were included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" or contained the phrase "injection site" or "infection site". Infusions associated with one or more AEs are defined as follows: if an AE occurs after an infusion but prior to the next infusion that infusion is associated with that AE.

Number of Infusions for Which the Infusion Rate Was Reduced and/or the Infusion Was Interrupted or Stopped Due to Intolerability and/or TEAEs
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study.

Rate of TEAEs Categorized as Systemic and Local Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. Systemic TEAEs were defined as AEs that were not included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" and did not contain the phrase "injection site". Local TEAEs were defined as AEs that were included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" or contained the phrase "injection site" or "infection site". Data for number of events per infusion was assessed at the group level calculated by dividing number of events by total number of infusions administered to participants in the Safety Analysis Set.

Rate of TEAEs Categorized as Systemic and Local Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. Systemic TEAEs were defined as AEs that were not included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" and did not contain the phrase "injection site". Local TEAEs were defined as AEs that were included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" or contained the phrase "injection site" or "infection site". Data for number of events per participant was assessed at the group level calculated by dividing number of events by total number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set.

Rate of TEAEs Categorized as Systemic and Local Regardless of Causality, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. Systemic TEAEs were defined as AEs that were not included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" and did not contain the phrase "injection site". Local TEAEs were defined as AEs that were included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" or contained the phrase "injection site" or "infection site". Events per participant-years was calculated as follows: 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the Safety Analysis Set, divided by 365.25).

Rate of IP-Related TEAEs Categorized as Systemic and Local, Expressed as Number of Events Per Infusion
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. Systemic TEAEs were defined as AEs that were not included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" and did not contain the phrase "injection site". Local TEAEs were defined as AEs that were included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" or contained the phrase "injection site" or "infection site". An adverse event that was "possibly related" or "probably related" to IP, or for which the relationship was unknown or missing, was considered as a "related AE". Data for number of events per infusion was assessed at the group level calculated by dividing number of events by total number of infusions administered to participants in the Safety Analysis Set.

Rate of IP-Related TEAEs Categorized as Systemic and Local, Expressed as Number of Events Per Participant
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. Systemic TEAEs were defined as AEs that were not included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" and did not contain the phrase "injection site". Local TEAEs were defined as AEs that were included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" or contained the phrase "injection site" or "infection site". An adverse event that was "possibly related" or "probably related" to IP, or for which the relationship was unknown or missing, was considered as a "related AE". Data for number of events per participant was assessed at the group level calculated by dividing number of events by total number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set.

Rate of IP-Related TEAEs Categorized as Systemic and Local, Expressed as Number of Events Per 1000 Participant-year
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. Systemic TEAEs were defined as AEs that were not included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" and did not contain the phrase "injection site". Local TEAEs were defined as AEs that were included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" or contained the phrase "injection site" or "infection site". An adverse event that was "possibly related" or "probably related" to IP, or for which the relationship was unknown or missing, was considered as a "related AE". Events per participant-years was calculated as follows: 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the Safety Analysis Set, divided by 365.25).

Rate of ARs or SARs Categorized as Local and Systemic, Expressed as Reactions Per Infusion
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AR plus SAR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Systemic AEs were defined as AEs that were not included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" and did not contain the phrase "injection site". Local AEs were defined as AEs that were included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" or contained the phrase "injection site" or "infection site". Data for number of events per infusion was assessed at the group level calculated by dividing number of events by total number of infusions administered to participants in the Safety Analysis Set.

Rate of ARs or SARs Categorized as Local and Systemic, Expressed as Reactions Per Participant
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AR plus SAR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Systemic AEs were defined as AEs that were not included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" and did not contain the phrase "injection site". Local AEs were defined as AEs that were included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" or contained the phrase "injection site" or "infection site". Data for number of events per participant was assessed at the group level calculated by dividing number of events by total number of participants in the Safety Analysis Set.

Rate of ARs or SARs Categorized as Local and Systemic, Expressed as Reactions Per 1000 Participant-year
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AR plus SAR is any AE that meets any of the following criteria: an AE considered by either the investigator and/or the sponsor to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion, or AE for which causality assessment is missing or indeterminate. Systemic AEs were defined as AEs that were not included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" and did not contain the phrase "injection site". Local AEs were defined as AEs that were included in the MedDRA Higher Level Group Term "administration site reactions" or contained the phrase "injection site" or "infection site". Events per participant-years was calculated as follows: 1000 x (number of events / total number of days of exposure, i.e., the sum of duration of treatment for all participants in the Safety Analysis Set, divided by 365.25).

Number of Participants With a TEAE That Led to Discontinuation From Study
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study.

Number of Participants With Moderate or Severe TEAEs That May be a Result of Immune-Mediated Responses
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. A moderate or severe AE could be a result of immune-mediated response to either immunoglobulin, rHuPH20, or other factors such as allergic reactions, immune complex-mediated reactions: local, complex-mediated reactions: systemic, thrombotic and embolic events. The severity of each AE was assessed by the investigator using clinical expertise based on the following description: moderate=AE produces limited impairment of function and may require therapeutic intervention and produces no sequela/sequelae; severe=AE results in a marked impairment of function and may lead to temporary inability to resume usual life pattern and produces sequela/sequelae, which require (prolonged) therapeutic intervention.

Rate of Moderate or Severe TEAEs That May be a Result of Immune-Mediated Responses, Expressed as Number of Events Per 100 Infusions
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered an IP that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. A moderate or severe AE could be a result of immune-mediated response to either immunoglobulin, rHuPH20, or other concomitant medications. The severity of each AE was assessed by the investigator using clinical expertise. Data for number of events per 100 infusions was assessed at the group level calculated by dividing number of events by total number of infusions and multiplying that by 100.

Number of Participants That Experienced Treatment-Emergent Local Infusion Site Reactions
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP in this Extension Study. AE=any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered an IP that does not have causal relationship with treatment. Adverse reaction/suspected adverse reaction=AE that is considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to IP administration, or for which the causality is indeterminate or missing, or that begins during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion. All local infusion site treatment-emergent AEs were reported as adverse reactions.

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Local Tolerability Events During Ramp-up
During the ramp-up (8 weeks)

Participants with local tolerability events were those for which the infusion rate was reduced and/or the infusion was interrupted or stopped due to intolerability and/or AEs. These events were assessed during the initial ramp-up for each participant i.e., during the first 8 weeks of open-label extension study 161505 \[NCT02955355\] among participants originally randomized to placebo (as being in the placebo arm, they had no ramp-up during the 161403 \[NCT02549170\] study) versus during the 8-week ramp-up for participants originally randomized to active HYQVIA in double-blind 161403 study. Thus, the data for this outcome measure are presented per the bifurcation of participants in the study 161403.

Number of Participants With Local Infusion Reactions, as a Function of Dosing Interval, Infusion Rate Per Site, and Infusion Volume Per Site
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

Local infusion reactions were defined as local (administration site-related) adverse events. Median infusion rate per site was derived as the median value across all participants, per participant's average infusion rate, by site: actual volume infused / duration in hours of infusion / number of sites. Median infusion volume per site was derived as the median value across all participants, per participant's average actual volume infused, by site: actual volume infused / number of sites. Number of participants with local infusion reactions as a function of each of the categories are presented below.

Number of Participants Whose Anti-Hyaluronidase Binding Antibody Titers Rose by ≥4-fold From Baseline
Baseline, up to 6.6 years

Number of participants whose anti-hyaluronidase antibody titers rose by ≥4 fold from the baseline value at any point during the study was assessed.

Number of Participants With Binding Antibodies to rHuPH20
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)

Binding antibodies were defined as anti-rHuPH20 titer ≥1:160.

Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies Binding to rHuPH20
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)
Number of Participants With a Decline of Anti-rHuPH20 Binding Antibody Titers to the Antibody Titer Level at Baseline in Study 161403 or to <1:160 Antibody Titer Level at the Study Completion or Early Discontinuation
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)
Number of Participants Who Had >1:10,000 Anti-rHuPH20 Binding Antibody Titers With Neutralizing Antibodies
From the first dose of study drug up to end of study (up to 6.6 years)
Epoch 1: Relapse Rate
Week 32 End of Epoch 1 Treatment (EOET1)/Unscheduled relapse visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination (ET)

Relapse rate is defined as the percentage of participants who experience a worsening of functional disability. Worsening of functional disability defined as an increase of \>=1 point relative to the pre- subcutaneous (SC) treatment baseline score in 2 consecutive adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score. The INCAT disability score is an effective and responsive tool to assess clinical response to treatment in CIDP. The disability score ranges from 0 to 10 points, where 0 is normal (eg, no upper limb problems and walking not affected) and 10 is severely incapacitated (eg, inability to move either arm for any purposeful movement and restricted to wheelchair, unable to stand and walk a few steps with help).

Epoch 2: Responder Rate
Up to 6 Months post-Epoch 1 (End of Epoch 2 Treatment [EOE2T])/Unscheduled visit assessment (UV)/Early Termination

Responder rate is defined as clinically meaningful improvement in functional ability defined as a decrease of \>=1 point in the adjusted INCAT disability score at the completion of the intravenous (IV) treatment period \[6 months\] or at the last study visit of the IV treatment period, relative to the pre-IV treatment baseline score.

Number of Participants Who Tolerated All Initiated HYQVIA Infusion
From start of the study drug administration up to Week 9

A tolerability event was considered to have occurred if an infusion was tolerable. An infusion was considered tolerable if the infusion rate was not reduced, or the infusion was not interrupted or stopped, due to an adverse event (AE) related to HYQVIA infusion. Tolerability was measured in terms of the number of participants for which the infusions was tolerable. Number of participants who tolerated all initiated HYQVIA Infusion were reported.

Secondary Endpoints

Rate Represented as Mean Number of All Infections Per Participant-year
From first dose of study drug up to end of Study Epoch 2 (up to approximately 37.2 months)
Epoch 2: Trough Levels of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Total and IgG Subclasses
Study Epoch 2, Year 1: Months 0, 6, and 12; Year 2: Months 18, 24 and 36
Epoch 2: Trough Levels of Specific Antibodies to Clinically Relevant Pathogens Categorized as Clostridium Tetani Toxoid and Hepatitis B Virus
Study Epoch 2, Year 2: Months 6, 24, and 36
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationNON_RANDOMIZED
MaskingNONE
ModelSINGLE_GROUP
PurposePREVENTION

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
Epoch 1EXPERIMENTALPediatric participants with PIDD who were on IV or non-HYQVIA SC treatment with immunoglobulin were enrolled and treated with HYQVIA SC with a dose or interval ramp-up period of up to six weeks. HYQVIA dose was planned to be equivalent to 100% (± 5%) of pre-study treatment. Dose frequency was one treatment interval of one week, then one treatment interval of two weeks for participants who were planned to be treated every three weeks, and one more treatment interval of three weeks for participants who were planned to be treated every four weeks.
Epoch 2EXPERIMENTALEpoch 1 was followed by Epoch 2 with HYQVIA treatment infusions given once every 3 or 4 weeks, depending on the participant's previous IV dosing schedule (for IV pretreated participants) and at the discretion of the investigator and participant (for SC-pretreated participants) up to approximately 36 months.
HYQVIA/HyQviaEXPERIMENTALParticipants received HYQVIA/HyQvia (recombinant human hyaluronidase \[rHuPH20\] at a dose of 80 units per gram (U/g) immunoglobulin G \[IgG\], followed by subcutaneous \[SC\] immune globulin infusion \[IGI\] 10%) at the same monthly equivalent dose as the individual participant's IgG treatment in Study 161403, every 3 or 4 weeks in this Extension Study for 77.3 months or until relapse.
Epoch 1: HYQVIA/HyQviaEXPERIMENTALParticipants received HYQVIA/HyQvia (rHuPH20) 80 U/g IG, following by SC injection of immunoglobulin (IGI) 10% at the same monthly equivalent IG dose as the individual participant's pre-randomized IG dose when administered every 2, 3, or 4 weeks for 30.28 weeks or until relapse.
Epoch 1: Placebo with rHuPH20PLACEBO_COMPARATORParticipants received rHuPH20 80 U/I0 mL placebo solution, followed by SC placebo infusion at matching infusion volume as the participant's pre-randomization monthly equivalent IG dose when administered every 2, 3, or 4 weeks for 31.54 weeks or until relapse.
Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEXPERIMENTALParticipants who were enrolled to receive placebo with rHuPH20 and achieved chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GGL/KIOVIG 2 g/kg bi-weekly (BW), followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 25.63 weeks or until relapse.
Epoch 2: E1: HYQVIA Relapse - E2: GGL/KIOVIGEXPERIMENTALParticipants who were enrolled to receive HYQVIA/HyQvia (rHuPH20) and achieved CIDP relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GGL/KIOVIG 2 g/kg BW, followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 28.67 weeks or until relapse.
Epoch 2: E1: Placebo Relapse - E2: GAMMUNEX-CEXPERIMENTALParticipants who were enrolled to receive placebo with rHuPH20 and achieved CIDP relapse during Epoch 1 received the induction dose of GAMMUNEX-C 2 g/kg BW, followed by IV infusion at the same monthly equivalent dose as the participant's pre-randomization IGIV dosing regimen when administered every 3 weeks for 24.33 weeks or until relapse.
Part 1 Schedule A: TA 1 (Low TDL HYQVIA)EXPERIMENTALParticipants received a subcutaneous (SC) infusion of HYQVIA 0.1 g/kg (1/4 of TDL) on Day 1 and 8, 0.2 g/kg (1/2 of TDL) on Day 15, 0.3 g/kg (3/4 of TDL) on Day 29 followed by 0.4 g/kg (full TDL) on Day 50 in Ramp-Up dosing manner.
Part 2 Schedule A: TA 4 (High TDL HYQVIA)EXPERIMENTALParticipants received a SC infusion of HYQVIA 0.25 g/kg (1/4 of TDL) on Day 1 and 8, 0.5 g/kg (1/2 of TDL) on Day 15, 0.75 g/kg (3/4 of TDL) on Day 29 followed by 1.0 g/kg (full TDL) on Day 50 in Ramp-Up dosing manner.
Part 1 Schedule B: TA 2 (Low TDL HYQVIA)EXPERIMENTALParticipants received a SC infusion of HYQVIA 0.2 g/kg (1/2 of TDL) on Day 1 and 15, followed by 0.4 g/kg (full TDL) on Day 29 and 57 in Ramp-Up dosing manner.
Part 2 Schedule B: TA 5 (High TDL HYQVIA)EXPERIMENTALParticipants received a SC infusion of HYQVIA 0.5 g/kg (1/2 of TDL) on Day 1 and 15, followed by 1.0 g/kg (full TDL) on Day 29 and 57 in Ramp-Up dosing manner.
Part 1 Schedule C: TA 3 (Low TDL HYQVIA)EXPERIMENTALParticipants received a SC infusion of HYQVIA 0.4 g/kg (full TDL) SC infusion on Day 1, 29 and 57 without Ramp-Up dosing manner.
Part 2 Schedule C: TA 6 (High TDL HYQVIA)EXPERIMENTALParticipants received a SC infusion of HYQVIA 1.0 g/kg (full TDL) SC infusion on Day 1, 29 and 57 without Ramp-Up dosing manner.

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
HYQVIABIOLOGICALImmune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) with Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (IGI, 10% with rHuPH20)
0.25% albumin placebo solution with rHuPH20BIOLOGICALParticipants will receive placebo solution (0.25% human albumin in Lactated Ringer's solution) and rHuPH20.
IGIV GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIGBIOLOGICALParticipants will receive GAMMAGARD LIQUID/KIOVIG
IGIV GAMUNEX®-CBIOLOGICALParticipants will receive GAMUNEX®-C
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range2 Years to 15 Years
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites19

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Participant must have a documented diagnosis of a form of primary immunodeficiency (PI) involving a defect in antibody formation and requiring gammaglobulin replacement, as defined according to the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS) Scientific Committee 201...

Countries:United StatesArgentinaBrazilCanadaColombiaCzechiaDenmarkFranceGermanyGreeceItalyMexicoPolandSerbiaSlovakiaSpainTurkey (Türkiye)United KingdomCroatiaIsraelNorwaySweden
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Frequently asked questions about HYQVIA

What is HYQVIA used for?

HYQVIA is an investigational therapy being studied for Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PID). It is also being evaluated in healthy volunteers for tolerability and pharmacokinetic studies. HYQVIA is developed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and is currently in Phase 3 clinical trials.

What does HYQVIA target?

HYQVIA is a monoclonal antibody therapy. It is being studied for its effects in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PID). The specific molecular target of HYQVIA is not disclosed in the available clinical trial information.

Who makes HYQVIA?

HYQVIA is developed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, which trades under the ticker TAK. Takeda is conducting Phase 3 clinical trials for HYQVIA in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PID).

What phase is HYQVIA in?

HYQVIA is in Phase 3 clinical development. It has completed two Phase 3 trials in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and one Phase 3 trial in Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PID). HYQVIA is investigational and not yet approved by regulatory authorities.

What clinical trials is HYQVIA in?

HYQVIA has completed several clinical trials, including NCT02549170 and NCT02955355 in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), NCT03277313 in Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PID), and NCT04578535 in healthy volunteers. These trials were Phase 3 and Phase 1 studies, all completed.

Is HYQVIA the same as HyQvia?

Yes, HYQVIA is also known as HyQvia. Clinical trial records refer to the therapy as both HYQVIA and HyQvia, including studies NCT02955355 and NCT04578535, which use the alternative name in their titles.