Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

KD025

Phase 4FDA approved 2021

Hepatic Impairment | Small molecule | Gastrointestinal |Sanofi|Trials Updated: Oct 16, 2026

KD025 development status

FDA approval Jul 16, 2021 as Rezurock
Approval holderKadmon Pharms Llc
ApplicationNDA214783
Highest phase Phase 4 (NCT06616415)
Phase scored for SNYPhase 1
Registered trials 21 across 8 sponsors since Nov 2019

Label indication REZUROCK is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with chronic graft-versus-host disease (chronic GVHD) after failure of at least two prior lines of systemic therapy. REZUROCK is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients 12 years and older with chronic graft-versus-host disease (chronic GVHD) after failure of at least two prior lines of… FDA label

KD025 target and mechanism

ModalitySmall molecule

Also known as belumosudil, Rho-associated Coiled-coil Kinase 2 Inhibitor KD025, ROCK-II Inhibitor KD025, ROCK2 Inhibitor KD025, SLx 2119, Belumosudil mesylate, SAR445761, Rezurock

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

CONTROLLED
Total Trials14
Total Enrollment1,225

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

KD025 clinical trials

KD025 · 14 trials · 12 indications

Phase 3 3Phase 2 5Phase 1 6
NCT07771439A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host DiseaseChronic Graft Versus Host Disease
NOT YET_RECRUITING356 Analytics
NCT06143891A Study to Test an Oral Medicine, Belumosudil, in Combination With Corticosteroids in Participants at Least 12 Years of Age With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease.Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING260 Analytics
NCT06082037A Study to Test How Effective Belumosudil Tablets Are for Treating Adult Participants With Chronic Lung Allograft DysfunctionLung Transplant Rejection
RECRUITING180 Analytics
PHASE3NOT YET_RECRUITING
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host DiseaseUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING
A Study to Test an Oral Medicine, Belumosudil, in Combination With Corticosteroids in Participants at Least 12 Years of Age With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease.
Chronic Graft Versus Host DiseaseUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3RECRUITING
A Study to Test How Effective Belumosudil Tablets Are for Treating Adult Participants With Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction
Lung Transplant RejectionUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Overall response rate
at week 24

Overall response rate at 24 weeks defined as the proportion of participants who achieve an overall response (PR or CR) without the requirement of new systemic therapy as per NIH consensus response criteria (2014) at Week 24.

Event-Free Survival (EFS)
Until the end of the study (up to 2.5 years since first patient in).

From the date of randomization to the date of any predefined event, whichever occurs first

Percent change from baseline to Week 26 in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)
Baseline to Week 26
Efficacy will be assessed using failure-free survival (FFS) at 48 weeks in the belumosudil + ruxolitinib 3rd-line phase (i.e. after initiation of the combination following documented ruxolitinib 2nd-line failure for chronic GvHD).
Enrollment to 24 and 48 weeks after combination therapy.

The proportion of responders and its 95% confidence interval (estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method) will be calculated.

Phase 1: AUC
Cycle 1 Day 15 after the last participant dosed in the phase 1 part.

PK parameter (AUC at steady state)

Proportion of participants who achieve an overall response (partial response [PR] or complete response [CR]) by Week 25 or Cycle 7 Day 1 whichever is first
Last participant completing 24 weeks (Week 25 visit or Cycle 7 Day 1 visit, whichever comes first) in the study

Proportion of participants who achieve an overall response (partial response \[PR\] or complete response \[CR\]) with up to 24 weeks of therapy (i.e. by the Week 25 or Cycle 7 Day 1 visit whichever is first), as defined by the National Institute of Health (NIH) Consensus response criteria

24-week Overall Response Rate (ORR) [Cohort A]
up to 24 weeks.

24-week ORR defined as the proportion of participants achieving BOS complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on change in FEV1 measurement per criteria of the 2014 NIH Consensus Conference.

24-week Overall Response Rate (ORR) [Cohort B]
up to 24 weeks.

24-week ORR defined as the proportion of participants achieving BOS complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on change in FEV1 measurement per criteria of the 2014 NIH Consensus Conference.

24-week Progression Rate [Cohort B]
up to 24 weeks.

24-week progression rate is defined as the proportion of participants experiencing BOS progression based on change in FEV1 measurement per criteria of the 2014 NIH Consensus Conference.

Duration of Response (DOR)
At Baseline (Day 1), Month 3 and every 3 months thereafter (+/-14 days), up to 23 months

DOR is defined as time from first documentation of response to time of first documentation of deterioration from best response (e.g., complete response \[CR\] to partial response \[PR\], or PR to Lack of response \[LR\]). As per the 2014 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Project for clinical trials in cGVHD criteria: CR was defined as resolution of all manifestations of cGVHD in each organ or site.PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site.LR included response status of mixed, unchanged, or progression.Mixed LR was defined as complete or partial response in at least 1 organ accompanied by progression in another organ. Unchanged LR was defined as outcomes that did not meet criteria for CR, PR, progression or mixed response. Progression LR was defined as progression in at least 1 organ or site without a response in any other organ or site. Confidence interval (CI) is calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Number of Participants With a >=7 Point Reduction (7PtR) From Baseline and >=7 Point Reduction From Baseline on 2 Consecutive Post-Baseline Assessments as Assessed by Lee Symptom Scale (LSS)
Baseline (Day 1) up to 23 months

The questionnaire asked participants to indicate the degree of bother that they experienced due to symptoms in 7 domains potentially affected by cGVHD. It consists of 30 items of 7 domains: skin, eyes and mouth, breathing, eating and digestion, muscles and joints, energy, and mental and emotional. Each question was rated/scored as 0-not at all, 1-slightly, 2-moderately, 3-quite a bit, 4-extremely with lower values representing better outcome. A domain score was calculated for each domain by taking the mean of all items completed if more than 50% were answered and normalizing to a 0 to 100 scale. A total score was calculated as average of all non-missing domain scores if more than 50% of them were non-missing, ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated more bothersome symptoms. A 7-point difference on the total score of cGVHD symptom scale was found to be clinically meaningful.

Duration of >=7 Point Reduction as Assessed by Lee Symptom Scale
Baseline (Day 1) up to 23 months

The questionnaire asked participants to indicate the degree of bother that they experienced due to symptoms in 7 domains potentially affected by cGVHD. It consisted of 30 items of 7 domains: skin, eyes and mouth, breathing, eating and digestion, muscles and joints, energy, and mental and emotional. Each question was rated/scored as 0-not at all, 1-slightly, 2-moderately, 3-quite a bit, 4-extremely with lower values representing better outcome. A domain score was calculated for each domain by taking the mean of all items completed if more than 50% were answered and normalizing to a 0 to 100 scale. A total score was calculated as average of all non-missing domain scores if more than 50% of them were non-missing, ranged from 0-100. A higher score indicated more bothersome symptoms. A 7-point difference on the total score of cGVHD symptom scale was found to be clinically meaningful. Mean of duration of \>=7PtR is presented.

Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
At Baseline (Day 1), Month 3 and every 3 months thereafter (+/-14 days), up to 23 months

The TTNT was measured as the time from first treatment to the time of new systemic cGVHD treatment, censored by last response assessment or long term follow up assessment, whichever was the latest and available. TTNT was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier survival method.

Failure-Free Survival (FFS)
At Baseline (Day 1), Month 3 and every 3 months thereafter (+/-14 days), up to 23 months

FFS was defined as the absence of new cGVHD systemic therapy, non-relapse mortality and recurrent malignancy (i.e. underlying disease) and was censored by last response assessment or long term follow up assessment, whichever was the latest and available. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis.

Overall Survival (OS)
From first dose of study drug (Day 1) to the date of death due to any cause, up to approximately 24 months

OS was defined as time from first dose of belumosudil to the date of death due to any cause. CI was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR)
At Baseline (Day 1), Month 3 and every 3 months thereafter (+/-14 days), up to 23 months

As per the 2014 NIH Consensus Development Project for clinical trials in cGVHD criteria: CR was defined as resolution of all manifestations of cGVHD in each organ or site. PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site.

Number of Participants With Best Response by Organ System
At Baseline (Day 1), Month 3 and every 3 months thereafter (+/-14 days), up to 23 months

The best response (CR, PR) for individual organs (skin, eyes, mouth, esophagus, upper gastrointestinal \[GI\], lower GI, liver, lungs, joints and fascia) was summarized. As per the 2014 NIH Consensus Development Project for clinical trials in cGVHD criteria, CR was defined as resolution of all manifestations of cGVHD in each organ or site. PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site.

Percent Change From Baseline in Corticosteroid Dose to Greatest Reduction
Baseline (Day 1) and Month 23

Change in corticosteroid doses was analyzed by using prednisone dose equivalents. If participants were not using prednisone as the systemic corticosteroid, then the prednisone dose equivalent would be determined according to following conversion ratios: 1 mg prednisone is equivalent to: 4.0 mg Hydrocortisone; 0.8 mg Methylprednisolone; 0.15 mg Dexamethasone; 1.0 mg Prednisolone and 0.8 mg Triamcinolone. Baseline was defined as the valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving the first study drug in parent study (KD025-208 \[NCT02841995\] or KD025-213 \[NCT03640481\]).

Number of Participants With Maximal Improvement From Baseline in Global Severity Rating (GSR) Based on Clinician-Reported Chronic Graft-Versus-Host-Disease Assessment
From Baseline (Day 1) up to 23 months

The GSR assessment was performed by asking the participants to rate their disease severity of cGVHD symptoms on a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale, where score 0 indicated 'not at all severe cGVHD symptoms' and score 10 indicated 'most severe cGVHD symptoms possible'. The response was defined using scores from 9 organs: skin, eyes, mouth, esophagus, upper GI track, lower GI tract, liver, lungs, and joints and fascia plus GSR. Baseline was defined as the valid and last non-missing value obtained within 28 days prior to participant receiving the first study drug in parent study (KD025-208 \[NCT02841995\] or KD025-213 \[NCT03640481\]). Maximal improvement from Baseline was calculated as lowest GSR score on scheduled visits minus GSR score at Baseline with possible ranges from -10 to 10. The lower the number means the better improvement in cGVHD symptoms.

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), Grade >=3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Deaths
From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug, approximately 24 months

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant associated with the use of a study drug, whether or not considered drug-related. Serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. The severity of each AE was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 scale. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TE period.

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR)
From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progression or death due to any cause or data cut-off, whichever occurred first (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)

OR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). The OR determination of chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) was based on cGVHD response assessment performed by clinicians as per the 2014 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Project for Clinical Trials in cGVHD criteria. CR was defined as the resolution of all manifestations in each organ or site. PR was defined as the improvement in at least 1 organ or site without progression in any other organ or site; and cGVHD progression was defined as the clinically meaningful worsening in 1 or more organs regardless of improvement in other organs.

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
From first dose of study drug up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug (maximum duration: up to 64.2 months)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug). TEAEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs.

AUClast
Baseline (H0) to Day 3 (H48) for each of the 2 periods

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve until the time of last quantifiable concentration

Cmax
Baseline (H0) to Day 3 (H48) for each of the 2 periods

Maximum plasma concentration observed

AUC(0-last)- Parts 1,2, and 3 (victim drugs)
Multiple timepoints up to approximately 15 days

Area under the curve from time 0 to the time of last measurable concentration

AUC(0-inf)- Parts 1,2, and 3 (victim drugs
Multiple timepoints up to approximately 15 days

Area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity

PK: AUC(0-inf)
Day 1 through Day 3

Area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity

PK: AUC(0-t)
Day 1 through Day 3

Area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration

PK: C(max)
Day 1 through Day 3

Maximum observed concentration

PK: t(max)
Day 1 through Day 3

Time of the observed maximum concentration

PK: t(1/2)
Day 1 through Day 3

Terminal elimination half-life

PK: t(last)
Day 1 through Day 3

Time of the last measurable concentration

PK: CL/F
Day 1 through Day 3

Apparent total clearance

PK: Vz/F
Day 1 through Day 3

Apparent volume of distribution

Number of participants with adverse events and serious adverse events
Up to approximately 58 days

Secondary Endpoints

Time from the date of randomization to the date of start of new systemic treatment for cGVHD, relapse or recurrence of underlying disease, or death, whichever occurs first.
Until the end of study, up to approximately 3 years from Last Participant In
Proportion of participants achieving at least 6-point reduction from baseline in the modified Lee cGVHD Symptom Scale score at Week 24.
at 24 week
Proportion of participants who achieve an overall response (CR or PR) within up to 24 weeks and without the requirement of new systemic therapy as per NIH consensus response criteria (2014).
up to 24 weeks
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingNONE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
BelumosudilEXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive belumosudil
best available therapy(BAT)OTHERParticipants will receive BAT based on the Investigator's judgment
PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATORParticipants will receive matching placebo tablets PO QD per 28-day cycles starting on Day 1 until discontinuation criteria are met or until end of study
Belumosudil + AzithromycinEXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive 200 mg belumosudil orally once daily
Placebo + AzithromycinPLACEBO_COMPARATORParticipants will receive placebo orally once daily
Combination therapy with two oral agents (belumosudil, ruxolitinib)EXPERIMENTALRuxolitinib monotherapy as second line treatment for up to 48 weeks. Upon documented ruxolitinib failure, patients transition to belumosudil and ruxolitinib combination 3rd line therapy for 48 weeks (i.e. 12 cycles), until progression of cGVHD, or intolerance to either agent, whichever occurs sooner. Patients will be monitored for documented individual efficacy/safety/toxicity as third line treatment in cGvHD patients.
Cohort A: Belumosudil + Standard of Care MedicationsEXPERIMENTAL30 participants with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) will complete study procedures as follows: * Drug diary * CT scans at Cycles 3 and 7 and at End of Treatment. * Cycle 1 * Day 1 - 28 of 28-day cycle: Predetermined dose of Belumosudil 1x daily. * Predetermined doses of Fluticasone, Montelukast, and Prednisone 1x daily. * Predetermined dose of azithromycin 3 days per treatment week. * Cycle 2 - 3 * Day 1 - 28 of 28-day cycle: Predetermined dose of Belumosudil 1x daily. * Predetermined doses of Fluticasone Montelukast 1x daily. Predetermined doses of Prednisone 1x daily at treating physician's discretion. * Predetermined dose of azithromycin 3 days per treatment week. * Cycle 4 - 12 * Day 1 - 28 of 28-day cycle: Predetermined dose of Belumosudil 1x daily. * Predetermined doses of Fluticasone and Montelukast 1x daily. * Predetermined dose of azithromycin 3 days per treatment week.
Cohort B: BelumosudilEXPERIMENTAL15 participants with signs concerning developing BOS will complete study procedure as follows: * Drug diary * CT scans at Cycles 3 and 7 and at End of Treatment. * Cycle 1 - 12 - Day 1 - 28 of 28-day cycle: Predetermined dose of Belumosudil 1x daily.
Arm A: belumosudil 200 mg QDEXPERIMENTALThe assigned arm is per the previous study KD025-213 or study KD025-208
Arm B: belumosudil 200 mg BIDEXPERIMENTALThe assigned arm is per the previous study KD025-213 or study KD025-208
Arm C: belumosudil 400 mg QDEXPERIMENTALThe assigned arm is per the previous study KD025-213 or study KD025-208
Cohort 1: Belumosudil 200 mg QDEXPERIMENTALParticipants received belumosudil 200 mg orally QD in each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurred first (maximum duration: 64.2 months).
Cohort 2: Belumosudil 200 mg BIDEXPERIMENTALParticipants received belumosudil 200 mg orally BID in each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurred first (maximum duration: 45.9 months).
Cohort 3: Belumosudil 400 mg QDEXPERIMENTALParticipants received belumosudil 400 mg orally QD in each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death whichever occurred first (maximum duration: 49.2 months).
belumosudil tablet,then belumosudil oral suspensionEXPERIMENTALbelumosudil tablet in period 1, then belumosudil oral suspension in period 2.
belumosudil oral suspension, then belumosudil tabletEXPERIMENTALbelumosudil oral suspension in period 1, then belumosudil tablet in period 2.
Part 1EXPERIMENTALBelumosudil + UGT1A1 victim drug administered in the fed state
Part 2EXPERIMENTALBelumosudil + P-gp victim drug administered in the fed state
Part 3EXPERIMENTALBelumosudil + OATP1B1/BCRP victim drug administered in the fed state
Normal Hepatic Function (Group 1--Control)EXPERIMENTALMatched healthy subjects with normal hepatic function
Mild Hepatic Impairment (Group 2)EXPERIMENTALSubjects with mild hepatic impairment based on Child-Pugh Class A score of 5 or 6
Moderate Hepatic Impairment (Group 3)EXPERIMENTALSubjects with moderate hepatic impairment based on Child-Pugh Class B score of 7 to 9
Severe Hepatic Impairment (Group 4)EXPERIMENTALSubjects with severe hepatic impairment based on Child-Pugh Class C score of 10 to 14
KD025EXPERIMENTAL500 mg KD025 administered orally twice daily (BID) for 28 days
Cohort 1EXPERIMENTAL500 mg KD025 or placebo once daily (QD) for 7 days
Cohort 2EXPERIMENTAL800 mg KD025 or placebo QD for 7 days
Cohort 3EXPERIMENTAL500 mg KD025 or placebo twice daily (BID) for 7 days
Cohort 4EXPERIMENTAL1000 mg KD025 or placebo QD for 7 days
Dose level 1EXPERIMENTALSingle Oral Doses of 20 mg SLx-2119 or placebo on Day 1
Dose level 2EXPERIMENTALSingle Oral Doses of 40 mg SLx-2119 or placebo on Day 1
Dose level 3EXPERIMENTALSingle Oral Doses of 80 mg SLx-2119 or placebo on Day 1
Dose level 4EXPERIMENTALSingle Oral Doses of 160 mg SLx-2119 or placebo on Day 1
Dose level 5EXPERIMENTALSingle Oral Doses of 320 mg SLx-2119 or placebo on Day 1
Dose level 6EXPERIMENTALSingle Oral Doses of 640 mg SLx-2119 or placebo on Day 1

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
BelumosudilDRUGPharmaceutical form:Tablet-Route of administration:oral
Best available therapy (BAT)OTHERParticipants will receive BAT based on the Investigator's judgment
PlaceboDRUGPharmaceutical form:Table-Route of administration:oral
PrednisoneDRUGPharmaceutical form:Tablet-Route of administration:oral
PrednisoloneDRUGPharmaceutical form:Tablet-Route of administration:oral
AzithromycinDRUGDepends on pharmaceutical presentation, Oral
RuxolitinibDRUGPatients receive ruxolitinib (10 mg twice daily) alone for one 28-day cycle for up to 48 weeks. Upon documentation of ruxolitinib failure, patients will begin taking belumosudil in addition to ruxolitinib, at a dose of 200 mg OD or 200 mg BID (if on a PPI) for 48 weeks total (i.e. 12 cycles), unless cGvHD progresses or side effects become intolerable.
FluticasoneDRUGVia inhalation by metered-dose inhaler.
MontelukastDRUGLeukotriene Receptor Antagonist, taken orally
Belumosudil 200 mg QDDRUGBelumosudil is an orally available Rho-associated protein kinase-2 (ROCK2) selective inhibitor.
Belumosudil 200 mg BIDDRUGBelumosudil is an orally available Rho-associated protein kinase-2 (ROCK2) selective inhibitor.
Belumosudil 400 mg QDDRUGBelumosudil is an orally available Rho-associated protein kinase-2 (ROCK2) selective inhibitor.
Belumosudil (KD025)DRUGPharmaceutical form: Capsules or Tablets Route of administration: Oral
UGT1A1 victim drugDRUGPharmaceutical form: Tablet; Route of administration: Oral
P-gp victim drugDRUGPharmaceutical form: Capsule; Route of administration: Oral
OATP1B1/BCRP victim drugDRUGPharmaceutical form: Tablet; Route of administration: Oral
KD025DRUGSingle dose of 200 mg KD025 orally
Belumosudil mesylateDRUGPharmaceutical form: capsule; Route of administration: oral
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range12 Years to N/A
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo

Inclusion Criteria: * Participant must be at least 12 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent. * Participants who have undergone allo-HCT. * Participants with active moderate to severe cGVHD at the time of enrollment, defined using the NIH Consensus diagnosis and staging criteria f...

Countries:United StatesArgentinaAustraliaAustriaBelgiumBrazilCanadaChinaCzechiaDenmarkFranceGermanyGreeceHong KongIsraelItalyNetherlandsPolandPortugalSouth KoreaSpainSwedenTurkey (Türkiye)United KingdomFinlandHungaryJapan
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Recent Changes (Last 90 Days)

LOWOct 16, 2026NCT06143891lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWOct 16, 2026NCT06143891lastUpdatePostDate: changed
MEDIUMOct 2, 2026NCT07643025Enrollment: 63 → 53
MEDIUMOct 2, 2026NCT07643025Enrollment: 63 → 53
LOWSep 23, 2026NCT06082037lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 23, 2026NCT06082037lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 22, 2026NCT07116031lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 22, 2026NCT07116031lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 16, 2026NCT07771439lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 16, 2026NCT07771439lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 16, 2026NCT07771439lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWSep 16, 2026NCT07771439lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWAug 24, 2026NCT07116031lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWAug 24, 2026NCT07116031lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWAug 18, 2026NCT07771439NEW_TRIAL: changed
LOWAug 18, 2026NCT07771439NEW_TRIAL: changed
LOWJul 24, 2026NCT07726914NEW_TRIAL: changed
LOWJul 24, 2026NCT07726914NEW_TRIAL: changed

Frequently asked questions about KD025

What is KD025 used for?

KD025 is an investigational small molecule being studied for hepatic impairment, a condition in which the liver is unable to function normally. It is being evaluated in a clinical trial that includes subjects with varying degrees of hepatic impairment as well as those with normal hepatic function.

Who makes KD025?

KD025 is being developed by Sanofi, a biopharmaceutical company listed on the stock exchange under the ticker symbol SNY. The company is conducting clinical research on this investigational drug for hepatic impairment.

What phase is KD025 in?

KD025 is in Phase 1 clinical development. It is an investigational drug, meaning it has not been approved by regulatory authorities and is still undergoing clinical trials to evaluate its safety and effects in humans.

What clinical trials is KD025 in?

KD025 has one completed clinical trial registered under NCT04166942, titled "KD025 Hepatic Impairment Study With Normal Hepatic Function and Subjects With Varying Degrees of Hepatic Impairment." This Phase 1 study enrolled 35 participants in the United States and included healthy volunteers.

Is KD025 the same as other drugs?

KD025 is not known to have alternative names. It is a distinct investigational small molecule being developed by Sanofi for hepatic impairment. No other names for this drug have been reported.