Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Faricimab

Phase 3

Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia | Small molecule | Ophthalmology |Roche Holding AG|Last Updated: Jul 31, 2026

Target and mechanism

Molecular targetANGPT2, VEGFA
Target classInhibitor
ModalitySmall molecule

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedDouble-BlindACTIVE_CONTROLLEDDMC
Total Trials1
Total Enrollment280

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

Clinical trial landscape

Faricimab · 12 trials · 12 indications

Phase 3 8Phase 2 4
NCT06790784Faricimab + PRP vs. Vitrectomy + Endolaser for Treatment of PDRProliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)
RECRUITING426 Analytics
NCT06176352A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic MyopiaChoroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia
COMPLETED280 Analytics
NCT04777201A Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Faricimab in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular DegenerationNeovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
COMPLETED1,036 Analytics
NCT04740905A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Participants With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein OcclusionMacular Edema
COMPLETED553 Analytics
NCT04740931A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Participants With Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein OcclusionMacular Edema
COMPLETED729 Analytics
NCT04432831A Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Faricimab in Participants With Diabetic Macular EdemaDiabetic Macular Edema
COMPLETED1,479 Analytics
NCT03823300A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (LUCERNE)Wet Macular Degeneration
COMPLETED658 Analytics
NCT03823287A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (TENAYA)Wet Macular Degeneration
COMPLETED671 Analytics
PHASE3RECRUITING
Faricimab + PRP vs. Vitrectomy + Endolaser for Treatment of PDR
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)Unlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Patients With Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia
Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic MyopiaUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Faricimab in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Neovascular Age-related Macular DegenerationUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Participants With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Macular EdemaUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Participants With Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion
Macular EdemaUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Faricimab in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Macular EdemaUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (LUCERNE)
Wet Macular DegenerationUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (TENAYA)
Wet Macular DegenerationUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Visual Acuity Change from Baseline
Baseline to 3- years

Visual acuity is measured as a continuous integer letter score from 0 to 100, with higher numbers indicating better visual acuity. A letter score of 85 is approximately 20/20 and a letter score of 70 is approximately 20/40.

Number of Post-Randomization Treatments for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
Over 3 Years

Initial randomized treatment will be excluded.

Change from Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Averaged Over Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Baseline and Average of Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Incidence and Severity of Ocular Adverse Events in the Study Eye, With Severity Determined According to Adverse Event Severity Grading Scale
From the date of first administration of faricimab through 28 days after the end of study (up to 2 years)

This is an analysis of participants with at least one ocular adverse event (AE) that occurred in the study eye. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of the seriousness, severity (e.g., mild, moderate, or severe intensity), and causality for each AE. AEs of special interest (AESI) included the following: Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, are associated with severe intraocular inflammation (IOI), or require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight; suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; and, cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law.

Incidence of Ocular Adverse Events in the Fellow Eye
From the date of first administration of faricimab through 28 days after the end of study (up to 2 years)

This is an analysis of participants with at least one ocular adverse event (AE) that occurred in the study eye. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of the seriousness, severity, and causality for each AE. AEs of special interest (AESI) included the following: Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, are associated with severe intraocular inflammation (IOI), or require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight; suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; and, cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law.

Incidence and Severity of Non-Ocular Adverse Events, With Severity Determined According to Adverse Event Severity Grading Scale
From the date of first administration of faricimab through 28 days after the end of study (up to 2 years)

This is an analysis of participants with at least one non-ocular (systemic) adverse event (AE). Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of the seriousness, severity (e.g., mild, moderate, or severe intensity), and causality for each AE. AEs of special interest (AESI) included the following: Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, are associated with severe intraocular inflammation (IOI), or require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight; suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; and, cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law.

Substudy: Percent Change in Corneal Endothelial Cell Density From Baseline at 1 Year in the Study Eye as Compared With the Fellow Eye
Baseline and 1 year

Specular microscopy was performed for both eyes prior to application of any topical ophthalmic anesthetic, tonometry, or any other study treatment on the same day for the evaluation of corneal endothelial cell (CEC) density. The 1-year timepoint was defined as the earliest substudy visit closest to Week 52 occurring between Week 48 and Week 64. Data (from both study eye and fellow eye) collected after the fellow eye's use of prohibited therapies-such as faricimab, brolucizumab, bevacizumab, and Port Delivery System implantation-were excluded from the corneal endothelial cell analysis.

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at Week 24
From Baseline through Week 24

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis included the categorical covariates of treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), and randomization stratification factors \[baseline BCVA (≥55 and ≤54 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world)\] as fixed effects. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM model assuming missing at random. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) was applied to all intercurrent events (discontinuation of treatment due to AEs or lack of efficacy, use of prohibited therapy). 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 40, 44, and 48
From Baseline through Week 48

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The Mixed Model of Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis adjusted for treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), baseline BCVA (≥74, 73-55, and ≤54 letters), baseline LLD (\<33 and ≥33 letters), and region (U.S. and Canada, Asia, and rest of the world). An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.03% CI.

Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Improvement From Baseline on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) in the Study Eye at Week 24
Baseline and Week 24

The ETDRS DRSS score of each participant's study eye was assessed using ultra-wide field color fundus photography (UWF-CFP) taken by trained personnel at the study sites. Analysis of the fundus photographs was performed by the central reading center, and the percentage of participants with a ≥2-step improvement from baseline was summarized along with a two-sided 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval. Baseline was defined as the participant's last observation prior to initiation of study drug.

Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 40, Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) BCVA Charts
Baseline, Week 40

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at a starting test distance of 4 meters was measured using a set of three Precision VisionTM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified visual acuity examiner. The BCVA examiner was masked to study eye and treatment assignment and only performed the refraction and BCVA assessment. The BCVA examiner was also masked to the BCVA letter scores of a participant's previous visits and could only know the refraction data from previous visits. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The analysis was performed using a Mixed Model for Repeated Measurement (MMRM) model, which included an unstructured covariance and the categorical covariates of treatment group, visit, and visit by treatment group interaction and the continuous covariate of baseline BCVA.

Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA Letter Score at Week 24, in Treatment-Naive Participants
Baseline, Week 24

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at a starting test distance of 4 meters was measured using a set of three Precision VisionTM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified visual acuity examiner masked to study drug arm assignment. The BCVA examiner was masked to study eye and treatment assignment and only performed the refraction and BCVA assessment, but was not allowed to perform any other tasks involving direct care. The BCVA examiner was also masked to the BCVA letter scores of a participant's previous visits and could only know the participant's refraction data from previous visits. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The primary analysis used a Linear Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measurements. Missing values were not imputed; it was assumed that the data were missing at random.

Mean Change From Baseline in BCVA Letter Score at Week 36, in Treatment-Naive Participants
Baseline, Week 36

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at a starting test distance of 4 meters was measured using a set of three Precision VisionTM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified visual acuity examiner masked to study drug arm assignment. The BCVA examiner was masked to study eye and treatment assignment and only performed the refraction and BCVA assessment, but was not allowed to perform any other tasks involving direct care. The BCVA examiner was also masked to the BCVA letter scores of a participant's previous visits and could only know the refraction data from previous visits. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The primary analysis used a Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measurements (MMRM). Missing data were implicitly imputed by the MMRM, assuming a missing-at-random mechanism.

Mean Change From Week 12 in BCVA Letter Score at Week 36, in Anti-VEGF Incomplete Responders
Weeks 12 and 36

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at a starting test distance of 4 meters was measured using a set of three Precision VisionTM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R) prior to dilating eyes by a trained and certified visual acuity examiner masked to study drug arm assignment. The BCVA examiner was masked to study eye and treatment assignment and only performed the refraction and BCVA assessment, but was not allowed to perform any other tasks involving direct care. The BCVA examiner was also masked to the BCVA letter scores of a participant's previous visits and could only know the refraction data from previous visits. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The primary analysis used a Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measurements (MMRM). Missing data were implicitly imputed by the MMRM, assuming a missing-at-random mechanism.

Secondary Endpoints

Change from Baseline in BCVA Over Time
From Baseline through Week 48
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA from Baseline Averaged Over Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Baseline and Average of Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA from Baseline Over Time
From Baseline through Week 48
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingSINGLE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
Faricimab + PRPEXPERIMENTALPRP = Panretinal Photocoagulation
Vitrectomy + EndolaserACTIVE_COMPARATOR -
Arm A: FaricimabEXPERIMENTALAll participants randomly assigned to Arm A will receive faricimab 6 mg at Day 1. Once every 4 weeks (Q4W) after Day 1, participants will receive treatment with faricimab on a pro re nata (PRN) basis dependent on prespecified retreatment criteria.
Arm B: RanibizumabACTIVE_COMPARATORAll participants randomly assigned to Arm B will receive ranibizumab 0.5 mg at Day 1. Once every 4 weeks (Q4W) after Day 1, participants will receive treatment with ranibizumab on a pro re nata (PRN) basis dependent on prespecified retreatment criteria.
Main Study: Faricimab PTIEXPERIMENTAL -
Substudy: Faricimab PTIEXPERIMENTAL -
Arm A: Faricimab Q4W (Part 1), Faricimab PTI (Part 2)EXPERIMENTALIn Part 1 (Day 1 through Week 24), participants randomly assigned to Arm A will receive faricimab 6 milligrams (mg) by IVT injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Day 1 through Week 20 (a total of 6 injections). In Part 2 (from Week 24 to Week 72), participants will receive faricimab 6 mg by IVT injection according to a personalized treatment interval (PTI) dosing regimen. To preserve masking for Part 2, a sham procedure will be administered during study visits at which no faricimab treatment is administered (according to the PTI dosing regimen).
Arm B: Aflibercept Q4W (Part 1), Faricimab PTI (Part 2)ACTIVE_COMPARATORIn Part 1 (Day 1 through Week 24), participants randomly assigned to Arm B will receive aflibercept 2 milligrams (mg) by IVT injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Day 1 through Week 20 (a total of 6 injections). In Part 2 (from Week 24 to Week 72), participants will receive faricimab 6 mg by IVT injection according to a personalized treatment interval (PTI) dosing regimen. To preserve masking for Part 2, a sham procedure will be administered during study visits at which no faricimab treatment is administered (according to the PTI dosing regimen).
Faricimab PTIEXPERIMENTAL -
Arm B: AfliberceptACTIVE_COMPARATOR -
FaricimabEXPERIMENTAL -
AfliberceptACTIVE_COMPARATOR -
6 mg Faricimab Q12WEXPERIMENTAL6 mg faricimab was given by intravitreal (IVT) injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) up to Week 12 (4 injections), followed by 6 mg faricimab IVT injection once every 12 weeks (Q12W) from Week 24 up to Week 48 (injections at Weeks 24, 36, and 48; 3 injections).
6 mg Faricimab Q16WEXPERIMENTAL6 mg faricimab was administered by IVT injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) up to Week 12 (4 injections), followed by no doses up to Week 24 when a protocol-defined assessment of disease activity was performed. Participants with disease activity at Week 24 initiated 6 mg faricimab IVT Q12W dosing, and participants without disease activity at Week 24 initiated 6 mg faricimab IVT once every 16 weeks (Q16W) dosing for the remainder of the study.
0.5 mg Ranibizumab Q4WACTIVE_COMPARATOR0.5 mg of ranibizumab was administered by IVT injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 48 weeks (13 injections).
Arm A: 0.3 mg RanibizumabACTIVE_COMPARATORParticipants will receive 0.3 milligrams (mg) ranibizumab every fourth week up to Week 20, for a total of 6 administrations, followed by an observational period up to Week 36. If a participant meets pre-specified criteria the participant will receive a single dose of 0.3 mg ranibizumab and exit the study.
Arm B: 1.5 mg FaricimabEXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive 1.5 mg faricimab every fourth week up to Week 20, for a total of 6 administrations, followed by an observational period up to Week 36. If a participant meets pre-specified criteria the participant will receive a single dose of 0.3 mg ranibizumab and exit the study.
Arm C: 6 mg FaricimabEXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive 6 mg faricimab every fourth week up to Week 20, for a total of 6 administrations, followed by an observational period up to Week 36. If a participant meets pre-specified criteria the participant will receive a single dose of 0.3 mg ranibizumab and exit the study.
Arm A: Ranibizumab, 0.5 mg Every 4 Weeks (Q4W)ACTIVE_COMPARATORParticipants will receive ranibizumab, 0.5 milligrams (mg) intravitreal (IVT) Q4W up to Week 32 (total 9 injections). The final study visit will take place at Week 36.
Arm B: Faricimab, 1.5 mg Q4WEXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive faricimab 1.5 mg IVT Q4W up to Week 32 (total 9 injections). The final study visit will take place at Week 36.
Arm C: Faricimab, 6 mg Q4WEXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive faricimab 6 mg IVT Q4W up to Week 32 (9 injections). The final study visit will take place at Week 36.
Arm D: Faricimab, 6 mg Every 4-8 weeksEXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive faricimab, 6 mg IVT Q4W up to Week 12 (4 injections), followed by 6 mg IVT every 8 weeks up to Week 28 (2 injections). On Weeks 16, 24, and 32, participants received the sham procedure in order to maintain masking. The final study visit will take place at Week 36.
Arm E: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + Faricimab 6 mg Q4WEXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive ranibizumab, 0.5 mg IVT Q4W up to Week 8 (3 injections), followed by faricimab, 6 mg IVT Q4W up to Week 32 (6 injections). The final study visit will take place at Week 36.

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
VitrectomyPROCEDUREThe vitrectomy must occur within 4 weeks of randomization. A single injection of faricimab is allowed at any point before the vitrectomy. It is recommended that this injection is within 1 week of the vitrectomy. Requirement of triamcinolone staining to assist in complete elevation and removal of the posterior hyaloid and in removal of as much peripheral vitreous as is safely possible, 20 gauge not permitted. Allows subconjunctival steroid at investigator discretion; however, sub-tenon's triamcinolone or other long-acting steroid will not be permitted.
EndolaserDEVICEComplete panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) during vitrectomy
FaricimabDRUGTreatment must be initiated on the day of randomization with one faricumab injection. The remainder of the randomized treatment includes 2 additional injections every 4-weeks. Injections must be completed within 90 days of randomization.
Panretinal Photocoagulation (PRP)DEVICEComplete PRP. PRP may be completed in 1-3 sessions, with the timing at the investigator's discretion. All PRP sessions must be completed within 90 days of randomization.
RanibizumabDRUGRanibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal (IVT) injection on Day 1 with Q4W PRN treatment thereafter to Week 44. At Week 48, participants will attend a follow-up visit.
Sham ProcedurePROCEDUREThe sham is a procedure that mimics an intravitreal (IVT) injection, but involves the blunt end of an empty syringe (without a needle) being pressed against the anesthetized eye. Participants will undergo the sham procedure at study visits where no study drug is to be administered, in order to maintain masking.
Anti-VEGF TherapyDRUGAt the discretion of the principal investigator, participants were allowed to have their fellow (non-study) eye treated with the standard of care anti-VEGF therapy (if needed) according to region-specific anti-VEGF prescribing information for the recommended dose and frequency of treatment.
AfliberceptDRUGAflibercept 2 mg will be administered by IVT injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Day 1 through Week 20 (a total of 6 injections).
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range18 Years to N/A
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites30

Inclusion Criteria: Individual: * ≥ 18 years old * Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) Study Eye:(A participant can have one or two study eyes if both eyes are eligible at screening.) * Presence of PDR requiring treatment, defined as moderate PDR or worse on global grading of ultra...

Countries:United StatesAustraliaChinaFranceGermanyHong KongItalyPolandSingaporeSouth KoreaSpainTaiwanArgentinaAustriaBrazilBulgariaCanadaDenmarkHungaryIsraelJapanMexicoNetherlandsPortugalRussiaSwitzerlandTurkey (Türkiye)United KingdomCzechiaPeruSlovakiaThailand
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Recent Changes (Last 90 Days)

MEDIUMAug 31, 2026NCT06176352TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMAug 31, 2026NCT06176352TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMAug 31, 2026NCT06176352TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMAug 31, 2026NCT06176352TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMJul 16, 2026NCT04597918TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMJul 16, 2026NCT04597918TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMJul 16, 2026NCT04597918TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMJul 10, 2026NCT06176352TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMJul 10, 2026NCT06176352TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMJul 10, 2026NCT06176352TRIAL_REMOVED: changed

Frequently asked questions about Faricimab

What is Faricimab used for?

Faricimab is an investigational antibody being developed for ophthalmology indications including choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia, macular edema, diabetic macular edema, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, wet macular degeneration, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. It is being studied in clinical trials for these conditions.

What does Faricimab target?

Faricimab is a monoclonal antibody, indicated by its -mab suffix. It is being developed to treat retinal diseases such as diabetic macular edema and wet macular degeneration. The specific molecular target is not disclosed in the available information.

Who makes Faricimab?

Faricimab is being developed by Roche Holding AG, which trades under the ticker RHHBY. The company is conducting clinical trials to evaluate the drug's safety and efficacy in various retinal conditions.

What phase is Faricimab in?

Faricimab is in clinical development, with trials listed as Phase 2 and Phase 3. It is not approved by the FDA and remains investigational. The development program includes completed trials in diabetic macular edema and choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia.

What clinical trials is Faricimab in?

Faricimab has been studied in several trials, including NCT02699450, a Phase 2 study in diabetic macular edema with 229 participants, and NCT04432831, a Phase 3 long-term safety study with 1,479 participants. NCT04597918 is a Phase 2 biomarker study, and NCT06176352 is a Phase 3 trial in choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia.

Is Faricimab the same as RO6867461?

Yes, Faricimab is also known as RO6867461. The clinical trial NCT02699450, titled 'A Study of Faricimab (RO6867461) in Participants With Center-Involving Diabetic Macular Edema,' uses this alternative name to refer to the same drug.