Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

2% urea/20% glycerol

Phase 2

Dermatitis, Atopic | Small molecule | Dermatology |Perrigo Company plc|Trials Updated: Dec 20, 2021

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedDouble-BlindACTIVE_CONTROLLED
Total Trials1
Total Enrollment50

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

2% urea/20% glycerol clinical trials

2% urea/20% glycerol · 1 trial · 1 indication

Phase 2 1
NCT03901144A NOVel Moisturiser for Atopic Dermatitis: Effect on the Skin BarrierDermatitis, Atopic
COMPLETED50 Analytics
PHASE2COMPLETED
A NOVel Moisturiser for Atopic Dermatitis: Effect on the Skin Barrier
Dermatitis, AtopicUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Skin Barrier Strengthening Effect by Measurement of Trans Epidermal Water Loss (TEWL) Before and After Induction of Skin Irritation
day 29 prior to irritant application and day 31 following application

The change in TEWL from treated and untreated skin before and after induction of skin irritation with SLS. SLS increases TEWL. An effective treatment protects skin from irritation and less TEWL increase is anticipated compared to untreated skin

Skin Barrier Strengthening Effect by Measurement of Skin Redness Before and After Induction of Skin Irritation as Assessed by the Erythema Index (Change From Day 29 to Day 31)
The 2D Skin Imaging was performed on day 15, day 29 and on day 31. Only day 29 and 31 was included in the statistical analysis

Skin redness measurement by Objective Erythema (2D Skin Imaging) on treated and untreated skin before (day 29) and after (day 31) induction of skin irritation with SLS. Captured 2D images are analysed to determine the skin erythema index (degree of redness, arbitrary numerical value), where a higher value denotes a stronger reaction/more redness. An effective treatment is anticipated to protect the skin from irritation, i.e. a weaker reaction from SLS/less redness compared to the untreated skin. Data is presented as change from day 29 to day 31

Skin Barrier Strengthening Effect by Measurement of Skin Redness Before and After Induction of Skin Irritation as Assessed by Mexameter (Change From Day 29 to Day 31)
Measured on day 29 and 31

Objective skin redness measurement by Mexameter on treated and untreated skin before (day 29) and after (day 31) induction of skin irritation with SLS. Skin redness is measured using a C\&K Mexameter probe to quantify SLS-induced skin irritation (arbitrary numerical scale). An effective treatment is anticipated to protect the skin from irritation, i.e. a weaker reaction from SLS/less redness compared to the untreated skin. Data is presented as change from day 29 to day 31

Skin Barrier Strengthening Effect by Measurement of Skin Redness Before Induction of Skin Irritation as Assessed by Visual Scoring
Skin redness was scored on day 29

Skin redness by visual scoring on treated and untreated skin before induction of skin irritation with SLS. Skin redness was evaluated on a 4-point visual scale from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates no redness/reaction and 3 indicates strong erythema.

Skin Barrier Strengthening Effect by Measurement of Skin Redness After Induction of Skin Irritation as Assessed by Visual Scoring
Skin redness was scored on day 31

Skin redness by visual scoring on treated and untreated skin after induction of skin irritation with SLS. Skin redness was evaluated on a 4-point visual scale from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates no redness/reaction and 3 indicates strong erythema.

Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingDOUBLE
ModelSINGLE_GROUP
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
Test cream (2% urea/20% glycerol)EXPERIMENTALTopical cream, 1 Finger Tip Unit per treatment area on the lower volar forearms twice daily for 28 days
Reference cream 1: Miniderm® 20% cream (20% glycerol)ACTIVE_COMPARATORTopical cream, 1 Finger Tip Unit per treatment area on the lower volar forearms twice daily for 28 days
Reference cream 2: Diprobase® cream (cream without humectants)ACTIVE_COMPARATORTopical cream, 1 Finger Tip Unit per treatment area on the lower volar forearms twice daily for 28 days
UntreatedNO_INTERVENTIONUntreated skin area on the volar forearm

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
2% urea/20% glycerol creamDRUGMoisturizing cream for topical application
Miniderm® 20% creamDRUGMoisturizing cream for topical application
Diprobase® creamDRUGEmollient cream for topical application
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range18 Years to N/A
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites1

Inclusion Criteria: The participants have to meet all of the following criteria to be eligible to enter the study: * Willing and able to provide informed consent * Male or female and aged 18 years or above * Volunteers able to read and understand English * A personal history of atopic dermatitis ...

Countries:United Kingdom
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Frequently asked questions about 2% urea/20% glycerol

What is 2% urea/20% glycerol used for?

2% urea/20% glycerol is a topical moisturizing formulation being studied for atopic dermatitis, a form of eczema. It is designed for application to the skin to support the skin barrier in adults with this condition. It is an investigational product and is not an approved treatment.

Who makes 2% urea/20% glycerol?

2% urea/20% glycerol is being developed by Perrigo Company plc, which trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker PRGO. Perrigo is the sponsor of the clinical program evaluating this topical formulation in atopic dermatitis.

What phase is 2% urea/20% glycerol in?

2% urea/20% glycerol is in Phase 2 clinical development. The program includes one completed Phase 2 trial conducted in the United Kingdom. The formulation remains investigational and has not been approved by the FDA for any indication.

What clinical trials is 2% urea/20% glycerol in?

2% urea/20% glycerol has been evaluated in one completed Phase 2 trial, NCT03901144, titled A NOVel Moisturiser for Atopic Dermatitis: Effect on the Skin Barrier. The trial enrolled 50 adults in the United Kingdom, was randomized, double blind, and used an active control.