Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

PF-06817024

Phase 1

Healthy | Monoclonal antibody | Immunology |Pfizer, Inc.|Last Updated: May 19, 2022

Success Probability
Approval Probability 71%
TA Base Rate26%
Adjusted LOA41%
ML RiskLOW_RISK
Premium
Market & Valuation
rNPV $3.2B
Market Size $9.4B
Revenue Basis $1.6B
Competitors 6
Premium
Trial Design
RandomizedDouble-BlindCONTROLLED
Total Trials1
Total Enrollment97
FDA Designations
No designations recorded
Clinical Trials (1)
NCT IDTitlePhaseStatusEnrollmentVelocityDesignStartCompletionLast UpdatedSitesCountries
NCT02743871Study Of PF-06817024 In Healthy Subjects, In Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps And in Patients With Atopic DermatitisPHASE1 COMPLETED 97Apr 27, 2016Mar 9, 2021May 19, 202220 United States
Unlock Drug Trial Details
Study Endpoints
Primary Endpoints
Number of Participants With All-causality Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Part 1
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 421 (Cohort 1 and 2), Day 601 (Cohort 3), Day 691 (Cohort 4), Day 781 (Cohort 5), and Day 511 (Cohort 7).

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs and SAEs in Part 1
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 421 (Cohort 1 and 2), Day 601 (Cohort 3), Day 691 (Cohort 4), Day 781 (Cohort 5), and Day 511 (Cohort 7).

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect. The causality of TEAEs and SAEs was determined by the investigator.

Number of All-Causality TEAEs According to Severity in Part 1
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 421 (Cohort 1 and 2), Day 601 (Cohort 3), Day 691 (Cohort 4), Day 781 (Cohort 5), and Day 511 (Cohort 7).

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. TEAE was assessed by the investigator according to severity; Mild: did not interfere with participant's usual function; moderate: interfered to some extent with participant's usual function; severe: interfered significantly with participant's usual function.

Number of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation Due to TEAEs in Part 1
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 421 (Cohort 1 and 2), Day 601 (Cohort 3), Day 691 (Cohort 4), Day 781 (Cohort 5), and Day 511 (Cohort 7).

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs and SAEs in Part 2
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 691.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs and SAEs in Part 2
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 691.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect. The causality of TEAEs and SAEs was determined by the investigator.

Number of All-Causality TEAEs According to Severity in Part 2
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 691.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. TEAE was assessed by the investigator according to severity; Mild: did not interfere with participant's usual function; moderate: interfered to some extent with participant's usual function; severe: interfered significantly with participant's usual function.

Number of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation Due to TEAEs in Part 2
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 691.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Number of Participants With All-Causality TEAEs and SAEs in Part 3
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 1105.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs and SAEs in Part 3
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 1105.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or results in congenital anomaly/birth defect. The causality of TEAEs and SAEs was determined by the investigator.

Number of All-Causality TEAEs According to Severity in Part 3
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 1105.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. TEAE was assessed by the investigator according to severity; Mild: did not interfere with participant's usual function; moderate: interfered to some extent with participant's usual function; severe: interfered significantly with participant's usual function.

Number of Participants With Permanent Discontinuation Due to TEAEs in Part 3
From Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 1105.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to discharge from study that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology, Chemistry, and Urinalysis in Part 1
Part 1 single-dose cohorts: from Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 211. Part 1 multiple-dose cohorts: from Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 241.

Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet and white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes. Chemistry parameters included blood urea nitrogen, glucose (fasting), calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein. Urine parameters included pH, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, microscopy. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator and those met the criteria of AE are listed here. Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant in the whole study are presented here.

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology, Chemistry, and Urinalysis in Part 2
Part 2: from Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 211.

Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet and white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes. Chemistry parameters included blood urea nitrogen, glucose (fasting), calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein. Urine parameters included pH, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, microscopy. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator and those met the criteria of AE are listed here. Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant in the whole study are presented here.

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology, Chemistry, and Urinalysis in Part 3
Part 3: from Study Day 1 (baseline) up to Day 966.

Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet and white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes. Chemistry parameters included blood urea nitrogen, glucose (fasting), calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein. Urine parameters included pH, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, microscopy. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator and those met the criteria of AE are listed here. Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant in the whole study are presented here.

Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities in Part 1
Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 211 for Part 1 SD cohorts, and Study Day 241 for Part 1 MD cohorts).

Criteria for abnormality in vital signs: supine pulse rate \<40 beats per minute (bpm) or \>120 bpm; supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \<50 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of \>=20 mmHg; supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<90 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of \>=30 mmHg. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to the first dosing. Vital sign abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.

Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities in Part 2
Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 211).

Criteria for abnormality in vital signs: supine pulse rate \<40 bpm or \>120 bpm; supine DBP \<50 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of \>=20 mmHg; supine SBP \<90 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of \>=30 mmHg. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to the first dosing. Vital sign abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.

Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities in Part 3
Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 337).

Criteria for abnormality in vital signs: supine pulse rate \<40 bpm or \>120 bpm; supine DBP \<50 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of \>=20 mmHg; supine SBP \<90 mmHg, maximum increase or decrease from baseline of \>=30 mmHg. Baseline was defined as the last measurement prior to the first dosing. Vital sign abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.

Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities in Part 1
Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 211 for Part 1 SD cohorts, and Study Day 241 for Part 1 MD cohorts).

ECG abnormalities criteria included: 1) maximum QTc interval adjusted according Fridericia formula (QTcF) (msec): 450\<= QTcF \<480, 480\<= QTcF \<500, and QTcF \>=500; QTcF maximum increase from baseline(msec): 30\<= change \<60, and change \>=60; 2) maximum PR interval (msec): \>=300; PR increase from baseline (msec): baseline \>200 with 25% increase at maximum, baseline \<=200 with 50% increase at maximum; 3) maximum QRS (msec): \>=140; QRS increase from baseline (msec) \>=50%. Baseline was defined as the average of the last triplicate measurement prior to the first dosing. ECG abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.

Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities in Part 2
Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 211).

ECG abnormalities criteria included: 1) maximum QTc interval adjusted according Fridericia formula (QTcF) (msec): 450\<= QTcF \<480, 480\<= QTcF \<500, and QTcF \>=500; QTcF maximum increase from baseline(msec): 30\<= change \<60, and change \>=60; 2) maximum PR interval (msec): \>=300; PR increase from baseline (msec): baseline \>200 with 25% increase at maximum, baseline \<=200 with 50% increase at maximum; 3) maximum QRS (msec): \>=140; QRS increase from baseline (msec) \>=50%. Baseline was defined as the average of the last triplicate measurement prior to the first dosing. ECG abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.

Number of Participants With ECG Abnormalities in Part 3
Study Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (Study Day 337).

ECG abnormalities criteria included: 1) maximum QTc interval adjusted according Fridericia formula (QTcF) (msec): 450\<= QTcF \<480, 480\<= QTcF \<500, and QTcF \>=500; QTcF maximum increase from baseline(msec): 30\<= change \<60, and change \>=60; 2) maximum PR interval (msec): \>=300; PR increase from baseline (msec): baseline \>200 with 25% increase at maximum, baseline \<=200 with 50% increase at maximum; 3) maximum QRS (msec): \>=140; QRS increase from baseline (msec) \>=50%. Baseline was defined as the average of the last triplicate measurement prior to the first dosing. ECG abnormalities reported for at least 1 participant are presented here.

Secondary Endpoints
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of PF-06817024 Following Single Dose in Part 1
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose on Day 1, and on Follow-up Days 8, 15, 32, 46, 61, 91, 121, 151, 181, 211, and at Extended Follow-Up visits (up to a maximum of 780 days/18720 hours post dose).
Cmax of PF-06817024 Following Multiple Doses in Part 1
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hr post dose on Day 1, Days 8 and 15, Day 31/46 (at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hr), Days 61, 91, 121, 151, 181, 211, 241, at Extended Follow-Up visits (up to a maximum of 645 days/15480 hr post dose).
Cmax of PF-06817024 in Part 2
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 96 hour post dose on Day 1, and Days 8, 15, 32, 61, 91, 121, 181, 211, and at Extended Follow-Up visits (up to a maximum of 690 days/16560 hours post dose).
Unlock Study Endpoints
Study Design & Arms
AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingQUADRUPLE
ModelSEQUENTIAL
PurposeTREATMENT
Treatment Arms
ArmTypeDescription
Cohort 1EXPERIMENTAL10 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 2EXPERIMENTAL30 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 3EXPERIMENTAL100 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 4EXPERIMENTAL300 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 5EXPERIMENTAL1000 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 6EXPERIMENTAL2000 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 7EXPERIMENTAL30 mg subcutaneous dose of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 8EXPERIMENTAL300 mg of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 9EXPERIMENTALIV dose to be determined of PF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 10EXPERIMENTALPF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 11EXPERIMENTALPF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 12EXPERIMENTALPF-06817024 or placebo
Cohort 13EXPERIMENTALPF-06817024 or placebo
Interventions
NameTypeDescription
PF-06817024BIOLOGICALSubjects will be given one dose of PF-06817024 intravenously
Placebo for PF-06817024OTHERSubjects will be given one dose of placebo for PF-06817024 intravenously
Unlock Study Design Details
Eligibility Criteria
Age Range18 Years — 75 Years
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersYes
Study Sites20

Inclusion Criteria * Healthy male subjects, healthy female subjects of non-childbearing potential, 18-55 years of age (Part 1) * Male subjects, female subjects of non-childbearing potential, female subjects of childbearing potential with documented bilateral tubal ligation (tubes tied) or bilateral...

Countries:United States
Unlock Eligibility Criteria