Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

PF-02341066

Phase 4FDA approved 2011

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung | Small molecule | Oncology |Pfizer, Inc.|Trials Updated: Feb 8, 2023

PF-02341066 development status

FDA approval Aug 26, 2011 as Xalkori
Approval holderPf Prism Cv
ApplicationNDA202570
Highest phase Phase 4 (NCT03672643)
Phase scored for PFEPhase 3
Registered trials 53 across 12 sponsors since Jan 2008

Label indication XALKORI is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of • adult patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors are anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) or ROS1-positive as detected by an FDA-approved test. ( 1.1 , 2.1 ) • pediatric patients 1 year of age and older and young adults with relapsed or refractory, systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) that is ALK-positive. FDA label

PF-02341066 target and mechanism

ModalitySmall molecule

Also known as cMET inhibitor, Crizotinib, Xalkori

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedACTIVE_CONTROLLEDDMCBiomarker
Total Trials10
Total Enrollment2,573

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

PF-02341066 clinical trials

PF-02341066 · 10 trials · 14 indications

Phase 3 2Phase 2 2Phase 1 6
NCT01639001A Study Of Crizotinib Versus Chemotherapy In Previously Untreated ALK Positive East Asian Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer PatientsNSCLC (Non-small Cell Lung Cancer)
COMPLETED207 Analytics
NCT00932893An Investigational Drug, PF-02341066 Is Being Studied Versus Standard Of Care In Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With A Specific Gene Profile Involving The Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) GeneCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
COMPLETED347 Analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study Of Crizotinib Versus Chemotherapy In Previously Untreated ALK Positive East Asian Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
NSCLC (Non-small Cell Lung Cancer)Unlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
An Investigational Drug, PF-02341066 Is Being Studied Versus Standard Of Care In Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With A Specific Gene Profile Involving The Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Gene
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on IRR by Treatment Arm
Randomization to objective progression, death or last tumor assessment without progression before any additional anti-cancer therapy (whichever occurred first, assessed up to 33 months)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression (by IRR) or death on study due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS (in months) was calculated as (first event date - randomization date +1)/30.44. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Randomization until progressive disease (PD) or initiation of antitumor therapy in the absence of PD or death, assessed every 6 weeks (up to 112 weeks)

PFS: Time in months from randomization to first documentation of objective disease progression as determined by independent radiology review or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus the date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), as at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

Independent Radiology Reviewed Overall Objective Response (ORR)
Starting from the first dose study treatment until the first documented CR or PR (every 8 weeks then after 8 cycles at every 12 weeks in duration of 94.0 weeks)

Overall objective response (ORR) was defined as the number of patients with a best overall response of confirmed Complete Response or confirmed Partial Response according to RECIST v1.1 (as determined by Independent Radiology Review \[IRR\]), relative to the total population of response-evaluable participants. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (\<10 mm short axis); PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Confirmed responses were those that persisted on repeat imaging at least 4 weeks after the initial documentation of response.

Objective Response Rate
6 years

The objective response rate (ORR) as a measure of anti-tumor efficacy of oral PF-02341066 in participants with advanced NSCLC with an ALK gene translocation or inversion after failure of at least one line of chemotherapy.

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
6 years

Incidence of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities (severity graded by the National Cancer Institute \[NCI\] Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\], version 4.0).

Rate of dose limiting toxicity (DLT)
28 Days

Rate of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in the first 28 days of study therapy by dose level when escalating doses of crizotinib are combined with enzalutamide and when appropriate a GnRH agonist.

Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib: Cycle 2 Day 1
Cycle 2 Day 1- Twice daily dosing: pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 hours post-dose; Once daily dosing: pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 hours post-dose

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the quantifiable concentration at the end of dosing interval (tau hours post-dose, where tau was 12 hours for twice daily dosing and 24 hours for once daily dosing) of Cycle 2 Day 1.

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib: Cycle 2 Day 1
Cycle 2 Day 1- Twice daily dosing: pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 hours post-dose; Once daily dosing: pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 hours post-dose
Plasma AUCinf (Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from zero to infinity) for crizotinib
18 months
Plasma Cmax (Maximum plasma concentration) for crizotinib
18 months
Overview of Treatment-emergent All Causalities Adverse Events (AEs) in Escalation Phase
Up to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)

AE was any untoward medical occurrence with study drug/ device in a trial participant. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.

Overview of Treatment-emergent All Causalities AEs in Expansion Phase
Up to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)

AE was any untoward medical occurrence with study drug/ device in a trial participant. SAE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using NCI CTCAE v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.

Overview of Treatment-emergent, Treatment-related AEs in Escalation Phase
Up to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study treatment in a participant who received study treatment. SAE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using NCI CTCAE v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.

Overview of Treatment-emergent, Treatment-related AEs in Expansion Phase
Up to Maximum of treatment duration + 28 days for each participant (could be 295 days)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study treatment in a participant who received study treatment. SAE was an AE resulting in death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or that worsen in severity after the first dose of study medication. AEs were reported from signing of informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication. SAEs were reported after this time frame if considered to be treatment related. The severity of AEs were graded by the investigator using NCI CTCAE v.4.02 and was assessed as Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: death related to AE. However the below table included Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs.

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Escalation Phase
Cycle 1 (4 weeks)

DLTs were those AEs which occurred in Cycle 1 of treatment in Dose Escalation Phase which may be attributed to study drug \[combined Crizotinib (PF-02341066) plus Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)\] without a clear alternative explanation and despite the use of adequate/maximal medical intervention as dictated by local institutional clinical practices or the judgment of the investigator. The following events were considered DLTs (using CTCAE version 4.02);1. Grade ≥4 hematologic events. 2. Grade ≥3 non-hematological events (except Grade 3/4 asymptomatic hypophosphatemia and Grade 3/4 hyperuricemia without signs and symptoms of gout). Nausea, vomiting or diarrhea had to have persisted at Grade 3 or 4 despite maximal medical therapy. Grade 3 hypertension will be considered a DLT only if the event is unmanageable by standard approved pharmacologic agents or if the symptomatic sequelae are identified despite appropriate medical intervention.

Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Phase 1)
Baseline up to Day 28

Phase 1, first cycle DLT includes Grade (Gr) ≥4 hematologic possible drug-related toxicities and Gr ≥3 possible drug-related febrile neutropenia. Gr ≥3 non-hematological possible drug-related toxicities (except asymptomatic lab value elevation). Gr 3/4 nausea, vomiting or diarrhea. Gr 3 hypertension considered DLT if event unmanageable by approved pharmacologic agents or symptomatic sequelae despite medical intervention. Diagnosis of interstitial lung disease. Inability to deliver at least 80 percent (%) of planned dose during cycle 1 due to possible drug-related adverse events (AEs).

Progression-Free Survival (Phase 2)
Baseline, every 42 days up to 20 months, disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity

Time in weeks from phase 2 study randomization to first documentation of objective disease progression or death due to any cause. Progression-Free Survival was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease \[PD\]), or from AE data (where the outcome was "Death"; date of death reported in notice of death was used).

Dose-Escalation Cohort: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Crizotinib
Cycle 1 (28 days)

MTD: Dose level at which at most 1 of 6 participants experienced DLT within and including 28 days of treatment (during Cycle 1 \[1 cycle=28 days\]) with next higher dose having at least 2/3 or 2/6 participants experiencing a DLT. DLT was defined as any of following: Hematologic toxicities- 1) prolonged grade 4 neutropenia for \>7 days. 2) Febrile neutropenia: grade 4 neutropenia with fever greater than (\>) 38.5 degree Celsius, both sustained over a 24 hour period (3) neutropenic infection: greater than or equal to (\>=) Grade 3 neutropenia with Grade \>=3 infection. (4) Grade \>=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding/grade 4 lasting \>=7 days. Other non-hematologic toxicity included: Grade 3/4 toxicities (except for alopecia, Grade 3/4 hypophosphatemia, grade 3 hypertension with controlled blood pressure \[less than (\<) 140/90 millimeter of mercury, and Grade 3/4 hyperuricemia without signs and symptoms of gout). Nausea, vomiting/diarrhea must persist at grade 3/4 despite maximal medical therapy.

Dose-Escalation Cohort: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Crizotinib
Cycle 1 (28 days)

RP2D was defined as a dose below or equal to MTD, at which crizotinib was unlikely to cause a significant inhibition of CYP3A4 activity.

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Crizotinib on Day -7
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7

AUCinf = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinite time (0-inf).

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Day -7
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 12 hours for BID dose and 24 hours for QD dose.

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1
Pre-dose, 2, 4 and 6 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 1

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 12 hours for BID dose and 24 hours for QD dose.

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 15
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 12 hours for BID dose and 24 hours for QD dose.

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 1
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 12 hours for BID dose and 24 hours for QD dose.

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib Cycle 1 Day 15
Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15

Ctrough refers to plasma concentration of Crizotinib observed just before treatment administration.

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 1
Pre-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1

Ctrough refers to plasma concentration of Crizotinib observed just before treatment administration.

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Day -7
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7

Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1
Pre-dose, 2, 4 and 6 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 1

Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 15
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15

Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 2 Day 1
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1

Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Day -7
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7

Tmax was defined as the time to reach the observed maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 1
Pre-dose, 2, 4 and 6 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 1

Tmax was defined as the time to reach the observed maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib on Cycle 1 Day 15
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15

Tmax was defined as the time to reach the observed maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Crizotinib Cycle 2 Day 1
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1

Tmax was defined as the time to reach the observed maximum plasma concentration (Cmax).

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of Crizotinib on Day -7
Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 24, 48 and any two time points (72, 96, 120 and 144 hours) post-dose on Day -7

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration of Crizotinib to decrease by one half.

Dose-Escalation and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAES) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
up to 189 Months

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events. TEAEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity on or after the first dose of investigational product administration.

Dose-Escalation Cohort: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLT)
Cycle 1 (28 days)

Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any of the following: Hematologic- prolonged grade 4 neutropenia for \>7 days. Febrile neutropenia, defined as grade 4 neutropenia with fever greater than (\>)38.5 degree Celsius, both sustained over a 24 hour period, neutropenic infection: greater than or equal to (\>=)Grade 3 neutropenia with Grade \>=3 infection. Grade \>=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding or grade 4 lasting \>=7 days Lymphopenia was not considered a DLT unless accompanied by infection. Other non-hematologic toxicity: Grade 3 or 4 toxicities (except for alopecia, Grade 3/4 hypophosphatemia, grade 3 hypertension with controlled blood pressure \[less than (\<) 140/90\], and Grade 3/4 hyperuricemia without signs and symptoms of gout). Nausea, vomiting or diarrhea must persist at grade 3 or 4 despite maximal medical therapy.

Midazolam Interaction Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Midazolam When Taken Alone or Taken With Crizotinib
pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post dose on Day -7 (midazolam alone arm), pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (midazolam with crizotinib arm)

Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Midazolam When Taken Alone or Taken With Crizotinib
pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post dose on Day -7 (midazolam alone arm), pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (midazolam with crizotinib arm)

AUCinf = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf).

RP2D Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC (0-24)] of Crizotinib When Taken With Food
pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7

AUC0-24 of Crizotinib was defined as the area under the free plasma concentration time curve from time 0 to 24 hours post-dose.

RP2D Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib When Taken With Food
pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 24 hours post-dose on Day -7

Cmax is defined as the observed maximum plasma concentration post drug administration.

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin
pre-dose, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib alone arm) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Crizotinib with Rifampin arm)

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau).

Rifampin Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin
pre-dose, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 hours on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib alone) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Crizotinib with Rifampin)
Rifampin Cohort: Ctrough of Crizotinib Alone and When Taken With Rifampin
pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib alone arm) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (Crizotinib with Rifampin arm)

Ctrough refers to plasma concentration of Crizotinib observed just before treatment administration.

Itraconazole Cohort: Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole
pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib with itraconazole) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (itraconazole alone)

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval is 24 hours.

Itraconazole Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole
pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 24 hours post dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (Crizotinib with itraconazole) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (itraconazole alone)
Itraconazole Cohort: Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Crizotinib When Taken Alone and When Taken With Itraconazole
pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (crizotinib with itraconazole) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (itraconazole alone)

Ctrough refers to plasma concentration of Crizotinib observed just before treatment administration.

Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)
Baseline up to 172 months

ORR was defined as participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the total number of evaluable participants per RECIST version 1.0 (RECIST1.1 for ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 1 and ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 2). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response.

Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Duration of Response (DOR)
From first documentation of response to date of PD or death due to any cause (up to 172 months)

Duration of response (DoR) was the time from first documentation of PR or CR to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response. PD: \>=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Time to Response (TTR)
From first dose until first documented response of PR or CR (up to 172 months)

TTR: time between first dose until first documented response of PR or CR. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response.

Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control at Week 8
Week 8

Disease control was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) per RECIST version 1.0 (RECIST1.1 for ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 1 and ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 2). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control at Week 16
Week 16

Disease control was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) per RECIST version 1.0 (RECIST1.1 for ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 1 and ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 2). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum), without progression of non-target lesions and no appearance of new lesions indicated partial response. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions, normalization of tumor marker levels, and no appearance of new lesions indicated complete response. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
From randomization until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to 172 months)

Progression free survival (PFS) was the time from randomization date to date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause RECIST version 1.0 (RECIST1.1 for ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 1 and ALK-negative NSCLC cohort 2). PD: \>=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Probability of Being Event Free at Month 6
From randomization to 6 months

Probability of being event free (event defined as PD or death due to any cause) at 6 months after the first dose of crizotinib was reported. PD: \>=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) Cohort: Overall Survival (OS)
From randomization date to the date of death (up to 172 Months)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.

Probability of Participant Survival at Month 6
Month 6

Probability of survival was defined as the probability of being alive at Month 6.

Probability of Participant Survival at Month 12
Month 12

Probability of survival was defined as the probability of being alive at Month 12.

Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 1 Day 15
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle1Day15/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts.

Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 2 Day 1
Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 2 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts.

Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 4 Day 1
Baseline, Cycle 4 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 4 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts.

Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 6 Day 1
Baseline, Cycle 6 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 6 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts.

Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 9 Day 1
Baseline, Cycle 9 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 9 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 12 Day 1
Baseline, Cycle 12 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 12 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 15 Day 1
Baseline, Cycle 15 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 15 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 18 Day 1
Baseline, Cycle 18 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 18 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 21 Day 1
Baseline, Cycle 21 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 21 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 24 Day 1
Baseline, Cycle 24 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 24 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 27 Day 1
Baseline, Cycle 27 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 27 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at Cycle 30 Day 1
Baseline, Cycle 30 Day 1

Geometric mean of ratio (Cycle 30 Day 1/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Geometric Mean of Ratio of Total Testosterone, Free Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Dihydroepiandrosterone Sulfate, Estradiol and Prolactin Levels in Males at End of Treatment
Baseline, End of Treatment (28 days post last dose)

Geometric mean of ratio (End of treatment/Baseline) of hypogonadism parameters (total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, dihydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol and prolactin) levels in males was analyzed. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected for combined RP2D Cohort only, excluding arms of low and high dose escalation cohorts. 95% CI should be interpreted with cautions due to the limited sample size at this time point.

Secondary Endpoints

Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Based on IRR
Randomization to objective progression, death or last tumor assessment without progression before any additional anti-cancer therapy (assessed up to 33 months)
Overall Survival (OS)
From randomization to death or last date known as alive for those who were lost to follow-up or withdrew consent (assessed up to 64 months).
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control at 12 Weeks Based on IRR
From randomization to Week 12
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingNONE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
CrizotinibEXPERIMENTALCrizotinib
ChemotherapyACTIVE_COMPARATORChemotherapy \[Option at Investigator's Choice\]
PF-02341066EXPERIMENTAL -
Pemetrexed or DocetaxelACTIVE_COMPARATORInvestigator selection of either pemetrexed or docetaxel as the active comparator
PF-0231066EXPERIMENTAL -
crizotinib and enzalutamideEXPERIMENTALA traditional 3+3 dose escalation scheme will be used to identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of crizotinib when used in combination with standard fixed dose enzalutamide. * Crizotinib- given orally daily-28 day cycle * Enzalutamide- given orally daily-28 day cycle
A1: normal hepatic functionEXPERIMENTAL -
A2: normal hepatic functionEXPERIMENTAL -
B: mild hepatic impairmentEXPERIMENTAL -
C: moderate hepatic impairmentEXPERIMENTAL -
D: severe hepatic impairmentEXPERIMENTAL -
Arm AOTHERCLCR: Creatinine clearance
Arm BOTHERCLCR: Creatinine clearance
Arm 1EXPERIMENTALPF-02341066 AND PF-00299804: Patients will be treated with combined cMET inhibitor (PF-02341066) and panHER inhibitor (PF-00299804).
Arm 2EXPERIMENTALPF-00299804 FOLLOWED BY COMBINED PF-02341066 AND PF-00299804: Patients will be treated with single agent panHER inhibitor (PF-00299804) until disease progression and then with the maximum tolerated combined dose of cMET inhibitor (PF-02341066) and panHER inhibitor (PF-00299804).
ErlotinibACTIVE_COMPARATOR -
Erlotinib + PF-02341066EXPERIMENTAL -
1EXPERIMENTAL -

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
CrizotinibDRUG250 mg two times daily \[BID\], oral, on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Cycles are defined in 21 day periods.
Pemetrexed/CisplatinDRUGOption 1: Pemetrexed/Cisplatin; Pemetrexed, 500 mg/m\^2, will be administered by intravenous infusion over 10 minutes or according to institutional administration timing on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Cisplatin, 75 mg/m\^2 will be administered by infusion after adequate hydration according to institutional practices beginning approximately 30 minutes after the end of the pemetrexed infusion. Pemetrexed and cisplatin will be repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles.
Pemetrexed/CarboplatinDRUGOption 2: Pemetrexed/Carboplatin. Pemetrexed, 500 mg/m\^2, will be administered by intravenous infusion over 10 minutes or according to institutional administration timing on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Carboplatin, at a dose calculated to produce an AUC of 5 or 6 mg.min/mL will be administered by infusion according to institutional practices beginning approximately 30 minutes after the end of the pemetrexed infusion. Pemetrexed and carboplatin will be repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles.
PF-02341066DRUGPF-02341066, 250 mg BID will be administered orally on a continuous schedule
PemetrexedDRUGPemetrexed, 500 mg/m\^2, will be administered by i.v. infusion over 10 minutes on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle
DocetaxelDRUGDocetaxel, 75 mg/m\^2, will be administered by i.v. infusion over 1 hour on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle
EnzalutamideDRUGEnzalutamide is an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor.
PF-00299804DRUGArm 1: The starting dose will be 30 mg by mouth once a day of PF-0029804 in tablet form. The dose of each drug in the combination \[PF-02341066 and PF-00299804\] will be escalated or de-escalated until the maximum tolerated combined dose is reached. Patients will then be treated with the maximum tolerated combined dose.
ErlotinibDRUGErlotinib, 150 mg, QD will be administered orally on a continuous schedule (Phase 2 only)
RifampinDRUG600 mg QD administered from Cycle 1, Day 16 to Cycle 2, Day 1 (14 days of dosing) in combination with PF-02341066.
ItraconazoleDRUGMultiple Dose Design: 200 mg QD administered from Cycle 1, Day 1 to Cycle 1, Day 16 (16 days) in combination with PF-02341066.
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range18 Years to 70 Years
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites47

Inclusion Criteria: * Histologically or cytologically proven diagnosis of locally advanced not suitable for local treatment, recurrent and metastatic non-squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. * Positive for translocation or inversion events involving the ALK gene locus. * No prior systemic treatment...

Countries:ChinaHong KongMalaysiaTaiwanThailandUnited StatesAustraliaBrazilBulgariaCanadaFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyJapanNetherlandsPolandRussiaSouth KoreaSpainSwedenUnited Kingdom
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Frequently asked questions about PF-02341066

What is PF-02341066 used for?

PF-02341066 is an investigational small molecule being studied for non-small cell lung cancer, including ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. It has been evaluated in patients with advanced disease and a specific gene profile involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene, as well as in combination studies in non-small cell lung cancer.

Who is developing PF-02341066?

PF-02341066 is being developed by Pfizer, Inc., which trades under the ticker PFE. Pfizer is the sponsor of the clinical trials evaluating the drug in non-small cell lung cancer, including the Phase 3 study comparing it with standard of care in patients whose tumors have an ALK gene profile.

What phase is PF-02341066 in?

PF-02341066 has reached Phase 3 development. The Phase 3 trial in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with an ALK gene profile has been completed, and earlier Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies in non-small cell lung cancer have also been completed. The drug remains investigational and is not described as approved.

What clinical trials is PF-02341066 in?

PF-02341066 has been studied in completed trials including NCT00932893, a Phase 3 study versus standard of care in advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer, and NCT00932451, a Phase 2 study in the same gene-defined population. Phase 1 trials NCT01121575 and NCT00965731 evaluated combinations in non-small cell lung cancer.

How does PF-02341066 work?

PF-02341066 is a small molecule studied in tumors with a specific gene profile involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. Its clinical program selected patients based on that ALK biomarker, and one Phase 1 trial combined it with a pan-HER inhibitor in non-small cell lung cancer.

How many patients have been studied with PF-02341066?

Across the reported trials, 1,416 patients have been enrolled in studies of PF-02341066. The largest was the Phase 2 trial NCT00932451 with 1,069 patients, followed by the Phase 3 trial NCT00932893 with 347 patients. The Phase 3 study was randomized and actively controlled.