| NCT ID | Title | Phase | Status | Enrollment | Velocity | Design | Start | Completion | Last Updated | Sites | Countries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT00853385 | A Phase 3 Study Comparing 2 Doses Of CP-690,550 And The Active Comparator, Humira (Adalimumab) Vs. Placebo For Treatment Of Rheumatoid Arthritis | PHASE3 | COMPLETED | 717 | — | — | May 1, 2009 | Mar 1, 2011 | Jan 18, 2013 | 125 | United States, Australia +19 |
| NCT00661661 | Long-Term, Open-Label Study Of CP-690,550 For Treatment Of Rheumatoid Arthritis In Japan | PHASE3 | COMPLETED | 487 | — | — | Apr 1, 2008 | Dec 1, 2013 | May 12, 2015 | 56 | Japan |
| NCT01359150 | A Study To Assess the Immune Response Following Administration Of Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccines To Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving CP-690,550 Or Placebo | PHASE2 | COMPLETED | 223 | — | — | Sep 1, 2011 | Feb 1, 2012 | Mar 29, 2013 | 57 | United States, Poland |
| NCT01059864 | Study Of The Effects Of Atorvastatin On Cholesterol Levels In Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Taking CP-690,550 | PHASE2 | COMPLETED | 111 | — | — | Feb 1, 2010 | Nov 1, 2010 | Dec 13, 2012 | 15 | United States, South Korea |
| NCT00976599 | A Study To Evaluate The Mechanism Of Action Of CP-690,550 In Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis | PHASE2 | COMPLETED | 29 | — | — | Nov 1, 2009 | Jul 1, 2011 | Jan 9, 2013 | 15 | United States |
| NCT00147498 | Three Dose Levels of CP-690,550 Monotherapy Versus Placebo, Administered Orally Twice Daily (BID) for 6 Weeks | PHASE2 | COMPLETED | 264 | — | — | Jan 1, 2005 | Jun 1, 2006 | Jan 30, 2013 | 60 | United States, Belgium +7 |
| NCT01262118 | Effects Of CP-690,550 (Tasocitinib) On Cholesterol Metabolism In Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis | PHASE1 | COMPLETED | 69 | — | — | May 1, 2011 | Feb 1, 2012 | Jan 23, 2013 | 11 | United States, Hungary |
| NCT01745055 | Co-Administration Of Methotrexate And CP-690,550 | PHASE1 | COMPLETED | 12 | — | — | Apr 1, 2005 | Jun 1, 2006 | Feb 4, 2013 | 4 | United States |
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20% improvement in tender joint count (TJC); \>= 20% improvement in swollen joint count (SJC); and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 6 analysis.
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 3 analysis.
DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from SJC and TJC using 28-joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than or equal to (\<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and \> 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and \< 2.6 = remission. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 6 analysis.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to the last participants visit in the study. The baseline data of Study A3921039, A3921040 or A3921044 were used as baseline data for safety evaluation.
Satisfactory humoral response to the pneumococcal vaccine was defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 fold increase in antibody concentrations from vaccination baseline (Day 29) in at least 6 of 12 pneumococcal antigens (1, 3, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 19A, 19F, 23F, 18C). Data was stratified by the background methotrexate use.
Satisfactory humoral response to the influenza vaccine was defined as \>= 4 fold increase in antibody titers from vaccination baseline (Day 29) in at least 2 of 3 influenza antigens (B, H1N1, H3N2). Data was stratified by the background methotrexate use.
Synovial tissue biopsy were performed and assayed for mRNA gene expression by quantitative polymerized chain reaction (PCR) using standard curve method. Standard curve generated by linear regression using log threshold cycle versus log (cell number). Interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), IL-6, matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP3), cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19), cluster of differentiation 3 epsilon (CD3E), Janus kinase 1 (JAK1), JAK2, JAK3, signal transducers, activators of transcription (STAT1), interferon stimulated gene 15 (ISG15), C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand2 (CCL2), phospho-STAT1 (pSTAT1), pSTAT3, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) presented as control gene normalized expression (relative expression) within synovial tissue.
Synovial tissue biopsy was to be performed and assayed for protein expression by quantitative PCR using standard curve method. Standard curve was to be generated by linear regression using log threshold cycle versus log (cell number). TNFalpha, IL-6, IL-17 and IL-10 data were to be presented as control normalized expression (relative expression) within synovial tissue.
The intensity of CD3 and CD68 cell infiltration was expressed as the percentage area of the tissue section occupied by positively stained cells. Surface marker CD68 macrophages and CD3 thymus cells (T cells) in the inflammatory cells of synovial tissue were detected by immunohistochemical staining.
Blood levels were utilized for expression analysis (mRNA) of following genes that reflect immune function: CD19, CD3 epsilon (CD3E), STAT1, STAT3, ISG15, CXCL10. mRNA gene expression in blood were assayed by quantitative PCR using standard curve method. Standard curve generated by linear regression using log threshold cycle versus log (cell number). Data were presented as control gene normalized expression (relative expression) within blood.
Blood levels were utilized for expression analysis (mRNA) of following genes that reflect immune function: CD19, CD3E, STAT1, STAT3, ISG15, CXCL10. mRNA gene expression in blood were assayed by quantitative PCR using standard curve method. Standard curve generated by linear regression using log threshold cycle versus log (cell number). Data were presented as control gene normalized expression (relative expression) within blood.
Blood samples were collected from all the participants and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were measured. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1beta, IL-1alpha, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-7, IL-21, active 70 kDa (p70) form of IL-12(IL-12p70), interferon gamma (IFNgamma) - induced protein 10 (IP-10), TNFalpha, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha (MIP1a), monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP1), soluble vascular endothelial growth factor (sVEGF), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM-1), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was measured by immunoassay and the levels were expresses as picogram per milliliter (pg/mL).
Blood samples were collected from all the participants and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were measured. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1beta, IL-1alpha, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-7, IL-21, IL-12p70, IP-10, TNFalpha, IFNgamma, GM-CSF, MIP1a, MCP1, sVEGF, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, G-CSF was measured by immunoassay and the levels were expresses as pg/mL.
Blood samples were collected from all the participants and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were measured. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1beta, IL-1alpha, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-7, IL-21, IL-12p70, IP-10, TNFalpha, IFNgamma, GM-CSF, MIP1a, MCP1, sVEGF, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, G-CSF was measured by immunoassay and the levels were expresses as pg/mL.
Blood samples were collected from all the participants and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were measured. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1beta, IL-1alpha, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-7, IL-21, IL-12p70, IP-10, TNFalpha, IFNgamma, GM-CSF, MIP1a, MCP1, sVEGF, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, G-CSF was measured by immunoassay and the levels were expresses as pg/mL.
Blood samples were collected from all the participants and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were measured. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1beta, IL-1alpha, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-7, IL-21, IL-12p70, IP-10, TNFalpha, IFNgamma, GM-CSF, MIP1a, MCP1, sVEGF, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, G-CSF was measured by immunoassay and the levels were expresses as pg/mL.
Blood samples were collected from all the participants and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were measured. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1beta, IL-1alpha, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-7, IL-21, IL-12p70, IP-10, TNFalpha, IFNgamma, GM-CSF, MIP1a, MCP1, sVEGF, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, G-CSF was measured by immunoassay and the levels were expresses as pg/mL.
Blood samples were collected from all the participants and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were measured. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1beta, IL-1alpha, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-7, IL-21, IL-12p70, IP-10, TNFalpha, IFNgamma, GM-CSF, MIP1a, MCP1, sVEGF, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, G-CSF was measured by immunoassay and the levels were expresses as pg/mL.
Blood samples were collected from all the participants and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were measured. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1beta, IL-1alpha, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-7, IL-21, IL-12p70, IP-10, TNFalpha, IFNgamma, GM-CSF, MIP1a, MCP1, sVEGF, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, G-CSF was measured by immunoassay and the levels were expresses as pg/mL.
Blood samples were collected from all the participants and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were measured. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1beta, IL-1alpha, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-7, IL-21, IL-12p70, IP-10, TNFalpha, IFNgamma, GM-CSF, MIP1a, MCP1, sVEGF, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, G-CSF was measured by immunoassay and the levels were expresses as pg/mL.
Blood samples were collected from all the participants and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were measured. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1beta, IL-1alpha, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-7, IL-21, IL-12p70, IP-10, TNFalpha, IFNgamma, GM-CSF, MIP1a, MCP1, sVEGF, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, G-CSF was measured by immunoassay and the levels were expresses as pg/mL.
Blood samples were collected for fluorescence-activated cell sorting \[FACS\] analysis of lymphocyte subsets. Lymphocyte subset counts of T cells, Bone-marrow cells (B cells) and natural killer (NK) cells were analyzed using fluorescent-labeled antibodies against clusters of differentiation (CD) markers.
Blood samples were collected for FACS analysis of lymphocyte subsets. Lymphocyte subset counts of T cells, B cells and NK cells were analyzed using fluorescent-labeled antibodies against CD markers.
Blood samples were collected for FACS analysis of lymphocyte subsets. Lymphocyte subset counts of T cells, B cells and NK cells were analyzed using fluorescent-labeled antibodies against CD markers.
Blood samples were collected for FACS analysis of lymphocyte subsets. Lymphocyte subset counts of T cells, B cells and NK cells were analyzed using fluorescent-labeled antibodies against CD markers.
Blood samples were collected for FACS analysis of lymphocyte subsets. Lymphocyte subset counts of T cells, B cells and NK cells were analyzed using fluorescent-labeled antibodies against CD markers.
Blood samples were collected for FACS analysis of lymphocyte subsets. Lymphocyte subset counts of T cells, B cells and NK cells were analyzed using fluorescent-labeled antibodies against CD markers.
Blood samples were collected for FACS analysis of lymphocyte subsets. Lymphocyte subset counts of T cells, B cells and NK cells were analyzed using fluorescent-labeled antibodies against CD markers.
Blood samples were collected for FACS analysis of lymphocyte subsets. Lymphocyte subset counts of T cells, B cells and NK cells were analyzed using fluorescent-labeled antibodies against CD markers.
Blood samples were collected for FACS analysis of lymphocyte subsets. Lymphocyte subset counts of T cells, B cells and NK cells were analyzed using fluorescent-labeled antibodies against CD markers.
Blood samples were collected for FACS analysis of lymphocyte subsets. Lymphocyte subset counts of T cells, B cells and NK cells were analyzed using fluorescent-labeled antibodies against CD markers.
Blood/serum samples were analyzed for MMP3, osteocalcin and osteopontin concentrations using a validated analytical assay sensitive and specific Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay \[ELISA\] method for MMP3 and osteopontin in serum samples; specific electrochemiluminescence method for osteocalcin in blood samples).
Blood/serum samples were analyzed for MMP3, osteocalcin and osteopontin concentrations using a validated analytical assay sensitive and specific ELISA method for MMP3 and osteopontin in serum samples; specific electrochemiluminescence method for osteocalcin in blood samples.
Blood/serum samples were analyzed for MMP3, osteocalcin and osteopontin concentrations using a validated analytical assay sensitive and specific ELISA method for MMP3 and osteopontin in serum samples; specific electrochemiluminescence method for osteocalcin in blood samples.
Blood/serum samples were analyzed for MMP3, osteocalcin and osteopontin concentrations using a validated analytical assay sensitive and specific ELISA method for MMP3 and osteopontin in serum samples; specific electrochemiluminescence method for osteocalcin in blood samples.
Blood/serum samples were analyzed for MMP3, osteocalcin and osteopontin concentrations using a validated analytical assay sensitive and specific ELISA method for MMP3 and osteopontin in serum samples; specific electrochemiluminescence method for osteocalcin in blood samples.
Blood/serum samples were analyzed for MMP3, osteocalcin and osteopontin concentrations using a validated analytical assay sensitive and specific ELISA method for MMP3 and osteopontin in serum samples; specific electrochemiluminescence method for osteocalcin in blood samples.
Blood/serum samples were analyzed for MMP3, osteocalcin and osteopontin concentrations using a validated analytical assay sensitive and specific ELISA method for MMP3 and osteopontin in serum samples; specific electrochemiluminescence method for osteocalcin in blood samples.
Blood/serum samples were analyzed for MMP3, osteocalcin and osteopontin concentrations using a validated analytical assay sensitive and specific ELISA method for MMP3 and osteopontin in serum samples; specific electrochemiluminescence method for osteocalcin in blood samples.
Blood/serum samples were analyzed for MMP3, osteocalcin and osteopontin concentrations using a validated analytical assay sensitive and specific ELISA method for MMP3 and osteopontin in serum samples; specific electrochemiluminescence method for osteocalcin in blood samples.
Blood/serum samples were analyzed for MMP3, osteocalcin and osteopontin concentrations using a validated analytical assay sensitive and specific ELISA method for MMP3 and osteopontin in serum samples; specific electrochemiluminescence method for osteocalcin in blood samples.
Plasma samples were analyzed for PTH concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific electrochemiluminescence method.
Plasma samples were analyzed for PTH concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific electrochemiluminescence method.
Plasma samples were analyzed for PTH concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific electrochemiluminescence method.
Plasma samples were analyzed for PTH concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific electrochemiluminescence method.
Plasma samples were analyzed for PTH concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific electrochemiluminescence method.
Plasma samples were analyzed for PTH concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific electrochemiluminescence method.
Plasma samples were analyzed for PTH concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific electrochemiluminescence method.
Plasma samples were analyzed for PTH concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific electrochemiluminescence method.
Plasma samples were analyzed for PTH concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific electrochemiluminescence method.
Plasma samples were analyzed for PTH concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific electrochemiluminescence method.
Blood samples were analyzed for OPG concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Blood samples were analyzed for OPG concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Blood samples were analyzed for OPG concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Blood samples were analyzed for OPG concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Blood samples were analyzed for OPG concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Blood samples were analyzed for OPG concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Blood samples were analyzed for OPG concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Blood samples were analyzed for OPG concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Blood samples were analyzed for OPG concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Blood samples were analyzed for OPG concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Serum samples were analyzed for SAA concentrations using meso scale discovery (MSD) single ELISA electrochemiluminescence method and for CTX-1 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific Electro ChemiLuminescent ImmunoAssay (ECLIA).
Serum samples were analyzed for SAA concentrations using MSD single ELISA electrochemiluminescence method and for CTX-1 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ECLIA.
Serum samples were analyzed for SAA concentrations using MSD single ELISA electrochemiluminescence method and for CTX-1 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ECLIA.
Serum samples were analyzed for SAA concentrations using MSD single ELISA electrochemiluminescence method and for CTX-1 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ECLIA.
Serum samples were analyzed for SAA concentrations using MSD single ELISA electrochemiluminescence method and for CTX-1 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ECLIA.
Serum samples were analyzed for SAA concentrations using MSD single ELISA electrochemiluminescence method and for CTX-1 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ECLIA.
Serum samples were analyzed for SAA concentrations using MSD single ELISA electrochemiluminescence method and for CTX-1 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ECLIA.
Serum samples were analyzed for SAA concentrations using MSD single ELISA electrochemiluminescence method and for CTX-1 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ECLIA.
Serum samples were analyzed for SAA concentrations using MSD single ELISA electrochemiluminescence method and for CTX-1 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ECLIA.
Serum samples were analyzed for SAA concentrations using MSD single ELISA electrochemiluminescence method and for CTX-1 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ECLIA.
Serum samples were analyzed for IL-1ra and IL-15 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Serum samples were analyzed for IL-1ra and IL-15 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Serum samples were analyzed for IL-1ra and IL-15 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Serum samples were analyzed for IL-1ra and IL-15 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Serum samples were analyzed for IL-1ra and IL-15 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Serum samples were analyzed for IL-1ra and IL-15 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Serum samples were analyzed for IL-1ra and IL-15 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Serum samples were analyzed for IL-1ra and IL-15 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Serum samples were analyzed for IL-1ra and IL-15 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Serum samples were analyzed for IL-1ra and IL-15 concentrations using a validated, sensitive and specific ELISA method.
Urinary concentration of collagen type II C-telopeptide fragments was measured by competitive ELISA. uCTX-II was measured as nanogram per millimoles of creatinine (ng/mmol Cr).
Urinary concentration of collagen type II C-telopeptide fragments was measured by competitive ELISA. uCTX-II was measured as ng/mmol Cr.
Urinary concentration of collagen type II C-telopeptide fragments was measured by competitive ELISA. uCTX-II was measured as ng/mmol Cr.
Urinary concentration of collagen type II C-telopeptide fragments was measured by competitive ELISA. uCTX-II was measured as ng/mmol Cr.
Urinary concentration of collagen type II C-telopeptide fragments was measured by competitive ELISA. uCTX-II was measured as ng/mmol Cr.
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joints count (TJC); \>= 20% improvement in swollen joints count (SJC); and \>= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Blood level of HDL-C was measured following a 12-hours fasting.
Blood level of HDL-C was measured following a 12-hours fasting.
Cholesterol ester production rate was calculated using a 3-pool model with a simulation, analysis and modeling (SAAM II) program.
Cholesterol ester production rate was calculated using a 3-pool model with a simulation, analysis and modeling (SAAM II) program.
AUC (0-12)= area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 12 hours (0-12).
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast).
| Arm | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 5mg | EXPERIMENTAL | - |
| 10 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | - |
| Placebo Sequence 1 | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | - |
| Placebo Sequence 2 | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | - |
| adalimumab | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | - |
| CP-690,550 | EXPERIMENTAL | - |
| Treatment Group 1: 10 mg BID CP-690,550 (100 subjects). | EXPERIMENTAL | CP-690,550 will be administered for 4 weeks, vaccines will be administered at week 4. CP-690,550 will then continue for another 5 weeks at which point the immune response will be evaluated. |
| Treatment Group 2:Placebo CP-690,550 (100 subjects). | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Placebo will be administered for 4 weeks, vaccines will be administered at week 4. Placebo will then continue for another 5 weeks at which point the immune response will be evaluated. |
| Arm 1 | EXPERIMENTAL | - |
| Arm 2 | EXPERIMENTAL | - |
| CP-690,550 + methotrexate | EXPERIMENTAL | - |
| Placebo + methotrexate | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | - |
| 5 mg BID | EXPERIMENTAL | CP 690,550 5 mg BID |
| 15 mg BID | EXPERIMENTAL | CP 690,550 15 mg BID |
| 30 mg BID | EXPERIMENTAL | Oral tablets administered at a dose of 30 mg BID for 6 weeks |
| Placebo | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Placebo |
| CP-690,550 (tasocitinib) 10 mg twice daily (BID) | EXPERIMENTAL | - |
| Healthy Volunteers | NO_INTERVENTION | No intervention |
| CP-690,550 (tofacitinib) 30 mg q12h | EXPERIMENTAL | Individual dose of methotrexate with the addition of CP-690,550 30 mg q12h |
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| CP 690,550 | DRUG | tablets 5 mg BID PO plus q2 week placebo SC injections for 12 months |
| CP-690,550 | DRUG | tablets 10 mg BID PO plus q2 week placebo SC injections for 12 months |
| Placebo | OTHER | placebo tablets BID PO advance to 5mg CP 690,550 BID at Month 3 or 6 visit plus q2 week placebo SC injections for 12 months |
| Biologic TNFi | BIOLOGICAL | placebo tablets BID PO plus adalimumab 40 mg q2 week SC injections for 12 months |
| Atorvastatin | DRUG | Starting at Week 6 and continuing through Week 12 atorvastatin 10 mg oral tablets administered once daily |
| Atorvastatin Placebo | DRUG | Starting at Week 6 and continuing through Week 12 atorvastatin placebo tablets administered once daily |
| CP-690,550 + methotrexate | DRUG | CP-690,550 dose is 10 mg twice daily, oral tablets, for 4 weeks Methotrexate dose is ≥ 7.5 mg / week and ≤ 25 mg / week |
| Placebo + Methotrexate | DRUG | Methotrexate dose is ≥ 7.5 mg / week and ≤ 25 mg / week |
| CP-690,550 (tasocitinib) | DRUG | CP-690,550 (tasocitinib) dosed at 10 mg BID for 6 weeks in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis |
| CP-690,550 (tofacitinib) | DRUG | CP-690,550 30 mg q12h for 5 days |
| Methotrexate (MTX) | DRUG | individual dose of methotrexate (stably dosed) |
Inclusion Criteria: * The patient has a diagnosis of RA based upon the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 Revised Criteria. * The patient must have had an inadequate response to methotrexate and have active disease, as defined by both: ≥6 joints tender or painful on motion; and ≥6 joints s...