Tapinarof

Incidence, frequency, and duration of treatment emergent AEs and SAEs

Local Tolerability Scale (LTS) is a clinical tool for assessing the presence and overall degree of irritation at the application sites, according to a 5-point scale (0-4). Higher LTS scores represent more severe irritation.

Local Tolerability Scale (LTS) is a clinical tool for assessing the presence and overall degree of irritation at the application sites, according to a 5-point scale (0-4). Higher LTS scores represent more severe irritation.

For rollover subjects, all AEs reported in this extension study were considered as TEAEs except for those AEs ongoing at the end of previous studies but resolved prior to the Visit 1 date for this extension study. For direct-enrolling subjects, all AEs that start after the first dose of study drug will be considered a TEAE.

All AEs reported in this extension study were considered as TEAEs except for those AEs ongoing at the end of previous studies but resolved prior to the Visit 1 date for this extension study. Subjects could have reported more than one TEAE.

The mean chemistry and hematology parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.

The mean chemistry parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.

The mean chemistry parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.

The mean chemistry parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.

The mean hematology parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.

The mean hematology parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.

The hematology parameter, Hematocrit, was assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.

The hematology parameter, Ery. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin was assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.

The hematology parameter, Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume, was assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.

The hematology parameter, Erythrocytes, was assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.

The vIGA-AD is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a subject's atopic dermatitis at a given timepoint. It is a static 5-point (0-4) morphological assessment of overall disease severity (scalp excluded), as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, oozing/crusting. Higher vIGA-AD scores represents more severe disease.

The vIGA-AD is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a subject's atopic dermatitis at a given timepoint. It is a static 5-point (0-4) morphological assessment of overall disease severity (scalp excluded), as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, oozing/crusting. Higher vIGA-AD scores represents more severe disease.

Subjects received treatment with tapinarof intermittently guided by disease severity. This outcome measure assesses the change from baseline in %BSA affected in all subjects, including those on and those off therapy. Assessment of BSA with Atopic Dermatitis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. Body regions are assigned specific number of handprints with percentage \[Head and neck = 10% (10 handprints), upper extremities = 20% (20 handprints), Trunk (including axillae and groin) = 30% (30 handprints), lower extremities (including buttocks) = 40% (40 handprints)\]. Lesions on the scalp will not be included in the calculation of %BSA affected. Estimates of the % involvement in each body region will be multiplied by the fraction of total body area to obtain the total %BSA involved by region and overall.

Subjects received treatment with tapinarof intermittently guided by disease severity. This outcome measure assesses the % change from baseline in %BSA affected in all subjects, including those on and those off therapy. Assessment of BSA with Atopic Dermatitis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. Body regions are assigned specific number of handprints with percentage \[Head and neck = 10% (10 handprints), upper extremities = 20% (20 handprints), Trunk (including axillae and groin) = 30% (30 handprints), lower extremities (including buttocks) = 40% (40 handprints)\]. Lesions on the scalp will not be included in the calculation of %BSA affected. Estimates of the % involvement in each body region will be multiplied by the fraction of total body area to obtain the total %BSA involved by region and overall.

Subjects received treatment with tapinarof intermittently guided by disease severity. This outcome measure assesses the change from baseline in EASI score in all subjects, including those on and those off therapy. The EASI scoring system is a clinical tool that quantifies the severity of a subject's AD based on both lesion severity and %BSA affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the %BSA involved for each body region relative to the whole body. The subject's scalp is excluded from this assessment. Higher EASI scores indicate more severe disease.

Subjects received treatment with tapinarof intermittently guided by disease severity. This outcome measure assesses the % change from baseline in EASI score in all subjects, including those on and those off therapy. The EASI scoring system is a clinical tool that quantifies the severity of a subject's AD based on both lesion severity and %BSA affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the %BSA involved for each body region relative to the whole body. The subject's scalp is excluded from this assessment. Higher EASI scores indicate more severe disease.

The EASI scoring system is a clinical tool that quantifies the severity of a subject's AD based on both lesion severity and %BSA affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the %BSA involved for each body region relative to the whole body. Higher EASI scores indicate more severe disease.

The EASI scoring system is a clinical tool that quantifies the severity of a subject's AD based on both lesion severity and %BSA affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the %BSA involved for each body region relative to the whole body. The subject's scalp is excluded from this assessment. Higher EASI scores indicate more severe disease.

The EASI scoring system is a clinical tool that quantifies the severity of a subject's AD based on both lesion severity and %BSA affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the %BSA involved for each body region relative to the whole body. The subject's scalp is excluded from this assessment. Higher EASI scores indicate more severe disease.

The Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) is used to quickly assess itch/pruritus severity over a 24-hour period. The PP-NRS is scored on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being "no itch" and 10 being "worst itch imaginable". The subject or caregiver will utilize the scale to assess peak pruritis once per day and record the results in their diaries. The daily ratings are averaged to generate a score for the week.

The Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) is used to quickly assess itch/pruritus severity over a 24-hour period. The PP-NRS is scored on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being "no itch" and 10 being "worst itch imaginable". The subject or caregiver will utilize the scale to assess peak pruritis once per day and record the results in their diaries. The daily ratings are averaged to generate a score for the week.

The mean vital sign parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study. Shifts from Baseline in vital sign parameters were assessed for clinical relevance.

The mean vital sign parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study. Shifts from Baseline in vital sign parameters were assessed for clinical relevance.

The mean vital sign parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study. Shifts from Baseline in vital sign parameters were assessed for clinical relevance.

The vIGA-AD is a global assessment of the current state of the disease. It is a static 5-point scale used to grade overall disease severity (scalp excluded), as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, oozing/crusting. The vIGA-AD ranges from 0 to 4 and is calculated as Clear (0), Almost clear (1), Mild (2), Moderate (3), and Severe (4). Higher vIGA-AD scores represent more severe disease. Statistics are based on 100 imputed datasets.

All AEs reported in this extension study were considered as TEAEs except for those AEs ongoing at the end of the pivotal Phase 3 studies but resolved prior to the Visit 1 date for this extension study. All SAEs were deemed unrelated to treatment with tapinarof cream, 1%.

The mean chemistry and hematology parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study. Shifts from Baseline in chemistry and hematology parameters for individual subjects were assessed for clinical relevance. The number of subjects with clinically significant changes from baseline in laboratory values was assessed for clinical relevance.

Subjects who completed 1 of the phase 3 studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of tapinarof had the option to enter this extension study. Subjects entering with a PGA = 0 had treatment discontinued and were monitored for duration of remittive response. If/when disease worsening occurred, as evidenced by a PGA ≥ 2, treatment was re-initiated and continued until a PGA = 0 was achieved. This outcome measure assesses the median time for subjects entering with a PGA = 0 to first worsening (PGA ≥ 2) while off therapy during this extension study. The PGA is an assessment of a subject's psoriasis using a static 5-point scale to grade lesions on the clinical characteristics of erythema, scaling, and plaque thickness/elevation. The PGA ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = clear, 1= almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe.

Subjects who completed 1 of the phase 3 studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of tapinarof had the option to enter this extension study. Subjects entering with a PGA ≥ 1 continued treatment with tapinarof until they achieved a PGA = 0, at which time treatment was discontinued and subjects were monitored for remittive response. If/when disease worsening occurred, as evidenced by a PGA ≥ 2, treatment was re-initiated and continued until a PGA = 0 was achieved. This outcome measure assesses the number of subjects who entered the extension study with a PGA ≥ 1 and achieved complete disease clearance (PGA=0) while on therapy during this extension study. The PGA is an assessment of a subject's psoriasis using a static 5-point scale to grade lesions on the clinical characteristics of erythema, scaling, and plaque thickness/elevation. The PGA ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = clear, 1= almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher PGA scores represent more severe disease.

Subjects who completed 1 of the phase 3 studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of tapinarof had the option to enter this extension study. Subjects entering with a PGA ≥ 1 continued treatment with tapinarof until they achieved a PGA = 0, at which time treatment was discontinued and subjects were monitored for remittive response. If/when disease worsening occurred, as evidenced by a PGA ≥ 2, treatment was re-initiated and continued until a PGA = 0 was achieved. This outcome measure assesses the number of these subjects who entered the study with a PGA≥ 2 and achieved a PGA of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) while on therapy during this extension study. The PGA is an assessment of a subject's psoriasis using a static 5-point scale to grade lesions on the clinical characteristics of erythema, scaling, and plaque thickness/elevation. The PGA ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = clear, 1= almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher PGA scores represent more severe disease.

Subjects who completed 1 of the phase 3 studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of tapinarof had the option to enter this extension study. Subjects entering with a PGA = 0 had treatment discontinued and were monitored for duration of remittive response. If/when disease worsening occurred, as evidenced by a PGA ≥ 2, treatment was re-initiated and continued until a PGA = 0 was achieved. This treatment and re-treatment pattern of use was continued until the end of the study. This outcome measure assesses the number of these subjects entering the study with a PGA= 0 who experienced worsening (PGA ≥ 2) while off therapy at least once during this extension study. The PGA is an assessment of a subject's psoriasis using a static 5-point scale to grade lesions on the clinical characteristics of erythema, scaling, and plaque thickness/elevation. The PGA ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = clear, 1= almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe.

Subjects received treatment with tapinarof intermittently guided by disease severity. This outcome measure assesses the change from baseline in %BSA affected in all subjects, including those on and those off therapy. BSA affected was estimated by the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the subject represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. Body regions are assigned specific number of handprints (hp) with percentage \[Head and neck = 10% (10 hp), upper extremities = 20% (20 hp), Trunk (including axillae and groin) = 30% (30 hp), lower extremities (including buttocks) = 40% (40 hp)\]. The total %BSA involved was estimated = % involvement

Subjects who completed 1 of the phase 3 studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of tapinarof had the option to enter this extension study. Subjects entering with a PGA ≥ 1 continued tapinarof until they achieved a PGA = 0, at which time treatment was discontinued. If/when disease worsening occurred, as evidenced by a PGA ≥ 2, treatment was re-initiated and continued until a PGA = 0 was achieved. Mean duration (days) of treatment episode = time (days) from date of each PGA ≥ 2 (or PGA ≥ 1 for the first episode) to 1 day before each subsequent PGA = 0. The PGA is an assessment of a subject's psoriasis using a static 5-point scale to grade lesions on the clinical characteristics of erythema, scaling, and plaque thickness/elevation. The PGA ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = clear, 1= almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher PGA scores represent more severe disease.

Subjects received treatment with tapinarof intermittently guided by disease severity. This outcome measure assesses the change from baseline in PASI score in all subjects, including those on and those off therapy. The PASI scoring system combines the assessment of lesion severity and extent of affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). The body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, and legs). Each area is assessed for 3 signs: erythema (redness), induration (plaque thickness), and scale. The severity of each sign in each body area is assessed and scored independently using a 5-point scale, where 0=none, 1=slight, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe. Each area is also assessed for percent of skin involved: 0 = (0%), 1 = (1-\<10%), 2 = (10-\<30%), 3 = (30-\<50%), 4 = (50 -\<70%), 5 = (70-\<90%), 6 = (90-100%). Overall PASI = the sum of (individual scores x by a weighted factor for each body region).

Subjects received treatment with tapinarof intermittently guided by disease severity. This outcome measure assesses the % change from baseline in PASI score in all subjects, including those on and those off therapy. The PASI scoring system combines the assessment of lesion severity and extent of affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). The body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, and legs). Each area is assessed for 3 signs: erythema (redness), induration (plaque thickness), and scale. The severity of each sign in each body area is assessed and scored independently using a 5-point scale, where 0=none, 1=slight, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe. Each area is also assessed for percent of skin involved: 0 = (0%), 1 = (1-\<10%), 2 = (10-\<30%), 3 = (30-\<50%), 4 = (50 -\<70%), 5 = (70-\<90%), 6 = (90-100%). Overall PASI = the sum of (individual scores x by a weighted factor for each body region).

Subjects received treatment with tapinarof intermittently guided by disease severity. This outcome measure assesses change from baseline in disease impact on daily activities, as measured by the DLQI, in all subjects including those on and those off therapy. The DLQI is a 10-item PRO measure that assesses the extent to which the skin condition has affected the subject's quality of life over the past week, including 6 domains (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work/school, and treatment). The total score (0-30) is the sum of 10 questions with each ranging from 0 to 3. The scoring of each question is as follows: Very much= 3, A lot=2, A little = 1, Not at all = 0, Not relevant = 0, Question unanswered = 0. DLQI scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a more impaired quality of life.

Subjects received treatment with tapinarof intermittently guided by disease severity. This outcome measure assesses % change from baseline in disease impact on daily activities, as measured by the DLQI, in all subjects including those on and those off therapy. The DLQI is a 10-item PRO measure that assesses the extent to which the skin condition has affected the subject's quality of life over the past week, including 6 domains (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work/school, and treatment). The total score (0-30) is the sum of 10 questions with each ranging from 0 to 3. The scoring of each question is as follows: Very much= 3, A lot=2, A little = 1, Not at all = 0, Not relevant = 0, Question unanswered = 0.

The PGA is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a subject's psoriasis at a given timepoint. A static 5-point scale is used to grade lesions on the clinical characteristics of erythema, scaling, and plaque thickness/elevation. The PGA ranges from 0 to 4, and is calculated as Clear (0), Almost clear (1), Mild (2), Moderate (3), and Severe (4). Higher PGA scores represent more severe disease. Analyses were done using multiple imputation

To evaluate the treatment benefit of Tapinarof applied topically to patients affected with palmoplantar keratoderma. Either an overall change in the PGA score to 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) or a decrease from baseline of at least 2 points. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. Title: PHYSICIAN GLOBAL ASSESSMENT Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 5

Number of Participants that Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs).

Change in laboratory values was assessed for clinical relevance

Change in laboratory values was assessed for clinical relevance

Change in laboratory values was assessed for clinical relevance

Change in laboratory values was assessed for clinical relevance

Change in laboratory values was assessed for clinical relevance

Change in laboratory values was assessed for clinical relevance

Change in Ery. mean corpuscular hemoglobin laboratory values was assessed for clinical relevance

Change in Ery. mean corpuscular volume laboratory values was assessed for clinical relevance

Change in Erythrocytes laboratory values was assessed for clinical relevance

Change in Hematocrit laboratory values was assessed for clinical relevance

Local Tolerability Scale (LTS) is a clinical tool for assessing the presence and overall degree of irritation at the application sites, according to a 5-point scale. 0 indicates no irritation and 4 indicates Very Severe irritation.

The AUC in plasma is a pharmacokinetic parameter that describes the overall exposure of the drug.

The Cmax is a pharmacokinetic parameter that describes the highest concentration of the drug that is achieved after dosing.

The tmax is a pharmacokinetic parameter that describes the time point at which the highest concentration of the drug is achieved after dosing.

The Cτ is a pharmacokinetic parameter that is the last quantifiable concentration determined directly from individual concentration-time data

Change in pulse vital signs was assessed for clinical relevance

Change in Blood Pressure vital signs was assessed for clinical relevance

Change in Temperature vital signs was assessed for clinical relevance

Frequency and severity of AEs (local and systemic)

Changes in laboratory values, biomarker values, ECG results and vital signs were assessed for clinical relevance.

At each specified study visit, the Investigator (or qualified evaluator) assessed the presence and overall degree of irritation at the application sites, according to the LTS. The score will ideally represent an 'average' across all application sites. To the fullest extent possible, the same Investigator (or designated evaluator) will perform all tolerability assessments for an individual participant throughout the study.

The AUC in plasma is a pharmacokinetic parameter that describes the overall exposure of the drug.

The Cmax is a pharmacokinetic parameter that describes the highest concentration of the drug that is achieved after dosing.

The tmax is a pharmacokinetic parameter that describes the time point at which the highest concentration of the drug is achieved after dosing.