Approval Probability 71%
TA Base Rate26%
Adjusted LOA41%
ML RiskLOW_RISK
| NCT ID | Title | Phase | Status | Enrollment | Velocity | Design | Start | Completion | Last Updated | Sites | Countries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT02382913 | Persistency Study After aP / Tdap Booster Vaccines in Adult Subjects (V113_01 Extension 1) | PHASE1 | COMPLETED | 315 | — | — | Apr 1, 2015 | Jun 1, 2015 | Mar 24, 2016 | 1 | Belgium |
The antibody response against the pertussis antigen components (PT, FHA and PRN) at day 1 as measured by Multiplex ELISA and reported as Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) in aP1, aP2, aP4 Groups versus the response to the commercially available Tdap comparator. Note: The mean and confidence intervals of Licensed Tdap for the same antigen can be different (from aP to Tdap table) since two different statistical model were fitted within each antigen: one with aP and Licensed Tdap groups and one with Tdap and Licensed Tdap groups.
The antibody response against the pertussis antigen components (PT, FHA and PRN) in serum at day 1 as measured by Multiplex ELISA and reported as Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) in T5D2aP1, T5D2aP2 and T5D2aP4 Groups versus the response to the commercially available Tdap comparator. Note: The mean and confidence intervals of Licensed Tdap for the same antigen can be different (from aP to Tdap table) since two different statistical model were fitted within each antigen: one with aP and Licensed Tdap groups and one with Tdap and Licensed Tdap groups.
The antibody response against the pertussis antigen components (PT, FHA and PRN) in serum at day 1 as measured by Multiplex ELISA and reported as Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) in T5D4aP1, T5D4aP2 and T5D4aP4 Groups versus the response to the commercially available Tdap comparator. Note: The mean and confidence intervals of Licensed Tdap for the same antigen can be different (from aP to Tdap table) since two different statistical model were fitted within each antigen: one with aP and Licensed Tdap groups and one with Tdap and Licensed Tdap groups.
Geometric Mean Ratios of anti-PT, anti-FHA and anti-PRN antibody were calculated to measure the changes in immunogenicity concentrations within subjects from all V113\_01 time points to V113\_01E1 day 1. Note: The mean and confidence intervals of Licensed Tdap for the same antigen can be different (from aP to Tdap table) since two different statistical model were fitted within each antigen: one with aP and Licensed Tdap groups and one with Tdap and Licensed Tdap groups.
Geometric Mean Ratios of anti-PT, anti-FHA and anti-PRN antibody were calculated to measure the changes in immunogenicity concentrations within subjects from all V113\_01 time points to V113\_01E1 day 1. Note: The mean and confidence intervals of Licensed Tdap for the same antigen can be different (from aP to Tdap table) since two different statistical model were fitted within each antigen: one with aP and Licensed Tdap groups and one with Tdap and Licensed Tdap groups.
Geometric Mean Ratios of anti-PT, anti-FHA and anti-PRN antibody were calculated to measure the changes in immunogenicity concentrations within subjects from all V113\_01 time points to V113\_01E1 day 1. Note: The mean and confidence intervals of Licensed Tdap for the same antigen can be different (from aP to Tdap table) since two different statistical model were fitted within each antigen: one with aP and Licensed Tdap groups and one with Tdap and Licensed Tdap groups.
| Arm | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects received acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine with different antigen dose formulations: low dose of PT, FHA, PRN, followed by one fixed dose of diphtheria and tetanus vaccine (adsorbed, reduced antigen content, Germany) administered one month apart. |
| Group 2 | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects received acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine with different antigen dose formulations: medium dose of PT, FHA, PRN, followed by one fixed dose of diphtheria and tetanus vaccine (adsorbed, reduced antigen content, Germany) administered one month apart. |
| Group 3 | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects received acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine with different antigen dose formulations: high dose of PT, FHA, PRN, followed by one fixed dose of diphtheria and tetanus vaccine (adsorbed, reduced antigen content, Germany) administered one month apart |
| Group 4 | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects received tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) with different antigen dose formulations: low dose of PT, FHA, PRN, low dose of D (diphteria) toxoid, fixed dose of T (tetanus) toxoid, followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart. |
| Group 5 | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects received tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) with different antigen dose formulations: medium dose of PT, FHA, PRN, low dose of D toxoid, fixed dose of T toxoid, followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart. |
| Group 6 | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects received tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) with different antigen dose formulations: high dose of PT, FHA, PRN, low dose of D toxoid, fixed dose of T toxoid, followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart. |
| Group 7 | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects received tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) with different antigen dose formulations: low dose of PT, FHA, PRN, double dose of D toxoid, fixed dose of T toxoid, followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart. |
| Group 8 | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects received tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) with different antigen dose formulations: medium dose of PT, FHA, PRN, double dose of D toxoid, fixed dose of T toxoid, followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart |
| Group 9 | EXPERIMENTAL | Subjects received tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) with different antigen dose formulations: high dose of PT, FHA, PRN, double dose of D toxoid, fixed dose of T toxoid, followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart. |
| Group 10 | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | Subject received one dose of a licensed TdaP booster vaccine (containing 8 μg each of PT, FHA and 2.5 μg of PRN antigens and 2.5 Lf of diphtheria toxoid and 5 Lf of tetanus toxoid) followed by one administration of saline solution one month apart |
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| aP booster | BIOLOGICAL | Acellular pertussis vaccine: Acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine was administered with different antigen doses intramuscularly in the upper deltoid region of the subject's non-dominant arm. Biological: Diphtheria and tetanus vaccine (adsorbed, reduced antigen content, Germany) To ensure all subjects receive a tetanus and diphtheria booster vaccination, an injection was administered on Study Day 30, one month after the administration of the investigational vaccine. |
| TdaP booster | BIOLOGICAL | Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (adsorbed) Tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (TdaP) vaccine was administered with different antigen doses intramuscularly in the upper deltoid region of the subject's non-dominant arm. Other: Saline solution Subjects received one injection of saline solution at one month after vaccination. |
| Licensed TdaP booster (Boostrix®) | BIOLOGICAL | Licensed TdaP booster vaccine Licenced TdaP booster vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the upper deltoid region of the subject's non-dominant arm. Other: Saline solution Subjects received one injection of saline solution at one month after vaccination. |
Inclusion Criteria: * Healthy individuals previously enrolled in V113\_01 trial, who completed the study following study protocol and who received the appropriate booster vaccine per group assignment * Individuals who voluntarily gave written informed consent after the nature of the study was expla...