AIN457

The number and percentage of participants with treatment emergent AEs/SAEs will be summarized. No hypothesis testing will be performed.

Sustained remission at Week 52 is defined as a participant meeting all of the following: ● achieved remission at Week 12 AND all of the following, sustained from Week 12 to Week 52: * no recurrence of signs or symptoms, attributable to PMR, that requires escape treatment or rescue treatment * no new diagnosis of Giant cell arteritis (GCA), that requires escape treatment or rescue treatment Remission at Week 12 is defined as a participant meeting all of the following at Week 12: * no use of escape treatment or rescue treatment prior to Week 12 * no signs or symptoms attributable to PMR, that requires escape treatment or use of rescue treatment, at Week 12 * no new diagnosis of GCA, that requires escape treatment or rescue treatment, at Week 12

The WORC Index consisted of 21 items divided into 5 Domains: Physical Symptoms (6 items), Sport/Recreation (4 items), Work Function (4 items), Lifestyle Function (4 items) and Emotional Function (3 items). Each of the 21 items in the WORC was rated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no impact on quality of life) to 100 (worst possible impact). Thus, the total score ranged from 0 to 2100 points. The score was reported as a percentage of normal by subtracting the total score from 2100, dividing by 2100, and multiplying by 100. Total final WORC percentage scores ranged from 0%, the lowest functional status level, to 100%, the highest functional status level. Change from baseline in the WORC percentage total score was assessed at Week 24. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

To demonstrate the superiority of secukinumab 300 mg s.c. compared to placebo (both arms in combination with a prednisolone or equivalent taper regimen as per treatment guideline) in delaying the time to first GCA clinical relapse from baseline in participants with new onset of GCA who are in clinical remission and eligible for treatment with glucocorticoid-monotherapy. GCA clinical relapse is defined as both: 1. The recurrence of signs or symptoms attributable to active GCA after clinical remission, which are considered clinically significant by the investigator AND 2. The requirement of a change in the treatment prompted by the recurrence of signs and symptoms i. an increase in prednisolone or equivalent dose AND/OR ii. the addition of a rescue treatment. Definition of clinical remission: absence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA as determined by the investigator.

Primary objective is to determine whether the efficacy of secukinumab 300 mg s.c. in combination with a 26-week GC taper regimen is superior to placebo in combination with a 52-week glucocorticoids (GC) taper regimen in participants with giant cell arteritis (GCA) based on sustained remission at Week 52

ASAS40 response was defined as relative improvement of at least 40% and absolute improvement of at least 2 units on a 0 to 10 scale in at least 3 of the 4 main domains of the ASAS and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. The 4 main domains of the ASAS are: 1.Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (score ranged from 0 \[not active\] to 10 \[very active\]); 2.Back Pain (score ranged from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[severe pain\]); 3.Function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index \[BASFI\]) (score ranged from 0 \[easy\] to 10 \[impossible\]); 4.Inflammation (mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) questions 5 and 6 concerning morning stiffness intensity and duration) (score ranged from 0 \[none\] to 10 \[very severe\]). The percentage of TNF-alpha-inhibitor-naïve participants who achieved ASAS40 response at Week 16 was assessed using a logistic regression model. Discontinued participants and those with missing responses were considered non-responders

Assessed the efficacy of secukinumab relative to placebo at week 16 using Non-responder imputation (NRI) and based on the percentage of participants achieving an ACR20 response (ACR = American College of Rheumatology). ACR20 response criteria is response ≥ 20% improvement based on: Swollen Joint Count (SJC)/Tender Joint Count (TJC), Patient's global assessment of disease activity (PaGA) (Visual Analog Scale (VAS)), Physician's global assessment of disease activity (PhGA) (VAS), Patient's assessment of PsA pain intensity (VAS), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) or Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).

The disability assessment component of the HAQ evaluated a subject's level of functional ability through 20 questions grouped into 8 categories: dressing, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Each item began with the prompt "Over the past week, are you able to…" and is scored on a 4-point scale: 0 (no difficulty), 1 (some difficulty), 2 (much difficulty), and 3 (unable to do). The overall score was calculated by averaging the scores across all answered domains, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A HAQ-DI response was defined as an improvement of ≥0.35 points from baseline at Week 28. Missing values were imputed as non-responders

Loss of response was defined as: * at least a 50% increase in abscess and/or nodules (AN) count compared to the average AN count from the 3 previous visits or at Week 52, whichever is lower and the increase was at least of 3 AN. * at least a 30% increase in AN compared to the average AN count from the 3 previous visits or Week 52, whichever is lower, with an increase of at least 2 AN and a further increase in the AN count of at least 2 AN at a re-assessment visit within 2-4 weeks

The incidence rate of participants achieving Loss of Response (LOR) was based on the primary estimand. * Day 1 = Date of 1st dose intake in the extension study. * Subjects at risk = Subjects who did not have LOR and were not censored before or at the start of the specified time interval. * Incidence rate (%) = (number of subjects with LOR / number of subjects at risk) x 100.

Percentage of participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) response The ACR50 is a composite measure defined as both improvement of 50% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 50% improvement in three of the following five criteria: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, functional ability measure \[most often Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)\], visual analog pain scale, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein (CRP)

ASAS40 is ≥ 40% and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥20 units (range 0-100) in ≥ 3 of the following 4 domains: back pain \[10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS)\], patient global assessment of disease activity (10 cm VAS), physical function (BASFI; range 0-100) and inflammation (mean score of items 5 and 6 of the BASDAI; both 10 cm VAS) without any worsening in the remaining domain. ASAS consists of 6 domains (4 main and 2 additional): 1. Patient's global assessment measured on a visual analog scale (VAS); 2. Patient's assessment of back pain, measured on a VAS; 3. Function represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) measured by VAS; 4. Inflammation represented by mean duration and severity of morning stiffness, on the BAS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) as measured by VAS; 5. Spinal mobility represented by the BAS Metrology Index (BASMI) lateral spinal flexion assessment; 6. C-reactive protein (acute phase reactant).

The JIA ACR response criteria consisted of 6 core criteria: * Physician global assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). * Parent's or patients' global assessment of overall well-being on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very well and 100=very poor). * Functional ability (CHAQ: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire): 30 questions across 8 domains assessing the child's functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain. It ranged from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe disability). * Number of joints with active arthritis (as per ACR definition), ranging from 0 to 73. * Number of joints with limited range of motion, ranging from 0 to 69. * Index of inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) levels The JIA ACR 30 response was achieved if 3 of any 6 core set variables improved by at least 30% from baseline of the core study, and no more than 1 variable worsening more than 30%

Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS) consists of 4 domains measured on visual analog scales (VAS): 1. Patient's global assessment; 2. Patient's assessment of back pain; 3. Function represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) average of 10 questions; 4. Inflammation represented by mean duration and severity of morning stiffness, on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). ASAS40 response is defined as an improvement of ≥40% and ≥2 units on a scale of 0 - 10 in at least three of the four ASAS domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. A score of 0 indicates less severity; a score of 10 indicates more severity. Percentage was calculated from a logistic regression model: logit(proportion) = treatment + baseline quick C-reactive protein (CRP) + baseline weight.

HiSCR50 at Week 16 is defined as at least a 50% decrease in Abscess and inflammatory Nodule (AN) count compared to baseline with no increase in the number of abscesses and/or in the number of draining fistulas from baseline to Week 16. The baseline is defined as the last assessment (including unscheduled visits) obtained before/on the day of the first administration of the study treatment, or on the randomization date if there had been no drug administration. This endpoint was analyzed by logistic regression.

Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI):Combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs); each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, Erythema,Thickening (plaque elevation, induration) \& Scaling(desquamation). Scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section(head: 0.1, upper limbs: 0.2 body: 0.3 lower limbs: 0.4). Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) will be assessed/calculated as per standard procedure. PASI 75 represents the percentage (or number)of patients who have achieved a 75% or more reduction in their PASI score from baseline. PASI 100 indicates patients who have achieved a complete resolution of all disease.

Investigator will assess the disease using the validated Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) mod 2011 and rate the disease from a score of 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease)

A subject was considered as a PASI 90 responder if s/he achieved a reduction of 90% or more of the PASI score, compared to baseline, at a given time point.The head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs were assessed separately for erythema, thickening, and scaling. PASI scores can range from a lower value of 0, corresponding to no signs of psoriasis, up to a theoretic maximum of 72.0, i.e., higher scores represent more severity.

The spinal pain numerical rating scale (NRS) is an 11-point scale to assess pain intensity in patients who are able to self-report. It is an 11-point scale from 0-10: 1) "0" = no pain. 2) "10" = the most intense pain imaginable. To calculate the average spinal pain, the patient was asked to answer 2 questions to get 2 pain ratings, the total spinal pain corresponding to the intensity of spinal pain experienced on an average over 24 hours during the previous week and the nocturnal back pain corresponding to the intensity of spinal pain experienced on an average over the night during the previous week.

Survival analysis of time to flare in treatment period 2 (TP2) FAS2 Subjects are either ERA or JPsA

Clinical response, failure to permanently discontinue study medication prematurely, and lack of need for rescue medication was required for a patient to achieve treatment success. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with monotherapy ACR20 response at Week 52 where monotherapy ACR20 response is defined as meeting the following 3 conditions: 1. achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response 2. no permanent study treatment (secukinumab or adalimumab) discontinuation before or at Week 50 (the last dosing visit) 3. no use of conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (also known as non-biologic DMARDs) cDMARDs (including Methotrexate (MTX)) after Week 36 (regardless of the starting time of taking cDMARDs)

ASAS20 response is defined as an improvement of ≥20% and ≥1 units on a scale of 10 in at least three of the four ASAS main domains and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit on a scale of 10 in the remaining domain

Purpose of this measure: was to demonstrate that secukinumab 150 mg s.c. is superior to placebo in the achievement of ASAS 20 response at Week 12 after superiority of 300 mg was established ASAS20 was defined as an improvement of ≥20% and absolute improvement of ≥10 unit (0-100 mm VAS) from baseline in ≥3 of the following 4 domains (and absence of deterioration in any domain): patient's global assessment of disease activity (PTGA), pain assessment (total pain score), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and clinical inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related scores on the BASDAI)

Number (%) of patients with resolution of Achilles tendon enthesitis (affected foot) as assessed by respective subcomponent of Leeds enthesitis index (LEI) at Week 24. The primary analysis was performed via a logistic regression model with the factors treatment, country, and stratification factor diagnosis (PsA or axSpA); patients with a missing assessment were considered as responders if they had already met the response criterion at the time of last assessment.

Mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis of change in Global OMERACT-EULAR Synovitis Score (GLOESS) score at Week 12 (observed data) to compare treatments The range for the GLOESS score is 0 to 144. GLOESS is the ultrasound scoring system measured for 24 pairs of joints. The scoring is from 0 to 3 for each joint; so the minimum score can be 0 and maximum can be 144.

Number of participants who achieved ≥ 90% reduction in PASI compared to baseline. Logistic regression analysis of PASI 90 response at Week 12 PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, upper limbs, trunk, lower limbs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of body region(head: 0.1, upper limbs: 0.2, trunk: 0.3, lower limbs: 0.4).

Investigator's Global Assessment uses a scale (IGA mod 2011) that rates disease from a score of 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease)

Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS) consist of 6 domains (4 main and 2 additional assessment domains): 1. Patient's global assessment measured on a visual analog scale (VAS); 2. Patient's assessment of back pain, measured on a VAS; 3. Function represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) average of 10 questions as measured by VAS; 4. Inflammation represented by mean duration and severity of morning stiffness, on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) as measured by VAS; 5. Spinal mobility represented by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) lateral spinal flexion assessment; 6. C-reactive protein (acute phase reactant). ASAS40 response is defined as an improvement of ≥40% and ≥2 units on a scale of 10 in at least three of the four ASAS main domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. A higher score on the VAS signifies higher severity.

Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS) consist of 6 domains (4 main and 2 additional assessment domains): 1. Patient's global assessment measured on a visual analog scale (VAS); 2. Patient's assessment of back pain, measured on a VAS; 3. Function represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) average of 10 questions as measured by VAS; 4. Inflammation represented by mean duration and severity of morning stiffness, on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) as measured by VAS; 5. Spinal mobility represented by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) lateral spinal flexion assessment; 6. C-reactive protein (acute phase reactant). ASAS40 response is defined as an improvement of ≥40% and ≥2 units on a scale of 10 in at least three of the four ASAS main domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain. A higher score on the VAS signifies higher severity.

Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI):Combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs); each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, Erythema,Thickening (plaque elevation, induration) \& Scaling(desquamation). Scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section(head: 0.1, upper limbs: 0.2 trunk: 0.3 lower limbs: 0.4). Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) will be assessed/calculated as per standard procedure. PASI 75 represents the percentage (or number) of patients who have achieved a 75% or more reduction in their PASI score from baseline.

IGA: The IGA mod 2011 scale has following different scores for the state of disease: 0: Clear, No signs of psoriasis. 1: Almost clear 2: Mild 3: Moderate 4 : Severe

ACR20 response was defined as having a positive clinical response to treatment (individual improvement) in disease activity if the participant had at least 20% improvement based on tender 78-joint count, swollen 76-joint count and at least 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: participant's assessment of PsA pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score), and acute phase reactant evaluated as (high sensitivity c-reactive protein (hsCRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)).

The ACR20 response is defined by at least 20% decrease in the swollen and tender joint count, and at least 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index, pain score on a visual analog scale, patient global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity and acute phase reactant \[either erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)\]. ACR20 is used to assess the efficacy of secukinumab, with or without loading, versus placebo.

The primary efficacy outcome of this study evaluates the benefit of secukinumab on the severity of psoriasis based on the SPI. This index comprises 3 components: severity (SPIs), psychosocial (SPIp) and intervention (SPIi) and were evaluated by both health care professional (professional, proSPI) and the patient (self-administered: saSPI). Only the severity components were evaluated for the primary objective: proSPI (s) and saSPI (s). Changes at Week 16 compared to Baseline in patients suffering from moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were analyzed for the purpose of this study.

The primary efficacy objective of the study was to evaluate the benefit of secukinumab on the severity of psoriasis based on the SPI. This index comprises 3 components: severity (SPIs), psychosocial (SPIp) and intervention (SPIi) and were evaluated by both health care professional (professional, proSPI) and the patient (self-administered: saSPI). Only the severity components were evaluated for the primary objective: proSPI (s) and saSPI (s). Changes at Week 16 compared to Baseline in patients suffering from moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were analyzed. proSPI (s) score range is 0 to 50. Higher score means worse condition

ASAS 20 response is a validated composite assessment, defined as an improvement of at least 20 percent (%) and 1 unit on a scale of 10 in three main domains and no worsening of at least 20% and 1 unit on a scale of 10 in the fourth domain within a defined time frame. Four main ASAS domains include: 1. Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm VAS ranging from not severe to very severe 2. Patient's assessment of back pain, measured on a 100 mm VAS ranging from no pain to unbearable pain 3. Function represented by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) average of 10 questions regarding ability to perform specific tasks as measured by a 0-10 VAS scale 4. Inflammation represented by average of duration and severity of morning stiffness for last 2 questions on BASDAI scale (0 - no problem, 10 - worst problem)

PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4).

PASI (Langley et al 2015) combines the assessment of the severity of lesions and the area affected into a single score with a range of 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). The PASI was assessed at all visits in CORE and extension phases. PASI 90 response: patients achieving ≥ 90% improvement (reduction) in PASI score compared to baseline are defined as PASI 90 responders.

PASI score is an average degree of severity of signs in head \[H\], trunk \[T\], upper limbs \[U\] and lower limbs \[L\], assessed separately for erythema \[E\], thickening (plaque elevation, induration) \[I\], and scaling (desquamation) \[D\]. Area \[A\] covered by lesions on each body region was estimated as a percentage (%) of total area of that particular body region and was assigned a score of 0=0%; 1=1-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100%. The head and neck, upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs correspond to approximately 10%, 20%, 30% and 40% of the body surface area, respectively. PASI score was calculated as: PASI = 0.1(EH+IH+DH) AH + 0.2(EU+IU+DU) AU + 0.3(ET+IT+DT) AT + 0.4(EL+IL+DL) AL. PASI scores can range from 0 (no signs) to a maximum of 72.0. PASI 75 responders were participants who achieved \>=75% improvement (reduction) in PASI score compared to baseline.

Number of participants with at least 90% improvement from baseline. PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4).

Number of participants with at least 90% improvement from baseline. PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4).

On a 100-mm horizontal line, the patient placed a mark representing their perception of worst itching (pruritus) within a recall period of 24 hours, where 0 = no pruritus and 100 = most severe pruritus.

PSSI 90 response (yes) at Week 12; PSSI 90 response means at least a 90% improvement in scalp psoriasis Percentage of participants with Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index 90 (PSSI 90) response of "yes"

A patient will be considered as improved according the ACR20 criteria if she/he has at least 20% decrease in the swollen and tender joint count, and at least 20% improvements in 3 of the following 5 criteria: physical disability on the Health Assessment Questionnaire; pain score on a visual analog scale; patient global assessment; physician global assessment; and acute phase reactant \[either erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)\]

Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) is non-invasive method evaluated by Doppler Ultrasound test, to assess endothelial function. FMD was calculated as the percent maximal deviation from the baseline arterial diameter (D):FMD = 100\*\[(D maximum - D baseline) / D baseline\]. Here, arterial diameter (brachial artery) was measured at rest (1 minute), during inflation of the distal cuff to 100 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) for 4.5 minutes and for 4.5 minutes following deflation.

Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 90 responders were defined as participants achieving ≥ 90% improvement at Week 16

ASAS 20 response is a validated composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined time frame at least 20% improvement in score in at least 3 of a conventional set of 4 clinical domains relevant to AS and no worsening in the fourth domain. In this study, ASAS 20 was used to assess the efficacy of at least one dose of secukinumab versus placebo.

The primary endpoint was assessed by the palmoplantar pustulosis Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (ppPASI 75). The percentage of subjects who achieved a 75% reduction in ppPASI score from Baseline to Week 16 was measured. The ppPASI is a modification of the PASI score and adjusted for palmoplantar pustular psoriasis by classifying and scoring erythema, scaling (desquamation) and pustules/vesicles. Both palms and both plants are scored from 0 to 4. The extent of involvement of each region of the body is scored from 0 to 6. The total ppPASI score can range from a lower level of 0, corresponding to no signs of psoriasis, up to a maximum of 72.

ASAS 20 response is a validated composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined time frame at least 20% improvement in score in at least 3 of a conventional set of 4 clinical domains relevant to AS and no worsening in the fourth domain. In this study, ASAS 20 is used to assess quantitatively the sustainability of clinical benefits of two dosage regimens of secukinumab over the treatment period from Week 104 to Week 260 No Statistical Analysis was performed This was the total for Group 1 Participants that up-titrated are counted only at the originally randomized treatment group.

PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs); each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 75 is defined as participants achieving ≥ 75% improvement from baseline.

Proportion of subjects with a positive clinical response to treatment (individual improvement) in disease activity according to ACR20 criteria if he/she has at least 20% improvement in 1. Tender 68-joint count 2. Swollen 66-joint count and 3. At least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's assessment of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) pain * Patient's global assessment of disease activity * Physician's global assessment of disease activity * Subject self-assessed disability (Health-Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ-DI\] score) * Acute phase reactant (hsCRP or ESR)

Proportion of subjects that have a positive clinical response to treatment (individual improvement) in disease activity according to ACR50 criteria if he/she has at least 50% improvement in 1. Tender 68-joint count 2. Swollen 66-joint count and 3. At least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's assessment of PsA pain * Patient's global assessment of disease activity * Physician's global assessment of disease activity * Subject self-assessed disability (Health-Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ-DI\] score) * Acute phase reactant (hsCRP or ESR)

Proportion of subjects that have a positive clinical response to treatment (individual improvement) in disease activity according to ACR70 criteria if he/she has at least 70% improvement in 1. Tender 68-joint count 2. Swollen 66-joint count and 3. At least 3 of the following 5 measures:- Patient's assessment of PsA pain * Patient's global assessment of disease activity * Physician's global assessment of disease activity * Subject self-assessed disability (Health-Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ-DI\] score) * Acute phase reactant (hsCRP or ESR)

Treatment success was defined as "Minimally improved", "Much improved" or "Very much improved" in Clinical global impression (CGI). Non-responder imputation assigns a value of nonresponse to missing data points, any patient who drops out is assumed to be a non-responder.

The NAPSI is a tool to assess psoriatic nail involvement in patients with nail psoriasis. Each nail is divided with imaginary horizontal and longitudinal lines into quadrants. Each nail is given a score for nail matrix psoriasis (0-4) and nail bed psoriasis (0-4) depending on the presence of any of the features of nail psoriasis in that quadrant. Each nail gets a nail matrix score and a nail bed score, the total of which is the NAPSI score for that nail ranging from 0 to 8. All 10 fingernails are assessed giving a total NAPSI score ranging from 0 to 80. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The adjusted mean is presented.

palmoplantar Investigator's Global Assessment (ppIGA) response after 16 weeks of treatment. To be considered a ppIGA responder at Week 16, a subject must have ppIGA of 0 or 1 at Week 16 and a reduction of at least 2 points on the ppIGA scale from baseline.

ACR20 response was defined as having a positive clinical response to treatment (individual improvement) in disease activity if the participant had at least 20% improvement in tender 68-joint count, swollen 66-joint count and at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of RA pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, subject self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ-DI\] score), and/or acute phase reactant (high sensitivity c-reactive protein (hsCRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). For subjects with early escape at Week 16 or had missing values at Week 24 or discontinued prior to Week 24, their ACR20 was set to nonresponse at Week 24. This applied for all treatment regimens in order to minimize bias. The Placebo arm was analyzed as one group, irrespective of the re-randomization, as assessments made under the re-randomized active treatment were not included in this analysis.

ASAS 20 response is a validated composite assessment reflecting the percentage of treated patients who achieve within a defined timeframe an improvement of 20% and ≥1 unit on a scale of 1 to 10 in at least three of the four ASAS main domains and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit in the remaining domain. ASAS 20 is used to assess the efficacy of at least one dose of secukinumab against placebo.

Efficacy of secukinumab compared to placebo in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis. PASI score was based on assessment of the head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs for erythema, thickening (plaque elevation, induration), and scaling (desquamation). PASI scores can range from 0, corresponding to no signs of psoriasis, up to a theoretical maximum of 72.0. PASI-based secondary variables included absolute PASI score, response rates for PASI 75. PASI 50 and PASI 90 were defined as ≥ 50% and ≥ 90% improvement from Baseline in PASI score, respectively, while PASI 100 response corresponded to complete clearing of psoriasis (PASI = 0). IGA mod 2011 was used to evaluate the overall severity of psoriatic disease, with scores ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). Treatment success was defined as achievement of IGA mod 2011 0 or 1 score.

Analysis of absolute and relative frequencies for treatment emergent Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Deaths by primary System Organ Class (SOC)

The primary variable was the cumulative rate of patients who lost PASI 75 response up to Week 68 (time=0 being defined as Week 52). Loss of PASI 75 response was analyzed by means of a survival analysis defining "loss of PASI 75 response" as "failure". The term cumulative rate corresponded to 1 minus the survival function within this survival analysis, and the cumulative rate and the survival functions were dependent on time t. PASI 75 response: patients achieving ≥ 75% improvement (reduction) in PASI score compared to baseline of the core study were defined as PASI 75 responders.

A 75% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (PASI 75) is the current benchmark of primary endpoints for most clinical trials of psoriasis

The IGA scale has been developed based on a previous version of the scale used in secukinumab phase II studies in collaboration with health authorities, in particular the FDA. The explanations/descriptions of the points on the scale have been improved to ensure appropriate differentiation between the points. The IGA used in this study is static, i.e. it refers exclusively to the subject's disease state at the time of the assessments, and does not attempt a comparison with any of the subject's previous disease states, whether at baseline or at a previous visit. IGA has a scale of 0-4 with the lower scores correlating to better performance. A score of 0= clear skin, 1= almost clear skin, 2=mild, 3=moderate,4=severe

PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4).

The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Treatment success was defined as achievement of IGA mod 2001 score of 0 or 1.

ASAS 20 response is a validated composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined timeframe at least 20% improvement in score in at least 3 of a conventional set of 4 clinical domains relevent to AS and no worsening in the fourth domain. ASAS 20 is used to assess the efficacy of at least one dose of secukinumab against placebo.

ACR20 response was defined as having a positive clinical response to treatment (individual improvement) in disease activity if the participant had at least 20% improvement in tender 68-joint count, swollen 66-joint count and at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of RA pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, subject self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ-DI\] score), and/or acute phase reactant (high sensitivity c-reactive protein (hsCRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The ACR20 response results at week 24 used non-responder imputation.

A patient will be considered as improved according the ACR20 criteria if she/he has at least 20 % improvement in the two following measures:Tender joint count,Swollen joint count and at least 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's assessment of pain, Patient's global assessment disease activity,Physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ©) score,Acute phase reactant (hsCRP or ESR)

ACR20 response was defined as having a positive clinical response to treatment (individual improvement) in disease activity if the participant had at least 20% improvement in tender 68-joint count, swollen 66-joint count and at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of RA pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, subject self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ-DI\] score), and/or acute phase reactant (high sensitivity c-reactive protein (hsCRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The ACR20 response results at week 24 used non-responder imputation.

PASI: Combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section(head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4)

A 75% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (PASI 75) is the current benchmark of primary endpoints for most clinical trials of psoriasis

The IGA mod 2011 scale has been developed based on a previous version of the scale used in secukinumab phase II studies in collaboration with health authorities, in particular the FDA. The explanations/descriptions of the points on the scale have been improved to ensure appropriate differentiation between the points. The IGA mod 2011 used in this study is static, i.e. it refers exclusively to the subject's disease state at the time of the assessments, and does not attempt a comparison with any of the subject's previous disease states, whether at baseline or at a previous visit.IGA mod 2011 has a scale of 0-4 with the lower scores correlating to better performance. A score of 0= clear skin, 1= almost clear skin, 2=mild, 3=moderate,4=severe.

A 75% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (PASI 75) is the current benchmark of primary endpoints for most clinical trials of psoriasis. PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4).

The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Treatment success was defined as achievement of IGA mod 2001 score of 0 or 1. IGA score of 0 or 1 as an indicator of efficacy.

Remission was defined as the absence of flare. Sustained remission was defined as the absence of flare until Week 28 and in adherence to the protocol prednisolone taper regimen. Flare was determined by the investigator and was defined as the recurrence after remission of signs or symptoms of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) greater than or equal to (\>/=) 30 millimeters per hour (mm/hr) and/or C-reactive Protein (CRP) (\>/=10.0 mg/L) attributable to GCA. Patients were classified as non-responders if they did not achieve remission within 12 weeks of Baseline (remission referred to the absence of flare), were in the "escape arm" (this referred to patients entering escape between Baseline and Week 28), prematurely discontinued study treatment prior to Week 28 (absence of flare was checked prior to study treatment administration), did not have information to evaluate sustained remission response until Week 28.

Proportion of patients with a reduction of the eczema score EASI of at least 50%. The proportions are then compared between study arms.

WORC PRO score at week 14. The WORC Index consists of 21 items divided into 5 Domains: Physical Symptoms (6 items), Sport/Recreation (4 items), Work Function (4 items), Lifestyle Function (4 items) and Emotional Function (3 items). The total scores and sub scores used were the percentages of the normal scores with 0 being worst and 100 being best. All Patients - Statistical analysis results of WORC scores at Week 14

Neutrophil apoptosis will be measured using flow-cytometry.

Neutrophil phenotype will be determine as percent of receptor expressing cells assessed by flow cytometry

Safety outcomes will be described in Adverse events section as there was not an efficacy primary outcome

Histological sections of lesional and nonlesional skin biopsies at baseline and at Week 12 were examined. For each visit, each patient's lesional skin biopsy was scored for the degree of histological improvement compared to that patient's baseline disease on a five point scale; - 1 (worse) to +3 (excellent). Histological disease reversal or "excellent improvement" (histological disease reversal score = 3) was declared at the endpoint when all of the following four criteria were met.

A participant was considered to be a responder according to the ACR20 criteria if the participant had at least 20% improvement in both the tender joint count and swollen joint count measures, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ©) score, and/or C-reactive protein (CRP)/Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR).

A participant was considered to be a responder according to the ACR20 criteria if the participant had at least 20% improvement in both the tender joint count and swollen joint count measures, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ©) score, and/or C-reactive protein (CRP)/Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR).

The DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in RA. The score is calculated by a complex mathematical formula, which includes the tender joint count(TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) out of a total of 28 joints, the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and the subject's 'global assessment' of disease activity/general health (GH). The subject's global assessment/GH was indicated by a visual analogue scale of 100 mm where the participant marked a point on a 100 mm line between 0 and 100 (0 indicated very good and 100 indicated very bad). The following formula was used to calculate DAS28: DAS-CRP = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) = 0.36\*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014\*GH = 0.96. A DAS28-CRP score \> 5.1 implies active disease, \<3.2 implies controlled disease and \<2.6 implied remission. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Corneal staining was done with 2% sodium fluorescein instilled into the lower palpebral conjunctiva of each eye. Staining was assessed in 5 zones of the cornea (central plus 4 quadrants) and rated on a scale of 0 (no staining) to 3 (severe, confluent staining). A mean of the 5 zones for the study eye was calculated. A higher score indicates a drier eye. A negative change score indicates improvement in dryness.

Safety was assessed by frequency of adverse events including serious adverse events.

PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4).

Combined unique active lesions (CUAL) observed on brain MRI scans performed every 4th week from week 4 to week 24 in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). CUAL is defined as: new gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions on T1-weighted, or new or enlarging lesions on T2-weighted MRI scans, without double counting.

Number (%) of patients achieving PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, by visit and induction treatment

A participant was considered to be a responder according to the ACR20, 50 or 70 criteria if the participant had at least 20% 50% or 70% improvement in both the tender joint count and swollen joint count measures, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ©) score, and/or C-reactive protein (CRP)

Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) includes measures of tender and swollen joint counts, patient's assessment of pain, physician's and patient's global assessment of disease activity A subject is defined as a PsARC responder if, and only if, they have an improvement in two of the following four factors (with at least one factor being a joint count) and no worsening in the remaining factors: 1) Patient global assessment (0-100 VAS scale, improvement defined as decrease of at least 20 units) 2) Physician global assessment (0-100 VAS scale, improvement defined as decrease of at least 20 units) 3) Tender 78-joint count (improvement defined as decrease of at least 30%) 4) Swollen 76-joint count (improvement defined as decrease of at least 30%)

Clinical response to treatment was assessed according to ASAS20 criteria. ASAS20 responder had improvement of 20% or more and absolute improvement of at least 1 units (on a scale of 0 \[least\] to 10 \[worst\]) from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 4 domains, with absence of deterioration (worsening of at least 20% an absolute Worsening of at least 1 unit) in the potential remaining domain: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Total Back Pain visual analog scale (VAS); Function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)); and Inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] scores

ASAS20 as described in Primary Outcome. ASAS40 responder had improvement of 40% or more and absolute improvement of at least 2 units (on a scale of 0 \[least\] to 10 \[worst\]) from Baseline in at least 3 of the following 4 domains, with no deterioration in the potential remaining domain: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Total Back Pain visual analog scale (VAS); Function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)); and Inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] scores). ASAS 5/6 responder had improvement of 20% or more) from Baseline in at least 5 of the following 6 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Total Back Pain visual analog scale (VAS); Function (BASFI); and Inflammation (mean of 2 morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] scores); Spinal Mobility (BASFI); Acute phase reactant (CRP)

PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area\* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4).

This outcome measure shows the proportion of participants in each of the AIN457 treatment groups who were relapse free throughout the study up to and including week 56.

AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgment of investigators represent significant hazards.

Maximum concentration of secukinumab on Day 1

Maximum concentration at steady-state.

Minimum concentration at steady-state

Area under the concentration-time curve at steady-state during a dosing interval

Average concentration at steady-state

Venous whole blood samples will be collected and analyzed for all PK evaluable participants. Maximum concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.

Venous whole blood samples will be collected and analyzed for all PK evaluable participants. Minimum concentration at steady state (Cmin,ss) will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.

Venous whole blood samples will be collected and analyzed for all PK evaluable participants. Area under the concentration-time curve at steady state during a dosing interval (AUCtau,ss) will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.

Venous whole blood samples will be collected and analyzed for all PK evaluable participants. Average concentration at steady state (Cavg,ss \[=AUCtau,ss/tau\]) will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.

Distribution of AIN457 into dermal interstitial fluid after single subcutaneous administration of AIN457 in healthy subjects and in psoriatic patients

The PASI assessed the extent of psoriasis on four body surface areas (head, trunk and upper limbs) and the degree of plaque erythema, scaling and thickness. The PASI score accounted for the extent of body surface area affected by the erythema, scaling and thickness and the severity of these measures. The score ranged from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease) where a reduction in PASI score from baseline indicates improvement. The percentage change was calculated by subtracting the week 4 values from the baseline values.The percentage change was calculated for each entire treatment group (not for each participant). A positive percentage change from baseline indicates improvement.

The IGA is an instrument which captured and categorized the global assessment of all clinical signs and symptoms of disease. The investigator used all available information for the assessment, including subjective information from the participant and (where available) photographs taken at baseline. The IGA categories were clear, almost clear, mild disease, moderate disease, severe disease and very severe disease. This outcome measure shows the percentage of patients who experienced a category change from baseline. Category changes of 1, 2 or 3 indicate improvement.

Clinical response to treatment was assessed according to ACR20 criteria. A participant was defined as an ACR20 responder if the following 3 conditions were met: 1) ≥20% improvement in the number of tender joints, 2) ≥20% improvement in the number of swollen joint and 3) ≥20% improvement in three of the following five domains: patient global assessment, physician global assessment, patient pain assessment, health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and acute phase reactant.

Serum samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 2, 4, 7, 12 and 24 hours post infusion on day 1, and on days 2, 5, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99 and 113.

Serum samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 2, 4, 7, 12 and 24 hours post infusion on day 1, and on days 2, 5, 8, 15, 22, 23, 26, 29, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99 and 113. On day 22, samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours post infusion.

Serum samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 2, 4, 7, 12 and 24 hours post infusion on day 1, and on days 2, 5, 8, 15, 22, 23, 26, 29, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99 and 113. On day 22, samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours post infusion.

Serum samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 2, 4, 7, 12 and 24 hours post infusion on day 1, and on days 2, 5, 8, 15, 22, 23, 26, 29, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99 and 113. On day 22, samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours post infusion.

Serum samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 2, 4, 7, 12 and 24 hours post infusion on day 1, and on days 2, 5, 8, 15, 22, 23, 26, 29, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99 and 113. On day 22, samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours post infusion.

Serum samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 2, 4, 7, 12 and 24 hours post infusion on day 1, and on days 2, 5, 8, 15, 22, 23, 26, 29, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99 and 113. On day 22, samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours post infusion.

Serum samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 2, 4, 7, 12 and 24 hours post infusion on day 1, and on days 2, 5, 8, 15, 22, 23, 26, 29, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99 and 113. On day 22, samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours post infusion.

Serum samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 2, 4, 7, 12 and 24 hours post infusion on day 1, and on days 2, 5, 8, 15, 22, 23, 26, 29, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99 and 113. On day 22, samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours post infusion.

Serum samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 2, 4, 7, 12 and 24 hours post infusion on day 1, and on days 2, 5, 8, 15, 22, 23, 26, 29, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99 and 113. On day 22, samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours post infusion.

Serum samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 2, 4, 7, 12 and 24 hours post infusion on day 1, and on days 2, 5, 8, 15, 22, 23, 26, 29, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99 and 113. On day 22, samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours post infusion.

Serum samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 2, 4, 7, 12 and 24 hours post infusion on day 1, and on days 2, 5, 8, 15, 22, 23, 26, 29, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99 and 113. On day 22, samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours post infusion.

Serum samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 2, 4, 7, 12 and 24 hours post infusion on day 1, and on days 2, 5, 8, 15, 22, 23, 26, 29, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99 and 113. On day 22, samples were collected pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7 and 24 hours post infusion.