AFQ056

The cocaine consumption was recorded once daily (Yes/No) by the subject using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) cocaine assessment tool during the treatment period. For each patient, the proportion of cocaine use days was calculated by dividing the number of days of cocaine use during the treatment period, i.e. 98 days for completers and number of days between Day 1 and day of last dose in case of premature discontinuation of study treatment.

The Weighted Child Intentional Communication Score is derived from a 22 minute semi-structured examiner/child play session. Structured and unstructured component scores are found by multiplying each intentional communication act by the following weights: nonverbal = 1; single symbol = 2; and multiple symbols = 3. The two scores are summed together to obtain the total. Higher scores indicate more child-initiated communication. There is no maximum score. The scale was administered at Baseline, Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, and Month 8. A composite score representing the average of the estimated change scores calculated at months 2, 4, 6, and 8 was recorded. A higher least squares mean value indicates a greater increase in WCS score from baseline.

The modified AIMS is a scale used to assess dyskinesia. It focuses on six different parts of the body and rates abnormal movements from 0 (absence of dyskinesia to 4 (severe) (maximal score, 24). Change from baseline to Week 12 will be analyzed using the mixed effect repeated measures model (MMRM) including treatment, pooled center, week, treatment by week interaction as fixed effects and baseline total score as covariate with an unstructured covariance structure.

The occurrence of adverse events would be sought by non-directive questioning of the patient. Adverse events may also be detected when they are volunteered by the patient or through physical examination, laboratory test, or other assessments. AEs will be summarized by presenting, for each treatment group the number and percentage of patients having any adverse event, having an adverse event in each system organ class and having each individual adverse event by system organ class and preferred term.

The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) would be sought by non-directive questioning of the patient. Adverse events may also be detected when they are volunteered by the patient or through physical examination, laboratory test, or other assessments. AEs will be summarized by presenting, for each treatment group the number and percentage of patients having any adverse event, having an adverse event in each system organ class and having each individual adverse event by system organ class and preferred term.

Randomized patients will be up titrated to the target dose and remain on the target dose for the duration of the fixed dose treatment period. AEs will be summarized by presenting, for each treatment group the number and percentage of patients having any adverse event, having an adverse event in each system organ class and having each individual adverse event by system organ class and preferred term.

Patients randomized will be up titrated to the target doses at regular intervals during the up titration period. AEs will be summarized by presenting, for each treatment group the number and percentage of patients having any adverse event, having an adverse event in each system organ class and having each individual adverse event by system organ class and preferred term.

The occurrence of adverse events would be sought by non-directive questioning of the patient at each visit. Adverse events may also be detected when they are volunteered by the patient during or between visits or through physical examination, laboratory test, or other assessment.

The occurrence and severity of adverse events would be sought by non-directive questioning of the patient at each visit. Adverse events may also be detected when they are volunteered by the patient during or between visits or through physical examination, laboratory test, or other assessment.

Pulse and blood pressure at each visit as indicated above. If a patient discontinues in between these visits, this will be assessed at the time of discontinuation.

Standard hematology with differential, aPTT, PT/INR;, clinical chemistry consists of albumin, alkaline phosphatase, amylase, total bilirubin, calcium, cholesterol, creatinine, CK, γ-GT, glucose, lipase, lactate dehydrogenase, inorganic phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, total protein, AST, ALT, sodium, triglycerides, urea and uric acid, FSH, LH, oxytocin, prolactin, TBG, TSH, and T4; urinalysis (specific gravity, protein, glucose and blood) If a patient discontinues in between these visits, these will be assessed at the time of discontinuation.

A standard 12-lead ECG will be performed. A central facility will be used for interpretation and analysis of the ECGs. If a patient discontinues in between these visits, this will be assessed at the time of discontinuation.

Part III of the UPDRS (items 18-31; total score 0-56), has been proven to be a reliable instrument in assessing the anti-parkinsonian effect in PD patients. This scale measures 14 items such as speech, facial expression, tremor, action or postural tremor, rigidity, finger taps, hand movement, alternating movement, leg agility, arising from a chair, posture, gait, postural stability, and bradykinesia. A higher score is indicative of worsening of symptoms. If a patient discontinues in between these visits, this will be assessed at the time of discontinuation.

The occurrence of adverse events relating to the underlying movement disorder Parkinson's disease would be sought by non-directive questioning of the patient at each visit. Adverse events may also be detected when they are volunteered by the patient during or between visits or through physical examination, laboratory test, or other assessment.

The Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community edition (ABC-C) is a 58-item, caregiver-rated symptom checklist for assessing problem behaviors of children and adults with mental retardation at home, in residential facilities, and work training centers. The assessment was done by attributing to each item a score from 0 ("not at all a problem") to 3 ("problem is severe in degree") and the total score ranks from 0 to 174. The data collected from the full, 58-item ABC-C were analyzed according to the modified FXS ABC-C algorithm (ABC-CFX) for which 55 items and six subscales (irritability, lethargy/withdrawal, stereotypic behavior, hyperactivity, inappropriate speech and social avoidance) plus the total score were considered, and for which the total score ranks from 0 to 165. Stratum I included patients whose Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 (FMR1) gene was fully methylated

The ABC-C is a 58-item questionnaire that should have been completed as much as possible by the same rater. It is comprised of five subscales (irritability, lethargy/social withdrawal, stereotypic behavior, hyperactivity and inappropriate speech) plus the total score which ranks from 0 to 174 in patients who were fully methylated (FM)

AUClast, AUCinf, Cmax, Tmax, T1/2, CL/F, Vz/F