Approval Probability
TA Base Rate
Adjusted LOA
ML Risk
Also known as ACZ885 (investigational), Canakinumab, Glucophage, Chlorpropramide, Diabinese, Acetohexamide, Dymelor, Tolazamise
ACZ885 · 44 trials · 37 indications
Adapted ACR30 response was defined as a ≥30% improvement from baseline in at least 3 of the following 5 core response variables, with no more than one of these variables worsening by \>30%: 1. Physicians global assessment of disease activity (PhGA) on a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) (0=very good and 100=very poor). 2. Participant's assessment of disease activity (PtGA) on a 0-100 mm VAS (0=very good and 100=very poor). 3. Health Assessment Questionnaire- disability index (HAQ-DI): 20 questions across 8 domains assessing the functional abilities. The total score was calculated as the average of the scores for each domain, ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe disability). 4. Number of active joints (68 joints evaluated for pain/tenderness and 66 for swelling) 5. Index of inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) levels Additionally, participants were required to have no intermittent fever during the preceding week.
Number of responders who survived without requiring invasive mechanical ventilation from Day 3 to Day 29. An early dropout without requiring invasive mechanical ventilation is considered as a responder if discharged from hospital with 9-point ordinal scale\<=1 or with last 9-point ordinal scale on/after Day 15 better than baseline.
Participants were monitored for safety throughout the study.
Minimum Adapted ACR Pediatric 30 criteria is defined as improvement from baseline at least 30% in at least 3 of response variables 1 to 6 in Adapted ACR Pediatric response variables and no intermittent fever (i.e. axillary, oral, or rectal body temperature ≤ 38°C) in the preceding week (variable 7), with no more than one variable 1-6 worsening by more than 30%. Adapted ACR Pediatric response variables consists of following 7 variables: 1. Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Parent's or Patient's (if appropriate in age) Global Assessment of Patient's overall wellbeing based upon the 0-100 mm VAS in the Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ); 3. Functional ability: CHAQ; 4. Number of joints with active arthritis; 5. Number of joints with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of inflammation: CRP (mg/L); 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week.
To evaluate the percentage of participants with canakinumab treatment who were able to taper corticosteroids successfully at Week 28
The primary efficacy variable for Part II was the proportion of patients in clinical remission on canakinumab 4 mg/kg (+/- concomitant NSAID only) who were able to remain on a reduced dose or on prolonged dose interval for at least 24 consecutive weeks. As the primary objective was to show statistically significance in at least one of canakinumab treatment arms (reduced dose and prolonged dose interval arms) in Part II then the Type I error rate 5% was controlled and split to 2.5%. Clinical remission per protocol is defined as the maintenance of inactive disease for at least 6 months (24consecutive weeks) while on therapy. The primary analysis considered both inactive disease status and the patient dose step duration. In the event the inactive disease status was missing, yet the patient remained at the same dose level through the next visit with the same disease status, it was concluded that inactive disease was maintained during this time period and was carried forward.
The objective of this protocol was to collect additional safety data (serious and non serious AEs) and to provide continuous Ilaris® (canakinumab) treatment to patients in France who completed CACZ885G2301E1, CACZ885N2301 or CACZ885G2306 studies.
Number of participants who died for any reason during the study
Resolution of the initial disease flare is defined as: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease activity (PGA) \<2 and C-reactive protein (CRP) within normal range (\<= 10 mg/L) or reduction by at least 70% from baseline. The PGA was evaluated by the investigator based on a 5-point scale: 0 = None (no) disease associated with clinical signs and symptoms; 1 = minimal disease associated signs and symptoms; 2 = mild disease associated signs and symptoms; 3 = moderate disease associated signs and symptoms; and 5 = severe disease associated signs and symptoms.
Disease relapse following complete response is defined as inflammation markers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and/or Serum Amyloid A (SAA) result \> 30 mg/L AND Physician's Global Assessment of Autoinflammatory Disease Activity \> minimal or Physician's Global Assessment \>= minimal AND Skin Disease Assessment \> minimal. Physician's Global Assessment of Autoinflammatory Disease Activity and Skin Disease Assessment (urticarial skin rash) are completed by the investigator using a 5 point rating scale: absent, minimal, mild, moderate and severe.
Adverse events (AEs) were defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline,or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were defined as any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgement of investigators represent significant hazards.
Time to occurrence of CEC (Cardiovascular clinical events adjudication committee) confirmed MACE, which was a composite endpoint consisting of CEC confirmed CV death, CEC confirmed non-fatal MI,or CEC confirmed non-fatal stroke. Patients with the CEC adjudicated reason for death of "Unknown" were counted as CV (cardiovascular) death.
Complete response was defined as clinical remission and serological remission. Clinical remission was defined as Physician global assessment of auto-inflammatory disease activity as absent or minimal (using a 5-point scale ranging from absent to severe) and assessment of skin disease as absent or minimal (using a 5-point scale ranging from absent to severe). Serological remission was defined as C reactive protein (CRP) or Serum amyloid A protein (SAA) to be less than (\<) 15 milligram per liter (mg/L) and \<10 mg/L respectively.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. For patients with event, time to event = (date of event - date of first dose of study drug + 1). Patients met definition of new flare if they had: •Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) •Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: • Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before flare has resolved completely.
Patients scored their pain intensity in the joint most affected at Baseline on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100), at 72 hours post-dose. Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.
This was primary endpoint of extension study 1. Adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
This was the primary endpoint of extension study 2. An adverse event was defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. For patients with event, time to event = (date of event - date of first dose of study drug + 1). Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before flare has resolved completely.
Patients scored their pain intensity in the joint most affected at baseline on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100), at 72 hours post-dose. Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The ANCOVA analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.
This was the primary endpoint of both extension studies. Adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign(including an abnormal laboratory finding),syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or,if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
This was the primary endpoint of both extension studies. Adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign(including an abnormal laboratory finding),syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or,if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not related to study drug. A SAE was defined as an event which was fatal or life threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, was significantly or permanently disabling or incapacitating, constituted a congenital anomaly or a birth defect, or encompassed any other clinically significant event that could jeopardize the participants or require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the aforementioned outcomes. Treatment related AEs or SAEs were defined as AEs or SAEs that were suspected to be related to study treatment as per investigator.
Immunogenicity assessment included determination of anti-canakinumab (ACZ885) antibodies in serum samples using BIAcore system.
Local injection site tolerability was assessed on the injection site. Each participant was classified into one of the following four categories: 1. no tolerability reactions at any time during the study, 2. mild reaction observed on at least one occasion but no moderate or severe reactions. 3. moderate reaction observed on at least one occasion but no severe reaction. 4. severe reaction observed on at least one occasion.
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 1-100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS); 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 1-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of C-reactive protein (CRP) and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to severe juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) during the preceding week. Response was defined as more than or equal to (≥) 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature less than or equal to (≤) 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Adapted ACR Paediatric 30/50/70/90 or 100 was assessed based on following 7 variables: 1.Physician's Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 2. Participants Global Assessment on a 0-100 mm VAS; 3. Functional ability; 4. Joints count with active arthritis; 5. Joints count with limitation of motion; 6. Laboratory measure of CRP and 7. Absence of intermittent fever due to SJIA during the preceding week. Response was defined as ≥ 30%/50%/70%/90% or 100% improvement in at least 3 of the response variables 1 to 6, no intermittent fever (i.e. body temperature ≤ 38 °C) in the preceding week (variable 7) and with no more than one variable 1 to 6, worsening by more than 30%.
Ability to taper oral steroids: if dose reduced from start of Part I to end of Part Ic from \> 0.8 mg/kg/day to ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day, or from ≥ 0.5 mg/kg/day and ≤ 0.8 mg/kg/day by at least 0.3 mg/kg, or from any initial dose to ≤ 0.2 mg/kg/day, while maintaining a minimum adapted ACR 30 pediatric criterion. Patients on oral steroids at study entry who did not enter Part 1c are considered steroid tapering failures.
Kaplan Meier estimate of the probability to experience a flare. Flare was defined as at least 1 of the following. * Reappearance of fever (\>38°C, lasting for at least 2 consecutive days) not due to infections * Flare according to the JIA pediatric criteria for flare (all criteria must have been met): * ≥ 30% worsening in at least 3 of the first 6 response variables * ≥ 30% improvement in not more than 1 of the first 6 response variables Patients who discontinued the study while in Part II were counted as flared unless they discontinued because of inactive disease for at least 24 weeks in Part II.
The number of participants with Adverse Events and Infections \& Infestations are regardless of study drug relationship by primary system organ class preferred term equal and/or greater than 2% in any group. The number of participants with mild injection site reactions= mild reactions observed on at least one occasion but no moderate or severe reactions. The number of participants with moderate injection site reactions= moderate reactions observed on at least one occasion but no severe reactions.
Determined by the Physician's global assessment of autoinflammatory disease activity, assessment of skin disease and inflammation markers. Data expressed as a percent of participants who had experienced a flare by the end of Part II.
Disease flare is determined by the Physician's global assessment of autoinflammatory disease activity, assessment of skin disease and inflammation markers. Disease Flare = the C-reactive protein and/or serum amyloid A (SAA) \> 30 mg/L and either a PGA \> minimal, or PGA equal to minimal and \> minimal SD.
Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to record severity. Pediatric and young adult participants rated their daily sickle cell associated pain intensity once each day in the evening using an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 with higher ratings associated with more intense pain (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain). For each subject, there was a maximum 28-day screening period that included recording of daily pain intensity by e-diary for at least 1 week. The average daily pain results in the screening period were used to derive the baseline value. The average over week 8 to 12 was calculated and the change from baseline in the average daily pain VAS was analyzed using a Bayesian model for repeated measures.
To compare the effect of ACZ885 versus placebo in the change between baseline and week 24 in pulmonary function as measured by spirometry (Predicted Forced Vital Capacity).
Resolution of acute exacerbation findings related to Behçet's Disease (BD). The attacks were assessed by pyhsician global assesment. For patients with parenchymal neurologic disease: Resolution of acute exacerbation of parenchymal neurologic findings based on improvements in any of the following items without deterioration on Day 30 This was an exploratory trial that was not powered for a statistical analysis.
The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis and monitoring changes in the level of disability over time. It is widely used in clinical trials and in the assessment of people with MS. Scale range is between 0-10 with 10 being most disability. Mean score of 3 participants who were evaluated in Neurology clinic. Other 5 participants were not evaluated for EDSS.
Neuro-Behçet's disability score (NBDS) has been proposed for parenchymal-NBD patients to quantify disabilities. This comprises scores for motor and cognitive status. NBDS is the arithmetic sum of both scores and ranges from 0 to 8, with 8 being death due to NBD. 3 neurologic participants were evaluated.
Mean Modified Rankin Scale (mRS): mRS is a scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. Scores range from 0-5 with 5 being the worst outcome. Only 3 participants from neurology clinic were evaluated with this scale.
Number of the partcipants with ataxia. 3 participants from neurology clinic were evaluated.
All 4 extremties were evaluated for muscle strength (upper right, upper left, lower right and lower left) fro each patient. Score 0 is the worst outcome whereas 5 is the best outcome for muscle strength. 3 participants from neurology clinic were assessed.
Mean CRP (C-reactive protein) value (8 participants)
Mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) value (8 participants)
Mean Serum Amyloid A value (8 participants)
The number of the participants with hemoptysis
Headache intensity was measured by VAS where score 0 means "no pain," and score 10 means "the worst pain''. Physician and participant determined the VAS score separately.
Stomacheache intensity was measured by VAS where score 0 means "no pain," and score 10 means "the worst pain''. VAS is determined separately by physician and the participants.
Extremity assessments were measured by VAS where score 0 means "no pain," and score 10 means "the worst possible pain''. The physicians and participants evaluated VAS separately.
Participants assessed their own well-being with VAS (visual analogue scale). Score 0 means the best outcome, score 10 is the worst outcome.
Physician's General Assessments is VAS scale, ranging between 0-5, showing the disease status of participants. Score 0 is the worst outcome; 5 is the best outcome
Mean steroid treatment dose (8 participants)
BDCAF is an assessment that is made by physician for evaluating the disease activity in last four weeks. Score range is 0 to 12, 0 is the best outcome, 12 is the worst outcome.
Localized pain in the extremities were assessed by visual analogue scale scores ranging between Scale; 0 is the best outcome; 10 is worst.
A flare was defined as Physician Global Assessment of HIDS flare severity score of ≥ 2 and a C-reactive protein (CRP) value \> 10 mg/L. Flares during a historical period were defined as most recent 6-months in which the participant has not received treatment for their HIDS other than symptomatic treatment with NSAIDs and/or corticosteroids.
Complete response was defined as clinical remission and serological remission. Clinical remission was defined as Physician's Global Assessment of TRAPS activity absent or minimal and serological remission was defined as C reactive protein (CRP) and/or Serum amyloid A protein (SAA) to be less than (\<) 10 milligram per liter (mg/L). Almost complete response was defined as clinical remission and a partial serological remission (equal to or more than \[≥\] 70% reduction of baseline CRP and/or SAA).
An intolerance event is defined as an acute inflammatory reaction, characterized by a 30 mm increase in pain (on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) and associated with a new or worsened synovial fluid effusion within 3 days following the intra-articular (i.a.) injection. If baseline VAS pain score is ≥ 70 mm, an intolerance event is defined as an increase in pain by 20 mm on a 100 mm VAS associated with new or worsened synovial fluid effusion within 3 days following the i.a. injection. If baseline VAS pain score is ≥ 80 mm, an intolerance event is defined as an increase in pain by 10 mm on a 100 mm VAS associated with new or worsened synovial fluid effusion within 3 days following the i.a. injection. If baseline pain score is ≥ 90 mm, an intolerance event is defined as the patients experiencing an unspecified increase in pain on a 100 mm VAS associated with new or worsened synovial fluid effusion within 3 days following the i.a. injection.
After walking for 20 meters, participants were asked to assess the pain in their affected knee on a 100 mm linear visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0 mm) to unbearable pain (100 mm). A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement. Results are from a Bayesian analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, fitting baseline pain VAS score as a covariate, time by treatment as fixed effects, region and subject as random effects.
The Western Ontario and McMaster osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale asks patients to rate pain in the index knee joint in the last 48 hours doing different activities on a scale from none (0) to extreme pain (4). The answers are summed and the total pain subscale score ranges from 0 to 20, where higher scores indicate more pain. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement. Results are from a Bayesian ANCOVA model, fitting baseline WOMAC pain score as a covariate, time by treatment as fixed effects, region and patient as random effects.
Change in Insulin Secretion Rate stimulated by Liquid mixed-meal challenge. Blood samples were taken prior to and after meal for glucose and insulin at sample times: -20, -10, -1 and 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes relative to the start of the meal.A mixed model with treatment fitted as fixed effect, and population and the interaction of population and treatment fitted as random effects were used for the comparison of Canakinumab versus placebo within each T2DM population. The mixed model did not include patients from the IGT population
Participants were monitored for adverse events, serious adverse events and death throughout the study.
Two axial, ECG-gated, steady state free precession (SSFP) 'cine' images were acquired during breath-hold to determine aortic distensibility. The first image was obtained at the level of the right pulmonary artery through the ascending and proximal descending aorta and the second through the distal aorta below the diaphragm. Imaging of the aorta also enabled evaluation of the plaque burden and additional vascular function measures.
For assessment of atherosclerotic plaque burden of the aorta, vessel wall images of the aorta were acquired with an ECG gated double-inversion recovery (black blood) fast spin echo sequence applied breath-holding. Using an oblique sagittal image of the aorta as a pilot, serial axial images were acquired to cover a section of the descending thoracic aorta. The midpoint of the right pulmonary artery in cross section was used as the anatomical reference for the first slice in baseline and follow-up scans. For assessment of the atherosclerotic plaque burden in the carotids, vessel wall images were acquired with an axial ECG gated PD (proton density) weighted black blood sequence. The carotid bifurcation was used as the anatomical reference for all three imaging time points (baseline, 12 weeks, 48 weeks) with axial slice planes acquired below the bifurcation region. The mean values reported here for the carotid are reported for the proximal common carotid region.
Adverse events (AEs) were defined as any unfavourable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were defined as any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalisation, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgement of investigators represent significant hazards
A gout flare was defined as an increase in participant-reported gout pain in the most affected joint during a gout attack.
Mean target dose at 24, 48 and 72 hours. Four models: Emax, Logistic, Linear in log-dose, Linear were selected to describe the potential dose-response curve and hence estimate the target dose of canakinumab using baseline Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Body Mass Index (BMI) as covariates. Target dose was defined as the dose for which the efficacy is equivalent to the efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg and was identified by assessing the dose response relationship with regards to the pain intensity in the target joint measured on a 0- 100 mm VAS (0= no pain and 100= unbearable pain).
72 hours following treatment, patients were asked the question: "How would you rate the improvement in your gout since receiving the study medication?" Patients rated their improvement on the Likert 5-point scale: 1=Excellent, 2=Good, 3=Acceptable,4=Slight and 5=Poor. Improvement was assessed by determining patients who scored a "good" or "excellent" response.
Blood was drawn after an overnight fast to measure plasma HbA1c levels. End of Study is defined as the last Analysis of covariance with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as the covariate was performed.
Mean Change in Glucose level stimulated by OGTT. Blood samples were taken at sample times: -20, -10, -1 and 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes. Glucose levels over 4 hrs were shown as Area Under the Curve, (AUC). Analysis of covariance with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline as the covariate was performed.
At each post-dose visit, an ACR20 responder was defined as someone who achieved at least 20% improvement in the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and 20% improvement in at least 3 of the following 5 measures:: * Patient's pain assessment (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 100 mm) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score) * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))
A patient was considered as improved according to the ACR50 criteria if she/he had at least a 50 % improvement in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 100 mm) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score) * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP))
Participants were defined as ACR50 responders if they had at least a 50% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm); * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score); * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Details on each of these components are provided in Outcome Measures 10-16. Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR50 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
Participants were defined as ACR20 responders if they had at least a 20% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score) * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR20 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
Participants were defined as ACR50 responders if they had at least a 50% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score) * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR50 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
Participants were defined as ACR70 responders if they had at least a 70% improvement from Baseline in both the tender and the swollen 28-joint count, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: * Patient's pain assessment (assessed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm) * Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score) * Acute phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein \[hsCRP\]). Participants were considered as non-responders if they failed the ACR70 criteria. Participants who prematurely discontinued due to insufficient therapeutic effect were also considered non-responders.
The Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 is a combined index to measure the disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and includes the following variables: * The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; * C-reactive protein (CRP) in mg/L; * Patient's global assessment of disease activity measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale. The DAS28 score ranges from zero to ten. DAS28 above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6
Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is the amount of air that can be exhaled in one second. FEV1 was measured by spirometry performed at approximately the same time of day on each visit to avoid diurnal variation. All spirometry calibrations and evaluations followed the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society / European Respiratory Society guidelines for acceptability. A positive change from baseline in FEV1 indicates improvement in lung function.
The FEV1 percent predicted expresses FEV1 as a percentage of the "predicted values" for participants of similar characteristics (height, age, sex, and sometimes race and weight). A positive change from baseline in FEV1 % predicted indicates improvement in lung function.
Forced Vital Capacity is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. FVC was assessed by spirometry. A positive change from baseline in FVC indicates improvement in lung function.
Vital Capacity is the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after a full inhalation. Slow Vital Capacity (SVC) test is performed by having the patient slowly and completely blow out all of the air from their lungs. A positive change from baseline in SVC indicates improvement in lung function.
The forced expiratory flow (FEF) 25%-75% measurement describes the amount of air expelled from the lungs during the middle half (25% - 75%) of the forced vital capacity test and is measured using spirometry. A positive change from baseline in FEF indicates improvement in lung function.
| Arm | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Canakinumab | EXPERIMENTAL | All participants received canakinumab as open-label study medication. Canakinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks, with a maximum allowable single dose of 300 mg. |
| Placebo | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | 250 mL of 5% dextrose infused IV over 2 hours. Single dose on Day 1. |
| Canakinumab (ACZ885) | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants continued the study drug based on the final dose and regimen administered at the end of the CACZ885N2301 study. All participants received 1 or 2 ACZ885 subcutaneous injections every 4 or 8 weeks. |
| Canakinumab Dose Reduction | EXPERIMENTAL | All patients received canakinumab 4mg/kg (300 mg max) every 4 weeks in Part I of the study. Patients eligible for Part II of the study were randomized to one of two treatment arms. This is Treatment Arm 1 in Part II of the study: Canakinumab was administered at a reduced dose (2 mg/kg every 4 weeks). If the patient continued to maintain inactive disease for 24 additional weeks, canakinumab was administered at 1mg/kg every 4 weeks. If the patient continued to maintain inactive disease for another 24 additional weeks, canakinumab treatment was discontinued. |
| Canakinumab Dose Interval Prolongation | EXPERIMENTAL | All participants received canakinumab 4mg/kg (300 mg max) every 4 weeks in Part I of the study. Patients eligible for Part II of the study were randomized to one of two treatment arms. This is Treatment Arm 2 in Part II of the study: Canakinumab dose interval was prolonged to a regimen of 4mg/kg every 8 weeks. If the patient continued to be stable with inactive disease for 24 additional weeks, canakinumab dose interval was prolonged to a regimen of 4mg/kg every 12 weeks. If the patient was clinically stable with inactive disease for another 24 additional weeks, canakinumab treatment was discontinued. |
| crFMF: 150 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | During Epoch 2, participants received canakinumab 150mg (or 2mg/kg for participants weighing \<= 40kg) q4w for 16 weeks. If participants were eligible for blinded escape, they received a single add-on dose of canakinumab (150 mg or 2mg/kg for participants weighing \<= 40kg) between day 8 and day 28, and then received blinded uptitration to canakinumab 300 mg q4w from day 29 through day 112. If patients on the highest allowed canakinumab dose of 300 mg (or 4 mg/kg for patients weighing ≤ 40 kg) q4w and re-flared (PGA ≥ 2 and CRP ≥ 30 mg/L) were not eligible for further up-titration. |
| crCMF: placebo | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | During epoch 2, participants received matching placebo to canakinumab 150 mg Participants who required blinded escape,they received a single add-on dose of canakinumab (150 mg or 2mg/kg for participants weighing \<= 40kg) between day 8 and day 28, and then received blinded one dose of placebo and one dose of canakinumab q4w from day 29 through day 112. If flare or re-flare still occurred after receipt of canakinumab. 150mg, participants were uptitrated to open-label canakinumab 300 mg. |
| HIDS/MKD: 150 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | During Epoch 2, participants received canakinumab 150mg (or 2mg/kg for participants weighing \<= 40kg) q4w for 16 weeks. If participants were eligible for blinded escape, they received a single add-on dose of canakinumab (150 mg or 2mg/kg for participants weighing \<= 40kg) between day 8 and day 28, and then received blinded uptitration to canakinumab 300 mg q4w from day 29 through day 112. If patients on the highest allowed canakinumab dose of 300 mg (or 4 mg/kg for patients weighing ≤ 40 kg) q4w and re-flared (PGA ≥ 2 and CRP ≥ 30 mg/L) were not eligible for further up-titration. |
| HIDS/MKD: placebo | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | During epoch 2, participants received matching placebo to canakinumab 150 mg qw4. Participants who required blinded escape, they received a single add-on dose of canakinumab (150 mg or 2mg/kg for participants weighing \<= 40kg) between day 8 and day 28 and then received blinded one dose of placebo and one dose of canakinumab q4w from day 29 through day 112. If flare or re-flare still occurred after receipt of canakinumab 150mg, participants were uptitrated to open-label canakinumab 300 mg. |
| TRAPS: 150 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | During Epoch 2, participants received canakinumab 150mg (or 2mg/kg for participants weighing \<= 40kg) q4w for 16 weeks. If participants were eligible for blinded escape, they received a single add-on dose of canakinumab (150 mg or 2mg/kg for participants weighing \<= 40kg) between day 8 and day 28, and then received blinded uptitration to canakinumab 300 mg q4w from day 29 through day 112. If patients on the highest allowed canakinumab dose of 300 mg (or 4 mg/kg for patients weighing ≤ 40 kg) q4w and re-flared (PGA ≥ 2 and CRP ≥ 30 mg/L) were not eligible for further up-titration |
| TRAPS: placebo | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | During epoch 2, participants received matching placebo to canakinumab 150 mg qw4. Participants who required blinded escape,they received a single add-on dose of canakinumab (150 mg or 2mg/kg for participants weighing \<= 40kg) between Day 8 and 28 and then received blinded one dose of placebo and one dose of canakinumab q4w from day 29 through day 112. If flare or re-flare still occurred after receipt of canakinumab 150mg, participants were uptitrated to open-label canakinumab 300 mg. |
| Canakinumab 150mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Canakinumab 150mg in prefilled syringe subcutaneously |
| Canakinumab Dose 50 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Pivotal Phase: Blinded Canakinumab 50 mg quarterly subcutaneous + standard of care therapy. Extension Phase: Switched to open-label Canakinumab 150 mg quarterly subcutaneous + standard of care therapy |
| Canakinumab Dose 150 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Pivotal Phase: Switched to open-label Canakinumab 150 mg quarterly subcutaneous + standard of care therapy |
| Canakinumab Dose 300 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Pivotal Phase: Blinded Canakinumab 300 mg quarterly subcutaneous (with one additional dose at week 2) + standard of care therapy. Extension phase: Switched to open-label Canakinumab 150 mg quarterly subcutaneous + standard of care therapy |
| canakinumab arm | EXPERIMENTAL | - |
| Canakinumab 150 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received 1 subcutaneous (sc) injection of canakinumab 150 mg and 1 intramuscular (im) injection of placebo to triamcinolone acetonide on Day 1. Participants could receive a re-dose of study drug on demand upon the occurrence of new flares, but re-dosing could not occur until 14 days had elapsed after the previous dose. Participants completing the 12 week core study could continue to be treated in a 12 week extension study for any new gout flare on demand with the same treatment as assigned in the core study. In the second extension study participants were to receive open-label on demand treatment with canakinumab 150 mg sc upon new flare for 1 year, for a total duration of 18 months. |
| Triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | Participants received 1 intramuscular (im) injection of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg and 1 subcutaneous (sc) injection of placebo to canakinumab on Day 1. Participants could receive a re-dose of study drug on demand upon the occurrence of new flares, but re-dosing could not occur until 14 days had elapsed after the previous dose. Participants completing the 12 week core study could continue to be treated in a 12 week extension study for any new gout flare on demand with the same treatment as assigned in the core study. In the second extension study participants were to switch to open-label on demand treatment with canakinumab 150 mg sc upon new flare for 1 year. Triamcinolone acetonide was not to be administered in the second extension study. |
| Part I, Part II-arm1, & Part III | EXPERIMENTAL | - |
| Part II - arm 2 | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | - |
| ACZ885 | EXPERIMENTAL | Monthly doses of 300 mg (4 mg/kg for patients ≤ 40 kg) canakinumab s.c. |
| Part A: Canakinumab | EXPERIMENTAL | In this ascending dose part, participants received a single intra-articular injection of canakinumab. The beginning dose was 150 mg, escalating to the 300 mg dose and then to 600 mg. |
| Part A: Placebo | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Participants received a single intra-articular injection of canakinumab-matching placebo. |
| Part B: Canakinumab | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received a single intra-articular injection of canakinumab on Day 1 and naproxen matching placebo tablets orally twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| Part B: Placebo | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Participants received a single intra-articular injection of canakinumab matching placebo on Day 1 and naproxen matching placebo tablets orally twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| Part B: Naproxen | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | Participants received a single intra-articular injection of canakinumab matching placebo on Day 1 and naproxen 500mg tablets orally twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| Canakinumab 150 mg + Metformin | EXPERIMENTAL | Eligible participants received a single subcutaneous injection Canakinumab 150 mg.Patients must have had documented diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and be on a stable dose of Metformin (Met) monotherapy treatment at least 1000 mg/day for 3 months prior to screening |
| Placebo + Metformin | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Eligible participants received a single subcutaneous injection of Placebo to Canakinumab. Patients must have had documented diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and be on a stable dose of Metformin (Met) monotherapy treatment at least 1000 mg/day for 3 months prior to screening |
| Canakinumab 150 mg + Metforimin + Sulfonylurea | EXPERIMENTAL | Eligible participants received a single subcutaneous injection of Canakinumab 150 mg.Patients must have had documented diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and be on a stable dose of Metformin (Met) at least 1000 mg/day , and a Sulfonylurea (Sulfonyl), at least 1/2 the maximally labeled dose combination therapy, for 3 months prior to screening. |
| Placebo + Metforimin + Sulfonylurea | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Eligible participants received a single subcutaneous injection of Placebo to Canakinumab.Patients must have had documented diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and be on a stable dose of Metformin (Met) at least 1000 mg/day , and a Sulfonylurea (Sulfonyl), at least 1/2 the maximally labeled dose combination therapy, for 3 months prior to screening. |
| Canakinumab 150 mg + Met + Sulfonyl + Thiazolidinedione | EXPERIMENTAL | Eligible participants received a single subcutaneous injection of Canakinumab 150 mg.Patients must have had documented diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and be on a stable dose of Metformin (Met) at least 1000 mg/day , and a Sulfonylurea (Sulfonyl), at least 1/2 the maximally labeled dose, and a Thiazolidinedione (Thiaz)at least 1/2 the maximally labeled dose combination therapy, for 3 months prior to screening. |
| Placebo + Met + Sulfonyl + Thiazolidinedione | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Eligible participants received a single subcutaneous injection of Placebo to Canakinumab. Patients must have had documented diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and be on a stable dose of Metformin (Met) at least 1000 mg/day , and a Sulfonylurea (Sulfonyl), at least 1/2 the maximally labeled dose, and a Thiazolidinedione (Thiaz)at least 1/2 the maximally labeled dose combination therapy, for 3 months prior to screening. |
| Canakinumab 150 mg + Insulin | EXPERIMENTAL | Eligible participants received a single subcutaneous injection of Canakinumab 150 mg. Patients must have had documented diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus for 3 months prior to screening and be on a stable dose of Insulin, 2 insulin injections per day for a total daily dose of less than 100 U with or without Metformin (Met)for 3 months prior to screening |
| Placebo + Insulin | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Eligible participants received a single subcutaneous injection of Placebo to Canakinumab. Patients must have had documented diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus for 3 months prior to screening and be on a stable dose of Insulin, 2 insulin injections per day for a total daily dose of less than 100 U with or without Metformin (Met)for 3 months prior to screening |
| Canakinumab 150 mg in patients with IGT | EXPERIMENTAL | Eligible participants received a single subcutaneous injection of Canakinumab 150 mg. Patients must have had Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria confirmed at screening visit. |
| Placebo in patients with IGT | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | Eligible participants received a single subcutaneous injection of Placebo to Canakinumab. Patients must have had Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria confirmed at screening visit. |
| Core study: Canakinumab 25 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Canakinumab 25 mg subcutaneously (sc) once at Day 1, placebo sc at Days 29, 57, and 85 plus daily placebo capsules for 16 weeks. Allopurinol treatment was initiated at the latest at baseline (Visit 2) according to the patient's renal function / estimated creatinine clearance at screening (Visit 1). Allopurinol was administered orally to all randomized patients once daily (100 mg-300 mg) for 24 weeks. |
| Core study: Canakinumab 50 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Canakinumab 50 mg sc once at Day 1, placebo sc at Days 29, 57, and 85 plus daily placebo capsules for 16 weeks. Allopurinol treatment was initiated at the latest at baseline (Visit 2) according to the patient's renal function / estimated creatinine clearance at screening (Visit 1). Allopurinol was administered orally to all randomized patients once daily (100 mg-300 mg) for 24 weeks. |
| Core study: Canakinumab 100 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Canakinumab 100 mg sc once at Day 1, placebo sc at Days 29, 57, and 85 plus daily placebo capsules for 16 weeks. Allopurinol treatment was initiated at the latest at baseline (Visit 2) according to the patient's renal function / estimated creatinine clearance at screening (Visit 1). Allopurinol was administered orally to all randomized patients once daily (100 mg-300 mg) for 24 weeks. |
| Core study: Canakinumab 200 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Canakinumab 100 mg sc once at Day 1, placebo sc at Days 29, 57, and 85 plus daily placebo capsules for 16 weeks. Allopurinol treatment was initiated at the latest at baseline (Visit 2) according to the patient's renal function / estimated creatinine clearance at screening (Visit 1). Allopurinol was administered orally to all randomized patients once daily (100 mg-300 mg) for 24 weeks. |
| Core study: Canakinumab 300 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Canakinumab 300 mg sc once at Day 1, placebo sc at Days 29, 57, and 85 plus daily placebo capsules for 16 weeks. Allopurinol treatment was initiated at the latest at baseline (Visit 2) according to the patient's renal function / estimated creatinine clearance at screening (Visit 1). Allopurinol was administered orally to all randomized patients once daily (100 mg-300 mg) for 24 weeks. |
| Core study: Canakinumab q4wk | EXPERIMENTAL | Canakinumab 50 mg sc at Days 1, and 29 followed by canakinumab 25 mg sc on Days 57, and 85 plus daily placebo capsules for 16 weeks, repeated every 4 week (q4wk). Allopurinol treatment was initiated at the latest at baseline (Visit 2) according to the patient's renal function / estimated creatinine clearance at screening (Visit 1). Allopurinol was administered orally to all randomized patients once daily (100 mg-300 mg) for 24 weeks. |
| Core study: Colchicine 0.5 mg | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | Colchicine 0.5 mg capsule orally once daily throughout the whole treatment phase of 16 weeks plus placebo matching canakinumab s.c. at Days 1, 29, 57, and 85. Allopurinol treatment was initiated at the latest at baseline (Visit 2) according to the patient's renal function / estimated creatinine clearance at screening (Visit 1). Allopurinol was administered orally to all randomized patients once daily (100 mg-300 mg) for 24 weeks. |
| Extension study: Group A | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants who were randomized to canakinumab in the core study and were treated with canakinumab for at least 1 flare in the extension study. |
| Extension study: Group B | EXPERIMENTAL | Patients who were randomized to canakinumab in the core study but did not receive treatment with canakinumab in the extension study. |
| Extension study: Group C | EXPERIMENTAL | Patients who were randomized to colchicine in the core study and were treated with canakinumab for at least 1 flare in the extension study. |
| Extension study: Group D | EXPERIMENTAL | Patients who were randomized to colchicine in the core study but did not receive treatment with canakinumab in the extension study. |
| Canakinumab 10 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Canakinumab 10 mg subcutaneous (s.c) once. The s.c. injection could be administered into the arm or thigh. Randomized patients received one s.c. injection of canakinumab and placebo matching triamcinolone acetonide (0.9% sodium chloride) intramuscularly (i.m.) once, on Day 1. The i.m. injection was recommended to be administered deeply into the gluteal muscle. |
| Canakinumab 25 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Canakinumab 25 mg subcutaneous (s.c) once. The s.c. injection could be administered into the arm or thigh. Randomized patients received one s.c. injection of canakinumab and placebo matching triamcinolone acetonide (0.9% sodium chloride) intramuscularly (i.m.) once, on Day 1. The i.m. injection was recommended to be administered deeply into the gluteal muscle. |
| Canakinumab 50 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Canakinumab 50 mg subcutaneous (s.c) once. The s.c. injection could be administered into the arm or thigh. Randomized patients received one s.c. injection of canakinumab and placebo matching triamcinolone acetonide (0.9% sodium chloride) intramuscularly (i.m.) once, on Day 1. The i.m. injection was recommended to be administered deeply into the gluteal muscle. |
| Canakinumab 90 mg | EXPERIMENTAL | Canakinumab 90 mg subcutaneous (s.c) once. The s.c. injection could be administered into the arm or thigh. Randomized patients received one s.c. injection of canakinumab and placebo matching triamcinolone acetonide (0.9% sodium chloride) intramuscularly (i.m.) once, on Day 1. The i.m. injection was recommended to be administered deeply into the gluteal muscle. |
| Dexamethasone | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | Dexamethasone 12 mg intravenous infusion and placebo matching canakinumab on Day 1. |
| Canakinumab + Methotrexate | EXPERIMENTAL | Canakinumab, human anti-interleukin-1beta monoclonal antibody plus Methotrexate (MTX). Intravenous (IV) Infusion of 600mg canakinumab on Day 1, 15 continuing every 4 weeks up to week 26. MTX was given as variable dosing regimen of 7.5 mg-15 mg weekly. |
| Methotrexate + placebo | ACTIVE_COMPARATOR | Methotrexate (MTX) was given as variable dosing regimen of 7.5 mg-15 mg weekly. Intravenous (IV) Placebo Solution, given in the same mode of administration as the canakinumab solution. |
| Canakinumab 600 mg IV + 300 mg q2wk | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received canakinumab 600 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose on Day 1 and 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg every 4 weeks. |
| Canakinumab 300 mg q2wk | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received canakinumab 300 mg subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks (q2wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks. |
| Canakinumab 150 mg q4wk | EXPERIMENTAL | Participants received canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks (q4wk) for 12 weeks in the Core Phase. In the Extension Phase, participants received 300 mg canakinumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously, until a protocol amendment in January 2009 decreased the dose to 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks. |
| 1 | EXPERIMENTAL | ACZ885 |
| 2 | PLACEBO_COMPARATOR | - |
| Name | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Canakinumab | BIOLOGICAL | Canakinumab was provided as a 150 mg/1 mL solution for subcutaneous injection, administered at a dose of 4 mg/kg every four weeks. The medication was supplied by Novartis in individual 2 mL glass vials, each containing 150 mg of liquid canakinumab. Throughout the study, participants received subcutaneous injections of canakinumab 4 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 300 mg) at the study site every four weeks. Any participant who required a dose greater than a single dose of 150 mg (participants \> 37.5 kg) received two s.c. injections per administration |
| Placebo | DRUG | 250 mL of 5% dextrose infused IV over 2 hours. Single dose on Day 1. |
| Canakinumab (AIN457) | BIOLOGICAL | Canakinumab solution for subcutaneous injection in vial which contained 150mg/mL canakinumab in 1 mL solution |
| ACZ885 150 mg (Canakinumab) | DRUG | Active canakinumab in individual 2 mL glass vials, each containing 150 mg canakinumab liquid in vial. |
| ACZ885 | BIOLOGICAL | - |
| Triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg | DRUG | Participants received 40 mg intramuscular (IM) |
| Canakinumab 150mg in prefilled syringe | DRUG | Canakinumab 150mg in prefilled syringe will be given in a single dose subcutaneously upon demand for gouty arthritis flares |
| Standard of care | DRUG | Standard of care post-MI background therapy includes, but is not limited to, lipid lowering, anti-hypertensive, beta blockers, and anti-platelet therapy as appropriate |
| canakinumab (company code: ACZ885D) | DRUG | - |
| Canakinumab 150 mg | DRUG | Canakinumab 150 mg was supplied in 6 mL glass vials each containing nominally 150 mg canakinumab (plus 20% overfill). |
| Placebo to canakinumab | DRUG | Placebo to canakinumab was supplied in 6 mL glass vials containing placebo powder as a lyophilized cake. |
| Placebo to triamcinolone acetonide | DRUG | Placebo triamcinolone acetonide was supplied as a lipid emulsion similar in appearance to triamcinolone acetonide. |
| Canakinumab (ACZ885) | DRUG | 6 mL glass vial containing 150 mg lyophilized Canakinumab reconstituted with water for a subcutaneous injection every 8 weeks. Dosage based on body weight. |
| Naproxen | DRUG | Tablets for oral administration |
| Placebo to Naproxen | DRUG | Tablets for oral administration |
| Colchicine | DRUG | 0.5 mg capsule orally once daily for 16 weeks. |
| Allopurinol | DRUG | 100-300 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks. |
| Placebo Matching Canakinumab | DRUG | Subcutaneous injection. |
| Placebo Matching Colchicine | DRUG | Capsule orally once daily for 16 weeks. |
| Triamcinolone acetonide | DRUG | Randomized patients received triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg i.m. once and placebo matching canakinumab s.c. once, on Day 1. |
| dexamethasone | DRUG | 12 mg intravenous infusion 50 mL over 30 minutes. |
| placebo matching dexamethasone | OTHER | Placebo intravenous infusion. |
| Metformin | DRUG | Participants continued on their stable daily dose of metformin throughout the study |
| ACZ885 (investigational) | DRUG | The ACZ885 was supplied in 6 mL colorless glass vials each containing nominally 150 mg ACZ885 (with 20% overfill). The vials were kept at 2-8°C. At the investigator's site, solutions for infusion were prepared depending on the volume and dose administered. |
| Canakinumab (investigational) | DRUG | Canakinumab was supplied in 6 mL colorless glass vials each containing nominally 150 mg canakinumab (with 20% overfill). The vials were kept at 2-8°C. At the investigator's site, solutions for infusion were prepared depending on the volume and dose administered. |
| Methotrexate (MTX) | DRUG | Methotrexate (MTX) was supplied in tablet form, each of 2.5 mg strength. |
Inclusion Criteria: * Signed informed consent had to be obtained prior to participation in the study. Parent's or legal guardian's written informed consent and child's assent, if appropriate, were required before any assessment was performed for participants \< 20 years of age. * Japanese male and ...
ACZ885 is an investigational small molecule developed by Novartis AG under the ticker NVS. It has been studied in inflammatory and metabolic conditions including acute gouty arthritis flares, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes, Muckle-Wells syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and pulmonary sarcoidosis. It is also known as canakinumab.
ACZ885 has been studied for acute gouty arthritis flares, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes, Muckle-Wells syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and pulmonary sarcoidosis. Completed trials have enrolled patients with sickle cell anemia, pulmonary sarcoidosis, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes. It remains an investigational agent rather than an approved therapy.
ACZ885 is developed by Novartis AG, which trades under the ticker NVS. Novartis has sponsored the clinical trial program evaluating ACZ885 across inflammatory, autoimmune, and metabolic indications, including studies in sickle cell anemia, pulmonary sarcoidosis, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes.
ACZ885 has reached Phase 3 in its clinical development program. Two Phase 3 trials have been completed: one in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and one in cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes. Additional Phase 2 trials have been completed in sickle cell anemia and pulmonary sarcoidosis. ACZ885 is investigational and is not an approved treatment.
Completed ACZ885 trials include NCT02296424 in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, NCT01576367 in cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes, NCT02961218 in sickle cell anemia, and NCT02888080 in pulmonary sarcoidosis. These studies enrolled a combined total of 288 participants across North America, Europe, and other regions. All four trials have been completed.
Yes, ACZ885 is the same as canakinumab. ACZ885 is the investigational code name used for canakinumab, and the 150 mg dose is referenced as ACZ885 150 mg. Both names refer to the same Novartis compound studied across inflammatory and metabolic conditions, including cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes and pulmonary sarcoidosis.