Hemoglobin A1C is a blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. The change from baseline represents the Week 20 A1C value minus the Week 0 (baseline) A1C value.

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product.

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product.

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 30 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C.

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia is defined as an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured (e.g., by fingerstick) plasma glucose concentration ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L). The event rate was the total number of events divided by follow-up time (participant-years), including multiple events from the same participant.

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.

HbA1c is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. Statistical analysis based on a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model with terms for treatment, time, prior use of AHAs, the interactions of treatment by time, time by prior use of AHAs, and treatment by time by prior use of AHAs with the constraint that the mean baseline is the same for both treatment groups.

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C.

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product. The AE does not have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The AE can include any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease or any worsening (change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the pharmaceutical product.

Change from baseline in FPG at Week 6 based on longitudinal data analysis (LDA) model including both baseline and post-baseline measurements as response variable and term time.

An adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product.

Participants who were discontinued from study drug due to an adverse event during the 6 weeks of treatment.

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study.

A1C was measured as a percent. This change from baseline reflects the A1C percent at Week 24 minus the A1C percent at Week 0.

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Adverse events may include the onset of new illness and the exacerbation of pre-existing conditions.

Based on a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model with terms for treatment, other prior antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) therapy status other than sitagliptin (yes/no), study drug regimen (just before meal/after meal), sitagliptin dosage (50 mg/100 mg), time and the interaction of time by treatment, time by other prior AHA therapy status, time by study drug regimen, time by sitagliptin dosage and study drug regimen by sitagliptin dosage, with a constraint that the mean baseline is the same for all treatment groups.

Change in daily insulin dose following 24 weeks of therapy (i.e., daily insulin dose at Week 24 minus daily insulin dose at baseline)

Glycated hemoglobin (A1C) is a blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Mean change from baseline at Week 20 was estimated from a longitudinal data analysis model.

The number of participants experiencing ≥1 adverse event during Weeks 0-20 was reported. An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a person administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.

The number of participants who discontinued from study drug due to an adverse event during Weeks 0-20 was reported. An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a person administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.

The number of participants experiencing ≥1 adverse event during Weeks 0-56 were reported. An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a person administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.

The number of participants who discontinued from study drug due to an adverse event during Weeks 0-54 was reported. An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a person administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.

A1C is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent. Efficacy analyses treated data as missing after the initiation of rescue therapy.

Participant whole blood samples were collected at baseline and Week 30 to determine the LS mean HbA1c change from baseline. HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood and provides an indication of participant blood glucose control in the 2 to 3 months prior to the evaluation.

Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an episode with clinical symptoms attributed to hypoglycemia, without regard to glucose level. Participants were instructed to complete the Hypoglycemia Assessment Log (HAL) for any symptomatic episodes he or she believed represent hypoglycemia. If a fingerstick glucose was obtained before or shortly (i.e., within a few minutes) after treating, the value was recorded in the HAL. In addition, participants were instructed to record in the HAL any fingerstick glucose values ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L) regardless of the presence of clinical symptoms.

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of the treatment administered.

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of the treatment administered.

Symptomatic hypoglycemic events were based on the participants own self-reported symptoms (for example, but not limited to the following: faintness, headache, confusion, anxiety, sweating, tremor, palpitations, nausea, pallor, dizziness, hunger, sudden behavioral change).

Change from baseline reflects the Week 24 value minus the baseline value. A1C represents the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin.

Change from baseline reflects the Week 26 value minus the baseline value. A1C represents the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin.

Primary composite CV endpoint of MACE plus which includes CV-related death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization.

Primary composite CV endpoint of MACE plus which includes CV-related death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization.

A1C represents the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin.

The change in A1C, compared to baseline for the Sita/Met FDC and the pioglitazone groups at Week 40. A1C represents percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin.

The change in A1C compared to baseline was measured for the participants treated with sitagliptin or pioglitazone at Week 12. Sitagliptin was the only intervention administered to the Sita/Met FDC group during this phase. A1c represents percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin.

HbA1c is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent.

Change from the baseline measurement, where the baseline measurement was obtained at randomization (0 week) before receiving study medication.

HbA1c is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent.

A1C is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent. The study hypothesis comparison was between sitagliptin versus placebo.

A1C was measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent.

HbA1c is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 12 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent.

The Swallowing Ability Questionnaire was completed on Day 2 after the participant received two matching placebo tablets (excluding marking) following consumption of a low- to moderate-fat meal in pediatric participants aged 10 to 17 years. The questionnaire consisted of five parts: could only swallow study med with help, easy to start swallowing study med, easy to swallow study med, felt like study med got stuck in throat, and had to swallow study med more than once. The number of participants who strongly agreed or agreed in each of the five parts is reported.

The Swallowing Ability Questionnaire was completed on Day 4 after the participant received two matching placebo tablets (excluding marking) following consumption of a low- to moderate-fat meal in pediatric participants aged 10 to 17 years. The questionnaire consisted of five parts: could only swallow study med with help, easy to start swallowing study med, easy to swallow study med, felt like study med got stuck in throat, and had to swallow study med more than once. The number of participants who strongly agreed or agreed in each of the five parts is reported.

The Swallowing Ability Questionnaire was completed on Day 6 after the participant received two matching placebo tablets (excluding marking) following consumption of a low- to moderate-fat meal in pediatric participants aged 10 to 17 years. The questionnaire consisted of five parts: could only swallow study med with help, easy to start swallowing study med, easy to swallow study med, felt like study med got stuck in throat, and had to swallow study med more than once. The number of participants who strongly agreed or agreed in each of the five parts is reported.

The Swallowing Ability Questionnaire was completed on Day 9 after the participant received two matching placebo tablets (excluding marking) following consumption of a low- to moderate-fat meal in pediatric participants aged 10 to 17 years. The questionnaire consisted of five parts: could only swallow study med with help, easy to start swallowing study med, easy to swallow study med, felt like study med got stuck in throat, and had to swallow study med more than once. The number of participants who strongly agreed or agreed in each of the five parts is reported.

In this study, metformin products were withheld 24 hours (hrs) prior to sitagliptin/metformin XR administration and were permitted to re-initiate 24 hrs post study drug administration. Owing to resumption of therapeutic metformin administration 24 hrs after sitagliptin/metformin XR administration for all participants, metformin pharmacokinetic analyses were restricted to maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) and area under the curve 0 to 24 hrs (AUC0-24hr). Therefore, metformin arm is not included in this endpoint.

Due different units of measure for sitagliptin and metformin, metformin data are presented in another endpoint.

In this study, metformin products were withheld 24 hours prior to sitagliptin/metformin XR administration and were permitted to re-initiate 24 hours post study drug administration. Due different units of measure for sitagliptin and metformin, sitagliptin data are presented in another endpoint.

In this study, metformin products were withheld 24 hours prior to sitagliptin/metformin XR administration and were permitted to re-initiate 24 hours post study drug administration. Owing to resumption of therapeutic metformin administration 24 hours after sitagliptin/metformin XR administration for all participants, metformin pharmacokinetic analyses were restricted to Cmax, Tmax and AUC0-24hr. Therefore, metformin arm is not included in this endpoint.

Due different units of measure for sitagliptin and metformin, metformin data are presented in another endpoint.

In this study, metformin products were withheld 24 hours prior to sitagliptin/metformin XR administration and were permitted to re-initiate 24 hours post study drug administration. Due different units of measure for sitagliptin and metformin, sitagliptin data are presented in another endpoint.

In this study, metformin products were withheld 24 hours prior to sitagliptin/metformin XR administration and were permitted to re-initiate 24 hours post study drug administration.

In this study, metformin products were withheld 24 hours prior to sitagliptin/metformin XR administration and were permitted to re-initiate 24 hours post study drug administration. Owing to resumption of therapeutic metformin administration 24 hours after sitagliptin/metformin XR administration for all participants, metformin pharmacokinetic analyses were restricted to Cmax, Tmax and AUC0-24hr. Therefore, metformin arm is not included in this endpoint.

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in the form of signs, symptoms, abnormal laboratory findings, or diseases that emerges or worsens relative to baseline during a clinical study with an Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP), regardless of causal relationship and even if no IMP has been administered.

Vital sign measurements included blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and oral temperature.

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in the form of signs, symptoms, abnormal laboratory findings, or diseases that emerges or worsens relative to baseline during a clinical study with an IMP, regardless of causal relationship and even if no IMP has been administered.

Percent inhibition of DPP-4 activity at 24 hours after the Day 5 morning dose (i.e., at trough) was determined by analysis of blood samples collected from the study participants.

ISR was estimated by the deconvolution of peripheral C-peptide concentrations using a 2-compartment model that utilizes population C-peptide kinetic parameters.

Meal was given 2 hours postdose. Blood samples for determination of active GLP-1 concentration were collected (4 hours postmeal) on Day 2 in each treatment period.

Serum samples were used to determine the AUC from time 0 to infinity for metformin.