rMenB+OMV NZ vaccine

The effectiveness (test-based) of rMenB+OMV vaccine at 1 month after the 3 doses in MenB\_0\_2\_6 group and 1 month after the 2 dose schedule in MenB\_0\_6 group when compared to one dose of MenACWY vaccination in ACWY group, against a panel of N. meningitidis serogroup B strains was measured in terms of percentage of samples without bactericidal activity using endogenous complement human Serum Bactericidal Assay (enc-hSBA), which provides a qualitative assessment (yes/no) of the presence of sufficient bactericidal antibodies in human sera to kill a meningococcal strain at a specific dilution of 1:4. Participants were randomly selected for testing against each strain therefore only a subset of participants were tested for each of the strains.

The effectiveness (test-based) of rMenB+OMV vaccine at 1 month after the 2 doses in MenB\_0\_2\_6 group when compared to one dose of MenACWY vaccination in ACWY group, against a panel of N. meningitidis serogroup B strains was measured in terms of percentage of samples without bactericidal activity using endogenous complement human Serum Bactericidal Assay (enc-hSBA), which provides a qualitative assessment (yes/no) of the presence of sufficient bactericidal antibodies in human sera to kill a meningococcal strain at a specific dilution of 1:4. Participants were randomly selected for testing against each strain therefore only a subset of participants were tested for each of the strains.

The effectiveness (responder-based) of the rMenB+OMV NZ vaccine was measured in terms of percentage of participants whose sera kill \>=70% of the strains tested using enc-hSBA, calculated based on Clopper Pearson method. Effectiveness is demonstrated if Lower Limit (LL) of the two-sided 97.5% CI for the percentages of participants whose sera kill ≥70% of strains is above 65%.

The effectiveness (responder-based) of the rMenB+OMV NZ vaccine was measured in terms of percentage of participants whose sera kill \>=70% of the strains tested using enc-hSBA, calculated based on Clopper Pearson method. Effectiveness is demonstrated if Lower Limit (LL) of the two-sided 97.5% CI for the percentages of participants whose sera kill ≥70% of strains is above 65%.

Immune response was measured in terms of hSBA GMTs directed against serogroups A, C, W and Y. As pre-specified in the protocol, the data reported in this outcome measures data were presented for individual lots to demonstrate the consistency of the immune response of 3 lots (ABCWY- 1 Group, ABCWY-2 Group, and ABCWY-3 Group) of the ACWY component of the MenABCWY vaccine.

Four-fold rise is defined as: If the pre-vaccination hSBA titer is \< 4, then post-vaccination hSBA titer should be \>= 16 . If the pre-vaccination hSBA titer is \>= limit of detection (LOD) but \< LL of quantification (LLOQ), then post-vaccination hSBA titer should be \>= 4 times the LLOQ. If the pre-vaccination hSBA titer is \>= LLOQ, then post-vaccination hSBA titer should be \>= 4 times the pre-vaccination hSBA titer. As pre-specified in the protocol, data reported in this outcome measure were presented for ACWY group, ABCWY pooled group to evaluate the immunological non-inferiority of 2 doses of the MenABCWY vaccines against MenACWY vaccines, participants from the ABCWY-1, ABCWY-2, and ABCWY-3 groups were pooled into a single group.

The effectiveness (test-based) of 2 doses of MenABCWY vaccine when compared to 1 dose of MenACWY vaccine, against a panel of N. meningitidis serogroup B strains was measured in terms of percentage of samples without bactericidal activity using enc-hSBA, which provides a qualitative assessment (yes/no) of the presence of sufficient bactericidal antibodies in human sera to kill a meningococcal strain at a specific dilution of 1:4. As pre-specified in the protocol, data reported in this outcome measure were presented for ACWY group and ABCWY pooled group to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 doses of the MenABCWY vaccines against MenACWY vaccines, participants from the ABCWY-1, ABCWY-2, and ABCWY-3 groups were pooled into a single group.

The effectiveness was measured in terms of percentage of samples with bactericidal activity using enc-hSBA, which provides a qualitative assessment (yes/no) of the presence of sufficient bactericidal antibodies in human sera to kill a meningococcal strain at a specific dilution of 1:4. As pre-specified in the protocol, data reported in this outcome measure were presented for MenB\_0\_2\_6 Group and ABCWY pooled group to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 doses of the MenABCWY vaccines against MenACWY vaccines, participants from the ABCWY-1, ABCWY-2, and ABCWY-3 groups were pooled into a single group.

The effectiveness (responder-based) of the MenABCWY vaccine is measured in terms of percentage of participants whose sera kill \>=70% of the strains tested using enc-hSBA, being calculated based on Clopper Pearson method. Effectiveness is demonstrated Lower Limit (LL) of the two-sided 97.5% CI for the percentages of participants whose sera kill ≥70% of strains tested for MenABCWY is above 65%.

Assessed solicited local adverse events were injection or administration site = pain, erythema, swelling, induration. Any = occurrence of the adverse event regardless of intensity grade. Any erythema and swelling = adverse event reported with a surface diameter greater than 0 millimeters. No solicited AEs were collected after vaccination on Day 211 because these vaccines were administered as part of standard of care and to maintain blinding. As pre- specified in the protocol, data reported in this outcome measure were presented for MenB\_0\_2\_6 group, MenB\_0\_6 group, ACWY group, ABCWY pooled group.

Assessed solicited local adverse events were injection or administration site pain, erythema, swelling, induration. Any = occurrence of the adverse event regardless of intensity grade. Any erythema and swelling = adverse event reported with a surface diameter greater than 0 millimeters. No solicited AEs were collected after vaccination on Day 211 because these vaccines were administered as part of standard of care and to maintain blinding. As pre- specified in the protocol, data reported in this outcome measure were presented for MenB\_0\_2\_6 group, MenB\_0\_6 group, ACWY group, ABCWY pooled group.

Assessed solicited local adverse events were injection or administration site pain, erythema, swelling, induration. Any = occurrence of the adverse event regardless of intensity grade. Any erythema and swelling = adverse event reported with a surface diameter greater than 0 millimeters. No solicited AEs were collected after vaccination on Day 211 because these vaccines were administered as part of standard of care and to maintain blinding. As pre- specified in the protocol, data reported in this outcome measure were presented for MenB\_0\_2\_6 group, MenB\_0\_6 group, ACWY group, ABCWY pooled group.

Assessed solicited systemic AEs were fatigue, nausea, myalgia, arthralgia, headache and fever \[temperature \>= 38.0°C\]. Any = occurrence of the adverse event regardless of intensity grade or relation to study vaccination. No solicited AEs were collected after vaccination on Day 211 because these vaccines were administered as part of standard of care and to maintain blinding. As pre- specified in the protocol, data reported in this outcome measure were presented for MenB\_0\_2\_6 group, MenB\_0\_6 group, ACWY group, ABCWY pooled group.

Assessed solicited systemic AEs were fatigue, nausea, myalgia, arthralgia, headache and fever \[temperature \>= 38.0°C\]. Any = occurrence of the adverse event regardless of intensity grade or relation to study vaccination. No solicited AEs were collected after vaccination on Day 211 because these vaccines were administered as part of standard of care and to maintain blinding. As pre- specified in the protocol, data reported in this outcome measure were presented for MenB\_0\_2\_6 group, MenB\_0\_6 group, ACWY group, ABCWY pooled group.

Assessed solicited systemic AEs were fatigue, nausea, myalgia, arthralgia, headache and fever \[temperature \>= 38.0°C\]. Any = occurrence of the adverse event regardless of intensity grade or relation to study vaccination. No solicited AEs were collected after vaccination on Day 211 because these vaccines were administered as part of standard of care and to maintain blinding. As pre- specified in the protocol, data reported in this outcome measure were presented for MenB\_0\_2\_6 group, MenB\_0\_6 group, ACWY group, ABCWY pooled group.

Unsolicited AEs are defined as any AE reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study. Also, any 'solicited' symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms were reported as an unsolicited AE. Any Unsolicited AEs (including Serious adverse events (SAEs), AEs leading to withdrawal, Adverse event of special interest (AESIs) and medically attended AEs were collected during 30 days after vaccination 1-3. For vaccination on Day 211 (Vaccination 4), conducted as part of standard of care and to maintain blinding, no eDiary data or all unsolicited AEs were collected for the 30 days following vaccination. However, SAEs, AEs leading to withdrawal, AESIs and medically attended AEs were collected throughout study duration. As pre-specified in the protocol, data reported in this outcome measure were presented for MenB\_0\_2\_6 group, MenB\_0\_6 group, ACWY group, ABCWY pooled group.

Unsolicited AEs are defined as any AE reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study. Also, any 'solicited' symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms were reported as an unsolicited AE. Any Unsolicited AEs (including Serious adverse events (SAEs), AEs leading to withdrawal, Adverse event of special interest (AESIs) and medically attended AEs were collected during 30 days after vaccination 1-3. For vaccination on Day 211 (Vaccination 4), conducted as part of standard of care and to maintain blinding, no eDiary data or all unsolicited AEs were collected for the 30 days following vaccination. However, SAEs, AEs leading to withdrawal, AESIs and medically attended AEs were collected throughout study duration. As pre-specified in the protocol, data reported in this outcome measure were presented for MenB\_0\_2\_6 group, MenB\_0\_6 group, ACWY group, ABCWY pooled group.

Unsolicited AEs are defined as any AE reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study. Also, any 'solicited' symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms were reported as an unsolicited AE. Any Unsolicited AEs (including Serious adverse events (SAEs), AEs leading to withdrawal, Adverse event of special interest (AESIs) and medically attended AEs were collected during 30 days after vaccination 1-3. For vaccination on Day 211 (Vaccination 4), conducted as part of standard of care and to maintain blinding, no eDiary data or all unsolicited AEs were collected for the 30 days following vaccination. However, SAEs, AEs leading to withdrawal, AESIs and medically attended AEs were collected throughout study duration. As pre-specified in the protocol, data reported in this outcome measure were presented for MenB\_0\_2\_6 group, MenB\_0\_6 group, ACWY group, ABCWY pooled group.

A SAEs is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity and is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study subject. AESIs are predefined (serious or non-serious) AEs of scientific and medical concern specific to the product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the investigator to the sponsor can be appropriate, because such an event might warrant further investigation to characterize and understand it. Medically attended AEs are symptoms or illnesses requiring hospitalization, or emergency room visit, or visit to/by a health care provider. As pre-specified in the protocol, data reported in this outcome measure were presented for MenB\_0\_2\_6 group, MenB\_0\_6 group, ACWY group, ABCWY pooled group.