Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Viaskin Peanut

Phase 3

Peanut Allergy | Monoclonal antibody | Immunology |DBV Technologies S.A.|Last Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedDouble-BlindPLACEBO_CONTROLLEDDMC
Total Trials4
Total Enrollment1,285

FDA Designations

ACCELERATED_APPROVAL

Clinical trial landscape

Viaskin Peanut · 4 trials · 1 indication

Phase 3 2Phase 2 2
NCT02916446Safety Study of Viaskin Peanut to Treat Peanut AllergyPeanut Allergy
COMPLETED393 Analytics
NCT02636699Efficacy and Safety of Viaskin Peanut in Children With Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-Mediated Peanut AllergyPeanut Allergy
COMPLETED500 Analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Safety Study of Viaskin Peanut to Treat Peanut Allergy
Peanut AllergyUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Efficacy and Safety of Viaskin Peanut in Children With Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-Mediated Peanut Allergy
Peanut AllergyUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Through study completion, an average of 3 years
Difference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in the Overall Population
At Month 12

The Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges (DBPCFCs) to determine Eliciting Dose (ED) were performed at screening and Month 12, with each challenge occurring over 2 days. The participant was gradually fed increasing amounts of standardized blinded oral formulas containing either peanut protein (during 1 of the 2 days of the challenge), or without any peanut protein (during the other day of the challenge). A participant was defined as a treatment responder if: * ED was ≥300 mg peanut protein at Month 12 DBPCFC (for screening ED subgroup 1), or * ED was ≥1,000 mg peanut protein at Month 12 DBPCFC (for screening ED subgroup 2). Participants with missing treatment response at Month 12 were imputed as non-responders. The percentage of treatment responders at Month 12 is presented. Analysis of the difference in response rates between treatment groups is presented in the subsequent statistical analysis table. Analysis was performed in the overall population.

Percentage of Treatment Responders at Months 12 and 24
Month 12 and Month 24 (end of treatment) of the OLFUS-VIPES study

A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose (ED) equal to or greater than 1000 milligram (mg) peanut protein or with at least a 10-fold increase of the ED compared to their initial ED observed at the VIPES baseline, as determined by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at Months 12 and 24. At Month 12, participants had received 24 months of active treatment for those who received Viaskin Peanut in the VIPES study, and 12 months of active treatment for those who received placebo in the VIPES study. At Month 24, participants had received 36 months of active treatment for those who received Viaskin Peanut in the VIPES study, and 24 months of active treatment for those who received placebo in the VIPES study. The percentage of responders at Month 12 and Month 24 are presented according to whether participants received Viaskin Peanut or placebo during the VIPES study.

Percentage of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Overall Population
At Month 12

A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a \>=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).

Secondary Endpoints

Difference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Each Screening Eliciting Dose (ED) Subgroup
At Month 12
Cumulative Reactive Dose (CRD) of Peanut Protein at Baseline and Month 12
Baseline and Month 12
Percentage of Participants Unresponsive to a Cumulative Dose of at Least 1440 mg Peanut Protein at Month 24
Month 24 (end of treatment) of the OLFUS-VIPES study
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingTRIPLE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
Viaskin Peanut 250 mcgEXPERIMENTALViaskin Peanut 250 mcg, daily administration
PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATORPlacebo patch, daily administration
Viaskin Peanut 250mcgEXPERIMENTALOne Viaskin epicutaneous delivery system (patch) containing 250 µg of peanut protein applied on the skin for 24 hours (±4 hours of allowance) daily for a period of 12 months.
Viaskin Peanut 50 mcgEXPERIMENTAL -
Viaskin Peanut 100 mcgEXPERIMENTAL -
Viaskin PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATOR -

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
Viaskin Peanut 250 mcgBIOLOGICAL -
PlaceboBIOLOGICAL -
Viaskin Peanut 250mcgBIOLOGICALPeanut extract cutaneous patch
Viaskin Peanut 50 mcgBIOLOGICALSubjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 50 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract
Viaskin Peanut 100 mcgBIOLOGICALSubjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 100 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract
Viaskin PlaceboBIOLOGICALSubjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing a matching placebo formulation
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range4 Years to 11 Years
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites32

Inclusion Criteria: * Physician-diagnosed peanut allergy; * A peanut Skin Prick Test (SPT) with a wheal largest diameter ≥8 mm; * A specific-peanut Immunoglobulin E (IgE) ≥14 kU/L; * Subjects following a strict peanut-free diet. Exclusion Criteria: * Generalized dermatologic disease * Spirometry ...

Countries:United StatesCanadaAustraliaGermanyIrelandFranceNetherlandsPoland
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Frequently asked questions about Viaskin Peanut

What is Viaskin Peanut used for?

Viaskin Peanut is an investigational immunotherapy being developed for the treatment of peanut allergy. It is designed for use in adults and children with immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated peanut allergy. The drug is delivered through a skin patch and has been studied in clinical trials for its efficacy and safety in desensitizing patients to peanut allergens.

Who makes Viaskin Peanut?

Viaskin Peanut is developed by DBV Technologies S.A., a biopharmaceutical company listed on the stock exchange under the ticker symbol DBVT. The company has conducted multiple clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Viaskin Peanut in patients with peanut allergy.

What phase is Viaskin Peanut in?

Viaskin Peanut is in Phase 3 clinical development. It has completed four clinical trials, including two Phase 3 studies, with a total enrollment of 1,285 participants. The drug is investigational and has not been approved by regulatory authorities, though it has received accelerated approval designation from the FDA.

What clinical trials is Viaskin Peanut in?

Viaskin Peanut has completed four clinical trials. These include NCT01675882 and NCT01955109, both Phase 2 studies in adults and children with peanut allergy, and NCT02636699 and NCT02916446, both Phase 3 studies. The trials were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, conducted in multiple countries including the United States, Canada, and European nations.

How does Viaskin Peanut work?

Viaskin Peanut is a monoclonal antibody-based immunotherapy delivered via a skin patch. It is designed to modulate the immune response to peanut allergens, aiming to reduce allergic reactions in patients with peanut allergy. The exact mechanism involves the delivery of peanut protein through the skin to induce immune tolerance.

Is Viaskin Peanut FDA approved?

Viaskin Peanut is not FDA approved. It is an investigational drug currently in Phase 3 clinical development. The FDA has granted it accelerated approval designation, which may facilitate a faster review process, but the drug has not yet received marketing authorization.