Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Autologous Human Fibroblasts

Phase 3

Bilateral Nasolabial Fold Wrinkles | Monoclonal antibody | Other |Castle Biosciences, Inc.|Last Updated: Mar 23, 2021

Target and mechanism

Molecular targetADA
Target classExogenous Gene
ModalityMonoclonal antibody

Also known as Autologous Human Fibroblasts (azficel-T)

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedDouble-BlindPLACEBO_CONTROLLED
Total Trials1
Total Enrollment218

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

Clinical trial landscape

Autologous Human Fibroblasts · 4 trials · 4 indications

Phase 3 1Phase 2 3
NCT00655356Safety and Efficacy Study of Isolagen Therapy in the Treatment of Nasolabial Fold WrinklesBilateral Nasolabial Fold Wrinkles
COMPLETED218 Analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Safety and Efficacy Study of Isolagen Therapy in the Treatment of Nasolabial Fold Wrinkles
Bilateral Nasolabial Fold WrinklesUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Subject Wrinkle Assessment Responders
Baseline (prior to first treatment) and 6 months post final treatment

A two point improvement on the Subject's live assessment of the wrinkles of the lower part of the face as compared to baseline on the Subject Wrinkle Assessment was considered a responder. The Subject Wrinkle Assessment scale was a five point scale with a score of -2 (Very Dissatisfied) being the worst and a score of +2 (Very Satisfied) being the best.

Evaluator Wrinkle Severity Assessment Responders
Baseline (prior to first treatment) and 6 months after last treatment

A responder was defined as a two point improvement on the blinded Evaluator's live assessment of each of the bilateral nasolabial fold wrinkles at rest using the 6-point ordinal Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale. On the Lemperle scale, a score of 5 (Very Deep Wrinkle) is worst and a score of 0 (No Visible Wrinkle) is best.

Evaluator Live Acne Scarring Assessment Responders
Baseline (prior to first treatment) and four months after last treatment

Subjects who improved by 1 point or more on the Evaluator Live Acne Scarring Assessment (ELASA), as assessed by the evaluating Investigator, are counted as responders. On the ELASA scale, a score of 0 (Clear) is best and a score of 4 (Severe) is worst.

Subject Live Acne Scarring Assessment Responders
Baseline (prior to first treatment) and four months after last treatment

Cheeks that improved by at least two points on the Subject Live Acne Scarring Assessment (SLASA) as scored by the subject were considered responders. On the SLASA scale, a score of -2 (Very Dissatisfied) was worst and a score of 2 (Very Satisfied) was best.

Change in Subject Assessment of Wrinkles Compared to Baseline on Subject Wrinkle Assessment
Baseline (prior to first treatment) compared to 6 months post last treatment

Subject Wrinkle Assessment was a five point ordinal scale that assessed the subject's assessment of the appearance of their face. A score of -2 (very dissatisfied) was the worst and a score of +2 (very satisfied) was the best.

Independent Panel Global Improvement Assessment Compared to Baseline
Baseline (prior to treatment) compared to 6 months post last treatment

An independent panel of physicians reviewed photographs of subjects at baseline and 6 months after final study treatment and provided a score for improvement in appearance on the Global Improvement Assessment. The Global Improvement Assessment was a four point ordinal scale with 0 (No improvement) as the worst score and 3 (Marked Improvement) the best.

Number of Responders Based on the Average Investigator Evaluation of Change From Baseline for All Treated Areas on the Global Ordinal Rating Scale (GORS)
Baseline (prior to first study treatment) compared to six months after first treatment

A patient was considered a responder in this outcome measure if the average Investigator's GORS score for all treatment areas was greater than 0. On the GORS, a score of -2 (much worsening from baseline) was the worst and +2 (great improvement from baseline) was the best.

Number of Responders Based on the Average Patient Evaluation of Change From Baseline for All Treated Areas on the Global Ordinal Rating Scale (GORS)
Baseline (prior to first study treatment) compared to six months after first treatment

A patient was considered a responder in this outcome measure if the average patient's GORS score for all treatment areas was greater than 0. On the GORS, a score of -2 (much worsening from baseline) was the worst and +2 (great improvement from baseline) was the best.

Secondary Endpoints

Subject Wrinkle Assessment Responders
Baseline (prior to first treatment) compared to 3rd treatment visit, 2 and 4 months post final treatment
Evaluator Wrinkle Severity Assessment Responders
Baseline (prior to first treatment) compared to 3rd treatment visit, 2 and 4 months post final treatment
Evaluator Live Acne Scarring Assessment Responders
Baseline (prior to first treatment) compared to one, two, and three months after last treatment
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingTRIPLE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
ActiveEXPERIMENTAL -
PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATOR -
Double blinded activeEXPERIMENTALSubject will receive autologous fibroblast treatment on either their left or right side of their face
Double blinded placeboPLACEBO_COMPARATORSubject will receive placebo treatment on the opposite side of the face from active treatment

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
Autologous Human Fibroblasts (azficel-T)BIOLOGICAL1. Collection of 3 mm post auricular skin punch biopsies. 2. Three treatment visits with injections administered 5 ± 1 weeks apart on each side of the face.
PlaceboBIOLOGICAL1. Collection of 3 mm post auricular skin punch biopsies. 2. Three treatment visits with injections administered 5 ± 1 weeks apart on each side of the face.
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range18 Years to N/A
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites6

Inclusion Criteria: * Subject is at least 18 years of age * Level of severity of bilateral nasolabial fold wrinkles meeting severity criteria as per protocol * Level of subject dissatisfaction with both nasolabial fold wrinkles as per protocol * Ability to comply with the study requirements * Negat...

Countries:United States
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Frequently asked questions about Autologous Human Fibroblasts

What is Autologous Human Fibroblasts used for?

Autologous Human Fibroblasts is being studied for dermatologic and oral soft tissue conditions, including acne scarring of the face, bilateral nasolabial fold wrinkles, facial wrinkles and creases, and interdental papillary insufficiency. It is an investigational cell-based therapy, not an approved product, and development is at Phase 2.

What does Autologous Human Fibroblasts target?

Autologous Human Fibroblasts targets ADA, which is classified as an exogenous gene target. The therapy uses a patient's own fibroblasts, the cells that produce collagen and other structural components of skin, to support tissue repair at the treatment site.

Who makes Autologous Human Fibroblasts?

Autologous Human Fibroblasts is developed by Castle Biosciences, Inc., which trades under the ticker CSTL. The company is the sponsor associated with the clinical development program for this autologous fibroblast therapy across its dermatologic and oral soft tissue indications.

What phase is Autologous Human Fibroblasts in?

Autologous Human Fibroblasts is in Phase 2 development. It is investigational and has not been approved by the FDA. The program includes completed Phase 2 studies in acne scarring, facial wrinkles and creases, and interdental papillary insufficiency, plus a completed Phase 3 study in nasolabial fold wrinkles.

What clinical trials is Autologous Human Fibroblasts in?

Completed trials include NCT00642642 in severe facial acne scarring, NCT00655356 in bilateral nasolabial fold wrinkles, NCT00654654 in facial wrinkles and creases, and NCT00655889 in interdental papillary insufficiency. All were conducted in the United States, and the studies were randomized, double blind, and placebo controlled.

Is Autologous Human Fibroblasts the same as azficel-T?

Yes. Autologous Human Fibroblasts is also known as azficel-T. Both names refer to the same autologous fibroblast therapy developed by Castle Biosciences, Inc. for dermatologic conditions such as facial acne scarring, nasolabial fold wrinkles, and facial wrinkles and creases.