Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Luspatercept

Phase 3

Erythrocyte Transfusion | Small molecule | Hematology |Bristol-Myers Squibb Company|Last Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Success Probability
Subscribe to view
Market & Valuation
Subscribe to view
Trial Design
RandomizedDouble-BlindPLACEBO_CONTROLLEDDMC
Total Trials1
Total Enrollment336
FDA Designations
No designations recorded
Clinical trial landscape

Luspatercept · 12 trials · 8 indications

Phase 3 6Phase 2 6
NCT05949684ELEMENT-MDS: A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept in Participants With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Anemia Not Receiving Blood TransfusionsMyelodysplastic Syndromes
ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING402 Analytics
NCT06045689A Study to Assess Luspatercept in Lower-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome ParticipantsMyelodysplastic Syndromes
ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING106 Analytics
NCT04064060A Study to Evaluate Long-term Safety in Participants Who Have Participated in Other Luspatercept (ACE-536) Clinical TrialsMyelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)
RECRUITING665 Analytics
NCT03682536A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Epoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Anemia Due to IPSS-R Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Participants Who Require Red Blood Cell Transfusions and Are ESA NaïveMyelodysplastic Syndromes
ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING363 Analytics
NCT02604433An Efficacy and Safety Study of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Placebo in Adults Who Require Regular Red Blood Cell Transfusions Due to Beta (β) ThalassemiaErythrocyte Transfusion
COMPLETED336 Analytics
NCT02631070A Study of Luspatercept (ACE-536) to Treat Anemia Due to Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic SyndromesMyelodysplastic Syndromes
COMPLETED229 Analytics
PHASE3ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING
ELEMENT-MDS: A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept in Participants With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Anemia Not Receiving Blood Transfusions
Myelodysplastic SyndromesUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING
A Study to Assess Luspatercept in Lower-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Participants
Myelodysplastic SyndromesUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3RECRUITING
A Study to Evaluate Long-term Safety in Participants Who Have Participated in Other Luspatercept (ACE-536) Clinical Trials
Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)Unlock trial analytics
PHASE3ACTIVE NOT_RECRUITING
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Epoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Anemia Due to IPSS-R Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Participants Who Require Red Blood Cell Transfusions and Are ESA Naïve
Myelodysplastic SyndromesUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Placebo in Adults Who Require Regular Red Blood Cell Transfusions Due to Beta (β) Thalassemia
Erythrocyte TransfusionUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
A Study of Luspatercept (ACE-536) to Treat Anemia Due to Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Myelodysplastic SyndromesUnlock trial analytics
Study Endpoints
Primary Endpoints
Number of participants with lower-risk non-transfusion dependent myelodysplastic syndromes (NTD-MDS) who converted to Transfusion Dependence (TD) during any continuous 16-week interval within the 96-week treatment period
Up to Week 96

TD is defined as ≥ 3 red blood cells (RBC) units/16 weeks assessed by International Working Group (IWG) 2018.

Number of participants with an increase from baseline in mean Hb values of ≥ 1.5 grams/deciliter (g/dL) in any continuous 16-week interval within the 48 week Treatment Period in the absence of transfusion
Up to Week 48
Number of participants who achieve red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI) for 8 weeks with a simultaneous mean hemoglobin (Hb) increase of ≥ 1 g/dL from Week 1 to Week 24
Up to week 24
Adverse Events (AEs)
From enrollment until at least 42 Day Safety Follow-up Phase

Type, frequency, severity of AEs, relationship of treatment emergent adverse events to luspatercept

Number of participants progressing to high/very high risk MDS or AML.
Enrollment to Long-term post-treatment follow-up (Approximately, 5 years)

Progression to high/very high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (MDS and myelofibrosis \[MF\] only).

Percentage of participants progressing to high/very high risk MDS or AML
Enrollment to Long-term post-treatment follow-up (Approximately, 5 years)

Progression to high/very high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (MDS and myelofibrosis \[MF\] only)

Number of participants developing other malignancies/pre-malignancies
Enrollment to Long-term post-treatment follow-up (Approximately, 5 years)

Development of other malignancies/pre-malignancies

Percentage of participants developing other malignancies/pre-malignancies
Enrollment to Long-term post-treatment follow-up (Approximately, 5 years)

Development of other malignancies/pre-malignancies

Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 12 Weeks (84 Days) With a Mean Hemoglobin Increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL
Week 1 through Week 24

Percentage of participants who are RBC transfusion-free for any 12-week period associated with a concurrent mean hemoglobin (Hgb) increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL compared to baseline. After applying below 14/3-day rule, the baseline Hgb value is defined as the lowest Hgb value from the central, local laboratory, or pre transfusion Hgb from transfusion records that is within 56 days on or prior to the first dose of treatment, or randomization date if participants were not treated. 4/3-day rule: only Hgb values that are at least 14 days after a transfusion may be used unless there is another transfusion within 3 days after the Hgb assessment. If this occurs, that Hgb value will be used despite being \< 14 days after the previous transfusion.

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Erythroid Response - Week 13 to Week 24
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24

Erythroid Response was defined as red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline ≥ 33% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Week 13 - 24 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.

Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 8 Weeks From Week 1 to Week 24
From Week 1 through Week 24 of study treatment

RBC-TI response was defined as the absence of any Red Blood Cells (RBC) transfusion during any consecutive 56-day (8-week) period (ie, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57, Days 3 to 58, etc.) during the first 24 weeks of study treatment. Participants had to have at least 56 days (≥ 8 weeks) of transfusion independence prior to (and including) the Week 24 cut-off date to qualify as a responder. Participants who failed to achieve RBC-TI at least 56 days prior to or on the cut-off date were counted as non-responders.

Number of participants with ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in RBC transfusion burden with a reduction of at least 2 units during any continuous 12 weeks during Week 13-48 compared to 12-week interval immediately prior to date of first dose
Up to Week 48

Adult TD Cohort

Number of participants with an increase from baseline of ≥ 1.0 grams (g)/decilitre (dL) in mean hemoglobin (Hb) values over the continuous 12-week interval from Week 13 to Week 24 in the absence of RBC transfusion
Up to Week 24

Adult NTD Cohort

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) defined as observance of ≥ Grade 3-related hemolytic crises or ≥ Grade 3-related event outside of the known safety profile occurring within the 21 days from their first dose of study therapy
Up to Week 3

Adolescent TD and NTD Cohorts

Number of participants with adverse events (AEs)
Up to 8.5 years

Adolescent TD and NTD Cohorts

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum concentration of Luspatercept
Up to Week 102

Adolescent TD and NTD Cohorts

Proportion of participants with ≥ 33% reduction from baseline in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden over any consecutive 24 weeks
24 weeks prior to Dose 1 Day 1 (inclusive); Week 1 - Week 48
Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 8 weeks
Week 1 through Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hematologic Improvement in Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per International Working Group (IWG) Through Week 24
Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24

Hematologic improvement is defined as the percent of participants meeting HI-E criteria of \>= 1.5 g/dL increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions from Week 1 Day 1 through Week 24. Participants who discontinued from the Treatment Period without achieving HI-E are counted as non-responders.

Percentage of Participants Achieving Erythroid Response (Week 13 to Week 24)
From Week 13 to Week 24 of study treatment

Erythroid Response is defined as an increase from baseline ≥1.0 g/dL in mean of hemoglobin values over a continuous 12-week interval from Weeks 13 to 24 of treatment in the absence of transfusions. Baseline hemoglobin (Hb) is the average of 2 or more Hb measurements at least 1 week apart within 4 weeks prior to Dose 1.

The Number of Participants With Anemia Responses Over Any 84-Day Period During the Primary Treatment Period
Any consecutive "rolling" 84-day period from Day 1 through and including Day 168

The number of participants that achieved anemia response as it relates to hemoglobin (Hgb) increase and red blood cell (RBC)-transfusion independence is defined below: Cohorts 1 (anemia only) and 3A: The number of participants achieving ≥ 1.5 g/dL hemoglobin increase from baseline over any consecutive 84-day period without an RBC transfusion from Day 1 up through and including Day 168. Cohorts 2 (RBC-transfusion dependent) and 3B: The number of participants who become RBC-transfusion free over any consecutive 84-day period from Day 1 up through and including Day 168. Baseline value is defined as the last value (including "unscheduled") measured on or before the first dose.

Secondary Endpoints
Number of participants with an increase from baseline in mean Hb values of ≥ 1.5 g/dL in any continuous 24-week interval within the 48-week and 96-week treatment period in the absence of transfusion
Up to Week 96
Number of participants with an increase from baseline in mean Hb values of ≥ 1.0 g/dL in any continuous 24-week interval within the 48-week and 96-week treatment period in the absence of transfusion
Up to Week 96
Mean Hb change over fixed 24-week periods compared to the baseline Hb
Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Unlock Study Endpoints
Study Design & Arms
AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingNONE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT
Treatment Arms
ArmTypeDescription
LuspaterceptEXPERIMENTAL -
Epoetin AlfaACTIVE_COMPARATOR -
Cohort 1: erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) naïveEXPERIMENTAL -
Cohort 2: ESA relapsed or refractoryEXPERIMENTAL -
ACE-536EXPERIMENTALLuspatercept will be administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection to participants by the study staff at the clinical site and administration will be documented in the subject's source record.
Luspatercept (ACE-536) plus Best Supportive Care (BSC)EXPERIMENTALLuspatercept, subcutaneous(ly) (SC) once every 21 days
Placebo plus Best Supportive Care (BSC)PLACEBO_COMPARATORnormal saline solution subcutaneous(ly) (SC) once every 21 days
Experimental Arm - Luspatercept (ACE-536)EXPERIMENTALStarting dose of 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks
Control Arm: PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATORSubcutaneous injection every 3 weeks
Transfusion Dependent (TD): Luspatercept + Best supportive care (BSC)EXPERIMENTAL -
Adult TD Cohort: Placebo + BSCPLACEBO_COMPARATOR -
Non-transfusion Dependent (NTD): Luspatercept + BSCEXPERIMENTAL -
Adult NTD Cohort: Placebo + BSCPLACEBO_COMPARATOR -
PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATOR -
Luspatercept AdministrationEXPERIMENTAL -
Luspatercept in subjects with MPN-associated myelofibrosisEXPERIMENTALSubjects across each of the cohorts (Cohort 1, Cohort 2, Cohort 3A, and Cohort 3B) will receive luspatercept.
Interventions
NameTypeDescription
LuspaterceptBIOLOGICALSpecified dose on specified days
Epoetin AlfaBIOLOGICALSpecified dose on specified days
PlaceboOTHERPlacebo, Subcutaneous, every 21 days.
Best Supportive Care (BSC)OTHERBest Supportive Care (BSC)
Unlock Study Design Details
Eligibility Criteria
Age Range18 Years to N/A
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites144

Inclusion Criteria * Participant has documented diagnosis of MDS according to World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 that meet IPSS-R classification of very low, low, or intermediate-risk disease, (intermediate-risk of ≤ 3.5 IPSS-R score) confirmed via bone marrow aspirate and:. i) \< 5% blasts in...

Countries:United StatesArgentinaAustraliaBrazilCanadaChileChinaColombiaCzechiaFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIndiaItalyMexicoPolandPuerto RicoSpainBelgiumBulgariaIsraelJapanLebanonMalaysiaNetherlandsSwedenTaiwanThailandTunisiaTurkey (Türkiye)United KingdomAustriaLithuaniaPortugalRussiaSouth KoreaSwitzerlandUkraineHong KongSaudi ArabiaSingapore
Unlock Eligibility Criteria
Recent Changes (Last 90 Days)
LOWJul 2, 2026NCT04064060lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWJul 2, 2026NCT04064060lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWJul 2, 2026NCT04064060lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWJul 2, 2026NCT04064060lastUpdatePostDate: changed
MEDIUMJun 30, 2026NCT05949684Enrollment: 360 → 402
MEDIUMJun 30, 2026NCT05949684Enrollment: 360 → 402
MEDIUMJun 30, 2026NCT05949684Enrollment: 360 → 402
LOWJun 24, 2026NCT05664737lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWJun 24, 2026NCT05664737lastUpdatePostDate: changed
LOWJun 16, 2026NCT06045689Completion: 2027-12-30 → 2027-09-29
LOWJun 16, 2026NCT06045689Completion: 2027-12-30 → 2027-09-29
LOWJun 16, 2026NCT06045689Completion: 2027-12-30 → 2027-09-29
LOWJun 16, 2026NCT06045689Completion: 2027-12-30 → 2027-09-29
MEDIUMJun 5, 2026NCT04477850TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMJun 5, 2026NCT04477850TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMJun 5, 2026NCT04477850TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMJun 5, 2026NCT04477850TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMJun 5, 2026NCT04477850TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
MEDIUMJun 5, 2026NCT04477850TRIAL_REMOVED: changed
LOWMay 29, 2026NCT04064060lastUpdatePostDate: changed