Recent Updates
Recently added Catalysts

Lotemax

Phase 4FDA approved 1998

Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca | Small molecule | Ophthalmology |Bausch + Lomb Corporation|Trials Updated: Jan 8, 2021

Lotemax development status

FDA approval Mar 9, 1998
Approval holderBausch And Lomb
ApplicationNDA020583
Highest phase Phase 4 (NCT00407043)
Phase scored for BLCOPhase 2
Registered trials 14 across 4 sponsors since Jun 2008

Label indication Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension is indicated for the treatment of steroid-responsive inflammatory conditions of the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva, cornea and anterior segment of the globe such as allergic conjunctivitis, acne rosacea, superficial punctate keratitis, herpes zoster keratitis, iritis, cyclitis, selected infective conjunctivitides, when the inherent hazard of steroid use is accepted to… FDA label

Lotemax target and mechanism

ModalitySmall molecule

Also known as loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.5%, Loteprednol Etabonate, LE Gel, Loteprednol Etabonate Gel (BID), Loteprednol Etabonate Gel (TID)

Success Probability

Subscribe to view

Market & Valuation

Subscribe to view

Trial Design

RandomizedACTIVE_CONTROLLED
Total Trials10
Total Enrollment3,281

FDA Designations

No designations recorded

Lotemax clinical trials

Lotemax · 10 trials · 7 indications

Phase 3 8Phase 2 2
NCT02786901LE Gel for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract SurgeryCataract
COMPLETED600 Analytics
NCT02208297Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Gel for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract SurgeryInflammation
COMPLETED326 Analytics
NCT01996839Loteprednol Ophthalmic Gel for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract SurgeryInflammation
COMPLETED514 Analytics
NCT01475643Loteprednol vs Prednisolone for the Treatment of Intraocular Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery in Children.Cataract
COMPLETED107 Analytics
NCT01435460Alrex® Versus Patanol in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis(SAC)Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis
COMPLETED300 Analytics
NCT01060072Evaluation of Loteprednol Etabonate Versus Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract SurgeryInflammation
COMPLETED407 Analytics
NCT01010633Loteprednol Etabonate Versus Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract SurgeryInflammation
COMPLETED406 Analytics
NCT00699153Loteprednol Etabonate in an Ophthalmic Base vs Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation Following Cataract SurgeryOcular Inflammation
COMPLETED400 Analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
LE Gel for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract Surgery
CataractUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Gel for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract Surgery
InflammationUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Loteprednol Ophthalmic Gel for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract Surgery
InflammationUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Loteprednol vs Prednisolone for the Treatment of Intraocular Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery in Children.
CataractUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Alrex® Versus Patanol in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis(SAC)
Seasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Evaluation of Loteprednol Etabonate Versus Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract Surgery
InflammationUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Loteprednol Etabonate Versus Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract Surgery
InflammationUnlock trial analytics
PHASE3COMPLETED
Loteprednol Etabonate in an Ophthalmic Base vs Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery
Ocular InflammationUnlock trial analytics

Study Endpoints

Primary Endpoints

Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells at Visit 5 (Postoperative Day 8)
8 days

Slit lamp examination was performed. White blood cell accumulation in anterior aqueous humor was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp examination and graded on a 5-point scale: Grade 0 = no cells seen; Grade 1 = 1 to 5 cells; Grade 2 = 6 to 15 cells; Grade 3 = 16 to 30 cells; Grade 4 = \> 30 cells. Complete resolution of AC cells was defined as Cell score = 0 in the study eye.

Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Ocular Pain in Study Eye at Visit 5 (Postoperative Day 8)
8 days

Ocular pain, defined as a positive sensation of the eye, including foreign body sensation, stabbing, throbbing, or aching, was assessed and graded by subjects on a 6-point scale: 0 (None), 1 (Minimal), 2 (Mild), 3 (Moderate), 4 (Moderately Severe), and 5 (Severe). Complete Resolution of Ocular Pain was defined as Pain Score = 0.

Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells
8 days

White blood cell accumulation in anterior aqueous humor was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp examination and graded on a 5-point scale: Grade 0 = no cells seen; Grade 1 = 1 to 5 cells; Grade 2 = 6 to 15 cells; Grade 3 = 16 to 30 cells; Grade 4 = \> 30 cells. Lower score indicated better outcome. Complete resolution of AC cells was defined as cell score = 0 in the study eye.

Percentage of Participants With Grade 0 Pain in the Study Eye.
8 days

Ocular pain, defined as a positive sensation of the eye, including foreign body sensation, stabbing, throbbing, or aching, was assessed and graded by subjects on the 6-point scale, with 0=None and 5=Severe.

Anterior Chamber Inflammation
Postoperative Day 29

Anterior Chamber Inflammation (for subjects that could only be examined with a pen light and a 20D \[g20 Diopter\] magnifying lens): 0 = None Clear anterior chamber with no visible clouding (Tyndall effect and cells combined). Red reflex normal 1. = Mild Mild anterior chamber clouding. Clear iris pattern on visualization. Red reflex normal 2. = Moderate Moderate anterior chamber clouding 3. = Severe Severe anterior chamber clouding. Iris pattern not clearly visualized. Red reflex diminished 4. = Very severe Severe anterior chamber clouding with a white and/or milky appearance of the anterior chamber. Red reflex absent or severely diminished

Bulbar Conjunctival Injection
Change from baseline to day 15 (visit 3)

Bulbar conjunctival injection (sign) evaluated using a grading scale from 0-3: where 0 = Absent and 3 = Severe

Ocular Itching
Change from baseline to day 15 (visit 3)

Ocular itching (symptom) evaluated using a grading scale from 0-4 where 0 = Absent and 4 = Severe

Resolution of Anterior Chamber Cells.
Visit 5 (Postoperative day 8)

Participants with complete resolution of anterior chamber cells(ACC). Cells were graded on a 0-4 scale, where 0=no cells and 4=\>30 cells

Grade 0 Pain
Visit 5 (Postoperative day 8)

Participants with no pain, graded on a 0-5 scale, 0=no pain and 5=severe pain

Resolution of Anterior Chamber Cells (ACC).
Visit 5 (Postoperative day 8)

Number of Study eyes with complete resolution(Grade 0) of anterior chamber cells (ACC) for loteprednol and vehicle. Accumulation of white cells in aqueous graded on a scale of 0-4 where grade 0=no cells. Investigators assessed ACC using a slit lamp.

Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber Cells and Flare. Grade=0
Postoperative day 8 (Visit 5)

A combination of the grades for inflammatory cells and flare in the anterior chamber. Cells: accumulation of white blood cells in aqueous. 0=No cells seen; 1=1-5 cells; 2=6-15 cells; 3=16-30 cells; 4= \>30 cells. Flare: Scattering of a slit lamp light beam when directed into the anterior chamber (Tyndall effect). 0=None; 1=Mild; 2=Moderate; 3=Severe; 4=Very severe.

Participants With Grade 0 (no) Pain
Postoperative day 8 (Visit 5)

Pain: A positive sensation of the eye, including foreign body sensation, stabbing, throbbing, or aching. Grade 0 = None; 1=Minimal; 2=Mild; 3=Moderate; 4=Moderately Severe; 5=Severe

Change From Baseline in Corneal Total Fluorescein Staining Score at for the Study Eye at Week 4
Baseline (Day 0), Week 4

Fluorescein Corneal Staining indicates the damage to the corneal epithelium (corneal epitheliopathy). Punctate corneal staining with fluorescein was evaluated and graded according to the National Eye Institute (NEI) grading method. The cornea was divided into 5 regions: central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal. Each of these 5 regions was graded from scores 0 to 3, where 0 indicated no staining (absent) and 3 maximal staining (severe damage). The total score was the sum of all these regions, ranged from 0 (absence of corneal epitheliopathy) to 15 (severe corneal epitheliopathy).

Change From Baseline in Mean Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire Total Score at Week 4
Baseline, Week 4

OSDI is a 12-item questionnaire developed to assess severity of DED. There are 3 question types: "Have you experienced any of following (light sensitivity, eye feel gritty, sore eyes, blurred vision, and poor vision) during last week?"(items 1-5); "Have problems with your eyes limited you in performing any of following (reading, driving at night, working with computer, and watching TV) during last week?" (items 6-9); and "Have your eyes felt uncomfortable in any of following situations (windy, low humidity, air conditioned) during the last week?" (items 10-12). Response of each of these questions were graded on a scale (that relate to the frequency of ocular surface disease effects) of 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time).Total OSDI score was calculated using following formula: OSDI=(\[sum of scores for all questions answered\] × 100)/(\[total number of questions answered\] \* 4). Total OSDI score ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability.

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Baseline up to Week 13

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AEs were defined as death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

Mean Grade for Participant-Reported Post-Dosing Ocular Comfort Values
Week 12

Participants scored their degree of comfort with their assigned study drug on a 4-point scale (0-3 units) within 5 minutes after instillation of study drug. Comfort grade 0 indicated comfortable, discomfort absent; 1 indicated generally comfortable, mild discomfort; 2 indicated some discomfort but tolerable, moderate discomfort; 3 indicated severely uncomfortable or intolerable. The mean global ocular comfort grade was reported.

Ocular discomfort during CAE exposure
during CAE exposure
Corneal and conjunctival staining and conjunctival redness
After CAE exposure

Secondary Endpoints

Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells in the Study Eye at Final On-treatment Visit.
14 days
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Ocular Pain in Study Eye at Final On-Treatment Visit
14 days
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Flare in the Study Eye at Final On-Treatment Visit
14 days
Unlock Study Endpoints

Study Design & Arms

AllocationRANDOMIZED
MaskingTRIPLE
ModelPARALLEL
PurposeTREATMENT

Treatment Arms

ArmTypeDescription
Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Gel dosed TIDEXPERIMENTALGel
Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Gel dosed BIDEXPERIMENTALGel
Vehicle GelPLACEBO_COMPARATORVehicle
Loteprednol Etabonate Gel (BID)EXPERIMENTALLoteprednol Etabonate Gel 0.38% administered two times daily (BID)
Vehicle Gel (BID)PLACEBO_COMPARATORVehicle gel administered two times daily (BID)
Vehicle (BID)ACTIVE_COMPARATORVehicle of Loteprednol Etabonate Gel 0.38% administered two times daily (BID).
Loteprednol Etabonate Gel (TID)EXPERIMENTALLoteprednol Gel 0.38% administered three times daily (TID).
Vehicle (TID)ACTIVE_COMPARATORVehicle of Loteprednol Etabonate Gel 0.38% administered three times daily (TID).
Loteprednol etabonateEXPERIMENTALLoteprednol etabonate 0.5%
Prednisolones acetateACTIVE_COMPARATORPrednisolone acetate 1.0%
AlrexEXPERIMENTALOphthalmic formulation containing the active ingredient loteprednol etabonate, 0.2%
PatanolACTIVE_COMPARATOROphthalmic solution containing olopatadine, 0.1%
VehiclePLACEBO_COMPARATORVehicle of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension
Lotemax Gel 0.5% and Restasis 0.05%EXPERIMENTALParticipants will administer lotemax gel 0.5 % BID in both eyes (OU) for 2 weeks, then administer both lotemax gel 0.5% and restasis emulsion 0.05% BID OU for 2 weeks, then administer restasis emulsion 0.05% BID OU for 8 weeks. Participants will also receive preservative-free Soothe Lubricant Eye Drops as needed (up to 4 times per day).
Lotemax Gel 0.5%EXPERIMENTALParticipants will administer lotemax gel 0.5% BID OU for 12 weeks. Participants will also receive preservative-free Soothe Lubricant Eye Drops as needed (up to 4 times per day).
Restasis 0.05%ACTIVE_COMPARATORParticipants will administer restasis emulsion 0.05% BID OU for 12 weeks. Participants will also receive preservative-free Soothe Lubricant Eye Drops as needed (up to 4 times per day).
Loteprednol Etabonate TIDEXPERIMENTALloteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%, TID
Loteprednol Etabonate QIDEXPERIMENTALloteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%, QID

Interventions

NameTypeDescription
Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Gel dosed TIDDRUGGel
Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Gel dosed BIDDRUGGel
Vehicle GelDRUGGel
Loteprednol Etabonate Gel (BID)DRUGOne drop of LE gel instilled into the study eye two times per day (BID) for 14 days
Vehicle Gel (BID)DRUGOne drop of vehicle gel instilled into the study eye two times per day (BID) for 14 days
Loteprednol Etabonate Gel (TID)DRUGOne drop of LE gel instilled into the study eye three times per day (TID) for 14 days.
Vehicle (BID)DRUGOne drop of vehicle instilled into the study eye two times per day (BID) for 14 days
Vehicle (TID)DRUGOne drop of vehicle instilled into the study eye three times per day (TID) for 14 days
Loteprednol etabonateDRUG1-2 Ophthalmic drops administered to study eye four times daily (QID) for 14 days post surgery. Tapered to twice daily (BID) for 7 days. Then once daily (QD) for 7 days.
Prednisolones acetateDRUG1-2 Ophthalmic drops administered to study eye four times daily (QID) for 14 days post surgery. Tapered to twice daily (BID) for 7 days. Then once daily (QD) for 7 days.
Loteprednol etabonate 0.2%DRUG1 drop of Alrex 4 times daily (QID) in both eyes at approximately 4 hour intervals for 2 weeks.
Olopatadine 0.1%DRUG1 drop of Patanol 2 times daily (BID)at intervals of 6-8 hours or more for 2 weeks.
Vehicle of Loteprednol EtabonateDRUGTopical administration of vehicle of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 1-2 drops in study eye QID, postoperative day 1-14.
Vehicle of Ophthalmic Loteprednol EtabonateDRUGVehicle of ophthalmic loteprednol etabonate administered postoperatively to study eye 4 times a day(QID) for 14 days.
LotemaxDRUGLotemax gel will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the arms.
RestasisDRUGRestasis emulsion will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the arms.
Soothe® Lubricant Eye DropsDRUG -
loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0.5%DRUGTID
Unlock Study Design Details

Eligibility Criteria

Age Range18 Years to N/A
SexALL
Healthy VolunteersNo
Study Sites6

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Be 18 years or older on the date the Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed and with the capacity to provide voluntary informed consent. 2. Be able to read, understand, and provide written informed consent on the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee (EC) appro...

Countries:United StatesSingapore
Unlock Eligibility Criteria

Frequently asked questions about Lotemax

What is Lotemax used for in keratoconjunctivitis sicca?

Lotemax is an ophthalmic small molecule being studied for keratoconjunctivitis sicca, also known as dry eye disease. It is a loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% formulation under investigation for mild or moderate cases of the condition. The drug is in Phase 2 clinical development.

Who makes Lotemax?

Lotemax is developed by Bausch + Lomb Corporation, which trades under the ticker BLCO. The company is conducting clinical research on the drug for the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca, or dry eye disease.

What phase is Lotemax in?

Lotemax is in Phase 2 clinical development for keratoconjunctivitis sicca. It is an investigational drug and has not been approved for this indication. One Phase 2 clinical trial for the drug has been completed.

What clinical trials is Lotemax in?

Lotemax has one completed Phase 2 clinical trial, identified as NCT01817582. The study evaluated Lotemax Gel 0.5% compared with Restasis 0.05% in 102 participants with mild or moderate keratoconjunctivitis sicca in the United States. The trial enrolled adults aged 40 years and older.

Is Lotemax the same as loteprednol etabonate?

Lotemax is a brand name for a formulation of loteprednol etabonate, specifically a 0.5% ophthalmic gel. It is being studied for keratoconjunctivitis sicca, or dry eye disease, and is in Phase 2 clinical development by Bausch + Lomb Corporation.